Is there a word for “Supercomponent”, similar to “Subcomponent”, but in the other direction?












0















So say you have a car, which is composed of some seats, which are composed of some fabric



You could say that the Seats are a subcomponent of the Car
and the Fabric is a subcomponent of the Seat



But is there a way to describe the relationship in the other direction?



Like "The Car is a supercomponent of a Seat"



Specifically, I am trying to list "Subcomponents" as well as "Supercomponents", and want to describe the lists accurately



Here is an example of the two lists, if I'm looking at a Seat:



Subcomponents:
- Fabric
- Cushion
- Frame

Supercomponents:
- Car
- Desk
- Airplane


I'm just wondering if there is another, better word for "Supercomponents"










share|improve this question























  • It's worth mentioning that "component" can be defined arbitrarily. If you assemble a bunch of components, you could say the result is an assembly. However, if you then have to combine that assembly with some other components (or assemblies), it is acting as a component of the larger assembly. Essentially, "component" or "assembly" depends on what you need to do. The assembly created by process A could be a component required by process B.

    – mRotten
    35 mins ago
















0















So say you have a car, which is composed of some seats, which are composed of some fabric



You could say that the Seats are a subcomponent of the Car
and the Fabric is a subcomponent of the Seat



But is there a way to describe the relationship in the other direction?



Like "The Car is a supercomponent of a Seat"



Specifically, I am trying to list "Subcomponents" as well as "Supercomponents", and want to describe the lists accurately



Here is an example of the two lists, if I'm looking at a Seat:



Subcomponents:
- Fabric
- Cushion
- Frame

Supercomponents:
- Car
- Desk
- Airplane


I'm just wondering if there is another, better word for "Supercomponents"










share|improve this question























  • It's worth mentioning that "component" can be defined arbitrarily. If you assemble a bunch of components, you could say the result is an assembly. However, if you then have to combine that assembly with some other components (or assemblies), it is acting as a component of the larger assembly. Essentially, "component" or "assembly" depends on what you need to do. The assembly created by process A could be a component required by process B.

    – mRotten
    35 mins ago














0












0








0








So say you have a car, which is composed of some seats, which are composed of some fabric



You could say that the Seats are a subcomponent of the Car
and the Fabric is a subcomponent of the Seat



But is there a way to describe the relationship in the other direction?



Like "The Car is a supercomponent of a Seat"



Specifically, I am trying to list "Subcomponents" as well as "Supercomponents", and want to describe the lists accurately



Here is an example of the two lists, if I'm looking at a Seat:



Subcomponents:
- Fabric
- Cushion
- Frame

Supercomponents:
- Car
- Desk
- Airplane


I'm just wondering if there is another, better word for "Supercomponents"










share|improve this question














So say you have a car, which is composed of some seats, which are composed of some fabric



You could say that the Seats are a subcomponent of the Car
and the Fabric is a subcomponent of the Seat



But is there a way to describe the relationship in the other direction?



Like "The Car is a supercomponent of a Seat"



Specifically, I am trying to list "Subcomponents" as well as "Supercomponents", and want to describe the lists accurately



Here is an example of the two lists, if I'm looking at a Seat:



Subcomponents:
- Fabric
- Cushion
- Frame

Supercomponents:
- Car
- Desk
- Airplane


I'm just wondering if there is another, better word for "Supercomponents"







single-word-requests






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









A OA O

1416




1416













  • It's worth mentioning that "component" can be defined arbitrarily. If you assemble a bunch of components, you could say the result is an assembly. However, if you then have to combine that assembly with some other components (or assemblies), it is acting as a component of the larger assembly. Essentially, "component" or "assembly" depends on what you need to do. The assembly created by process A could be a component required by process B.

    – mRotten
    35 mins ago



















  • It's worth mentioning that "component" can be defined arbitrarily. If you assemble a bunch of components, you could say the result is an assembly. However, if you then have to combine that assembly with some other components (or assemblies), it is acting as a component of the larger assembly. Essentially, "component" or "assembly" depends on what you need to do. The assembly created by process A could be a component required by process B.

    – mRotten
    35 mins ago

















It's worth mentioning that "component" can be defined arbitrarily. If you assemble a bunch of components, you could say the result is an assembly. However, if you then have to combine that assembly with some other components (or assemblies), it is acting as a component of the larger assembly. Essentially, "component" or "assembly" depends on what you need to do. The assembly created by process A could be a component required by process B.

– mRotten
35 mins ago





It's worth mentioning that "component" can be defined arbitrarily. If you assemble a bunch of components, you could say the result is an assembly. However, if you then have to combine that assembly with some other components (or assemblies), it is acting as a component of the larger assembly. Essentially, "component" or "assembly" depends on what you need to do. The assembly created by process A could be a component required by process B.

– mRotten
35 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














In manufacturing, components are combined to create an assembly. You will see this word on parts diagrams and other documentation about how to construct a machine. In fact, a component is an assembly of its subcomponents. For example, most cars have what is called a "tail light assembly" which consists of a light bulb, socket, reflector, and lens. The "seat" in your list would be ordered from a supplier as a "set assembly" to distinguish it from the "seat frame".



However, there is a conceptual problem with your question: although the tail light is part of a car, a car is a lot more than something that has a tail light. In manufacturing, you might call the car a product or a machine.



For your list, I would use used in or part of



Seat has subcomponents:
- Fabric
- Cushion
- Frame

Seat is used in:
- Car
- Desk
- Airplane


Or just say a seat is a subcomponent of a car.






share|improve this answer































    -1














    Try construction.



    A component is literally a constituent part of something (Merriam-Webster). A subcomponent is a constituent part of a component (M-W). You're right that supercomponent may be odd - logically, if a subcomponent helps form a component, a component helps form, well, anything built from components. So you're looking for a word that signals how something is built from components.



    One word for this is a construction:




    2a : the process, art, or manner of constructing something ... also : a thing constructed




    What does it mean to construct something?




    1 : to make or form by combining or arranging parts or elements : build




    So the car is a construction made from a seat and other components. Similarly, your three-part breakdown would involve subcomponents, components, and constructions, the last denoting what components can be used to build.



    Other words to try include assembly and assemblage.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

      – R Mac
      2 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486314%2fis-there-a-word-for-supercomponent-similar-to-subcomponent-but-in-the-othe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    In manufacturing, components are combined to create an assembly. You will see this word on parts diagrams and other documentation about how to construct a machine. In fact, a component is an assembly of its subcomponents. For example, most cars have what is called a "tail light assembly" which consists of a light bulb, socket, reflector, and lens. The "seat" in your list would be ordered from a supplier as a "set assembly" to distinguish it from the "seat frame".



    However, there is a conceptual problem with your question: although the tail light is part of a car, a car is a lot more than something that has a tail light. In manufacturing, you might call the car a product or a machine.



    For your list, I would use used in or part of



    Seat has subcomponents:
    - Fabric
    - Cushion
    - Frame

    Seat is used in:
    - Car
    - Desk
    - Airplane


    Or just say a seat is a subcomponent of a car.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      In manufacturing, components are combined to create an assembly. You will see this word on parts diagrams and other documentation about how to construct a machine. In fact, a component is an assembly of its subcomponents. For example, most cars have what is called a "tail light assembly" which consists of a light bulb, socket, reflector, and lens. The "seat" in your list would be ordered from a supplier as a "set assembly" to distinguish it from the "seat frame".



      However, there is a conceptual problem with your question: although the tail light is part of a car, a car is a lot more than something that has a tail light. In manufacturing, you might call the car a product or a machine.



      For your list, I would use used in or part of



      Seat has subcomponents:
      - Fabric
      - Cushion
      - Frame

      Seat is used in:
      - Car
      - Desk
      - Airplane


      Or just say a seat is a subcomponent of a car.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        In manufacturing, components are combined to create an assembly. You will see this word on parts diagrams and other documentation about how to construct a machine. In fact, a component is an assembly of its subcomponents. For example, most cars have what is called a "tail light assembly" which consists of a light bulb, socket, reflector, and lens. The "seat" in your list would be ordered from a supplier as a "set assembly" to distinguish it from the "seat frame".



        However, there is a conceptual problem with your question: although the tail light is part of a car, a car is a lot more than something that has a tail light. In manufacturing, you might call the car a product or a machine.



        For your list, I would use used in or part of



        Seat has subcomponents:
        - Fabric
        - Cushion
        - Frame

        Seat is used in:
        - Car
        - Desk
        - Airplane


        Or just say a seat is a subcomponent of a car.






        share|improve this answer













        In manufacturing, components are combined to create an assembly. You will see this word on parts diagrams and other documentation about how to construct a machine. In fact, a component is an assembly of its subcomponents. For example, most cars have what is called a "tail light assembly" which consists of a light bulb, socket, reflector, and lens. The "seat" in your list would be ordered from a supplier as a "set assembly" to distinguish it from the "seat frame".



        However, there is a conceptual problem with your question: although the tail light is part of a car, a car is a lot more than something that has a tail light. In manufacturing, you might call the car a product or a machine.



        For your list, I would use used in or part of



        Seat has subcomponents:
        - Fabric
        - Cushion
        - Frame

        Seat is used in:
        - Car
        - Desk
        - Airplane


        Or just say a seat is a subcomponent of a car.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Old ProOld Pro

        2,5991918




        2,5991918

























            -1














            Try construction.



            A component is literally a constituent part of something (Merriam-Webster). A subcomponent is a constituent part of a component (M-W). You're right that supercomponent may be odd - logically, if a subcomponent helps form a component, a component helps form, well, anything built from components. So you're looking for a word that signals how something is built from components.



            One word for this is a construction:




            2a : the process, art, or manner of constructing something ... also : a thing constructed




            What does it mean to construct something?




            1 : to make or form by combining or arranging parts or elements : build




            So the car is a construction made from a seat and other components. Similarly, your three-part breakdown would involve subcomponents, components, and constructions, the last denoting what components can be used to build.



            Other words to try include assembly and assemblage.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

              – R Mac
              2 hours ago
















            -1














            Try construction.



            A component is literally a constituent part of something (Merriam-Webster). A subcomponent is a constituent part of a component (M-W). You're right that supercomponent may be odd - logically, if a subcomponent helps form a component, a component helps form, well, anything built from components. So you're looking for a word that signals how something is built from components.



            One word for this is a construction:




            2a : the process, art, or manner of constructing something ... also : a thing constructed




            What does it mean to construct something?




            1 : to make or form by combining or arranging parts or elements : build




            So the car is a construction made from a seat and other components. Similarly, your three-part breakdown would involve subcomponents, components, and constructions, the last denoting what components can be used to build.



            Other words to try include assembly and assemblage.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

              – R Mac
              2 hours ago














            -1












            -1








            -1







            Try construction.



            A component is literally a constituent part of something (Merriam-Webster). A subcomponent is a constituent part of a component (M-W). You're right that supercomponent may be odd - logically, if a subcomponent helps form a component, a component helps form, well, anything built from components. So you're looking for a word that signals how something is built from components.



            One word for this is a construction:




            2a : the process, art, or manner of constructing something ... also : a thing constructed




            What does it mean to construct something?




            1 : to make or form by combining or arranging parts or elements : build




            So the car is a construction made from a seat and other components. Similarly, your three-part breakdown would involve subcomponents, components, and constructions, the last denoting what components can be used to build.



            Other words to try include assembly and assemblage.






            share|improve this answer













            Try construction.



            A component is literally a constituent part of something (Merriam-Webster). A subcomponent is a constituent part of a component (M-W). You're right that supercomponent may be odd - logically, if a subcomponent helps form a component, a component helps form, well, anything built from components. So you're looking for a word that signals how something is built from components.



            One word for this is a construction:




            2a : the process, art, or manner of constructing something ... also : a thing constructed




            What does it mean to construct something?




            1 : to make or form by combining or arranging parts or elements : build




            So the car is a construction made from a seat and other components. Similarly, your three-part breakdown would involve subcomponents, components, and constructions, the last denoting what components can be used to build.



            Other words to try include assembly and assemblage.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

            3,877724




            3,877724













            • Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

              – R Mac
              2 hours ago



















            • Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

              – R Mac
              2 hours ago

















            Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

            – R Mac
            2 hours ago





            Yes but that doesn't answer the OP's question. If A is a subcomponent of B, B is not a component of A. I believe that's what the OP is asking--what is the opposite relational descriptor.

            – R Mac
            2 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486314%2fis-there-a-word-for-supercomponent-similar-to-subcomponent-but-in-the-othe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?