subequations: How to continue numbering while considering scrbook numbering scheme?
The user daleif has posted a nice approach on how to increase equation numbers when using subequations
.
Minimum Working Example (MWE):
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
Screenshot of the result:
Description of the issue:
As you can see, scrbook
uses a custom numbering scheme like chapternumber.equationnumber
. With the counter modification from daleif this does not work unfortunately.
Is there an option available to consider the common scrbook
numbering scheme in subequations
as well?
In the upper example the subequation numbers should appear like:
0.2a
, 0.2b
, 0.3a
and 0.3b
to match the numbering scheme of scrbook
.
equations numbering koma-script scrbook subequations
add a comment |
The user daleif has posted a nice approach on how to increase equation numbers when using subequations
.
Minimum Working Example (MWE):
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
Screenshot of the result:
Description of the issue:
As you can see, scrbook
uses a custom numbering scheme like chapternumber.equationnumber
. With the counter modification from daleif this does not work unfortunately.
Is there an option available to consider the common scrbook
numbering scheme in subequations
as well?
In the upper example the subequation numbers should appear like:
0.2a
, 0.2b
, 0.3a
and 0.3b
to match the numbering scheme of scrbook
.
equations numbering koma-script scrbook subequations
add a comment |
The user daleif has posted a nice approach on how to increase equation numbers when using subequations
.
Minimum Working Example (MWE):
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
Screenshot of the result:
Description of the issue:
As you can see, scrbook
uses a custom numbering scheme like chapternumber.equationnumber
. With the counter modification from daleif this does not work unfortunately.
Is there an option available to consider the common scrbook
numbering scheme in subequations
as well?
In the upper example the subequation numbers should appear like:
0.2a
, 0.2b
, 0.3a
and 0.3b
to match the numbering scheme of scrbook
.
equations numbering koma-script scrbook subequations
The user daleif has posted a nice approach on how to increase equation numbers when using subequations
.
Minimum Working Example (MWE):
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
Screenshot of the result:
Description of the issue:
As you can see, scrbook
uses a custom numbering scheme like chapternumber.equationnumber
. With the counter modification from daleif this does not work unfortunately.
Is there an option available to consider the common scrbook
numbering scheme in subequations
as well?
In the upper example the subequation numbers should appear like:
0.2a
, 0.2b
, 0.3a
and 0.3b
to match the numbering scheme of scrbook
.
equations numbering koma-script scrbook subequations
equations numbering koma-script scrbook subequations
asked Apr 1 at 14:45
DaveDave
1,268619
1,268619
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can always add thechapter to the representation:
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{thechapter.arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
As a comment to Ulrikes answer,
We can simply copy the normal formatting of the equation number and patch it to use parentequation
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{etoolbox}
letsillymacrotheequation % copy definition, then patch,
% ERROR does not exist, so doc will not compile if patch fails
patchcmdsillymacro{equation}{parentequation}{typeout{patched ok}}{ERROR}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
% gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
gdeftheparentequation{sillymacro}%
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
...
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482595%2fsubequations-how-to-continue-numbering-while-considering-scrbook-numbering-sche%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can always add thechapter to the representation:
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{thechapter.arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
You can always add thechapter to the representation:
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{thechapter.arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
You can always add thechapter to the representation:
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{thechapter.arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
You can always add thechapter to the representation:
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{thechapter.arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
First, some normal equation:
begin{equation}
content...
end{equation}
And in following the subequations:
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}
end{document}
answered Apr 1 at 14:55
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
199k9306692
199k9306692
add a comment |
add a comment |
As a comment to Ulrikes answer,
We can simply copy the normal formatting of the equation number and patch it to use parentequation
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{etoolbox}
letsillymacrotheequation % copy definition, then patch,
% ERROR does not exist, so doc will not compile if patch fails
patchcmdsillymacro{equation}{parentequation}{typeout{patched ok}}{ERROR}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
% gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
gdeftheparentequation{sillymacro}%
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
...
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
add a comment |
As a comment to Ulrikes answer,
We can simply copy the normal formatting of the equation number and patch it to use parentequation
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{etoolbox}
letsillymacrotheequation % copy definition, then patch,
% ERROR does not exist, so doc will not compile if patch fails
patchcmdsillymacro{equation}{parentequation}{typeout{patched ok}}{ERROR}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
% gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
gdeftheparentequation{sillymacro}%
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
...
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
add a comment |
As a comment to Ulrikes answer,
We can simply copy the normal formatting of the equation number and patch it to use parentequation
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{etoolbox}
letsillymacrotheequation % copy definition, then patch,
% ERROR does not exist, so doc will not compile if patch fails
patchcmdsillymacro{equation}{parentequation}{typeout{patched ok}}{ERROR}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
% gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
gdeftheparentequation{sillymacro}%
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
...
As a comment to Ulrikes answer,
We can simply copy the normal formatting of the equation number and patch it to use parentequation
documentclass{scrbook}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{etoolbox}
letsillymacrotheequation % copy definition, then patch,
% ERROR does not exist, so doc will not compile if patch fails
patchcmdsillymacro{equation}{parentequation}{typeout{patched ok}}{ERROR}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
% gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
gdeftheparentequation{sillymacro}%
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
...
answered Apr 1 at 15:10
daleifdaleif
33.8k255118
33.8k255118
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
add a comment |
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Thanks a lot for your hint! But what does this approach improve in detail?
– Dave
Apr 1 at 19:16
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
Say you are using a strange numbering, say it is not a dot as a separator, you do not have to remember how to format this strange formatting. Only requirement is that the copy needs to me made after the initial definition of theequation.
– daleif
Apr 1 at 19:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482595%2fsubequations-how-to-continue-numbering-while-considering-scrbook-numbering-sche%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown