What's missing in this development board? [on hold]












2














I came across an old development board with an ATMEL ATMEGA8A-PU . I am not an expert but I want to use this board. But something is missing in this board as seen in this photo:



ATMEL development board with a missing part






microcontroller atmel







share|improve this question









New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Nick Alexeev♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Schematic is missing.
    – Nick Alexeev♦
    2 days ago
















2














I came across an old development board with an ATMEL ATMEGA8A-PU . I am not an expert but I want to use this board. But something is missing in this board as seen in this photo:



ATMEL development board with a missing part






microcontroller atmel







share|improve this question









New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Nick Alexeev♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Schematic is missing.
    – Nick Alexeev♦
    2 days ago














2












2








2







I came across an old development board with an ATMEL ATMEGA8A-PU . I am not an expert but I want to use this board. But something is missing in this board as seen in this photo:



ATMEL development board with a missing part






microcontroller atmel







share|improve this question









New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I came across an old development board with an ATMEL ATMEGA8A-PU . I am not an expert but I want to use this board. But something is missing in this board as seen in this photo:



ATMEL development board with a missing part






microcontroller atmel




microcontroller atmel






share|improve this question









New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Dave Tweed♦

117k9145256




117k9145256






New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Aashish Loknath Panigrahi

1164




1164




New contributor




Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Aashish Loknath Panigrahi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Nick Alexeev♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Nick Alexeev♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Schematic is missing.
    – Nick Alexeev♦
    2 days ago


















  • Schematic is missing.
    – Nick Alexeev♦
    2 days ago
















Schematic is missing.
– Nick Alexeev♦
2 days ago




Schematic is missing.
– Nick Alexeev♦
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















11














It is max232 ic.



Which is used to convert the signals from the RS232 serial port to the proper signal which are used in the TTL compatible digital logic circuits.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
    – Unimportant
    2 days ago






  • 5




    To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
    – Michael
    2 days ago






  • 1




    yes.. Michael is right...
    – Satish Singupuram
    2 days ago


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11














It is max232 ic.



Which is used to convert the signals from the RS232 serial port to the proper signal which are used in the TTL compatible digital logic circuits.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
    – Unimportant
    2 days ago






  • 5




    To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
    – Michael
    2 days ago






  • 1




    yes.. Michael is right...
    – Satish Singupuram
    2 days ago
















11














It is max232 ic.



Which is used to convert the signals from the RS232 serial port to the proper signal which are used in the TTL compatible digital logic circuits.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
    – Unimportant
    2 days ago






  • 5




    To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
    – Michael
    2 days ago






  • 1




    yes.. Michael is right...
    – Satish Singupuram
    2 days ago














11












11








11






It is max232 ic.



Which is used to convert the signals from the RS232 serial port to the proper signal which are used in the TTL compatible digital logic circuits.






share|improve this answer












It is max232 ic.



Which is used to convert the signals from the RS232 serial port to the proper signal which are used in the TTL compatible digital logic circuits.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Satish Singupuram

955111




955111








  • 1




    Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
    – Unimportant
    2 days ago






  • 5




    To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
    – Michael
    2 days ago






  • 1




    yes.. Michael is right...
    – Satish Singupuram
    2 days ago














  • 1




    Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
    – Unimportant
    2 days ago






  • 5




    To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
    – Michael
    2 days ago






  • 1




    yes.. Michael is right...
    – Satish Singupuram
    2 days ago








1




1




Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
– Unimportant
2 days ago




Yes, one can even see "MAX" on the silkscreen in the hole in the socket.
– Unimportant
2 days ago




5




5




To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
– Michael
2 days ago




To add: The board should work without it, you only need it if you want to communicate over the RS232.
– Michael
2 days ago




1




1




yes.. Michael is right...
– Satish Singupuram
2 days ago




yes.. Michael is right...
– Satish Singupuram
2 days ago



-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness. ...
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout ...
Read more

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 17 1 Today, I found myself discussing what students should have "under their belts" during a lecture, and I wondered to myself if there was some inappropriate undertone here that I might be unaware of. Question : What is the origin of the phrase "under your belt"? A google search revealed some webpages (e.g. [1]) that assert its origin is related to consumption of food -- once a meal has been eaten, it's under your belt (which is a relief). However, with such websites, I have no way to determine fact from "random guy on the internet making stuff up". etymology idioms ...
Read more