Could “there are” be removed in the following sentence?
It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than (there are) in Elmsford.
Hi, could the (there are) be removed?
grammar
New contributor
add a comment |
It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than (there are) in Elmsford.
Hi, could the (there are) be removed?
grammar
New contributor
Sure. It's even better if you do that.
– Robusto
yesterday
Hi Mark, welcome to EL&U. We would normally expect a bit more in a question - in particular, why you think "there are" can't be removed - and what research you've done before asking here. For further guidance, see How to Ask and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than (there are) in Elmsford.
Hi, could the (there are) be removed?
grammar
New contributor
It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than (there are) in Elmsford.
Hi, could the (there are) be removed?
grammar
grammar
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
MarkMark
31
31
New contributor
New contributor
Sure. It's even better if you do that.
– Robusto
yesterday
Hi Mark, welcome to EL&U. We would normally expect a bit more in a question - in particular, why you think "there are" can't be removed - and what research you've done before asking here. For further guidance, see How to Ask and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
Sure. It's even better if you do that.
– Robusto
yesterday
Hi Mark, welcome to EL&U. We would normally expect a bit more in a question - in particular, why you think "there are" can't be removed - and what research you've done before asking here. For further guidance, see How to Ask and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
Sure. It's even better if you do that.
– Robusto
yesterday
Sure. It's even better if you do that.
– Robusto
yesterday
Hi Mark, welcome to EL&U. We would normally expect a bit more in a question - in particular, why you think "there are" can't be removed - and what research you've done before asking here. For further guidance, see How to Ask and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
Hi Mark, welcome to EL&U. We would normally expect a bit more in a question - in particular, why you think "there are" can't be removed - and what research you've done before asking here. For further guidance, see How to Ask and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes.
We could argue that the sentence has already had similar parts removed: '...that there are more younger... or [that there are] more elderly...'.
As long as the sentence has a strong enough structure that the the reader can predict, removing such parts is relatively safe.
add a comment |
Yes, it can. It is one form of comparative ellipsis that can happen in than-clauses.The first example in the link.
It is not an obligatory rule like comparative deletion or comparative subdeletion, but an optional one.
This one is called gapping.
Since Wikipedia is not a primary source, you can use instead this article in the Linguistic Inquiry journal, pubished by MIT press. Case (3) in the article, in which a second instance of the verb is optionally omitted to avoid repetition.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483466%2fcould-there-are-be-removed-in-the-following-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes.
We could argue that the sentence has already had similar parts removed: '...that there are more younger... or [that there are] more elderly...'.
As long as the sentence has a strong enough structure that the the reader can predict, removing such parts is relatively safe.
add a comment |
Yes.
We could argue that the sentence has already had similar parts removed: '...that there are more younger... or [that there are] more elderly...'.
As long as the sentence has a strong enough structure that the the reader can predict, removing such parts is relatively safe.
add a comment |
Yes.
We could argue that the sentence has already had similar parts removed: '...that there are more younger... or [that there are] more elderly...'.
As long as the sentence has a strong enough structure that the the reader can predict, removing such parts is relatively safe.
Yes.
We could argue that the sentence has already had similar parts removed: '...that there are more younger... or [that there are] more elderly...'.
As long as the sentence has a strong enough structure that the the reader can predict, removing such parts is relatively safe.
answered yesterday
Trevor Christopher ButcherTrevor Christopher Butcher
1,562312
1,562312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Yes, it can. It is one form of comparative ellipsis that can happen in than-clauses.The first example in the link.
It is not an obligatory rule like comparative deletion or comparative subdeletion, but an optional one.
This one is called gapping.
Since Wikipedia is not a primary source, you can use instead this article in the Linguistic Inquiry journal, pubished by MIT press. Case (3) in the article, in which a second instance of the verb is optionally omitted to avoid repetition.
New contributor
add a comment |
Yes, it can. It is one form of comparative ellipsis that can happen in than-clauses.The first example in the link.
It is not an obligatory rule like comparative deletion or comparative subdeletion, but an optional one.
This one is called gapping.
Since Wikipedia is not a primary source, you can use instead this article in the Linguistic Inquiry journal, pubished by MIT press. Case (3) in the article, in which a second instance of the verb is optionally omitted to avoid repetition.
New contributor
add a comment |
Yes, it can. It is one form of comparative ellipsis that can happen in than-clauses.The first example in the link.
It is not an obligatory rule like comparative deletion or comparative subdeletion, but an optional one.
This one is called gapping.
Since Wikipedia is not a primary source, you can use instead this article in the Linguistic Inquiry journal, pubished by MIT press. Case (3) in the article, in which a second instance of the verb is optionally omitted to avoid repetition.
New contributor
Yes, it can. It is one form of comparative ellipsis that can happen in than-clauses.The first example in the link.
It is not an obligatory rule like comparative deletion or comparative subdeletion, but an optional one.
This one is called gapping.
Since Wikipedia is not a primary source, you can use instead this article in the Linguistic Inquiry journal, pubished by MIT press. Case (3) in the article, in which a second instance of the verb is optionally omitted to avoid repetition.
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered yesterday
mamamama
1375
1375
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483466%2fcould-there-are-be-removed-in-the-following-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Sure. It's even better if you do that.
– Robusto
yesterday
Hi Mark, welcome to EL&U. We would normally expect a bit more in a question - in particular, why you think "there are" can't be removed - and what research you've done before asking here. For further guidance, see How to Ask and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday