Mac OS X: conventional places where binary files should live
up vote
47
down vote
favorite
I've downloaded an application that is a command-line application, and want to put it somewhere where I can run it from the command-line without having to type the path explicitly.
What are the conventional paths used for something like this?
/usr/bin
? Are there different options, one if I want it for all users, and one if I want it for just a particular user, like my administrator account?Or should I put it in its own directory under the Applications directory, and add it to the path? If so, which file controls where the path is set?
macos terminal shell path
add a comment |
up vote
47
down vote
favorite
I've downloaded an application that is a command-line application, and want to put it somewhere where I can run it from the command-line without having to type the path explicitly.
What are the conventional paths used for something like this?
/usr/bin
? Are there different options, one if I want it for all users, and one if I want it for just a particular user, like my administrator account?Or should I put it in its own directory under the Applications directory, and add it to the path? If so, which file controls where the path is set?
macos terminal shell path
add a comment |
up vote
47
down vote
favorite
up vote
47
down vote
favorite
I've downloaded an application that is a command-line application, and want to put it somewhere where I can run it from the command-line without having to type the path explicitly.
What are the conventional paths used for something like this?
/usr/bin
? Are there different options, one if I want it for all users, and one if I want it for just a particular user, like my administrator account?Or should I put it in its own directory under the Applications directory, and add it to the path? If so, which file controls where the path is set?
macos terminal shell path
I've downloaded an application that is a command-line application, and want to put it somewhere where I can run it from the command-line without having to type the path explicitly.
What are the conventional paths used for something like this?
/usr/bin
? Are there different options, one if I want it for all users, and one if I want it for just a particular user, like my administrator account?Or should I put it in its own directory under the Applications directory, and add it to the path? If so, which file controls where the path is set?
macos terminal shell path
macos terminal shell path
edited Nov 14 '15 at 4:00
Peter Mortensen
8,326166184
8,326166184
asked Jul 17 '09 at 14:44
Jason S
2,863115173
2,863115173
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
38
down vote
accepted
Core answer: you probably want /usr/local/bin
. Depending on how recent your macOS is, you may need to update your default $PATH
. See below for further details.
UPDATE 12-01-2018 At some point since I wrote my original answer, Apple changed its default $PATH
. As a result, a lot of what I say below is irrelevant to recent Macs. If you type echo $PATH
in a terminal, and /usr/local/bin
is first, then you can ignore everything below about changing your $PATH
.
Original answer
Macs are unusual in this regard. The default $PATH
variable for a regular user looks like this:
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
By putting /usr/local/bin
after /usr/bin
and /bin
, Mac upends the usual system. Normally, you can put something into /usr/local/bin
(say a second Perl interpreter, compiled in some non-standard way), and then a regular user will hit the custom one rather than the system-wide one first. This is good. Users can get variants, but the system stays pure. Given Apple’s default $PATH
, however, items in /usr/bin
or /bin
will get found before anything in /usr/local/bin
. (This basically defeats the purpose of installing, e.g., the custom Perl in /usr/local/bin
.)
To fix this, you can change the regular user's $PATH
by editing the .profile
file in the user's home directory. (That file may not exist, if you have a brand-new install. In that case, create it.)
Semi-related: Homebrew provides excellent package management for Macs. By default, Homebrew installs software into /usr/local
, but it does so in a way that makes it very easy to remove things and return to a vanilla state later.
1
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
1
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
/usr/local/bin
and /usr/local/sbin
are well worth adding to your path, as a lot of makefiles for source builds are defaulted to install there.
If you use MacPorts, it's worth adding /opt/local/bin
and /opt/local/sbin
as well.
The best way to do this is to add
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
to the .bashrc
file in your home directory (which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this), or, if you want to change the system wide path, add the same line to /etc/bashrc
(not hidden), but you will need to sudo
to do this.
If you don't have a .bashrc
in any user's home, you can make one and add this line to it, but remember to change the permissions on the file you create to make it readable by the user in question (obviously not relevant if you're doing it for your own profile).
The $PATH
at the end appends the system default path to whatever you put before. Note that the system searches for binaries in the order of paths given, so if you install a binary in /usr/local
or /opt/local
that is also installed by default on the system, the versions you install will be found first, which can (though rarely) upset things. It is worth watching out for.
Good information is here.
I should note that the above assumes you are using Bash for the shell, which is the default on Mac OS X v10.4 (Tiger) and Mac OS X v10.5 (Leopard), but not on earlier systems, which used tcsh
instead, which has a different syntax.
I hope that helps...
1
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X$PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).
– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
1
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
No such thing as a dumb question: use theopen
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
I tend to go with /usr/local
. Here's a nice explanation why, which refers to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS)., which in turn says about /usr/local
:
Tertiary hierarchy for local data, specific to this host. Typically
has further subdirectories, e.g., bin, lib, share.
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
1
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f7150%2fmac-os-x-conventional-places-where-binary-files-should-live%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
38
down vote
accepted
Core answer: you probably want /usr/local/bin
. Depending on how recent your macOS is, you may need to update your default $PATH
. See below for further details.
UPDATE 12-01-2018 At some point since I wrote my original answer, Apple changed its default $PATH
. As a result, a lot of what I say below is irrelevant to recent Macs. If you type echo $PATH
in a terminal, and /usr/local/bin
is first, then you can ignore everything below about changing your $PATH
.
Original answer
Macs are unusual in this regard. The default $PATH
variable for a regular user looks like this:
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
By putting /usr/local/bin
after /usr/bin
and /bin
, Mac upends the usual system. Normally, you can put something into /usr/local/bin
(say a second Perl interpreter, compiled in some non-standard way), and then a regular user will hit the custom one rather than the system-wide one first. This is good. Users can get variants, but the system stays pure. Given Apple’s default $PATH
, however, items in /usr/bin
or /bin
will get found before anything in /usr/local/bin
. (This basically defeats the purpose of installing, e.g., the custom Perl in /usr/local/bin
.)
To fix this, you can change the regular user's $PATH
by editing the .profile
file in the user's home directory. (That file may not exist, if you have a brand-new install. In that case, create it.)
Semi-related: Homebrew provides excellent package management for Macs. By default, Homebrew installs software into /usr/local
, but it does so in a way that makes it very easy to remove things and return to a vanilla state later.
1
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
1
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
add a comment |
up vote
38
down vote
accepted
Core answer: you probably want /usr/local/bin
. Depending on how recent your macOS is, you may need to update your default $PATH
. See below for further details.
UPDATE 12-01-2018 At some point since I wrote my original answer, Apple changed its default $PATH
. As a result, a lot of what I say below is irrelevant to recent Macs. If you type echo $PATH
in a terminal, and /usr/local/bin
is first, then you can ignore everything below about changing your $PATH
.
Original answer
Macs are unusual in this regard. The default $PATH
variable for a regular user looks like this:
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
By putting /usr/local/bin
after /usr/bin
and /bin
, Mac upends the usual system. Normally, you can put something into /usr/local/bin
(say a second Perl interpreter, compiled in some non-standard way), and then a regular user will hit the custom one rather than the system-wide one first. This is good. Users can get variants, but the system stays pure. Given Apple’s default $PATH
, however, items in /usr/bin
or /bin
will get found before anything in /usr/local/bin
. (This basically defeats the purpose of installing, e.g., the custom Perl in /usr/local/bin
.)
To fix this, you can change the regular user's $PATH
by editing the .profile
file in the user's home directory. (That file may not exist, if you have a brand-new install. In that case, create it.)
Semi-related: Homebrew provides excellent package management for Macs. By default, Homebrew installs software into /usr/local
, but it does so in a way that makes it very easy to remove things and return to a vanilla state later.
1
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
1
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
add a comment |
up vote
38
down vote
accepted
up vote
38
down vote
accepted
Core answer: you probably want /usr/local/bin
. Depending on how recent your macOS is, you may need to update your default $PATH
. See below for further details.
UPDATE 12-01-2018 At some point since I wrote my original answer, Apple changed its default $PATH
. As a result, a lot of what I say below is irrelevant to recent Macs. If you type echo $PATH
in a terminal, and /usr/local/bin
is first, then you can ignore everything below about changing your $PATH
.
Original answer
Macs are unusual in this regard. The default $PATH
variable for a regular user looks like this:
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
By putting /usr/local/bin
after /usr/bin
and /bin
, Mac upends the usual system. Normally, you can put something into /usr/local/bin
(say a second Perl interpreter, compiled in some non-standard way), and then a regular user will hit the custom one rather than the system-wide one first. This is good. Users can get variants, but the system stays pure. Given Apple’s default $PATH
, however, items in /usr/bin
or /bin
will get found before anything in /usr/local/bin
. (This basically defeats the purpose of installing, e.g., the custom Perl in /usr/local/bin
.)
To fix this, you can change the regular user's $PATH
by editing the .profile
file in the user's home directory. (That file may not exist, if you have a brand-new install. In that case, create it.)
Semi-related: Homebrew provides excellent package management for Macs. By default, Homebrew installs software into /usr/local
, but it does so in a way that makes it very easy to remove things and return to a vanilla state later.
Core answer: you probably want /usr/local/bin
. Depending on how recent your macOS is, you may need to update your default $PATH
. See below for further details.
UPDATE 12-01-2018 At some point since I wrote my original answer, Apple changed its default $PATH
. As a result, a lot of what I say below is irrelevant to recent Macs. If you type echo $PATH
in a terminal, and /usr/local/bin
is first, then you can ignore everything below about changing your $PATH
.
Original answer
Macs are unusual in this regard. The default $PATH
variable for a regular user looks like this:
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
By putting /usr/local/bin
after /usr/bin
and /bin
, Mac upends the usual system. Normally, you can put something into /usr/local/bin
(say a second Perl interpreter, compiled in some non-standard way), and then a regular user will hit the custom one rather than the system-wide one first. This is good. Users can get variants, but the system stays pure. Given Apple’s default $PATH
, however, items in /usr/bin
or /bin
will get found before anything in /usr/local/bin
. (This basically defeats the purpose of installing, e.g., the custom Perl in /usr/local/bin
.)
To fix this, you can change the regular user's $PATH
by editing the .profile
file in the user's home directory. (That file may not exist, if you have a brand-new install. In that case, create it.)
Semi-related: Homebrew provides excellent package management for Macs. By default, Homebrew installs software into /usr/local
, but it does so in a way that makes it very easy to remove things and return to a vanilla state later.
edited Dec 1 at 15:53
answered Jul 17 '09 at 14:55
Telemachus
5,1652030
5,1652030
1
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
1
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
add a comment |
1
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
1
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
1
1
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
On my freshly installed OsX 10.13.6 (High Sierra), the path does contain /usr/local/bin first (even though the folder doesn't even exist) by default.
– Legolas
Nov 30 at 15:15
1
1
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
@Legolas Apple appears to have changed how they handle this. I'll edit the post.
– Telemachus
Dec 1 at 15:21
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
/usr/local/bin
and /usr/local/sbin
are well worth adding to your path, as a lot of makefiles for source builds are defaulted to install there.
If you use MacPorts, it's worth adding /opt/local/bin
and /opt/local/sbin
as well.
The best way to do this is to add
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
to the .bashrc
file in your home directory (which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this), or, if you want to change the system wide path, add the same line to /etc/bashrc
(not hidden), but you will need to sudo
to do this.
If you don't have a .bashrc
in any user's home, you can make one and add this line to it, but remember to change the permissions on the file you create to make it readable by the user in question (obviously not relevant if you're doing it for your own profile).
The $PATH
at the end appends the system default path to whatever you put before. Note that the system searches for binaries in the order of paths given, so if you install a binary in /usr/local
or /opt/local
that is also installed by default on the system, the versions you install will be found first, which can (though rarely) upset things. It is worth watching out for.
Good information is here.
I should note that the above assumes you are using Bash for the shell, which is the default on Mac OS X v10.4 (Tiger) and Mac OS X v10.5 (Leopard), but not on earlier systems, which used tcsh
instead, which has a different syntax.
I hope that helps...
1
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X$PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).
– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
1
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
No such thing as a dumb question: use theopen
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
/usr/local/bin
and /usr/local/sbin
are well worth adding to your path, as a lot of makefiles for source builds are defaulted to install there.
If you use MacPorts, it's worth adding /opt/local/bin
and /opt/local/sbin
as well.
The best way to do this is to add
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
to the .bashrc
file in your home directory (which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this), or, if you want to change the system wide path, add the same line to /etc/bashrc
(not hidden), but you will need to sudo
to do this.
If you don't have a .bashrc
in any user's home, you can make one and add this line to it, but remember to change the permissions on the file you create to make it readable by the user in question (obviously not relevant if you're doing it for your own profile).
The $PATH
at the end appends the system default path to whatever you put before. Note that the system searches for binaries in the order of paths given, so if you install a binary in /usr/local
or /opt/local
that is also installed by default on the system, the versions you install will be found first, which can (though rarely) upset things. It is worth watching out for.
Good information is here.
I should note that the above assumes you are using Bash for the shell, which is the default on Mac OS X v10.4 (Tiger) and Mac OS X v10.5 (Leopard), but not on earlier systems, which used tcsh
instead, which has a different syntax.
I hope that helps...
1
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X$PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).
– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
1
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
No such thing as a dumb question: use theopen
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
/usr/local/bin
and /usr/local/sbin
are well worth adding to your path, as a lot of makefiles for source builds are defaulted to install there.
If you use MacPorts, it's worth adding /opt/local/bin
and /opt/local/sbin
as well.
The best way to do this is to add
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
to the .bashrc
file in your home directory (which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this), or, if you want to change the system wide path, add the same line to /etc/bashrc
(not hidden), but you will need to sudo
to do this.
If you don't have a .bashrc
in any user's home, you can make one and add this line to it, but remember to change the permissions on the file you create to make it readable by the user in question (obviously not relevant if you're doing it for your own profile).
The $PATH
at the end appends the system default path to whatever you put before. Note that the system searches for binaries in the order of paths given, so if you install a binary in /usr/local
or /opt/local
that is also installed by default on the system, the versions you install will be found first, which can (though rarely) upset things. It is worth watching out for.
Good information is here.
I should note that the above assumes you are using Bash for the shell, which is the default on Mac OS X v10.4 (Tiger) and Mac OS X v10.5 (Leopard), but not on earlier systems, which used tcsh
instead, which has a different syntax.
I hope that helps...
/usr/local/bin
and /usr/local/sbin
are well worth adding to your path, as a lot of makefiles for source builds are defaulted to install there.
If you use MacPorts, it's worth adding /opt/local/bin
and /opt/local/sbin
as well.
The best way to do this is to add
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
to the .bashrc
file in your home directory (which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this), or, if you want to change the system wide path, add the same line to /etc/bashrc
(not hidden), but you will need to sudo
to do this.
If you don't have a .bashrc
in any user's home, you can make one and add this line to it, but remember to change the permissions on the file you create to make it readable by the user in question (obviously not relevant if you're doing it for your own profile).
The $PATH
at the end appends the system default path to whatever you put before. Note that the system searches for binaries in the order of paths given, so if you install a binary in /usr/local
or /opt/local
that is also installed by default on the system, the versions you install will be found first, which can (though rarely) upset things. It is worth watching out for.
Good information is here.
I should note that the above assumes you are using Bash for the shell, which is the default on Mac OS X v10.4 (Tiger) and Mac OS X v10.5 (Leopard), but not on earlier systems, which used tcsh
instead, which has a different syntax.
I hope that helps...
edited Nov 14 '15 at 4:05
Peter Mortensen
8,326166184
8,326166184
answered Jul 17 '09 at 15:10
avstrallen
52047
52047
1
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X$PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).
– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
1
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
No such thing as a dumb question: use theopen
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
1
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X$PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).
– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
1
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
No such thing as a dumb question: use theopen
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
1
1
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X $PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
/usr/local/bin
is already in a default OS X $PATH
(though too late - see my answer). If you use MacPorts, its installer should edit your path as necessary - at least it always has in my experience. That said, it's good for users to know what it's doing (and why).– Telemachus
Jul 17 '09 at 15:13
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
well spotted @Telemachus: whenever I build a Mac for myself, I customise the hell out of the path first thing, so I can never remember what's standard and what's mine!
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:15
1
1
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
I know what you're daying about the MacPorts installer customising the paths in .profile, but I have had an occasion in the past when for some reason, I know not what, this failed to stick (which confused the hell out of me for quite a while!)... so since then I tend to wire it in by hand...
– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:18
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
"which is hidden, so the CLI is the best way to to do this": dumb question, how do you run TextEdit on a file from the command prompt?
– Jason S
Jul 17 '09 at 15:32
No such thing as a dumb question: use the
open
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
No such thing as a dumb question: use the
open
command with the filename as an argument and it should open with whatever is set as the default text editor (TextEdit as standard).– avstrallen
Jul 17 '09 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
I tend to go with /usr/local
. Here's a nice explanation why, which refers to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS)., which in turn says about /usr/local
:
Tertiary hierarchy for local data, specific to this host. Typically
has further subdirectories, e.g., bin, lib, share.
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
1
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
I tend to go with /usr/local
. Here's a nice explanation why, which refers to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS)., which in turn says about /usr/local
:
Tertiary hierarchy for local data, specific to this host. Typically
has further subdirectories, e.g., bin, lib, share.
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
1
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
I tend to go with /usr/local
. Here's a nice explanation why, which refers to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS)., which in turn says about /usr/local
:
Tertiary hierarchy for local data, specific to this host. Typically
has further subdirectories, e.g., bin, lib, share.
I tend to go with /usr/local
. Here's a nice explanation why, which refers to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS)., which in turn says about /usr/local
:
Tertiary hierarchy for local data, specific to this host. Typically
has further subdirectories, e.g., bin, lib, share.
edited Nov 30 at 15:49
Legolas
375311
375311
answered Jul 17 '09 at 14:47
John Topley
68331322
68331322
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
1
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
add a comment |
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
1
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
Yep, it's pretty much the same as other *nix operating systems in that regard.
– jtbandes
Jul 24 '09 at 17:29
1
1
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
Please quote the essential parts of the answer from the reference link(s), as the answer can become invalid if the linked page(s) change.
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 15 '16 at 11:53
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f7150%2fmac-os-x-conventional-places-where-binary-files-should-live%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown