*A ton* vs *tons of*
Is there a preferred or more common usage between the phrase "with a ton of xxx" or "with tons of xxx"? Both referring to something having an abundance of something.
phrase-usage
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
add a comment |
Is there a preferred or more common usage between the phrase "with a ton of xxx" or "with tons of xxx"? Both referring to something having an abundance of something.
phrase-usage
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
"tons of" is more common.
– mohamed
Aug 11 '15 at 21:16
3
If you're English, perhaps with a smidge more X. If you're a New Yorker, with a ton of X. If you're a Valley Girl, with like a billion tons of X, or whatever.
– choster
Aug 11 '15 at 21:19
1
What does your research show?
– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 11 '15 at 21:37
the second phrase is just more emphatic. You said it yourself, abundance, and more than one ton would be even more abundant, overabundant.
– dockeryZ
Aug 12 '15 at 1:19
add a comment |
Is there a preferred or more common usage between the phrase "with a ton of xxx" or "with tons of xxx"? Both referring to something having an abundance of something.
phrase-usage
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
Is there a preferred or more common usage between the phrase "with a ton of xxx" or "with tons of xxx"? Both referring to something having an abundance of something.
phrase-usage
phrase-usage
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
edited Aug 12 '15 at 14:15
aparente001
14.9k43671
14.9k43671
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
asked Aug 11 '15 at 21:13
Benjamin SchererBenjamin Scherer
118114
118114
"tons of" is more common.
– mohamed
Aug 11 '15 at 21:16
3
If you're English, perhaps with a smidge more X. If you're a New Yorker, with a ton of X. If you're a Valley Girl, with like a billion tons of X, or whatever.
– choster
Aug 11 '15 at 21:19
1
What does your research show?
– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 11 '15 at 21:37
the second phrase is just more emphatic. You said it yourself, abundance, and more than one ton would be even more abundant, overabundant.
– dockeryZ
Aug 12 '15 at 1:19
add a comment |
"tons of" is more common.
– mohamed
Aug 11 '15 at 21:16
3
If you're English, perhaps with a smidge more X. If you're a New Yorker, with a ton of X. If you're a Valley Girl, with like a billion tons of X, or whatever.
– choster
Aug 11 '15 at 21:19
1
What does your research show?
– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 11 '15 at 21:37
the second phrase is just more emphatic. You said it yourself, abundance, and more than one ton would be even more abundant, overabundant.
– dockeryZ
Aug 12 '15 at 1:19
"tons of" is more common.
– mohamed
Aug 11 '15 at 21:16
"tons of" is more common.
– mohamed
Aug 11 '15 at 21:16
3
3
If you're English, perhaps with a smidge more X. If you're a New Yorker, with a ton of X. If you're a Valley Girl, with like a billion tons of X, or whatever.
– choster
Aug 11 '15 at 21:19
If you're English, perhaps with a smidge more X. If you're a New Yorker, with a ton of X. If you're a Valley Girl, with like a billion tons of X, or whatever.
– choster
Aug 11 '15 at 21:19
1
1
What does your research show?
– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 11 '15 at 21:37
What does your research show?
– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 11 '15 at 21:37
the second phrase is just more emphatic. You said it yourself, abundance, and more than one ton would be even more abundant, overabundant.
– dockeryZ
Aug 12 '15 at 1:19
the second phrase is just more emphatic. You said it yourself, abundance, and more than one ton would be even more abundant, overabundant.
– dockeryZ
Aug 12 '15 at 1:19
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
According to the following ngram, "tons of" is the most common:
Source: Google Ngram
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
1
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
1
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
1
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
add a comment |
Yes, they are interchangeable, but here's how I usually use them:
A ton of: countable objects.
Tons of: uncountable objects.
Such-and-so candidate for mayor has tons of charm, but is a little light on the issues. Explanation: charm isn't countable.
She's already got a ton of stuffed animals, let's get her something else for her birthday. Explanation: the stuffed animals are countable.
(Yes, you could also say tons of stuffed animals.)
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
add a comment |
The use of "tons of something" by LONGMAN Dictionary is given in URL.
tons of "something"
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tons-of-something
Therefore, the phrase of "tons of ..." also supports both countable plural noun and uncountable singular noun.
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f266320%2fa-ton-vs-tons-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to the following ngram, "tons of" is the most common:
Source: Google Ngram
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
1
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
1
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
1
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
add a comment |
According to the following ngram, "tons of" is the most common:
Source: Google Ngram
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
1
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
1
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
1
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
add a comment |
According to the following ngram, "tons of" is the most common:
Source: Google Ngram
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
According to the following ngram, "tons of" is the most common:
Source: Google Ngram
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
edited Jul 11 '17 at 20:46
thomj1332
3,7701933
3,7701933
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
answered Aug 11 '15 at 22:09
Dog LoverDog Lover
4,91653264
4,91653264
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
1
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
1
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
1
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
add a comment |
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
1
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
1
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
1
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
That only shows that people more often ship tons of things than a single ton of it.
– tchrist♦
Aug 11 '15 at 22:22
1
1
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
@thmj1332 that's the first times I've ever seen Ngam chart look that. It's very clear. How did you manage to compress the dates, and resize the text?
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 10:32
1
1
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
@Mari-Lou A, you just need to shrink the size of your browser window and then click Refresh. In this way, the text size is larger relative to the overall size of the graph. I wish more people knew this!
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:04
1
1
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@thomj1332 that is nothing short of b.r.i.l.l.i.a.n.t. Oh, I might even retrace all my old answers and use this ingenious workaround on my Ngram charts. mind "explodes"
– Mari-Lou A
Jul 12 '17 at 17:08
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
@Mari-Lou A and all, Yes. Good idea. And, it doesn't have to be the original author who makes the changes. If folks want to go back and edit any previous illegible Ngram graphs with the better visualization, you get +2 credits for each one! I just did it on this one to see how it was received. Glad it is appreciated.
– thomj1332
Jul 12 '17 at 17:13
add a comment |
Yes, they are interchangeable, but here's how I usually use them:
A ton of: countable objects.
Tons of: uncountable objects.
Such-and-so candidate for mayor has tons of charm, but is a little light on the issues. Explanation: charm isn't countable.
She's already got a ton of stuffed animals, let's get her something else for her birthday. Explanation: the stuffed animals are countable.
(Yes, you could also say tons of stuffed animals.)
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
add a comment |
Yes, they are interchangeable, but here's how I usually use them:
A ton of: countable objects.
Tons of: uncountable objects.
Such-and-so candidate for mayor has tons of charm, but is a little light on the issues. Explanation: charm isn't countable.
She's already got a ton of stuffed animals, let's get her something else for her birthday. Explanation: the stuffed animals are countable.
(Yes, you could also say tons of stuffed animals.)
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
add a comment |
Yes, they are interchangeable, but here's how I usually use them:
A ton of: countable objects.
Tons of: uncountable objects.
Such-and-so candidate for mayor has tons of charm, but is a little light on the issues. Explanation: charm isn't countable.
She's already got a ton of stuffed animals, let's get her something else for her birthday. Explanation: the stuffed animals are countable.
(Yes, you could also say tons of stuffed animals.)
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
Yes, they are interchangeable, but here's how I usually use them:
A ton of: countable objects.
Tons of: uncountable objects.
Such-and-so candidate for mayor has tons of charm, but is a little light on the issues. Explanation: charm isn't countable.
She's already got a ton of stuffed animals, let's get her something else for her birthday. Explanation: the stuffed animals are countable.
(Yes, you could also say tons of stuffed animals.)
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
answered Aug 12 '15 at 13:06
aparente001aparente001
14.9k43671
14.9k43671
add a comment |
add a comment |
The use of "tons of something" by LONGMAN Dictionary is given in URL.
tons of "something"
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tons-of-something
Therefore, the phrase of "tons of ..." also supports both countable plural noun and uncountable singular noun.
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
add a comment |
The use of "tons of something" by LONGMAN Dictionary is given in URL.
tons of "something"
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tons-of-something
Therefore, the phrase of "tons of ..." also supports both countable plural noun and uncountable singular noun.
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
add a comment |
The use of "tons of something" by LONGMAN Dictionary is given in URL.
tons of "something"
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tons-of-something
Therefore, the phrase of "tons of ..." also supports both countable plural noun and uncountable singular noun.
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
The use of "tons of something" by LONGMAN Dictionary is given in URL.
tons of "something"
https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/tons-of-something
Therefore, the phrase of "tons of ..." also supports both countable plural noun and uncountable singular noun.
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
answered Mar 18 at 13:39
Jarurote TippayachaiJarurote Tippayachai
63
63
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f266320%2fa-ton-vs-tons-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"tons of" is more common.
– mohamed
Aug 11 '15 at 21:16
3
If you're English, perhaps with a smidge more X. If you're a New Yorker, with a ton of X. If you're a Valley Girl, with like a billion tons of X, or whatever.
– choster
Aug 11 '15 at 21:19
1
What does your research show?
– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 11 '15 at 21:37
the second phrase is just more emphatic. You said it yourself, abundance, and more than one ton would be even more abundant, overabundant.
– dockeryZ
Aug 12 '15 at 1:19