Natural uncovering of desert ruins
My world has a semi-nomadic people that inhabit a vast sandy desert. Underneath this desert lie the ruins of an enormous metropolis -- a city that was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago.
In the past fifteen to twenty centuries something has changed in the region which has resulted in the slow uncovering of these long-lost buildings. This process could have been going on for longer, but only in the past few centuries have the ruins actually started to surface.
What is the slow, gradual change that started this? My first thought was a shifting of the direction of the prevailing winds, causing sand to be blown away instead of deposited, but I don't know how realistic this is.
edit: The idea I have in my head is of a once-fertile region that is absolutely crammed with ruins. This city/metropolis could once have had the size and density of Paris or Berlin, for example.
This city was abandoned as its people suffered some mysterious mass extinction, but its buildings and their interiors remain mostly intact, owing to the great architectural prowess of its people.
The region is now covered in huge amounts of sand and has become a typical sand desert, so that nothing alludes to its former grandeur.
Only recently (3~4 centuries) have the tops of the tallest of these buildings (e.g., monuments or other, rare, buildings taller than, say, 80m.) begun to become visible features in the sand.
It is key that none of the peoples who have lived near the region, even for centuries, can recall it being anything other than a desert. Ideally, the uncovering would be plausible as a natural, slow event, but it doesn't have to be scientifically rigorous.
I like the answer below about the flooding of Sarnath, because it explains how the city vanished (I can tie that in with the mass extinction event), how the desert was formed by the settling of salt and sand, and how the sand blows away now the sea is no longer there. The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat.
reality-check geography deserts archaeology
New contributor
|
show 2 more comments
My world has a semi-nomadic people that inhabit a vast sandy desert. Underneath this desert lie the ruins of an enormous metropolis -- a city that was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago.
In the past fifteen to twenty centuries something has changed in the region which has resulted in the slow uncovering of these long-lost buildings. This process could have been going on for longer, but only in the past few centuries have the ruins actually started to surface.
What is the slow, gradual change that started this? My first thought was a shifting of the direction of the prevailing winds, causing sand to be blown away instead of deposited, but I don't know how realistic this is.
edit: The idea I have in my head is of a once-fertile region that is absolutely crammed with ruins. This city/metropolis could once have had the size and density of Paris or Berlin, for example.
This city was abandoned as its people suffered some mysterious mass extinction, but its buildings and their interiors remain mostly intact, owing to the great architectural prowess of its people.
The region is now covered in huge amounts of sand and has become a typical sand desert, so that nothing alludes to its former grandeur.
Only recently (3~4 centuries) have the tops of the tallest of these buildings (e.g., monuments or other, rare, buildings taller than, say, 80m.) begun to become visible features in the sand.
It is key that none of the peoples who have lived near the region, even for centuries, can recall it being anything other than a desert. Ideally, the uncovering would be plausible as a natural, slow event, but it doesn't have to be scientifically rigorous.
I like the answer below about the flooding of Sarnath, because it explains how the city vanished (I can tie that in with the mass extinction event), how the desert was formed by the settling of salt and sand, and how the sand blows away now the sea is no longer there. The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat.
reality-check geography deserts archaeology
New contributor
This desert... is it a sandy desert or dried mud desert?
– SRM
2 days ago
A sandy desert. Think Sahara
– Harm van den Brand
2 days ago
As a side note, this might be worth a look - messagetoeagle.com/…
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Hmmm.... this could be a normal very in-scope question, or a question that needs to be closed because it's very broad. Describing what climate change brings about the uncovering of a city buried in sand is vague. Yes... winds... but what caused that change? For the moment, I'm voting to close as unclear. Please don't be offended. The closing process gives you time to clarify the question. What is the nature of a good answer? Scientific purity? Speed of event? Collateral damage? Our answer will affect your plot. What should we avoid?
– JBH
2 days ago
I think it's a good question. Better than many. While I am not too keen on closing this question, because I think it is pretty clear what you're asking, I do agree with JBH that we really need more information to give you a really spanking answer!
– elemtilas
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
My world has a semi-nomadic people that inhabit a vast sandy desert. Underneath this desert lie the ruins of an enormous metropolis -- a city that was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago.
In the past fifteen to twenty centuries something has changed in the region which has resulted in the slow uncovering of these long-lost buildings. This process could have been going on for longer, but only in the past few centuries have the ruins actually started to surface.
What is the slow, gradual change that started this? My first thought was a shifting of the direction of the prevailing winds, causing sand to be blown away instead of deposited, but I don't know how realistic this is.
edit: The idea I have in my head is of a once-fertile region that is absolutely crammed with ruins. This city/metropolis could once have had the size and density of Paris or Berlin, for example.
This city was abandoned as its people suffered some mysterious mass extinction, but its buildings and their interiors remain mostly intact, owing to the great architectural prowess of its people.
The region is now covered in huge amounts of sand and has become a typical sand desert, so that nothing alludes to its former grandeur.
Only recently (3~4 centuries) have the tops of the tallest of these buildings (e.g., monuments or other, rare, buildings taller than, say, 80m.) begun to become visible features in the sand.
It is key that none of the peoples who have lived near the region, even for centuries, can recall it being anything other than a desert. Ideally, the uncovering would be plausible as a natural, slow event, but it doesn't have to be scientifically rigorous.
I like the answer below about the flooding of Sarnath, because it explains how the city vanished (I can tie that in with the mass extinction event), how the desert was formed by the settling of salt and sand, and how the sand blows away now the sea is no longer there. The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat.
reality-check geography deserts archaeology
New contributor
My world has a semi-nomadic people that inhabit a vast sandy desert. Underneath this desert lie the ruins of an enormous metropolis -- a city that was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago.
In the past fifteen to twenty centuries something has changed in the region which has resulted in the slow uncovering of these long-lost buildings. This process could have been going on for longer, but only in the past few centuries have the ruins actually started to surface.
What is the slow, gradual change that started this? My first thought was a shifting of the direction of the prevailing winds, causing sand to be blown away instead of deposited, but I don't know how realistic this is.
edit: The idea I have in my head is of a once-fertile region that is absolutely crammed with ruins. This city/metropolis could once have had the size and density of Paris or Berlin, for example.
This city was abandoned as its people suffered some mysterious mass extinction, but its buildings and their interiors remain mostly intact, owing to the great architectural prowess of its people.
The region is now covered in huge amounts of sand and has become a typical sand desert, so that nothing alludes to its former grandeur.
Only recently (3~4 centuries) have the tops of the tallest of these buildings (e.g., monuments or other, rare, buildings taller than, say, 80m.) begun to become visible features in the sand.
It is key that none of the peoples who have lived near the region, even for centuries, can recall it being anything other than a desert. Ideally, the uncovering would be plausible as a natural, slow event, but it doesn't have to be scientifically rigorous.
I like the answer below about the flooding of Sarnath, because it explains how the city vanished (I can tie that in with the mass extinction event), how the desert was formed by the settling of salt and sand, and how the sand blows away now the sea is no longer there. The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat.
reality-check geography deserts archaeology
reality-check geography deserts archaeology
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Harm van den Brand
566
566
New contributor
New contributor
This desert... is it a sandy desert or dried mud desert?
– SRM
2 days ago
A sandy desert. Think Sahara
– Harm van den Brand
2 days ago
As a side note, this might be worth a look - messagetoeagle.com/…
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Hmmm.... this could be a normal very in-scope question, or a question that needs to be closed because it's very broad. Describing what climate change brings about the uncovering of a city buried in sand is vague. Yes... winds... but what caused that change? For the moment, I'm voting to close as unclear. Please don't be offended. The closing process gives you time to clarify the question. What is the nature of a good answer? Scientific purity? Speed of event? Collateral damage? Our answer will affect your plot. What should we avoid?
– JBH
2 days ago
I think it's a good question. Better than many. While I am not too keen on closing this question, because I think it is pretty clear what you're asking, I do agree with JBH that we really need more information to give you a really spanking answer!
– elemtilas
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
This desert... is it a sandy desert or dried mud desert?
– SRM
2 days ago
A sandy desert. Think Sahara
– Harm van den Brand
2 days ago
As a side note, this might be worth a look - messagetoeagle.com/…
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Hmmm.... this could be a normal very in-scope question, or a question that needs to be closed because it's very broad. Describing what climate change brings about the uncovering of a city buried in sand is vague. Yes... winds... but what caused that change? For the moment, I'm voting to close as unclear. Please don't be offended. The closing process gives you time to clarify the question. What is the nature of a good answer? Scientific purity? Speed of event? Collateral damage? Our answer will affect your plot. What should we avoid?
– JBH
2 days ago
I think it's a good question. Better than many. While I am not too keen on closing this question, because I think it is pretty clear what you're asking, I do agree with JBH that we really need more information to give you a really spanking answer!
– elemtilas
2 days ago
This desert... is it a sandy desert or dried mud desert?
– SRM
2 days ago
This desert... is it a sandy desert or dried mud desert?
– SRM
2 days ago
A sandy desert. Think Sahara
– Harm van den Brand
2 days ago
A sandy desert. Think Sahara
– Harm van den Brand
2 days ago
As a side note, this might be worth a look - messagetoeagle.com/…
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
As a side note, this might be worth a look - messagetoeagle.com/…
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Hmmm.... this could be a normal very in-scope question, or a question that needs to be closed because it's very broad. Describing what climate change brings about the uncovering of a city buried in sand is vague. Yes... winds... but what caused that change? For the moment, I'm voting to close as unclear. Please don't be offended. The closing process gives you time to clarify the question. What is the nature of a good answer? Scientific purity? Speed of event? Collateral damage? Our answer will affect your plot. What should we avoid?
– JBH
2 days ago
Hmmm.... this could be a normal very in-scope question, or a question that needs to be closed because it's very broad. Describing what climate change brings about the uncovering of a city buried in sand is vague. Yes... winds... but what caused that change? For the moment, I'm voting to close as unclear. Please don't be offended. The closing process gives you time to clarify the question. What is the nature of a good answer? Scientific purity? Speed of event? Collateral damage? Our answer will affect your plot. What should we avoid?
– JBH
2 days ago
I think it's a good question. Better than many. While I am not too keen on closing this question, because I think it is pretty clear what you're asking, I do agree with JBH that we really need more information to give you a really spanking answer!
– elemtilas
2 days ago
I think it's a good question. Better than many. While I am not too keen on closing this question, because I think it is pretty clear what you're asking, I do agree with JBH that we really need more information to give you a really spanking answer!
– elemtilas
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Before the metropolis was covered by the desert, it was drowned in a sea.
https://www.slowfood.com/a-salt-storm-from-the-aral-sea-save-the-planet-from-climate-change/
I am thinking of H.P. Lovecraft's Sarnath, claimed by its lake.
These men indeed went to the lake to view Sarnath; but though they
found the vast still lake itself, and the grey rock Akurion which
rears high above it near the shore, they beheld not the wonder of the
world and pride of all mankind. Where once had risen walls of 300
cubits and towers yet higher, now stretched only the marshy shore, and
where once had dwelt fifty millions of men now crawled only the
detestable green water-lizard. Not even the mines of precious metal
remained, for DOOM had come to Sarnath.
The Doom that came to Sarnath
A sea claimed the metropolis, covering it in the waters. Over the millennia silt and sand built up, burying the sunken city. Years passed; the world changed. A thousand years ago the sea dried up, leaving only an expanse of salt and sand.
Winds and rare rains then eroded the mudstone into peaks and spires. Like an ancient fossil, the entombed city gradually emerged into the light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands#/media/File:Badlands00503.JPG
add a comment |
This happens all the time over a relatively short timescale. Sand travels across the desert in wind-driven waves - these are usually described as dunes but they move.
A building could be covered one day by the crest of a wave and a week later be exposed in the trough of the wave.
I imagine that originally the area was a vast fertile plain and underneath the soil was alluvial rock. When the plain started to become desert, the sand gradually blew over it over hundreds or thousands of years, eventually burying the city. As the wind continues to drive the sand along, eventually the bedrock is uncovered. The foundations of the buildings were cemented to it and so they appear gradually. There is no need to change the direction of the prevailing wind.
add a comment |
To answer What is the slow, gradual change that started this? - if you're all right with it being a combination of changes, I would add small tectonic shifting to your wind changes. Tectonic plates shift gradually and only large abrupt shifts cause earthquakes. So the land could've shifted over the years and gradually led to the shifting of sand until the buildings were closer to the surface so the changes wind currents could uncover them.
Now as for your second question The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat. - Since you say your city was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago, there is room for the climate to change. Perhaps, while there was a sea covering the city, the temperature began to rise so it led to the sea drying up/receding. Similar, perhaps to the Pannonian Sea
New contributor
add a comment |
I can't do better than Wilik's answer, but I'd like to add to it.
The land flooded and the sea built up with silt and eventually dried completely, leaving only desert.
As it dried, it left a crust perhaps a foot or two thick (30-60 cm). I'm thinking limestone or something similar. This crust isn't very strong but it is enough so that the winds can not blow it away. Sand builds up on the surface and blows away again, but the surface stays intact.
As your nomadic peoples become more semi-nomadic, they begin to do things like till the soil, dig irrigation canals, dig wells, and set some pillars for construction underground.
This activity cracks the crust over the dried up lake and, slowly, the winds are able to reach areas they could not before. The smallest of the cracked pieces blow away and so does the sand/dirt underneath.
Over time, the tops of very tall structures become regular features of the desert.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Harm van den Brand is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134860%2fnatural-uncovering-of-desert-ruins%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Before the metropolis was covered by the desert, it was drowned in a sea.
https://www.slowfood.com/a-salt-storm-from-the-aral-sea-save-the-planet-from-climate-change/
I am thinking of H.P. Lovecraft's Sarnath, claimed by its lake.
These men indeed went to the lake to view Sarnath; but though they
found the vast still lake itself, and the grey rock Akurion which
rears high above it near the shore, they beheld not the wonder of the
world and pride of all mankind. Where once had risen walls of 300
cubits and towers yet higher, now stretched only the marshy shore, and
where once had dwelt fifty millions of men now crawled only the
detestable green water-lizard. Not even the mines of precious metal
remained, for DOOM had come to Sarnath.
The Doom that came to Sarnath
A sea claimed the metropolis, covering it in the waters. Over the millennia silt and sand built up, burying the sunken city. Years passed; the world changed. A thousand years ago the sea dried up, leaving only an expanse of salt and sand.
Winds and rare rains then eroded the mudstone into peaks and spires. Like an ancient fossil, the entombed city gradually emerged into the light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands#/media/File:Badlands00503.JPG
add a comment |
Before the metropolis was covered by the desert, it was drowned in a sea.
https://www.slowfood.com/a-salt-storm-from-the-aral-sea-save-the-planet-from-climate-change/
I am thinking of H.P. Lovecraft's Sarnath, claimed by its lake.
These men indeed went to the lake to view Sarnath; but though they
found the vast still lake itself, and the grey rock Akurion which
rears high above it near the shore, they beheld not the wonder of the
world and pride of all mankind. Where once had risen walls of 300
cubits and towers yet higher, now stretched only the marshy shore, and
where once had dwelt fifty millions of men now crawled only the
detestable green water-lizard. Not even the mines of precious metal
remained, for DOOM had come to Sarnath.
The Doom that came to Sarnath
A sea claimed the metropolis, covering it in the waters. Over the millennia silt and sand built up, burying the sunken city. Years passed; the world changed. A thousand years ago the sea dried up, leaving only an expanse of salt and sand.
Winds and rare rains then eroded the mudstone into peaks and spires. Like an ancient fossil, the entombed city gradually emerged into the light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands#/media/File:Badlands00503.JPG
add a comment |
Before the metropolis was covered by the desert, it was drowned in a sea.
https://www.slowfood.com/a-salt-storm-from-the-aral-sea-save-the-planet-from-climate-change/
I am thinking of H.P. Lovecraft's Sarnath, claimed by its lake.
These men indeed went to the lake to view Sarnath; but though they
found the vast still lake itself, and the grey rock Akurion which
rears high above it near the shore, they beheld not the wonder of the
world and pride of all mankind. Where once had risen walls of 300
cubits and towers yet higher, now stretched only the marshy shore, and
where once had dwelt fifty millions of men now crawled only the
detestable green water-lizard. Not even the mines of precious metal
remained, for DOOM had come to Sarnath.
The Doom that came to Sarnath
A sea claimed the metropolis, covering it in the waters. Over the millennia silt and sand built up, burying the sunken city. Years passed; the world changed. A thousand years ago the sea dried up, leaving only an expanse of salt and sand.
Winds and rare rains then eroded the mudstone into peaks and spires. Like an ancient fossil, the entombed city gradually emerged into the light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands#/media/File:Badlands00503.JPG
Before the metropolis was covered by the desert, it was drowned in a sea.
https://www.slowfood.com/a-salt-storm-from-the-aral-sea-save-the-planet-from-climate-change/
I am thinking of H.P. Lovecraft's Sarnath, claimed by its lake.
These men indeed went to the lake to view Sarnath; but though they
found the vast still lake itself, and the grey rock Akurion which
rears high above it near the shore, they beheld not the wonder of the
world and pride of all mankind. Where once had risen walls of 300
cubits and towers yet higher, now stretched only the marshy shore, and
where once had dwelt fifty millions of men now crawled only the
detestable green water-lizard. Not even the mines of precious metal
remained, for DOOM had come to Sarnath.
The Doom that came to Sarnath
A sea claimed the metropolis, covering it in the waters. Over the millennia silt and sand built up, burying the sunken city. Years passed; the world changed. A thousand years ago the sea dried up, leaving only an expanse of salt and sand.
Winds and rare rains then eroded the mudstone into peaks and spires. Like an ancient fossil, the entombed city gradually emerged into the light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands#/media/File:Badlands00503.JPG
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Willk
101k25193424
101k25193424
add a comment |
add a comment |
This happens all the time over a relatively short timescale. Sand travels across the desert in wind-driven waves - these are usually described as dunes but they move.
A building could be covered one day by the crest of a wave and a week later be exposed in the trough of the wave.
I imagine that originally the area was a vast fertile plain and underneath the soil was alluvial rock. When the plain started to become desert, the sand gradually blew over it over hundreds or thousands of years, eventually burying the city. As the wind continues to drive the sand along, eventually the bedrock is uncovered. The foundations of the buildings were cemented to it and so they appear gradually. There is no need to change the direction of the prevailing wind.
add a comment |
This happens all the time over a relatively short timescale. Sand travels across the desert in wind-driven waves - these are usually described as dunes but they move.
A building could be covered one day by the crest of a wave and a week later be exposed in the trough of the wave.
I imagine that originally the area was a vast fertile plain and underneath the soil was alluvial rock. When the plain started to become desert, the sand gradually blew over it over hundreds or thousands of years, eventually burying the city. As the wind continues to drive the sand along, eventually the bedrock is uncovered. The foundations of the buildings were cemented to it and so they appear gradually. There is no need to change the direction of the prevailing wind.
add a comment |
This happens all the time over a relatively short timescale. Sand travels across the desert in wind-driven waves - these are usually described as dunes but they move.
A building could be covered one day by the crest of a wave and a week later be exposed in the trough of the wave.
I imagine that originally the area was a vast fertile plain and underneath the soil was alluvial rock. When the plain started to become desert, the sand gradually blew over it over hundreds or thousands of years, eventually burying the city. As the wind continues to drive the sand along, eventually the bedrock is uncovered. The foundations of the buildings were cemented to it and so they appear gradually. There is no need to change the direction of the prevailing wind.
This happens all the time over a relatively short timescale. Sand travels across the desert in wind-driven waves - these are usually described as dunes but they move.
A building could be covered one day by the crest of a wave and a week later be exposed in the trough of the wave.
I imagine that originally the area was a vast fertile plain and underneath the soil was alluvial rock. When the plain started to become desert, the sand gradually blew over it over hundreds or thousands of years, eventually burying the city. As the wind continues to drive the sand along, eventually the bedrock is uncovered. The foundations of the buildings were cemented to it and so they appear gradually. There is no need to change the direction of the prevailing wind.
answered 2 days ago
chasly from UK
12.4k355112
12.4k355112
add a comment |
add a comment |
To answer What is the slow, gradual change that started this? - if you're all right with it being a combination of changes, I would add small tectonic shifting to your wind changes. Tectonic plates shift gradually and only large abrupt shifts cause earthquakes. So the land could've shifted over the years and gradually led to the shifting of sand until the buildings were closer to the surface so the changes wind currents could uncover them.
Now as for your second question The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat. - Since you say your city was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago, there is room for the climate to change. Perhaps, while there was a sea covering the city, the temperature began to rise so it led to the sea drying up/receding. Similar, perhaps to the Pannonian Sea
New contributor
add a comment |
To answer What is the slow, gradual change that started this? - if you're all right with it being a combination of changes, I would add small tectonic shifting to your wind changes. Tectonic plates shift gradually and only large abrupt shifts cause earthquakes. So the land could've shifted over the years and gradually led to the shifting of sand until the buildings were closer to the surface so the changes wind currents could uncover them.
Now as for your second question The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat. - Since you say your city was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago, there is room for the climate to change. Perhaps, while there was a sea covering the city, the temperature began to rise so it led to the sea drying up/receding. Similar, perhaps to the Pannonian Sea
New contributor
add a comment |
To answer What is the slow, gradual change that started this? - if you're all right with it being a combination of changes, I would add small tectonic shifting to your wind changes. Tectonic plates shift gradually and only large abrupt shifts cause earthquakes. So the land could've shifted over the years and gradually led to the shifting of sand until the buildings were closer to the surface so the changes wind currents could uncover them.
Now as for your second question The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat. - Since you say your city was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago, there is room for the climate to change. Perhaps, while there was a sea covering the city, the temperature began to rise so it led to the sea drying up/receding. Similar, perhaps to the Pannonian Sea
New contributor
To answer What is the slow, gradual change that started this? - if you're all right with it being a combination of changes, I would add small tectonic shifting to your wind changes. Tectonic plates shift gradually and only large abrupt shifts cause earthquakes. So the land could've shifted over the years and gradually led to the shifting of sand until the buildings were closer to the surface so the changes wind currents could uncover them.
Now as for your second question The only thing I would then like to know, is what causes the sea to dry up / retreat. - Since you say your city was abandoned tens of thousands of years ago, there is room for the climate to change. Perhaps, while there was a sea covering the city, the temperature began to rise so it led to the sea drying up/receding. Similar, perhaps to the Pannonian Sea
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
bigchickcannibalistic
745
745
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
I can't do better than Wilik's answer, but I'd like to add to it.
The land flooded and the sea built up with silt and eventually dried completely, leaving only desert.
As it dried, it left a crust perhaps a foot or two thick (30-60 cm). I'm thinking limestone or something similar. This crust isn't very strong but it is enough so that the winds can not blow it away. Sand builds up on the surface and blows away again, but the surface stays intact.
As your nomadic peoples become more semi-nomadic, they begin to do things like till the soil, dig irrigation canals, dig wells, and set some pillars for construction underground.
This activity cracks the crust over the dried up lake and, slowly, the winds are able to reach areas they could not before. The smallest of the cracked pieces blow away and so does the sand/dirt underneath.
Over time, the tops of very tall structures become regular features of the desert.
add a comment |
I can't do better than Wilik's answer, but I'd like to add to it.
The land flooded and the sea built up with silt and eventually dried completely, leaving only desert.
As it dried, it left a crust perhaps a foot or two thick (30-60 cm). I'm thinking limestone or something similar. This crust isn't very strong but it is enough so that the winds can not blow it away. Sand builds up on the surface and blows away again, but the surface stays intact.
As your nomadic peoples become more semi-nomadic, they begin to do things like till the soil, dig irrigation canals, dig wells, and set some pillars for construction underground.
This activity cracks the crust over the dried up lake and, slowly, the winds are able to reach areas they could not before. The smallest of the cracked pieces blow away and so does the sand/dirt underneath.
Over time, the tops of very tall structures become regular features of the desert.
add a comment |
I can't do better than Wilik's answer, but I'd like to add to it.
The land flooded and the sea built up with silt and eventually dried completely, leaving only desert.
As it dried, it left a crust perhaps a foot or two thick (30-60 cm). I'm thinking limestone or something similar. This crust isn't very strong but it is enough so that the winds can not blow it away. Sand builds up on the surface and blows away again, but the surface stays intact.
As your nomadic peoples become more semi-nomadic, they begin to do things like till the soil, dig irrigation canals, dig wells, and set some pillars for construction underground.
This activity cracks the crust over the dried up lake and, slowly, the winds are able to reach areas they could not before. The smallest of the cracked pieces blow away and so does the sand/dirt underneath.
Over time, the tops of very tall structures become regular features of the desert.
I can't do better than Wilik's answer, but I'd like to add to it.
The land flooded and the sea built up with silt and eventually dried completely, leaving only desert.
As it dried, it left a crust perhaps a foot or two thick (30-60 cm). I'm thinking limestone or something similar. This crust isn't very strong but it is enough so that the winds can not blow it away. Sand builds up on the surface and blows away again, but the surface stays intact.
As your nomadic peoples become more semi-nomadic, they begin to do things like till the soil, dig irrigation canals, dig wells, and set some pillars for construction underground.
This activity cracks the crust over the dried up lake and, slowly, the winds are able to reach areas they could not before. The smallest of the cracked pieces blow away and so does the sand/dirt underneath.
Over time, the tops of very tall structures become regular features of the desert.
answered yesterday
Cyn
4,599831
4,599831
add a comment |
add a comment |
Harm van den Brand is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Harm van den Brand is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Harm van den Brand is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Harm van den Brand is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134860%2fnatural-uncovering-of-desert-ruins%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This desert... is it a sandy desert or dried mud desert?
– SRM
2 days ago
A sandy desert. Think Sahara
– Harm van den Brand
2 days ago
As a side note, this might be worth a look - messagetoeagle.com/…
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Hmmm.... this could be a normal very in-scope question, or a question that needs to be closed because it's very broad. Describing what climate change brings about the uncovering of a city buried in sand is vague. Yes... winds... but what caused that change? For the moment, I'm voting to close as unclear. Please don't be offended. The closing process gives you time to clarify the question. What is the nature of a good answer? Scientific purity? Speed of event? Collateral damage? Our answer will affect your plot. What should we avoid?
– JBH
2 days ago
I think it's a good question. Better than many. While I am not too keen on closing this question, because I think it is pretty clear what you're asking, I do agree with JBH that we really need more information to give you a really spanking answer!
– elemtilas
2 days ago