Does adding the suffix “ality” to a noun change its meaning?
I thought that -ality was used to turn an adjective into a noun : bestial to beastiality, final to finality.
But I see that some people add it onto the end of nouns : criminal to criminality, position to positionality.
What do you think?
nouns suffixes morphology
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
add a comment |
I thought that -ality was used to turn an adjective into a noun : bestial to beastiality, final to finality.
But I see that some people add it onto the end of nouns : criminal to criminality, position to positionality.
What do you think?
nouns suffixes morphology
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
4
"Criminal" is also an adjective
– sumelic
Oct 5 '17 at 0:27
Do you mean like adding "ity" to the military rank of General to produce generality??
– Gary's Student
Nov 11 '17 at 1:31
Take a closer look at your own examples. You’re not adding -ality to bestial to form bestiality – it would be *bestialality then.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
22 hours ago
add a comment |
I thought that -ality was used to turn an adjective into a noun : bestial to beastiality, final to finality.
But I see that some people add it onto the end of nouns : criminal to criminality, position to positionality.
What do you think?
nouns suffixes morphology
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
I thought that -ality was used to turn an adjective into a noun : bestial to beastiality, final to finality.
But I see that some people add it onto the end of nouns : criminal to criminality, position to positionality.
What do you think?
nouns suffixes morphology
nouns suffixes morphology
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
asked Oct 4 '17 at 23:56
Damian Siniakowicz
43
43
4
"Criminal" is also an adjective
– sumelic
Oct 5 '17 at 0:27
Do you mean like adding "ity" to the military rank of General to produce generality??
– Gary's Student
Nov 11 '17 at 1:31
Take a closer look at your own examples. You’re not adding -ality to bestial to form bestiality – it would be *bestialality then.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
22 hours ago
add a comment |
4
"Criminal" is also an adjective
– sumelic
Oct 5 '17 at 0:27
Do you mean like adding "ity" to the military rank of General to produce generality??
– Gary's Student
Nov 11 '17 at 1:31
Take a closer look at your own examples. You’re not adding -ality to bestial to form bestiality – it would be *bestialality then.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
22 hours ago
4
4
"Criminal" is also an adjective
– sumelic
Oct 5 '17 at 0:27
"Criminal" is also an adjective
– sumelic
Oct 5 '17 at 0:27
Do you mean like adding "ity" to the military rank of General to produce generality??
– Gary's Student
Nov 11 '17 at 1:31
Do you mean like adding "ity" to the military rank of General to produce generality??
– Gary's Student
Nov 11 '17 at 1:31
Take a closer look at your own examples. You’re not adding -ality to bestial to form bestiality – it would be *bestialality then.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
22 hours ago
Take a closer look at your own examples. You’re not adding -ality to bestial to form bestiality – it would be *bestialality then.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
22 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
There are three parts to the answer:
PART I
We are not adding '-ality', but '-ity'.
Bestial + -ity = Bestiality
Criminal + -ity = Criminality
Final + -ity = Finality
Positional + -ity = Positionality
Functional + -ity = Functionality
PART II
In each of these examples, we are adding -ity to an adjective and turning it into a noun. Criminal can be noun as well as an adjective. For example, "criminal offence", so can be positional, e.g. 'positional reference'.
So your original hypothesis is correct (with slight adjustment to the suffix). We add -ity to the adjectives ending into -al to form a noun.
PART III
As to your question about the change in meaning. The change is that now you are talking about the phoenomenon of the quality. Finality is a state or phenomenon of the quality 'being final'.
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
add a comment |
I believe that you would call -ity a nominalising suffix or noun suffix, which is one that converts other words into nouns.
There are many other such suffixes, for example -ing, -ism, and -ness.
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
add a comment |
When I find "functionality" in the American Heritage Dictionary – one of the last to hold out against allowing incorrect usage to change their definitions – it is defined as "The quality of being functional", which is a long-winded way of saying "functional". The field of computer science loves functionality. Instead of saying, "This application has functionality," one could simply say "This application functions."
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
4
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
3
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f412743%2fdoes-adding-the-suffix-ality-to-a-noun-change-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are three parts to the answer:
PART I
We are not adding '-ality', but '-ity'.
Bestial + -ity = Bestiality
Criminal + -ity = Criminality
Final + -ity = Finality
Positional + -ity = Positionality
Functional + -ity = Functionality
PART II
In each of these examples, we are adding -ity to an adjective and turning it into a noun. Criminal can be noun as well as an adjective. For example, "criminal offence", so can be positional, e.g. 'positional reference'.
So your original hypothesis is correct (with slight adjustment to the suffix). We add -ity to the adjectives ending into -al to form a noun.
PART III
As to your question about the change in meaning. The change is that now you are talking about the phoenomenon of the quality. Finality is a state or phenomenon of the quality 'being final'.
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
add a comment |
There are three parts to the answer:
PART I
We are not adding '-ality', but '-ity'.
Bestial + -ity = Bestiality
Criminal + -ity = Criminality
Final + -ity = Finality
Positional + -ity = Positionality
Functional + -ity = Functionality
PART II
In each of these examples, we are adding -ity to an adjective and turning it into a noun. Criminal can be noun as well as an adjective. For example, "criminal offence", so can be positional, e.g. 'positional reference'.
So your original hypothesis is correct (with slight adjustment to the suffix). We add -ity to the adjectives ending into -al to form a noun.
PART III
As to your question about the change in meaning. The change is that now you are talking about the phoenomenon of the quality. Finality is a state or phenomenon of the quality 'being final'.
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
add a comment |
There are three parts to the answer:
PART I
We are not adding '-ality', but '-ity'.
Bestial + -ity = Bestiality
Criminal + -ity = Criminality
Final + -ity = Finality
Positional + -ity = Positionality
Functional + -ity = Functionality
PART II
In each of these examples, we are adding -ity to an adjective and turning it into a noun. Criminal can be noun as well as an adjective. For example, "criminal offence", so can be positional, e.g. 'positional reference'.
So your original hypothesis is correct (with slight adjustment to the suffix). We add -ity to the adjectives ending into -al to form a noun.
PART III
As to your question about the change in meaning. The change is that now you are talking about the phoenomenon of the quality. Finality is a state or phenomenon of the quality 'being final'.
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
There are three parts to the answer:
PART I
We are not adding '-ality', but '-ity'.
Bestial + -ity = Bestiality
Criminal + -ity = Criminality
Final + -ity = Finality
Positional + -ity = Positionality
Functional + -ity = Functionality
PART II
In each of these examples, we are adding -ity to an adjective and turning it into a noun. Criminal can be noun as well as an adjective. For example, "criminal offence", so can be positional, e.g. 'positional reference'.
So your original hypothesis is correct (with slight adjustment to the suffix). We add -ity to the adjectives ending into -al to form a noun.
PART III
As to your question about the change in meaning. The change is that now you are talking about the phoenomenon of the quality. Finality is a state or phenomenon of the quality 'being final'.
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
edited 23 hours ago
MetaEd♦
25.3k1371121
25.3k1371121
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
answered Oct 10 '17 at 12:05
Pranesh
411
411
add a comment |
add a comment |
I believe that you would call -ity a nominalising suffix or noun suffix, which is one that converts other words into nouns.
There are many other such suffixes, for example -ing, -ism, and -ness.
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
add a comment |
I believe that you would call -ity a nominalising suffix or noun suffix, which is one that converts other words into nouns.
There are many other such suffixes, for example -ing, -ism, and -ness.
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
add a comment |
I believe that you would call -ity a nominalising suffix or noun suffix, which is one that converts other words into nouns.
There are many other such suffixes, for example -ing, -ism, and -ness.
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
I believe that you would call -ity a nominalising suffix or noun suffix, which is one that converts other words into nouns.
There are many other such suffixes, for example -ing, -ism, and -ness.
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
answered Oct 12 '17 at 0:11
jerielsj
322
322
add a comment |
add a comment |
When I find "functionality" in the American Heritage Dictionary – one of the last to hold out against allowing incorrect usage to change their definitions – it is defined as "The quality of being functional", which is a long-winded way of saying "functional". The field of computer science loves functionality. Instead of saying, "This application has functionality," one could simply say "This application functions."
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
4
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
3
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
add a comment |
When I find "functionality" in the American Heritage Dictionary – one of the last to hold out against allowing incorrect usage to change their definitions – it is defined as "The quality of being functional", which is a long-winded way of saying "functional". The field of computer science loves functionality. Instead of saying, "This application has functionality," one could simply say "This application functions."
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
4
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
3
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
add a comment |
When I find "functionality" in the American Heritage Dictionary – one of the last to hold out against allowing incorrect usage to change their definitions – it is defined as "The quality of being functional", which is a long-winded way of saying "functional". The field of computer science loves functionality. Instead of saying, "This application has functionality," one could simply say "This application functions."
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
When I find "functionality" in the American Heritage Dictionary – one of the last to hold out against allowing incorrect usage to change their definitions – it is defined as "The quality of being functional", which is a long-winded way of saying "functional". The field of computer science loves functionality. Instead of saying, "This application has functionality," one could simply say "This application functions."
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
answered Dec 1 '17 at 20:27
Lance
7
7
4
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
3
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
add a comment |
4
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
3
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
4
4
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
"The quality of being functional" is not "a long-winded way of saying 'functional'". A "quality" is a noun; "functional" is an adjective; "functions" in "This application functions" is a verb. Different parts of speech are used in different contexts.
– sumelic
Dec 1 '17 at 20:31
3
3
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
No- If the function of a program is to add numbers, then a more functional program would add numbers more quickly or more accurately, or would add irrational numbers or larger numbers than a less functional program. The functionality of the program describes how functional it is. The function and the functionality are not the same thing.
– jejorda2
Dec 1 '17 at 20:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f412743%2fdoes-adding-the-suffix-ality-to-a-noun-change-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
"Criminal" is also an adjective
– sumelic
Oct 5 '17 at 0:27
Do you mean like adding "ity" to the military rank of General to produce generality??
– Gary's Student
Nov 11 '17 at 1:31
Take a closer look at your own examples. You’re not adding -ality to bestial to form bestiality – it would be *bestialality then.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
22 hours ago