Deleting from multiple tables using a left join in one query





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















I am wondering if I can do the following, I have 3 tables that I want to delete data from : Table1, Table2, Table3



There will always be a record in Table1 and there might or might not be an associated record in Table2 and Table3.



So I thought I could do the following:



DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table2 t2 ON t1.Id = t2.Id
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table3 t3 ON t3.Id = t1.Id
WHERE t1.Id = @Id;


But I get an Incorrect syntax near ','. because of the DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3 line.



The desired results is to have all the data from the 3 tables deleted with the Where clause.



I'm not sure how to acomplish this.










share|improve this question























  • Remove the first 'FROM' clause and try

    – Abdul Rasheed
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54






  • 2





    SQL Server only allows you to delete from one table at a time. Perhaps you want cascading foreign key constraints.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54











  • @AbdulRasheed that doesn't work, I tried that

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:55











  • @GordonLinoff let's say this is quite an old database and db integrity wasn't that thought out of at the time...

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56











  • First you need to remove the first from, 2nd SQL Server allow to delete just from one table, 3rd you can use OUTPUT clause to delete from 3 tables, or even so by ON DELETE CASCADE

    – Sami
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56




















0















I am wondering if I can do the following, I have 3 tables that I want to delete data from : Table1, Table2, Table3



There will always be a record in Table1 and there might or might not be an associated record in Table2 and Table3.



So I thought I could do the following:



DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table2 t2 ON t1.Id = t2.Id
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table3 t3 ON t3.Id = t1.Id
WHERE t1.Id = @Id;


But I get an Incorrect syntax near ','. because of the DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3 line.



The desired results is to have all the data from the 3 tables deleted with the Where clause.



I'm not sure how to acomplish this.










share|improve this question























  • Remove the first 'FROM' clause and try

    – Abdul Rasheed
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54






  • 2





    SQL Server only allows you to delete from one table at a time. Perhaps you want cascading foreign key constraints.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54











  • @AbdulRasheed that doesn't work, I tried that

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:55











  • @GordonLinoff let's say this is quite an old database and db integrity wasn't that thought out of at the time...

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56











  • First you need to remove the first from, 2nd SQL Server allow to delete just from one table, 3rd you can use OUTPUT clause to delete from 3 tables, or even so by ON DELETE CASCADE

    – Sami
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56
















0












0








0








I am wondering if I can do the following, I have 3 tables that I want to delete data from : Table1, Table2, Table3



There will always be a record in Table1 and there might or might not be an associated record in Table2 and Table3.



So I thought I could do the following:



DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table2 t2 ON t1.Id = t2.Id
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table3 t3 ON t3.Id = t1.Id
WHERE t1.Id = @Id;


But I get an Incorrect syntax near ','. because of the DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3 line.



The desired results is to have all the data from the 3 tables deleted with the Where clause.



I'm not sure how to acomplish this.










share|improve this question














I am wondering if I can do the following, I have 3 tables that I want to delete data from : Table1, Table2, Table3



There will always be a record in Table1 and there might or might not be an associated record in Table2 and Table3.



So I thought I could do the following:



DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table2 t2 ON t1.Id = t2.Id
LEFT JOIN dbo.Table3 t3 ON t3.Id = t1.Id
WHERE t1.Id = @Id;


But I get an Incorrect syntax near ','. because of the DELETE FROM dbo.Table1, dbo.Table2, dbo.Table3 line.



The desired results is to have all the data from the 3 tables deleted with the Where clause.



I'm not sure how to acomplish this.







sql sql-server tsql






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 23 '18 at 11:53









Jamie ReesJamie Rees

4,77712960




4,77712960













  • Remove the first 'FROM' clause and try

    – Abdul Rasheed
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54






  • 2





    SQL Server only allows you to delete from one table at a time. Perhaps you want cascading foreign key constraints.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54











  • @AbdulRasheed that doesn't work, I tried that

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:55











  • @GordonLinoff let's say this is quite an old database and db integrity wasn't that thought out of at the time...

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56











  • First you need to remove the first from, 2nd SQL Server allow to delete just from one table, 3rd you can use OUTPUT clause to delete from 3 tables, or even so by ON DELETE CASCADE

    – Sami
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56





















  • Remove the first 'FROM' clause and try

    – Abdul Rasheed
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54






  • 2





    SQL Server only allows you to delete from one table at a time. Perhaps you want cascading foreign key constraints.

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:54











  • @AbdulRasheed that doesn't work, I tried that

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:55











  • @GordonLinoff let's say this is quite an old database and db integrity wasn't that thought out of at the time...

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56











  • First you need to remove the first from, 2nd SQL Server allow to delete just from one table, 3rd you can use OUTPUT clause to delete from 3 tables, or even so by ON DELETE CASCADE

    – Sami
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:56



















Remove the first 'FROM' clause and try

– Abdul Rasheed
Nov 23 '18 at 11:54





Remove the first 'FROM' clause and try

– Abdul Rasheed
Nov 23 '18 at 11:54




2




2





SQL Server only allows you to delete from one table at a time. Perhaps you want cascading foreign key constraints.

– Gordon Linoff
Nov 23 '18 at 11:54





SQL Server only allows you to delete from one table at a time. Perhaps you want cascading foreign key constraints.

– Gordon Linoff
Nov 23 '18 at 11:54













@AbdulRasheed that doesn't work, I tried that

– Jamie Rees
Nov 23 '18 at 11:55





@AbdulRasheed that doesn't work, I tried that

– Jamie Rees
Nov 23 '18 at 11:55













@GordonLinoff let's say this is quite an old database and db integrity wasn't that thought out of at the time...

– Jamie Rees
Nov 23 '18 at 11:56





@GordonLinoff let's say this is quite an old database and db integrity wasn't that thought out of at the time...

– Jamie Rees
Nov 23 '18 at 11:56













First you need to remove the first from, 2nd SQL Server allow to delete just from one table, 3rd you can use OUTPUT clause to delete from 3 tables, or even so by ON DELETE CASCADE

– Sami
Nov 23 '18 at 11:56







First you need to remove the first from, 2nd SQL Server allow to delete just from one table, 3rd you can use OUTPUT clause to delete from 3 tables, or even so by ON DELETE CASCADE

– Sami
Nov 23 '18 at 11:56














4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can only delete from one table at a time. Presumably, you want cascading constraints:



alter table2 add constraint fk_table2_table1
foreign key (id) references table1(id)
on delete cascade;

alter tablee add constraint fk_tablee_table1
foreign key (id) references table1(id)
on delete cascade;


Foreign keys ensure data integrity. Cascading constraints mean that when the primary key is deleted, then the corresponding rows in the other tables are also removed.






share|improve this answer
























  • Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

    – Jamie Rees
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:59






  • 1





    @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

    – Jeroen Mostert
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:12



















2














A couple of methods to this. Personally, I would recommend the SP over the trigger; like others I'm not a huge fan of triggers as they can often be a "hidden" entity (far too many times have I been unable to work out why something isn't working to find it it was a trigger I wasn't aware of).



Anyway, there trigger method would be:



CREATE TRIGGER Cascade_Table2_Table3 ON dbo.Table1
AFTER DELETE
AS

DELETE T2
FROM Table2 T2
JOIN deleted d ON t2.Id = d.Id;

DELETE T3
FROM Table3 T3
JOIN deleted d ON t3.Id = d.Id;
GO


However, as you're using a single value, then a parametrised Stored Procedure would be far better; and then you DENY users from running a DELETE on the tables:



CREATE PROC Delete_T1T2T3 @ID int AS

DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
WHERE ID = @ID;

DELETE FROM dbo.Table2
WHERE ID = @ID;

DELETE FROM dbo.Table3
WHERE ID = @ID;

GO





share|improve this answer

































    1














    can you use a trigger on table1?, so you can delete records only from table1 and then let the trigger delete stuff from table2 and table3.



    Something like:



    CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[T_deleteT2_t3]
    ON [dbo].[Table1]
    AFTER DELETE
    AS

    BEGIN

    delete from table2 where id = select id from deleted
    delete from table3 where id = select id from deleted

    END





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

      – Jamie Rees
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:05











    • What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

      – Sami
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:05






    • 3





      @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

      – Sami
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











    • @Sami I overlooked that, good point

      – Jamie Rees
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











    • @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

      – picklerick
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:08



















    1














    Here is another way using OUTPUT clause



    CREATE TABLE T1( ID INT);
    CREATE TABLE T2( ID INT);
    CREATE TABLE T3( ID INT);

    INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (1), (2);
    INSERT INTO T2 VALUES (1), (3);
    INSERT INTO T3 VALUES (1), (4);

    BEGIN TRAN;

    DECLARE @Out TABLE (IDs INT);

    DELETE T1
    OUTPUT DELETED.ID INTO @Out
    FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID;

    DELETE T2
    FROM T2 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T2.ID = O.IDs;

    DELETE T3
    FROM T3 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T3.ID = O.IDs;

    COMMIT TRAN;

    SELECT *
    FROM T1;
    SELECT *
    FROM T2;
    SELECT *
    FROM T3;


    Demo






    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53446226%2fdeleting-from-multiple-tables-using-a-left-join-in-one-query%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      You can only delete from one table at a time. Presumably, you want cascading constraints:



      alter table2 add constraint fk_table2_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;

      alter tablee add constraint fk_tablee_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;


      Foreign keys ensure data integrity. Cascading constraints mean that when the primary key is deleted, then the corresponding rows in the other tables are also removed.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

        – Jamie Rees
        Nov 23 '18 at 11:59






      • 1





        @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

        – Jeroen Mostert
        Nov 23 '18 at 12:12
















      4














      You can only delete from one table at a time. Presumably, you want cascading constraints:



      alter table2 add constraint fk_table2_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;

      alter tablee add constraint fk_tablee_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;


      Foreign keys ensure data integrity. Cascading constraints mean that when the primary key is deleted, then the corresponding rows in the other tables are also removed.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

        – Jamie Rees
        Nov 23 '18 at 11:59






      • 1





        @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

        – Jeroen Mostert
        Nov 23 '18 at 12:12














      4












      4








      4







      You can only delete from one table at a time. Presumably, you want cascading constraints:



      alter table2 add constraint fk_table2_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;

      alter tablee add constraint fk_tablee_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;


      Foreign keys ensure data integrity. Cascading constraints mean that when the primary key is deleted, then the corresponding rows in the other tables are also removed.






      share|improve this answer













      You can only delete from one table at a time. Presumably, you want cascading constraints:



      alter table2 add constraint fk_table2_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;

      alter tablee add constraint fk_tablee_table1
      foreign key (id) references table1(id)
      on delete cascade;


      Foreign keys ensure data integrity. Cascading constraints mean that when the primary key is deleted, then the corresponding rows in the other tables are also removed.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Nov 23 '18 at 11:57









      Gordon LinoffGordon Linoff

      794k37318422




      794k37318422













      • Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

        – Jamie Rees
        Nov 23 '18 at 11:59






      • 1





        @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

        – Jeroen Mostert
        Nov 23 '18 at 12:12



















      • Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

        – Jamie Rees
        Nov 23 '18 at 11:59






      • 1





        @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

        – Jeroen Mostert
        Nov 23 '18 at 12:12

















      Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

      – Jamie Rees
      Nov 23 '18 at 11:59





      Yeah ideally this would work, but due to the size of the database and the importance of the data, currently cascade deleting is not an option.

      – Jamie Rees
      Nov 23 '18 at 11:59




      1




      1





      @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

      – Jeroen Mostert
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:12





      @JamieRees: you can always add the constraint WITH NOCHECK so it isn't validated for current data -- and drop it afterwards if you don't like the idea of having it stick around afterwards. This makes the size of the current data largely irrelevant. The only sticking points then are out-of-order inserts, if the system uses those, and possible failure if rows are updated that refer to non-existent parent records (which is typically undesirable anyway, and would justify a preceding scrubbing step, or at least a query to see if there are any).

      – Jeroen Mostert
      Nov 23 '18 at 12:12













      2














      A couple of methods to this. Personally, I would recommend the SP over the trigger; like others I'm not a huge fan of triggers as they can often be a "hidden" entity (far too many times have I been unable to work out why something isn't working to find it it was a trigger I wasn't aware of).



      Anyway, there trigger method would be:



      CREATE TRIGGER Cascade_Table2_Table3 ON dbo.Table1
      AFTER DELETE
      AS

      DELETE T2
      FROM Table2 T2
      JOIN deleted d ON t2.Id = d.Id;

      DELETE T3
      FROM Table3 T3
      JOIN deleted d ON t3.Id = d.Id;
      GO


      However, as you're using a single value, then a parametrised Stored Procedure would be far better; and then you DENY users from running a DELETE on the tables:



      CREATE PROC Delete_T1T2T3 @ID int AS

      DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
      WHERE ID = @ID;

      DELETE FROM dbo.Table2
      WHERE ID = @ID;

      DELETE FROM dbo.Table3
      WHERE ID = @ID;

      GO





      share|improve this answer






























        2














        A couple of methods to this. Personally, I would recommend the SP over the trigger; like others I'm not a huge fan of triggers as they can often be a "hidden" entity (far too many times have I been unable to work out why something isn't working to find it it was a trigger I wasn't aware of).



        Anyway, there trigger method would be:



        CREATE TRIGGER Cascade_Table2_Table3 ON dbo.Table1
        AFTER DELETE
        AS

        DELETE T2
        FROM Table2 T2
        JOIN deleted d ON t2.Id = d.Id;

        DELETE T3
        FROM Table3 T3
        JOIN deleted d ON t3.Id = d.Id;
        GO


        However, as you're using a single value, then a parametrised Stored Procedure would be far better; and then you DENY users from running a DELETE on the tables:



        CREATE PROC Delete_T1T2T3 @ID int AS

        DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
        WHERE ID = @ID;

        DELETE FROM dbo.Table2
        WHERE ID = @ID;

        DELETE FROM dbo.Table3
        WHERE ID = @ID;

        GO





        share|improve this answer




























          2












          2








          2







          A couple of methods to this. Personally, I would recommend the SP over the trigger; like others I'm not a huge fan of triggers as they can often be a "hidden" entity (far too many times have I been unable to work out why something isn't working to find it it was a trigger I wasn't aware of).



          Anyway, there trigger method would be:



          CREATE TRIGGER Cascade_Table2_Table3 ON dbo.Table1
          AFTER DELETE
          AS

          DELETE T2
          FROM Table2 T2
          JOIN deleted d ON t2.Id = d.Id;

          DELETE T3
          FROM Table3 T3
          JOIN deleted d ON t3.Id = d.Id;
          GO


          However, as you're using a single value, then a parametrised Stored Procedure would be far better; and then you DENY users from running a DELETE on the tables:



          CREATE PROC Delete_T1T2T3 @ID int AS

          DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
          WHERE ID = @ID;

          DELETE FROM dbo.Table2
          WHERE ID = @ID;

          DELETE FROM dbo.Table3
          WHERE ID = @ID;

          GO





          share|improve this answer















          A couple of methods to this. Personally, I would recommend the SP over the trigger; like others I'm not a huge fan of triggers as they can often be a "hidden" entity (far too many times have I been unable to work out why something isn't working to find it it was a trigger I wasn't aware of).



          Anyway, there trigger method would be:



          CREATE TRIGGER Cascade_Table2_Table3 ON dbo.Table1
          AFTER DELETE
          AS

          DELETE T2
          FROM Table2 T2
          JOIN deleted d ON t2.Id = d.Id;

          DELETE T3
          FROM Table3 T3
          JOIN deleted d ON t3.Id = d.Id;
          GO


          However, as you're using a single value, then a parametrised Stored Procedure would be far better; and then you DENY users from running a DELETE on the tables:



          CREATE PROC Delete_T1T2T3 @ID int AS

          DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
          WHERE ID = @ID;

          DELETE FROM dbo.Table2
          WHERE ID = @ID;

          DELETE FROM dbo.Table3
          WHERE ID = @ID;

          GO






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 23 '18 at 12:28

























          answered Nov 23 '18 at 12:18









          LarnuLarnu

          22.6k51933




          22.6k51933























              1














              can you use a trigger on table1?, so you can delete records only from table1 and then let the trigger delete stuff from table2 and table3.



              Something like:



              CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[T_deleteT2_t3]
              ON [dbo].[Table1]
              AFTER DELETE
              AS

              BEGIN

              delete from table2 where id = select id from deleted
              delete from table3 where id = select id from deleted

              END





              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05











              • What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05






              • 3





                @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami I overlooked that, good point

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

                – picklerick
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:08
















              1














              can you use a trigger on table1?, so you can delete records only from table1 and then let the trigger delete stuff from table2 and table3.



              Something like:



              CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[T_deleteT2_t3]
              ON [dbo].[Table1]
              AFTER DELETE
              AS

              BEGIN

              delete from table2 where id = select id from deleted
              delete from table3 where id = select id from deleted

              END





              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05











              • What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05






              • 3





                @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami I overlooked that, good point

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

                – picklerick
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:08














              1












              1








              1







              can you use a trigger on table1?, so you can delete records only from table1 and then let the trigger delete stuff from table2 and table3.



              Something like:



              CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[T_deleteT2_t3]
              ON [dbo].[Table1]
              AFTER DELETE
              AS

              BEGIN

              delete from table2 where id = select id from deleted
              delete from table3 where id = select id from deleted

              END





              share|improve this answer













              can you use a trigger on table1?, so you can delete records only from table1 and then let the trigger delete stuff from table2 and table3.



              Something like:



              CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[T_deleteT2_t3]
              ON [dbo].[Table1]
              AFTER DELETE
              AS

              BEGIN

              delete from table2 where id = select id from deleted
              delete from table3 where id = select id from deleted

              END






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 23 '18 at 12:02









              picklerickpicklerick

              32918




              32918








              • 1





                It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05











              • What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05






              • 3





                @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami I overlooked that, good point

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

                – picklerick
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:08














              • 1





                It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05











              • What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:05






              • 3





                @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

                – Sami
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami I overlooked that, good point

                – Jamie Rees
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:06











              • @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

                – picklerick
                Nov 23 '18 at 12:08








              1




              1





              It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

              – Jamie Rees
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:05





              It's a valid answer, but I personally don't like the use of triggers in this scenario, triggers in general i'm not a fan of due to their 'hidden' nature.

              – Jamie Rees
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:05













              What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

              – Sami
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:05





              What if you delete 100 rows from this table?

              – Sami
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:05




              3




              3





              @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

              – Sami
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:06





              @JamieRees How that can be a valid answer while it has id = select id from deleted?

              – Sami
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:06













              @Sami I overlooked that, good point

              – Jamie Rees
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:06





              @Sami I overlooked that, good point

              – Jamie Rees
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:06













              @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

              – picklerick
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:08





              @Sami Its preudocode just to know if the answer could fit him

              – picklerick
              Nov 23 '18 at 12:08











              1














              Here is another way using OUTPUT clause



              CREATE TABLE T1( ID INT);
              CREATE TABLE T2( ID INT);
              CREATE TABLE T3( ID INT);

              INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (1), (2);
              INSERT INTO T2 VALUES (1), (3);
              INSERT INTO T3 VALUES (1), (4);

              BEGIN TRAN;

              DECLARE @Out TABLE (IDs INT);

              DELETE T1
              OUTPUT DELETED.ID INTO @Out
              FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID;

              DELETE T2
              FROM T2 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T2.ID = O.IDs;

              DELETE T3
              FROM T3 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T3.ID = O.IDs;

              COMMIT TRAN;

              SELECT *
              FROM T1;
              SELECT *
              FROM T2;
              SELECT *
              FROM T3;


              Demo






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                Here is another way using OUTPUT clause



                CREATE TABLE T1( ID INT);
                CREATE TABLE T2( ID INT);
                CREATE TABLE T3( ID INT);

                INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (1), (2);
                INSERT INTO T2 VALUES (1), (3);
                INSERT INTO T3 VALUES (1), (4);

                BEGIN TRAN;

                DECLARE @Out TABLE (IDs INT);

                DELETE T1
                OUTPUT DELETED.ID INTO @Out
                FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID;

                DELETE T2
                FROM T2 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T2.ID = O.IDs;

                DELETE T3
                FROM T3 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T3.ID = O.IDs;

                COMMIT TRAN;

                SELECT *
                FROM T1;
                SELECT *
                FROM T2;
                SELECT *
                FROM T3;


                Demo






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Here is another way using OUTPUT clause



                  CREATE TABLE T1( ID INT);
                  CREATE TABLE T2( ID INT);
                  CREATE TABLE T3( ID INT);

                  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (1), (2);
                  INSERT INTO T2 VALUES (1), (3);
                  INSERT INTO T3 VALUES (1), (4);

                  BEGIN TRAN;

                  DECLARE @Out TABLE (IDs INT);

                  DELETE T1
                  OUTPUT DELETED.ID INTO @Out
                  FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID;

                  DELETE T2
                  FROM T2 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T2.ID = O.IDs;

                  DELETE T3
                  FROM T3 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T3.ID = O.IDs;

                  COMMIT TRAN;

                  SELECT *
                  FROM T1;
                  SELECT *
                  FROM T2;
                  SELECT *
                  FROM T3;


                  Demo






                  share|improve this answer













                  Here is another way using OUTPUT clause



                  CREATE TABLE T1( ID INT);
                  CREATE TABLE T2( ID INT);
                  CREATE TABLE T3( ID INT);

                  INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (1), (2);
                  INSERT INTO T2 VALUES (1), (3);
                  INSERT INTO T3 VALUES (1), (4);

                  BEGIN TRAN;

                  DECLARE @Out TABLE (IDs INT);

                  DELETE T1
                  OUTPUT DELETED.ID INTO @Out
                  FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID;

                  DELETE T2
                  FROM T2 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T2.ID = O.IDs;

                  DELETE T3
                  FROM T3 INNER JOIN @Out O ON T3.ID = O.IDs;

                  COMMIT TRAN;

                  SELECT *
                  FROM T1;
                  SELECT *
                  FROM T2;
                  SELECT *
                  FROM T3;


                  Demo







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 23 '18 at 12:20









                  SamiSami

                  9,40331244




                  9,40331244






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53446226%2fdeleting-from-multiple-tables-using-a-left-join-in-one-query%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]