Is it unethical to use healthcare paid by your company to cure a life-long health problem?
Background info:
I was born with a small defect in my eyes that requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of personal or professional task. I've used glasses since my early childhood.
While this is a bit problematic, I never had any issues with wearing glasses. I even like to wear them, they're part of me by now.
Fast forward to my adulthood. I joined a company that offers a nice healthcare package for almost free (I contribute with 1% of my monthly income) but basically never use it, since I rarely have any health problem at all.
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes. It is not that expensive, but is also not that cheap. Since then I've been wondering if I should use the benefits of the healthcare to finally fix my eyes or not?
Additional info: If I had to pay from my own funds, I probably wouldn't start treatment: wearing glasses is not a burden to me.
Question: In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
ethics health brazil
New contributor
|
show 9 more comments
Background info:
I was born with a small defect in my eyes that requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of personal or professional task. I've used glasses since my early childhood.
While this is a bit problematic, I never had any issues with wearing glasses. I even like to wear them, they're part of me by now.
Fast forward to my adulthood. I joined a company that offers a nice healthcare package for almost free (I contribute with 1% of my monthly income) but basically never use it, since I rarely have any health problem at all.
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes. It is not that expensive, but is also not that cheap. Since then I've been wondering if I should use the benefits of the healthcare to finally fix my eyes or not?
Additional info: If I had to pay from my own funds, I probably wouldn't start treatment: wearing glasses is not a burden to me.
Question: In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
ethics health brazil
New contributor
48
I feel the real dilemma should be about the actual health risks of having the unneeded operation VS not having it if it's not already inconveniencing you.
– Gabriel C.
yesterday
80
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes.
Why would it be unethical to use a part of the policy that is provided to you? If the company didn't want to cover employees that got such an operation, the company wouldn't have included it.
– kolsyra
yesterday
8
Does your health plan also cover the cost of glasses? If you stay with the company long enough, getting your eyes fixed might actually be less costly than buying glasses periodically.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
3
I agree 100% with motosubatsu's excellent answer, but wanted to clarify: is this procedure covered by your insurance on an elective basis? From what you've described it sounds like it does, but that's the sort of thing worth triple-checking before scheduling appointments with doctors.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
8
....................... of course you can. That's... that's what health insurance is for.
– only_pro
10 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
Background info:
I was born with a small defect in my eyes that requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of personal or professional task. I've used glasses since my early childhood.
While this is a bit problematic, I never had any issues with wearing glasses. I even like to wear them, they're part of me by now.
Fast forward to my adulthood. I joined a company that offers a nice healthcare package for almost free (I contribute with 1% of my monthly income) but basically never use it, since I rarely have any health problem at all.
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes. It is not that expensive, but is also not that cheap. Since then I've been wondering if I should use the benefits of the healthcare to finally fix my eyes or not?
Additional info: If I had to pay from my own funds, I probably wouldn't start treatment: wearing glasses is not a burden to me.
Question: In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
ethics health brazil
New contributor
Background info:
I was born with a small defect in my eyes that requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of personal or professional task. I've used glasses since my early childhood.
While this is a bit problematic, I never had any issues with wearing glasses. I even like to wear them, they're part of me by now.
Fast forward to my adulthood. I joined a company that offers a nice healthcare package for almost free (I contribute with 1% of my monthly income) but basically never use it, since I rarely have any health problem at all.
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes. It is not that expensive, but is also not that cheap. Since then I've been wondering if I should use the benefits of the healthcare to finally fix my eyes or not?
Additional info: If I had to pay from my own funds, I probably wouldn't start treatment: wearing glasses is not a burden to me.
Question: In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
ethics health brazil
ethics health brazil
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
IconDaemon
1253
1253
New contributor
asked yesterday
BonifacioBonifacio
405127
405127
New contributor
New contributor
48
I feel the real dilemma should be about the actual health risks of having the unneeded operation VS not having it if it's not already inconveniencing you.
– Gabriel C.
yesterday
80
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes.
Why would it be unethical to use a part of the policy that is provided to you? If the company didn't want to cover employees that got such an operation, the company wouldn't have included it.
– kolsyra
yesterday
8
Does your health plan also cover the cost of glasses? If you stay with the company long enough, getting your eyes fixed might actually be less costly than buying glasses periodically.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
3
I agree 100% with motosubatsu's excellent answer, but wanted to clarify: is this procedure covered by your insurance on an elective basis? From what you've described it sounds like it does, but that's the sort of thing worth triple-checking before scheduling appointments with doctors.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
8
....................... of course you can. That's... that's what health insurance is for.
– only_pro
10 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
48
I feel the real dilemma should be about the actual health risks of having the unneeded operation VS not having it if it's not already inconveniencing you.
– Gabriel C.
yesterday
80
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes.
Why would it be unethical to use a part of the policy that is provided to you? If the company didn't want to cover employees that got such an operation, the company wouldn't have included it.
– kolsyra
yesterday
8
Does your health plan also cover the cost of glasses? If you stay with the company long enough, getting your eyes fixed might actually be less costly than buying glasses periodically.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
3
I agree 100% with motosubatsu's excellent answer, but wanted to clarify: is this procedure covered by your insurance on an elective basis? From what you've described it sounds like it does, but that's the sort of thing worth triple-checking before scheduling appointments with doctors.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
8
....................... of course you can. That's... that's what health insurance is for.
– only_pro
10 hours ago
48
48
I feel the real dilemma should be about the actual health risks of having the unneeded operation VS not having it if it's not already inconveniencing you.
– Gabriel C.
yesterday
I feel the real dilemma should be about the actual health risks of having the unneeded operation VS not having it if it's not already inconveniencing you.
– Gabriel C.
yesterday
80
80
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes.
Why would it be unethical to use a part of the policy that is provided to you? If the company didn't want to cover employees that got such an operation, the company wouldn't have included it.– kolsyra
yesterday
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes.
Why would it be unethical to use a part of the policy that is provided to you? If the company didn't want to cover employees that got such an operation, the company wouldn't have included it.– kolsyra
yesterday
8
8
Does your health plan also cover the cost of glasses? If you stay with the company long enough, getting your eyes fixed might actually be less costly than buying glasses periodically.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Does your health plan also cover the cost of glasses? If you stay with the company long enough, getting your eyes fixed might actually be less costly than buying glasses periodically.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
3
3
I agree 100% with motosubatsu's excellent answer, but wanted to clarify: is this procedure covered by your insurance on an elective basis? From what you've described it sounds like it does, but that's the sort of thing worth triple-checking before scheduling appointments with doctors.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
I agree 100% with motosubatsu's excellent answer, but wanted to clarify: is this procedure covered by your insurance on an elective basis? From what you've described it sounds like it does, but that's the sort of thing worth triple-checking before scheduling appointments with doctors.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
8
8
....................... of course you can. That's... that's what health insurance is for.
– only_pro
10 hours ago
....................... of course you can. That's... that's what health insurance is for.
– only_pro
10 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
You're paying for it - why not use it?
If they explicitly wanted to prevent you using it for such conditions then they would have a policy that excluded them.
47
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
25
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
1
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
8
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
4
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
|
show 10 more comments
Healthcare plans are not limited to work related problems. They are a benefit, like flexible working hours or no dress code.
If the plan covers it, there is no reason to not use it.
72
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
3
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
1
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
1
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal [....]
No, not in general and definitely not in your case. It's completely ethical and you are expected to make use of that policy / fund for your individual betterment (for health care). Any organization, wants their employees to be fit, active and healthy - this increases productivity and positive vibe in the organization.
Health issues are always personal (or, individual). I believe it's just the nature of the health issue (a simple flu or viral fever over your eye surgery) that is causing you the the dilemma. I, personally do not see anything unethical in using company provided fund to treat a real problem you have. If not today, it will help you in long run, thereby also having a positive effect on the organization by having a healthier version of you.
[...] requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of task personal or professional.
I'd say, that's reason enough to go ahead. For sake of argument, your professional work will be improved (the degree, well, depends).
add a comment |
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
No.
Paid healthcare is compensation, like salary. A good sanity check for questions like this is to ask if it's unethical to use your salary for your operation. Certainly not.
It seems you're thinking of your healthcare benefits as a side effect of having a job, and you are afraid of exploiting it. A made-up example is using the fact that your office has power outlets to plug in a crypto-mining computer. This is unethical because you are exploiting something the business provides for a not-intended use that causes the company harm for your benefit.
Your benefits package was meant to be used for healthcare costs, so there is no question of ethics.
3
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
add a comment |
It's up to the healthcare provider to either allow or disallow claims based on the details of the policy/cost/whatever.
Ethics doesn't play a part in that decision, it's just whether or not the condition/injury is covered or not. It's as simple as that.
Ethics might come into play if you happened to join a company with the sole intention of using the healthcare benefit to cure your ailment.
4
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
9
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
add a comment |
Health Insurance is created to cover part of the cost of your medical care - it does not (or more specifically should not) exclude any conditions you may have had before getting that health care.
That being said - if there are any concerns with coverage, you should address this with your doctor and your insurance - not with Workplace.se.
More specifically, you should see if your company has a health insurance consultant for you to talk to about this issue, and if not then you should contact the insurance company directly regarding your vision issues. You are right to be concerned, but the concern should be whether or not your insurance will cover it for you - not whether or not it would be 'unethical'.
You're paying for it already by buying the insurance. The only question you should have now is whether or not the insurance program will in fact cover it as you expect.
add a comment |
In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
It's unclear what country you're in. I do not see how or why you can only use medical healthcare only when it aids in your duties as a employee.
You're really asking if pre-existing conditions should be included with your current health plan. I think anything can be rationalized as "pre-existing" if you think about. If you get sick, that means your immune system has a pre-existing condition where it doesn't know how to fight the new illness since it never discovered it yet. Would that mean you can't go to the doctor? I'd hope not.
add a comment |
I don't think it is unethical, you pay for it. Also, it is such a bonus you may want to search when your searching for a job.
Please also note that I don't expect that the company really pays for your operation. I think it is like an insurance: you pay a monthly amount, your company may-be also pay another monthly amount. Overall the insurance chooses an amount to make their business work.
Background: my father has such an healthcare program (Italy). He paid a monthly amount, and his company also paid another monthly amount. The healthcase program protected also relatives. As a child with less than 25 years old, I got my eyes fixed.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Bonifacio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127417%2fis-it-unethical-to-use-healthcare-paid-by-your-company-to-cure-a-life-long-healt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You're paying for it - why not use it?
If they explicitly wanted to prevent you using it for such conditions then they would have a policy that excluded them.
47
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
25
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
1
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
8
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
4
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
|
show 10 more comments
You're paying for it - why not use it?
If they explicitly wanted to prevent you using it for such conditions then they would have a policy that excluded them.
47
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
25
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
1
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
8
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
4
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
|
show 10 more comments
You're paying for it - why not use it?
If they explicitly wanted to prevent you using it for such conditions then they would have a policy that excluded them.
You're paying for it - why not use it?
If they explicitly wanted to prevent you using it for such conditions then they would have a policy that excluded them.
answered yesterday
motosubatsumotosubatsu
45.8k25121180
45.8k25121180
47
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
25
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
1
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
8
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
4
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
|
show 10 more comments
47
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
25
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
1
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
8
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
4
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
47
47
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
In a nutshell this is the answer.HEALTHCARE is about your health and if you're paying for it, what's the problem? You earned it. You're paying for it and you want to use it. Side note here, what seems small now, but one day get bigger. Just because we have a health issue that seems inconsequential in the moment, it doesn't mean it cannot compound later on or make a future, unseen or unknowable illness more difficult. In short, always try to keep your health in check, even the little things.
– ShinEmperor
yesterday
25
25
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
This is the simple answer. Your company plan administrators have already gone through a selection process of what procedures they will and won't cover. If the treatment you want is covered, you shouldn't feel bad for using it.
– pboss3010
yesterday
1
1
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
+1; I would add to this answer that if you're feeling dodgy about it, then tell your HR and your healthcare provider. I can pretty much guarantee you that they will say the same thing as this answer.
– Mikey
yesterday
8
8
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
The catch of saying "you're paying for it" is that - at 1% of the OP's salary - the employer is almost certainly carrying the great majority of the plan cost. That said, I agree with this answer 100%. Who's paying for the plan isn't really the relevant things here. If an employer's plan covers something, there's implicit permission to use that coverage - either the plan is required by law to cover that thing (which would be hard to argue against in terms of ethics) or the employer has specifically chosen to allow coverage of that thing (which is even harder to argue against!).
– dwizum
yesterday
4
4
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
Excellent answer. Unless this operation/medical condition is specifically excluded from coverage as an elective procedure, the risk of an employee needing/wanting to have the operation is already priced in to the plan premium. Further, your health insurance is part of your compensation, more similar to salary than different from it. It's not like it's a cosmetic procedure.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
|
show 10 more comments
Healthcare plans are not limited to work related problems. They are a benefit, like flexible working hours or no dress code.
If the plan covers it, there is no reason to not use it.
72
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
3
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
1
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
1
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Healthcare plans are not limited to work related problems. They are a benefit, like flexible working hours or no dress code.
If the plan covers it, there is no reason to not use it.
72
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
3
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
1
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
1
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Healthcare plans are not limited to work related problems. They are a benefit, like flexible working hours or no dress code.
If the plan covers it, there is no reason to not use it.
Healthcare plans are not limited to work related problems. They are a benefit, like flexible working hours or no dress code.
If the plan covers it, there is no reason to not use it.
answered yesterday
Lucas EspindolaLucas Espindola
8952311
8952311
72
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
3
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
1
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
1
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
72
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
3
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
1
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
1
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
72
72
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
Right. Work-related health problems are covered under a different system, Workers' Compensation. Your health insurance is supposed to be used for your own personal issues. If you fall and break your leg on the loading dock, you use Workers' Comp. If you fall and break your leg in your bathtub, you use your health insurance.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
3
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
@RobertColumbia That's a really great example. I'm going to remember that one.
– Steve-O
yesterday
3
3
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
The only problem with this answer is that flexible working hours and no dress code are not benefits. They might be considered advantages (some would consider that a baseline necessity), but it is not a benefit that you get from the company as remuneration for spending your time working for them.
– AviD
11 hours ago
1
1
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
I prefer this answer to the currently accepted one. It's not just something that you might as well use because it hasn't been forbidden, it's an explicit and intentional benefit that you absolutely should use if you want to.
– Matthew Read
7 hours ago
1
1
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
@AviD Very true. Employers like to act like company culture is a job benefit, but it isn't. Even more reason why they should take advantage of their healthcare benefits since it is literally part of their compensation
– Kevin Wells
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal [....]
No, not in general and definitely not in your case. It's completely ethical and you are expected to make use of that policy / fund for your individual betterment (for health care). Any organization, wants their employees to be fit, active and healthy - this increases productivity and positive vibe in the organization.
Health issues are always personal (or, individual). I believe it's just the nature of the health issue (a simple flu or viral fever over your eye surgery) that is causing you the the dilemma. I, personally do not see anything unethical in using company provided fund to treat a real problem you have. If not today, it will help you in long run, thereby also having a positive effect on the organization by having a healthier version of you.
[...] requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of task personal or professional.
I'd say, that's reason enough to go ahead. For sake of argument, your professional work will be improved (the degree, well, depends).
add a comment |
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal [....]
No, not in general and definitely not in your case. It's completely ethical and you are expected to make use of that policy / fund for your individual betterment (for health care). Any organization, wants their employees to be fit, active and healthy - this increases productivity and positive vibe in the organization.
Health issues are always personal (or, individual). I believe it's just the nature of the health issue (a simple flu or viral fever over your eye surgery) that is causing you the the dilemma. I, personally do not see anything unethical in using company provided fund to treat a real problem you have. If not today, it will help you in long run, thereby also having a positive effect on the organization by having a healthier version of you.
[...] requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of task personal or professional.
I'd say, that's reason enough to go ahead. For sake of argument, your professional work will be improved (the degree, well, depends).
add a comment |
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal [....]
No, not in general and definitely not in your case. It's completely ethical and you are expected to make use of that policy / fund for your individual betterment (for health care). Any organization, wants their employees to be fit, active and healthy - this increases productivity and positive vibe in the organization.
Health issues are always personal (or, individual). I believe it's just the nature of the health issue (a simple flu or viral fever over your eye surgery) that is causing you the the dilemma. I, personally do not see anything unethical in using company provided fund to treat a real problem you have. If not today, it will help you in long run, thereby also having a positive effect on the organization by having a healthier version of you.
[...] requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of task personal or professional.
I'd say, that's reason enough to go ahead. For sake of argument, your professional work will be improved (the degree, well, depends).
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal [....]
No, not in general and definitely not in your case. It's completely ethical and you are expected to make use of that policy / fund for your individual betterment (for health care). Any organization, wants their employees to be fit, active and healthy - this increases productivity and positive vibe in the organization.
Health issues are always personal (or, individual). I believe it's just the nature of the health issue (a simple flu or viral fever over your eye surgery) that is causing you the the dilemma. I, personally do not see anything unethical in using company provided fund to treat a real problem you have. If not today, it will help you in long run, thereby also having a positive effect on the organization by having a healthier version of you.
[...] requires me to wear glasses to be able to do any kind of task personal or professional.
I'd say, that's reason enough to go ahead. For sake of argument, your professional work will be improved (the degree, well, depends).
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
738516
738516
add a comment |
add a comment |
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
No.
Paid healthcare is compensation, like salary. A good sanity check for questions like this is to ask if it's unethical to use your salary for your operation. Certainly not.
It seems you're thinking of your healthcare benefits as a side effect of having a job, and you are afraid of exploiting it. A made-up example is using the fact that your office has power outlets to plug in a crypto-mining computer. This is unethical because you are exploiting something the business provides for a not-intended use that causes the company harm for your benefit.
Your benefits package was meant to be used for healthcare costs, so there is no question of ethics.
3
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
add a comment |
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
No.
Paid healthcare is compensation, like salary. A good sanity check for questions like this is to ask if it's unethical to use your salary for your operation. Certainly not.
It seems you're thinking of your healthcare benefits as a side effect of having a job, and you are afraid of exploiting it. A made-up example is using the fact that your office has power outlets to plug in a crypto-mining computer. This is unethical because you are exploiting something the business provides for a not-intended use that causes the company harm for your benefit.
Your benefits package was meant to be used for healthcare costs, so there is no question of ethics.
3
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
add a comment |
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
No.
Paid healthcare is compensation, like salary. A good sanity check for questions like this is to ask if it's unethical to use your salary for your operation. Certainly not.
It seems you're thinking of your healthcare benefits as a side effect of having a job, and you are afraid of exploiting it. A made-up example is using the fact that your office has power outlets to plug in a crypto-mining computer. This is unethical because you are exploiting something the business provides for a not-intended use that causes the company harm for your benefit.
Your benefits package was meant to be used for healthcare costs, so there is no question of ethics.
is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
No.
Paid healthcare is compensation, like salary. A good sanity check for questions like this is to ask if it's unethical to use your salary for your operation. Certainly not.
It seems you're thinking of your healthcare benefits as a side effect of having a job, and you are afraid of exploiting it. A made-up example is using the fact that your office has power outlets to plug in a crypto-mining computer. This is unethical because you are exploiting something the business provides for a not-intended use that causes the company harm for your benefit.
Your benefits package was meant to be used for healthcare costs, so there is no question of ethics.
answered yesterday
user1717828user1717828
786814
786814
3
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
add a comment |
3
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
3
3
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
Right. This is similar to asking whether it is ethical to donate part of your salary to a political cause that the employer disfavors. Socially awkward, perhaps, but not unethical.
– Robert Columbia
yesterday
add a comment |
It's up to the healthcare provider to either allow or disallow claims based on the details of the policy/cost/whatever.
Ethics doesn't play a part in that decision, it's just whether or not the condition/injury is covered or not. It's as simple as that.
Ethics might come into play if you happened to join a company with the sole intention of using the healthcare benefit to cure your ailment.
4
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
9
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
add a comment |
It's up to the healthcare provider to either allow or disallow claims based on the details of the policy/cost/whatever.
Ethics doesn't play a part in that decision, it's just whether or not the condition/injury is covered or not. It's as simple as that.
Ethics might come into play if you happened to join a company with the sole intention of using the healthcare benefit to cure your ailment.
4
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
9
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
add a comment |
It's up to the healthcare provider to either allow or disallow claims based on the details of the policy/cost/whatever.
Ethics doesn't play a part in that decision, it's just whether or not the condition/injury is covered or not. It's as simple as that.
Ethics might come into play if you happened to join a company with the sole intention of using the healthcare benefit to cure your ailment.
It's up to the healthcare provider to either allow or disallow claims based on the details of the policy/cost/whatever.
Ethics doesn't play a part in that decision, it's just whether or not the condition/injury is covered or not. It's as simple as that.
Ethics might come into play if you happened to join a company with the sole intention of using the healthcare benefit to cure your ailment.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Snow♦Snow
60.5k51196241
60.5k51196241
4
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
9
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
add a comment |
4
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
9
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
4
4
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
Regarding your last sentence - not weird at all, during my tenure running data analytics for a third party benefits administrator I certainly saw many anecdotal cases where people chose employers because of specific (and sometimes unusual) coverage from the health plan.
– dwizum
yesterday
9
9
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
Some people take jobs for the sole intention of earning money, which I don't see as unethical, and healthcare doesn't really seem any different. So long as the employer gets a good day's work out of the employee, I don't think it matters if they're there for money, healthcare, personal satisfaction, or just to get out of the house. For some individuals, the value of their health plan will far exceed their salary, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that healthcare would be a primary motivator for those people.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday
add a comment |
Health Insurance is created to cover part of the cost of your medical care - it does not (or more specifically should not) exclude any conditions you may have had before getting that health care.
That being said - if there are any concerns with coverage, you should address this with your doctor and your insurance - not with Workplace.se.
More specifically, you should see if your company has a health insurance consultant for you to talk to about this issue, and if not then you should contact the insurance company directly regarding your vision issues. You are right to be concerned, but the concern should be whether or not your insurance will cover it for you - not whether or not it would be 'unethical'.
You're paying for it already by buying the insurance. The only question you should have now is whether or not the insurance program will in fact cover it as you expect.
add a comment |
Health Insurance is created to cover part of the cost of your medical care - it does not (or more specifically should not) exclude any conditions you may have had before getting that health care.
That being said - if there are any concerns with coverage, you should address this with your doctor and your insurance - not with Workplace.se.
More specifically, you should see if your company has a health insurance consultant for you to talk to about this issue, and if not then you should contact the insurance company directly regarding your vision issues. You are right to be concerned, but the concern should be whether or not your insurance will cover it for you - not whether or not it would be 'unethical'.
You're paying for it already by buying the insurance. The only question you should have now is whether or not the insurance program will in fact cover it as you expect.
add a comment |
Health Insurance is created to cover part of the cost of your medical care - it does not (or more specifically should not) exclude any conditions you may have had before getting that health care.
That being said - if there are any concerns with coverage, you should address this with your doctor and your insurance - not with Workplace.se.
More specifically, you should see if your company has a health insurance consultant for you to talk to about this issue, and if not then you should contact the insurance company directly regarding your vision issues. You are right to be concerned, but the concern should be whether or not your insurance will cover it for you - not whether or not it would be 'unethical'.
You're paying for it already by buying the insurance. The only question you should have now is whether or not the insurance program will in fact cover it as you expect.
Health Insurance is created to cover part of the cost of your medical care - it does not (or more specifically should not) exclude any conditions you may have had before getting that health care.
That being said - if there are any concerns with coverage, you should address this with your doctor and your insurance - not with Workplace.se.
More specifically, you should see if your company has a health insurance consultant for you to talk to about this issue, and if not then you should contact the insurance company directly regarding your vision issues. You are right to be concerned, but the concern should be whether or not your insurance will cover it for you - not whether or not it would be 'unethical'.
You're paying for it already by buying the insurance. The only question you should have now is whether or not the insurance program will in fact cover it as you expect.
answered yesterday
ZibbobzZibbobz
6,93352455
6,93352455
add a comment |
add a comment |
In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
It's unclear what country you're in. I do not see how or why you can only use medical healthcare only when it aids in your duties as a employee.
You're really asking if pre-existing conditions should be included with your current health plan. I think anything can be rationalized as "pre-existing" if you think about. If you get sick, that means your immune system has a pre-existing condition where it doesn't know how to fight the new illness since it never discovered it yet. Would that mean you can't go to the doctor? I'd hope not.
add a comment |
In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
It's unclear what country you're in. I do not see how or why you can only use medical healthcare only when it aids in your duties as a employee.
You're really asking if pre-existing conditions should be included with your current health plan. I think anything can be rationalized as "pre-existing" if you think about. If you get sick, that means your immune system has a pre-existing condition where it doesn't know how to fight the new illness since it never discovered it yet. Would that mean you can't go to the doctor? I'd hope not.
add a comment |
In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
It's unclear what country you're in. I do not see how or why you can only use medical healthcare only when it aids in your duties as a employee.
You're really asking if pre-existing conditions should be included with your current health plan. I think anything can be rationalized as "pre-existing" if you think about. If you get sick, that means your immune system has a pre-existing condition where it doesn't know how to fight the new illness since it never discovered it yet. Would that mean you can't go to the doctor? I'd hope not.
In this case, is it unethical to use the healthcare package to cure a problem that is personal and does not affect my professional duties?
It's unclear what country you're in. I do not see how or why you can only use medical healthcare only when it aids in your duties as a employee.
You're really asking if pre-existing conditions should be included with your current health plan. I think anything can be rationalized as "pre-existing" if you think about. If you get sick, that means your immune system has a pre-existing condition where it doesn't know how to fight the new illness since it never discovered it yet. Would that mean you can't go to the doctor? I'd hope not.
answered yesterday
DanDan
7,39921426
7,39921426
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don't think it is unethical, you pay for it. Also, it is such a bonus you may want to search when your searching for a job.
Please also note that I don't expect that the company really pays for your operation. I think it is like an insurance: you pay a monthly amount, your company may-be also pay another monthly amount. Overall the insurance chooses an amount to make their business work.
Background: my father has such an healthcare program (Italy). He paid a monthly amount, and his company also paid another monthly amount. The healthcase program protected also relatives. As a child with less than 25 years old, I got my eyes fixed.
New contributor
add a comment |
I don't think it is unethical, you pay for it. Also, it is such a bonus you may want to search when your searching for a job.
Please also note that I don't expect that the company really pays for your operation. I think it is like an insurance: you pay a monthly amount, your company may-be also pay another monthly amount. Overall the insurance chooses an amount to make their business work.
Background: my father has such an healthcare program (Italy). He paid a monthly amount, and his company also paid another monthly amount. The healthcase program protected also relatives. As a child with less than 25 years old, I got my eyes fixed.
New contributor
add a comment |
I don't think it is unethical, you pay for it. Also, it is such a bonus you may want to search when your searching for a job.
Please also note that I don't expect that the company really pays for your operation. I think it is like an insurance: you pay a monthly amount, your company may-be also pay another monthly amount. Overall the insurance chooses an amount to make their business work.
Background: my father has such an healthcare program (Italy). He paid a monthly amount, and his company also paid another monthly amount. The healthcase program protected also relatives. As a child with less than 25 years old, I got my eyes fixed.
New contributor
I don't think it is unethical, you pay for it. Also, it is such a bonus you may want to search when your searching for a job.
Please also note that I don't expect that the company really pays for your operation. I think it is like an insurance: you pay a monthly amount, your company may-be also pay another monthly amount. Overall the insurance chooses an amount to make their business work.
Background: my father has such an healthcare program (Italy). He paid a monthly amount, and his company also paid another monthly amount. The healthcase program protected also relatives. As a child with less than 25 years old, I got my eyes fixed.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 11 hours ago
user3664452user3664452
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Bonifacio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bonifacio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bonifacio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bonifacio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127417%2fis-it-unethical-to-use-healthcare-paid-by-your-company-to-cure-a-life-long-healt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
48
I feel the real dilemma should be about the actual health risks of having the unneeded operation VS not having it if it's not already inconveniencing you.
– Gabriel C.
yesterday
80
Recently I found out that my company healthcare package covers the cost of the operation to fix my eyes.
Why would it be unethical to use a part of the policy that is provided to you? If the company didn't want to cover employees that got such an operation, the company wouldn't have included it.– kolsyra
yesterday
8
Does your health plan also cover the cost of glasses? If you stay with the company long enough, getting your eyes fixed might actually be less costly than buying glasses periodically.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
3
I agree 100% with motosubatsu's excellent answer, but wanted to clarify: is this procedure covered by your insurance on an elective basis? From what you've described it sounds like it does, but that's the sort of thing worth triple-checking before scheduling appointments with doctors.
– Upper_Case
yesterday
8
....................... of course you can. That's... that's what health insurance is for.
– only_pro
10 hours ago