Can't show equation tag properly












2














begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}


I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:



enter image description here



The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:57












  • It worked, thank you!
    – HankY
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:08










  • You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:11
















2














begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}


I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:



enter image description here



The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:57












  • It worked, thank you!
    – HankY
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:08










  • You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:11














2












2








2







begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}


I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:



enter image description here



The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}


I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:



enter image description here



The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)







tags






share|improve this question









New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Werner

437k649591650




437k649591650






New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 30 '18 at 2:52









HankY

111




111




New contributor




HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:57












  • It worked, thank you!
    – HankY
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:08










  • You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:11














  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:57












  • It worked, thank you!
    – HankY
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:08










  • You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.
    – marmot
    Dec 30 '18 at 3:11








1




1




Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.
– marmot
Dec 30 '18 at 2:57






Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.
– marmot
Dec 30 '18 at 2:57














It worked, thank you!
– HankY
Dec 30 '18 at 3:08




It worked, thank you!
– HankY
Dec 30 '18 at 3:08












You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.
– marmot
Dec 30 '18 at 3:11




You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.
– marmot
Dec 30 '18 at 3:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.



In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{
substack
{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
}
}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
$(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467870%2fcant-show-equation-tag-properly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.



    In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

    begin{document}

    begin{align*}
    sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
    sum_{
    substack
    { k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
    k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
    }
    }
    = sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
    end{align*}
    which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
    1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
    $(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots

    end{document}





    share|improve this answer


























      3














      tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.



      In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:



      enter image description here



      documentclass{article}

      usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

      begin{document}

      begin{align*}
      sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
      sum_{
      substack
      { k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
      k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
      }
      }
      = sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
      end{align*}
      which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
      1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
      $(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots

      end{document}





      share|improve this answer
























        3












        3








        3






        tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.



        In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}

        usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

        begin{document}

        begin{align*}
        sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
        sum_{
        substack
        { k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
        k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
        }
        }
        = sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
        end{align*}
        which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
        1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
        $(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots

        end{document}





        share|improve this answer












        tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.



        In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}

        usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

        begin{document}

        begin{align*}
        sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
        sum_{
        substack
        { k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
        k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
        }
        }
        = sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
        end{align*}
        which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
        1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
        $(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots

        end{document}






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Werner

        437k649591650




        437k649591650






















            HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467870%2fcant-show-equation-tag-properly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?