Redirect script output both to console and to log












2















Take a look on the following



# more  /tmp/myscript

#!/bin/bash





echo I AM

echo BIG GUY

echo AND ALSO SMART



# bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log


why we not get the output from echo in the script to the console?



actually output redirect to the log - /tmp/log
but not also to the standard output



its very strange because tee -a should redirect top log and also to stand art output



what is the right way to write to log and print to console ?



expected output



# bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log



     I AM

     BIG GUY

     AND ALSO SMART





linux shell-script logs io-redirection tee







share|improve this question





























    2















    Take a look on the following



    # more  /tmp/myscript
    
#!/bin/bash
    

    

    
echo I AM
    
echo BIG GUY
    
echo AND ALSO SMART
    

    
# bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log


    why we not get the output from echo in the script to the console?



    actually output redirect to the log - /tmp/log
    but not also to the standard output



    its very strange because tee -a should redirect top log and also to stand art output



    what is the right way to write to log and print to console ?



    expected output



    # bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log
    

    
     I AM
    
     BIG GUY
    
     AND ALSO SMART





    linux shell-script logs io-redirection tee







    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      Take a look on the following



      # more  /tmp/myscript
      
#!/bin/bash
      

      

      
echo I AM
      
echo BIG GUY
      
echo AND ALSO SMART
      

      
# bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log


      why we not get the output from echo in the script to the console?



      actually output redirect to the log - /tmp/log
      but not also to the standard output



      its very strange because tee -a should redirect top log and also to stand art output



      what is the right way to write to log and print to console ?



      expected output



      # bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log
      

      
     I AM
      
     BIG GUY
      
     AND ALSO SMART





      linux shell-script logs io-redirection tee







      share|improve this question
















      Take a look on the following



      # more  /tmp/myscript
      
#!/bin/bash
      

      

      
echo I AM
      
echo BIG GUY
      
echo AND ALSO SMART
      

      
# bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log


      why we not get the output from echo in the script to the console?



      actually output redirect to the log - /tmp/log
      but not also to the standard output



      its very strange because tee -a should redirect top log and also to stand art output



      what is the right way to write to log and print to console ?



      expected output



      # bash   /tmp/myscript | tee -a >/tmp/log
      

      
     I AM
      
     BIG GUY
      
     AND ALSO SMART





      linux shell-script logs io-redirection tee




      linux shell-script logs io-redirection tee






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Rui F Ribeiro

      39.6k1479132




      39.6k1479132










      asked 2 days ago









      yaelyael

      2,51012363




      2,51012363






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          That's because you use the redirection of output >. tee should do the redirection, not the shell. Try without >:



          bash /tmp/myscript | tee -a /tmp/log





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495634%2fredirect-script-output-both-to-console-and-to-log%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            That's because you use the redirection of output >. tee should do the redirection, not the shell. Try without >:



            bash /tmp/myscript | tee -a /tmp/log





            share|improve this answer




























              5














              That's because you use the redirection of output >. tee should do the redirection, not the shell. Try without >:



              bash /tmp/myscript | tee -a /tmp/log





              share|improve this answer


























                5












                5








                5







                That's because you use the redirection of output >. tee should do the redirection, not the shell. Try without >:



                bash /tmp/myscript | tee -a /tmp/log





                share|improve this answer













                That's because you use the redirection of output >. tee should do the redirection, not the shell. Try without >:



                bash /tmp/myscript | tee -a /tmp/log






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                TomaszTomasz

                9,39852965




                9,39852965






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495634%2fredirect-script-output-both-to-console-and-to-log%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                    Image
                    5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
                    Read more

                    Alcedinidae

                    Image
                    Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
                    Read more

                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

                    Image
                    9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
                    Read more