How do I deal with null and duplicate values in a Java 8 Comparator?
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
I have a Photo object:
public class Photo {
@Id
private String id;
private LocalDateTime created;
private Integer poNumber;
}
poNumber can be null for some photos or all photos in a set. I want to sort a set of photos according to poNumber, so that the lowest poNumber appears first in the sorted set. poNumber may also be duplicated in the set. If poNumber is duplicated then sort according to created (earliest created photo appears first). If poNumber is null then sort according to created.
I tried the below code:
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
for (Photo photo : unOrderedPhotos) {
orderedPhotos.add(photo);
}
But it throws a NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then it works fine. How can I solve this issue?
java java-8 comparator
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
I have a Photo object:
public class Photo {
@Id
private String id;
private LocalDateTime created;
private Integer poNumber;
}
poNumber can be null for some photos or all photos in a set. I want to sort a set of photos according to poNumber, so that the lowest poNumber appears first in the sorted set. poNumber may also be duplicated in the set. If poNumber is duplicated then sort according to created (earliest created photo appears first). If poNumber is null then sort according to created.
I tried the below code:
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
for (Photo photo : unOrderedPhotos) {
orderedPhotos.add(photo);
}
But it throws a NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then it works fine. How can I solve this issue?
java java-8 comparator
1
Where should elements withpoNumber = nullgo? After or before the elements with a non-null value in that field?
– Federico Peralta Schaffner
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
I have a Photo object:
public class Photo {
@Id
private String id;
private LocalDateTime created;
private Integer poNumber;
}
poNumber can be null for some photos or all photos in a set. I want to sort a set of photos according to poNumber, so that the lowest poNumber appears first in the sorted set. poNumber may also be duplicated in the set. If poNumber is duplicated then sort according to created (earliest created photo appears first). If poNumber is null then sort according to created.
I tried the below code:
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
for (Photo photo : unOrderedPhotos) {
orderedPhotos.add(photo);
}
But it throws a NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then it works fine. How can I solve this issue?
java java-8 comparator
I have a Photo object:
public class Photo {
@Id
private String id;
private LocalDateTime created;
private Integer poNumber;
}
poNumber can be null for some photos or all photos in a set. I want to sort a set of photos according to poNumber, so that the lowest poNumber appears first in the sorted set. poNumber may also be duplicated in the set. If poNumber is duplicated then sort according to created (earliest created photo appears first). If poNumber is null then sort according to created.
I tried the below code:
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
for (Photo photo : unOrderedPhotos) {
orderedPhotos.add(photo);
}
But it throws a NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then it works fine. How can I solve this issue?
java java-8 comparator
java java-8 comparator
edited 9 hours ago
Boann
36.5k1286119
36.5k1286119
asked yesterday
ace
5,9922674128
5,9922674128
1
Where should elements withpoNumber = nullgo? After or before the elements with a non-null value in that field?
– Federico Peralta Schaffner
23 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Where should elements withpoNumber = nullgo? After or before the elements with a non-null value in that field?
– Federico Peralta Schaffner
23 hours ago
1
1
Where should elements with
poNumber = null go? After or before the elements with a non-null value in that field?– Federico Peralta Schaffner
23 hours ago
Where should elements with
poNumber = null go? After or before the elements with a non-null value in that field?– Federico Peralta Schaffner
23 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use a two-argument Comparator.comparing overload, for example:
import static java.util.Comparator.*; // for the sake of brevity
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, nullsFirst(naturalOrder()))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
We need a solution which turns the Function<> to a Comparator, but in a way which adds the said null checking to the chain.
And that's where Oleksandr's answer enters the scene: it creates a Comparator which maps the compared Photo to comparing of Integers, and then adds a Comparator which naturally orders these Integers with the nulls first:
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.naturalOrder()))
And this comparator is then chained (for the case of equality) with another comparator which considers the creation date.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The way you have written it, the Photo key could be null but nothing else.
Comparator.nullsFirst( // Photo could be null.
Comparator.comparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getPoNumber)) // poNumber could be null.
.thenComparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getCreated))) // created could be null
If any of these can't be null you can remove the Comparator.nullsFirst
4
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention ofcreatedbeing able to be null.
– glglgl
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This will put null values at the beginning
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : poNumber };
This will put null values at the end
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MAX_VALUE: poNumber };
Otherwise, implement your own comparator to handle the null values
I dislikeIntegerso would returnintin this case. ;)
– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use a two-argument Comparator.comparing overload, for example:
import static java.util.Comparator.*; // for the sake of brevity
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, nullsFirst(naturalOrder()))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use a two-argument Comparator.comparing overload, for example:
import static java.util.Comparator.*; // for the sake of brevity
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, nullsFirst(naturalOrder()))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use a two-argument Comparator.comparing overload, for example:
import static java.util.Comparator.*; // for the sake of brevity
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, nullsFirst(naturalOrder()))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
You can use a two-argument Comparator.comparing overload, for example:
import static java.util.Comparator.*; // for the sake of brevity
Set<Photo> orderedPhotos = new TreeSet<>(
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, nullsFirst(naturalOrder()))
.thenComparing(Photo::getCreated));
edited 15 hours ago
answered yesterday
Oleksandr
7,72543467
7,72543467
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
We need a solution which turns the Function<> to a Comparator, but in a way which adds the said null checking to the chain.
And that's where Oleksandr's answer enters the scene: it creates a Comparator which maps the compared Photo to comparing of Integers, and then adds a Comparator which naturally orders these Integers with the nulls first:
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.naturalOrder()))
And this comparator is then chained (for the case of equality) with another comparator which considers the creation date.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
We need a solution which turns the Function<> to a Comparator, but in a way which adds the said null checking to the chain.
And that's where Oleksandr's answer enters the scene: it creates a Comparator which maps the compared Photo to comparing of Integers, and then adds a Comparator which naturally orders these Integers with the nulls first:
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.naturalOrder()))
And this comparator is then chained (for the case of equality) with another comparator which considers the creation date.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
We need a solution which turns the Function<> to a Comparator, but in a way which adds the said null checking to the chain.
And that's where Oleksandr's answer enters the scene: it creates a Comparator which maps the compared Photo to comparing of Integers, and then adds a Comparator which naturally orders these Integers with the nulls first:
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.naturalOrder()))
And this comparator is then chained (for the case of equality) with another comparator which considers the creation date.
We need a solution which turns the Function<> to a Comparator, but in a way which adds the said null checking to the chain.
And that's where Oleksandr's answer enters the scene: it creates a Comparator which maps the compared Photo to comparing of Integers, and then adds a Comparator which naturally orders these Integers with the nulls first:
Comparator.comparing(Photo::getPoNumber, Comparator.nullsFirst(Comparator.naturalOrder()))
And this comparator is then chained (for the case of equality) with another comparator which considers the creation date.
edited 19 hours ago
community wiki
4 revs, 2 users 65%
glglgl
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The way you have written it, the Photo key could be null but nothing else.
Comparator.nullsFirst( // Photo could be null.
Comparator.comparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getPoNumber)) // poNumber could be null.
.thenComparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getCreated))) // created could be null
If any of these can't be null you can remove the Comparator.nullsFirst
4
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention ofcreatedbeing able to be null.
– glglgl
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The way you have written it, the Photo key could be null but nothing else.
Comparator.nullsFirst( // Photo could be null.
Comparator.comparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getPoNumber)) // poNumber could be null.
.thenComparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getCreated))) // created could be null
If any of these can't be null you can remove the Comparator.nullsFirst
4
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention ofcreatedbeing able to be null.
– glglgl
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The way you have written it, the Photo key could be null but nothing else.
Comparator.nullsFirst( // Photo could be null.
Comparator.comparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getPoNumber)) // poNumber could be null.
.thenComparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getCreated))) // created could be null
If any of these can't be null you can remove the Comparator.nullsFirst
The way you have written it, the Photo key could be null but nothing else.
Comparator.nullsFirst( // Photo could be null.
Comparator.comparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getPoNumber)) // poNumber could be null.
.thenComparing(Comparator.nullsFirst(Photo::getCreated))) // created could be null
If any of these can't be null you can remove the Comparator.nullsFirst
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Peter Lawrey
436k55548945
436k55548945
4
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention ofcreatedbeing able to be null.
– glglgl
yesterday
add a comment |
4
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention ofcreatedbeing able to be null.
– glglgl
yesterday
4
4
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention of
created being able to be null.– glglgl
yesterday
"But it throws NullPointerException whenever poNumber is null. If poNumber is not null then works fine." There is no mention of
created being able to be null.– glglgl
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This will put null values at the beginning
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : poNumber };
This will put null values at the end
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MAX_VALUE: poNumber };
Otherwise, implement your own comparator to handle the null values
I dislikeIntegerso would returnintin this case. ;)
– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This will put null values at the beginning
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : poNumber };
This will put null values at the end
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MAX_VALUE: poNumber };
Otherwise, implement your own comparator to handle the null values
I dislikeIntegerso would returnintin this case. ;)
– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This will put null values at the beginning
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : poNumber };
This will put null values at the end
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MAX_VALUE: poNumber };
Otherwise, implement your own comparator to handle the null values
This will put null values at the beginning
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : poNumber };
This will put null values at the end
Integer getPoNumber() { return poNumber == null ? Integer.MAX_VALUE: poNumber };
Otherwise, implement your own comparator to handle the null values
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Joseph D
374110
374110
I dislikeIntegerso would returnintin this case. ;)
– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
add a comment |
I dislikeIntegerso would returnintin this case. ;)
– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
I dislike
Integer so would return int in this case. ;)– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
I dislike
Integer so would return int in this case. ;)– Peter Lawrey
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
Its what he's using, but yeah... @ace , Integer.intValue();
– Joseph D
yesterday
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337345%2fhow-do-i-deal-with-null-and-duplicate-values-in-a-java-8-comparator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Where should elements with
poNumber = nullgo? After or before the elements with a non-null value in that field?– Federico Peralta Schaffner
23 hours ago