Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
When taxiing at an airport without a full-blown airport diagram (most commonly, a non-towered airport), how does a pilot know whether taxiway A (Alpha) is on one end of a runway, or the other? Or, in the case of taxiway exits, how does one know whether exit A1 is at one end of a runway, or the other?
In other words, are taxiways numbered in a predictable or consistent way? An example would be, “Exit A1 is always located at the easternmost exitway of Alpha”. If they are, is this because of custom or regulation?
runways taxiing airport-design airport-markings non-towered-airport
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
When taxiing at an airport without a full-blown airport diagram (most commonly, a non-towered airport), how does a pilot know whether taxiway A (Alpha) is on one end of a runway, or the other? Or, in the case of taxiway exits, how does one know whether exit A1 is at one end of a runway, or the other?
In other words, are taxiways numbered in a predictable or consistent way? An example would be, “Exit A1 is always located at the easternmost exitway of Alpha”. If they are, is this because of custom or regulation?
runways taxiing airport-design airport-markings non-towered-airport
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
When taxiing at an airport without a full-blown airport diagram (most commonly, a non-towered airport), how does a pilot know whether taxiway A (Alpha) is on one end of a runway, or the other? Or, in the case of taxiway exits, how does one know whether exit A1 is at one end of a runway, or the other?
In other words, are taxiways numbered in a predictable or consistent way? An example would be, “Exit A1 is always located at the easternmost exitway of Alpha”. If they are, is this because of custom or regulation?
runways taxiing airport-design airport-markings non-towered-airport
When taxiing at an airport without a full-blown airport diagram (most commonly, a non-towered airport), how does a pilot know whether taxiway A (Alpha) is on one end of a runway, or the other? Or, in the case of taxiway exits, how does one know whether exit A1 is at one end of a runway, or the other?
In other words, are taxiways numbered in a predictable or consistent way? An example would be, “Exit A1 is always located at the easternmost exitway of Alpha”. If they are, is this because of custom or regulation?
runways taxiing airport-design airport-markings non-towered-airport
runways taxiing airport-design airport-markings non-towered-airport
asked yesterday
Conway Yao
9817
9817
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
In the U.S., taxiway number/nomenclature is generally designed in accordance with FAA AC 150/5340-18F. Also, Engineering Brief 89 available here clarifies some of the information in the AC with respect to taxiway numbering/nomenclature. The two pages shown below summarize the guidelines for numbering (from Engineering Brief 89)
Also, note the general taxiway numbering/nomenclature schema for Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX) illustrated on the bottom of this page. The letter "A" starts the taxiway nomenclature beginning on the south side of the airport and progresses alphabetically towards the northside of the airport. Intersecting taxiways are numbered sequentially.
Airport taxiway nomenclature can be very complex depending on the airport. Also, as modifications are made to the ramps and movement areas, etc., effectively designating taxi routes or other areas of the airport becomes challenging.
Finally, in the U.S., there is a taxiway numbering/nomenclature methodology that is framed within FAA guidance documents. A close comparison of the design guidance with current airport layouts and taxiway numbering/nomenclature not only illustrates the complexity involved but also reveals, in most cases, a consistency that can be relied upon and proves to be extremely useful in actual practice.
Excerpt from Engineering Brief 89 (two pages):
2
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. TaxiwayA
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway withZ
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).
– FreeMan
yesterday
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
5
down vote
Not at all - they'll be built-up in a logical fashion in so much as they're not just randomly assigned but there's no standard beyond the use of letters to denote taxiways and numbers to denote holds. Each airport is free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways and exits as it sees fit, and many will evolve and grow over time.
For example, at Birmingham International taxiway A (Alpha) takes you from the runway to an intersection with T (Tango) and D (Delta). Bravo is a small spur between the runway and Alpha and there is no Charlie.
At the other end of the runway is Echo and Sierra.
At London Gatwick, Alpha isn't even used on 26/08 - rather it's Juliet, Quebec Hotel and Golf. And neither runway has Echo or Sierra.
In short, there's no substitute for simply knowing (Through the use of chart or local knowledge), looking for signs for asking for a progressive taxi where the controller gives you step by step instructions.
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
In the U.S., taxiway number/nomenclature is generally designed in accordance with FAA AC 150/5340-18F. Also, Engineering Brief 89 available here clarifies some of the information in the AC with respect to taxiway numbering/nomenclature. The two pages shown below summarize the guidelines for numbering (from Engineering Brief 89)
Also, note the general taxiway numbering/nomenclature schema for Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX) illustrated on the bottom of this page. The letter "A" starts the taxiway nomenclature beginning on the south side of the airport and progresses alphabetically towards the northside of the airport. Intersecting taxiways are numbered sequentially.
Airport taxiway nomenclature can be very complex depending on the airport. Also, as modifications are made to the ramps and movement areas, etc., effectively designating taxi routes or other areas of the airport becomes challenging.
Finally, in the U.S., there is a taxiway numbering/nomenclature methodology that is framed within FAA guidance documents. A close comparison of the design guidance with current airport layouts and taxiway numbering/nomenclature not only illustrates the complexity involved but also reveals, in most cases, a consistency that can be relied upon and proves to be extremely useful in actual practice.
Excerpt from Engineering Brief 89 (two pages):
2
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. TaxiwayA
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway withZ
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).
– FreeMan
yesterday
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
11
down vote
In the U.S., taxiway number/nomenclature is generally designed in accordance with FAA AC 150/5340-18F. Also, Engineering Brief 89 available here clarifies some of the information in the AC with respect to taxiway numbering/nomenclature. The two pages shown below summarize the guidelines for numbering (from Engineering Brief 89)
Also, note the general taxiway numbering/nomenclature schema for Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX) illustrated on the bottom of this page. The letter "A" starts the taxiway nomenclature beginning on the south side of the airport and progresses alphabetically towards the northside of the airport. Intersecting taxiways are numbered sequentially.
Airport taxiway nomenclature can be very complex depending on the airport. Also, as modifications are made to the ramps and movement areas, etc., effectively designating taxi routes or other areas of the airport becomes challenging.
Finally, in the U.S., there is a taxiway numbering/nomenclature methodology that is framed within FAA guidance documents. A close comparison of the design guidance with current airport layouts and taxiway numbering/nomenclature not only illustrates the complexity involved but also reveals, in most cases, a consistency that can be relied upon and proves to be extremely useful in actual practice.
Excerpt from Engineering Brief 89 (two pages):
2
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. TaxiwayA
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway withZ
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).
– FreeMan
yesterday
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
In the U.S., taxiway number/nomenclature is generally designed in accordance with FAA AC 150/5340-18F. Also, Engineering Brief 89 available here clarifies some of the information in the AC with respect to taxiway numbering/nomenclature. The two pages shown below summarize the guidelines for numbering (from Engineering Brief 89)
Also, note the general taxiway numbering/nomenclature schema for Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX) illustrated on the bottom of this page. The letter "A" starts the taxiway nomenclature beginning on the south side of the airport and progresses alphabetically towards the northside of the airport. Intersecting taxiways are numbered sequentially.
Airport taxiway nomenclature can be very complex depending on the airport. Also, as modifications are made to the ramps and movement areas, etc., effectively designating taxi routes or other areas of the airport becomes challenging.
Finally, in the U.S., there is a taxiway numbering/nomenclature methodology that is framed within FAA guidance documents. A close comparison of the design guidance with current airport layouts and taxiway numbering/nomenclature not only illustrates the complexity involved but also reveals, in most cases, a consistency that can be relied upon and proves to be extremely useful in actual practice.
Excerpt from Engineering Brief 89 (two pages):
In the U.S., taxiway number/nomenclature is generally designed in accordance with FAA AC 150/5340-18F. Also, Engineering Brief 89 available here clarifies some of the information in the AC with respect to taxiway numbering/nomenclature. The two pages shown below summarize the guidelines for numbering (from Engineering Brief 89)
Also, note the general taxiway numbering/nomenclature schema for Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX) illustrated on the bottom of this page. The letter "A" starts the taxiway nomenclature beginning on the south side of the airport and progresses alphabetically towards the northside of the airport. Intersecting taxiways are numbered sequentially.
Airport taxiway nomenclature can be very complex depending on the airport. Also, as modifications are made to the ramps and movement areas, etc., effectively designating taxi routes or other areas of the airport becomes challenging.
Finally, in the U.S., there is a taxiway numbering/nomenclature methodology that is framed within FAA guidance documents. A close comparison of the design guidance with current airport layouts and taxiway numbering/nomenclature not only illustrates the complexity involved but also reveals, in most cases, a consistency that can be relied upon and proves to be extremely useful in actual practice.
Excerpt from Engineering Brief 89 (two pages):
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
757toga
6,9721538
6,9721538
2
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. TaxiwayA
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway withZ
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).
– FreeMan
yesterday
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. TaxiwayA
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway withZ
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).
– FreeMan
yesterday
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
2
2
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. Taxiway
A
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway with Z
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).– FreeMan
yesterday
So, while there is a very definite and logical scheme to naming taxiways at an airport, there is no consistent scheme across all airports as asked in the OP. i.e. Taxiway
A
is not always the eastern-/southern-most taxiway with Z
being the western-/northern-most (or something similar).– FreeMan
yesterday
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@FreeMan - you got me on that one. I guess doing research and finding info on U.S. standards, does not contribute to the OPs understanding of how (in the U.S.) the taxiway nomenclature is designed to work. By the way, the OP does not use the word "all" in his question. Perhaps illustrating how taxiways (in the U.S.) are named is non-responsive. Likely, hundreds of taxiways/airports in the U.S. are numbered using the AC 150/5340 criteria. Note - I limited my answer to U.S. airports. Rest assured that there is a basic scheme in place over most of the world. Best option - get an airport diagram.
– 757toga
16 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@757toga The problem is the standards don't really help. We know there will be some form of logic, but even your highlighted bit demonstrates that each airport authority can choose a different starting point. If A is North-West in one Airport, and South-East at another then that's not really useful for our purposes - and even that method isn't mandatory. And while OP didn't say All, the crux of the question is looking for something that can apply at all airports
– Dan
13 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@Dan - my comment was meant to contrast your "Not at all" statement and that each airport is '...free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways as it sees fit...' This is not the case in the U.S. as my references demonstrate. I'm not criticizing your answer but I disagree with most of what you say in your first paragraph and your subsequent examples are anecdotal and suggest there is no thought or design scheme in airport taxiway nomenclature. To think that it's even possible for all world-wide airports to start taxiway designations from a common geo location, for example, is a bit misinformed.
– 757toga
7 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
@757toga You seem to have a very odd take. The question is 'Are taxiways numbered in a predictable order?' and the answer is "No". You have absolutely no way of landing at any random airport in the world and taking even a guess at the taxiways. My answer also isn't US Centric and using two international airports by way of example is not "anecdotal". I didn't say there was no thought - I said an outsider couldn't accurately predict it
– Dan
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
5
down vote
Not at all - they'll be built-up in a logical fashion in so much as they're not just randomly assigned but there's no standard beyond the use of letters to denote taxiways and numbers to denote holds. Each airport is free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways and exits as it sees fit, and many will evolve and grow over time.
For example, at Birmingham International taxiway A (Alpha) takes you from the runway to an intersection with T (Tango) and D (Delta). Bravo is a small spur between the runway and Alpha and there is no Charlie.
At the other end of the runway is Echo and Sierra.
At London Gatwick, Alpha isn't even used on 26/08 - rather it's Juliet, Quebec Hotel and Golf. And neither runway has Echo or Sierra.
In short, there's no substitute for simply knowing (Through the use of chart or local knowledge), looking for signs for asking for a progressive taxi where the controller gives you step by step instructions.
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Not at all - they'll be built-up in a logical fashion in so much as they're not just randomly assigned but there's no standard beyond the use of letters to denote taxiways and numbers to denote holds. Each airport is free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways and exits as it sees fit, and many will evolve and grow over time.
For example, at Birmingham International taxiway A (Alpha) takes you from the runway to an intersection with T (Tango) and D (Delta). Bravo is a small spur between the runway and Alpha and there is no Charlie.
At the other end of the runway is Echo and Sierra.
At London Gatwick, Alpha isn't even used on 26/08 - rather it's Juliet, Quebec Hotel and Golf. And neither runway has Echo or Sierra.
In short, there's no substitute for simply knowing (Through the use of chart or local knowledge), looking for signs for asking for a progressive taxi where the controller gives you step by step instructions.
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Not at all - they'll be built-up in a logical fashion in so much as they're not just randomly assigned but there's no standard beyond the use of letters to denote taxiways and numbers to denote holds. Each airport is free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways and exits as it sees fit, and many will evolve and grow over time.
For example, at Birmingham International taxiway A (Alpha) takes you from the runway to an intersection with T (Tango) and D (Delta). Bravo is a small spur between the runway and Alpha and there is no Charlie.
At the other end of the runway is Echo and Sierra.
At London Gatwick, Alpha isn't even used on 26/08 - rather it's Juliet, Quebec Hotel and Golf. And neither runway has Echo or Sierra.
In short, there's no substitute for simply knowing (Through the use of chart or local knowledge), looking for signs for asking for a progressive taxi where the controller gives you step by step instructions.
Not at all - they'll be built-up in a logical fashion in so much as they're not just randomly assigned but there's no standard beyond the use of letters to denote taxiways and numbers to denote holds. Each airport is free to "make up" it's pattern of taxiways and exits as it sees fit, and many will evolve and grow over time.
For example, at Birmingham International taxiway A (Alpha) takes you from the runway to an intersection with T (Tango) and D (Delta). Bravo is a small spur between the runway and Alpha and there is no Charlie.
At the other end of the runway is Echo and Sierra.
At London Gatwick, Alpha isn't even used on 26/08 - rather it's Juliet, Quebec Hotel and Golf. And neither runway has Echo or Sierra.
In short, there's no substitute for simply knowing (Through the use of chart or local knowledge), looking for signs for asking for a progressive taxi where the controller gives you step by step instructions.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Dan
4,45611642
4,45611642
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
Evolving is a good point. There may have been some logical plan when the airport was first built, but reconstruction over the decades may have rendered it almost unrecognizeable.
– Stephen Sprunk
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57162%2fare-taxiways-numbered-in-a-predictable-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown