TLC cannot handle this conjunct of the spec












0















I have a TLA+ module, which, summarized, looks like this:



--- MODULE Group ---

CONSTANTS People
VARIABLES members

Join(person) == ...
Leave(person) == ...

Init == members subseteq People

Next == E p in People :
/ Join(p)
/ Leave(p)

====================


When I try to model-check this with TLC, I get the following error:




TLC threw an unexpected exception.
This was probably caused by an error in the spec or model.
See the User Output or TLC Console for clues to what happened.
The exception was a java.lang.RuntimeException
:
TLC cannot handle this conjunct of the spec:
line X, col Y to line Z, col T of module Group




...pointing to the entire content of Next.



I believe my Next is well-written, because here's an example model that has a very similar Next to mine: https://github.com/tlaplus/Examples/blob/master/specifications/aba-asyn-byz/aba_asyn_byz.tla#L110



Also, section 14.2.2 of Leslie Lamport's Specifying Systems says:




TLC can evaluate a set-valued expression only if that expression equals a finite set[...]. TLC will evaluate expressions of the following forms only if it can enumerate the set S:




and provides the example of "there exists x in S such that p".



How can I solve this error?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    You need to provide a minimal self-contained example. Try to reduce your code to a small example that shows the error. Also are you sure it points to Next? Because that's a disjunct, not a conjunct. It's more likely to be a problem in Spec.

    – Jorge Adriano
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:30
















0















I have a TLA+ module, which, summarized, looks like this:



--- MODULE Group ---

CONSTANTS People
VARIABLES members

Join(person) == ...
Leave(person) == ...

Init == members subseteq People

Next == E p in People :
/ Join(p)
/ Leave(p)

====================


When I try to model-check this with TLC, I get the following error:




TLC threw an unexpected exception.
This was probably caused by an error in the spec or model.
See the User Output or TLC Console for clues to what happened.
The exception was a java.lang.RuntimeException
:
TLC cannot handle this conjunct of the spec:
line X, col Y to line Z, col T of module Group




...pointing to the entire content of Next.



I believe my Next is well-written, because here's an example model that has a very similar Next to mine: https://github.com/tlaplus/Examples/blob/master/specifications/aba-asyn-byz/aba_asyn_byz.tla#L110



Also, section 14.2.2 of Leslie Lamport's Specifying Systems says:




TLC can evaluate a set-valued expression only if that expression equals a finite set[...]. TLC will evaluate expressions of the following forms only if it can enumerate the set S:




and provides the example of "there exists x in S such that p".



How can I solve this error?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    You need to provide a minimal self-contained example. Try to reduce your code to a small example that shows the error. Also are you sure it points to Next? Because that's a disjunct, not a conjunct. It's more likely to be a problem in Spec.

    – Jorge Adriano
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:30














0












0








0








I have a TLA+ module, which, summarized, looks like this:



--- MODULE Group ---

CONSTANTS People
VARIABLES members

Join(person) == ...
Leave(person) == ...

Init == members subseteq People

Next == E p in People :
/ Join(p)
/ Leave(p)

====================


When I try to model-check this with TLC, I get the following error:




TLC threw an unexpected exception.
This was probably caused by an error in the spec or model.
See the User Output or TLC Console for clues to what happened.
The exception was a java.lang.RuntimeException
:
TLC cannot handle this conjunct of the spec:
line X, col Y to line Z, col T of module Group




...pointing to the entire content of Next.



I believe my Next is well-written, because here's an example model that has a very similar Next to mine: https://github.com/tlaplus/Examples/blob/master/specifications/aba-asyn-byz/aba_asyn_byz.tla#L110



Also, section 14.2.2 of Leslie Lamport's Specifying Systems says:




TLC can evaluate a set-valued expression only if that expression equals a finite set[...]. TLC will evaluate expressions of the following forms only if it can enumerate the set S:




and provides the example of "there exists x in S such that p".



How can I solve this error?










share|improve this question














I have a TLA+ module, which, summarized, looks like this:



--- MODULE Group ---

CONSTANTS People
VARIABLES members

Join(person) == ...
Leave(person) == ...

Init == members subseteq People

Next == E p in People :
/ Join(p)
/ Leave(p)

====================


When I try to model-check this with TLC, I get the following error:




TLC threw an unexpected exception.
This was probably caused by an error in the spec or model.
See the User Output or TLC Console for clues to what happened.
The exception was a java.lang.RuntimeException
:
TLC cannot handle this conjunct of the spec:
line X, col Y to line Z, col T of module Group




...pointing to the entire content of Next.



I believe my Next is well-written, because here's an example model that has a very similar Next to mine: https://github.com/tlaplus/Examples/blob/master/specifications/aba-asyn-byz/aba_asyn_byz.tla#L110



Also, section 14.2.2 of Leslie Lamport's Specifying Systems says:




TLC can evaluate a set-valued expression only if that expression equals a finite set[...]. TLC will evaluate expressions of the following forms only if it can enumerate the set S:




and provides the example of "there exists x in S such that p".



How can I solve this error?







tla+ tlc






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:25









PhilipPhilip

1,044818




1,044818








  • 1





    You need to provide a minimal self-contained example. Try to reduce your code to a small example that shows the error. Also are you sure it points to Next? Because that's a disjunct, not a conjunct. It's more likely to be a problem in Spec.

    – Jorge Adriano
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:30














  • 1





    You need to provide a minimal self-contained example. Try to reduce your code to a small example that shows the error. Also are you sure it points to Next? Because that's a disjunct, not a conjunct. It's more likely to be a problem in Spec.

    – Jorge Adriano
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:30








1




1





You need to provide a minimal self-contained example. Try to reduce your code to a small example that shows the error. Also are you sure it points to Next? Because that's a disjunct, not a conjunct. It's more likely to be a problem in Spec.

– Jorge Adriano
Nov 22 '18 at 19:30





You need to provide a minimal self-contained example. Try to reduce your code to a small example that shows the error. Also are you sure it points to Next? Because that's a disjunct, not a conjunct. It's more likely to be a problem in Spec.

– Jorge Adriano
Nov 22 '18 at 19:30












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The problem was with my use of subseteq in Init, as answered here: in works, while subseteq gives a "identifier undefined" error






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53423052%2ftlc-cannot-handle-this-conjunct-of-the-spec%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    The problem was with my use of subseteq in Init, as answered here: in works, while subseteq gives a "identifier undefined" error






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      The problem was with my use of subseteq in Init, as answered here: in works, while subseteq gives a "identifier undefined" error






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        The problem was with my use of subseteq in Init, as answered here: in works, while subseteq gives a "identifier undefined" error






        share|improve this answer













        The problem was with my use of subseteq in Init, as answered here: in works, while subseteq gives a "identifier undefined" error







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        PhilipPhilip

        1,044818




        1,044818
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53423052%2ftlc-cannot-handle-this-conjunct-of-the-spec%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?