Optimising a list searching algorithm












13












$begingroup$


I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.



Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.



Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.



import itertools
import sys
import time

sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']

global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =

def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]

totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)

def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])

for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)




Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the $text{SP} :$



$$
begin{align}
text{Carbs} & {~=~} frac{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 times text{carbs}_1 + cdots}{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 + cdots} \[5px]
text{SP} & {~=~} frac{N_1 C_1 + N_2 C_2}{C_1 + C_2} times text{Balance} + text{Base Gain}
end{align}
$$

where:




  • $N$ is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins);


  • $C$ is the calories of the food;


  • $text{Base Gain} = 12$ (in all cases);


  • $text{Balance} = frac{text{Sum Nutrients}}{2 times text{highest nutrition}} .$











share|improve this question









New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in itertools.combinations.
    $endgroup$
    – Reinderien
    Mar 17 at 20:52






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OOh, it's the knapsac problem! You're probably better off trying for a "good enough" solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    2 days ago
















13












$begingroup$


I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.



Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.



Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.



import itertools
import sys
import time

sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']

global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =

def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]

totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)

def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])

for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)




Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the $text{SP} :$



$$
begin{align}
text{Carbs} & {~=~} frac{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 times text{carbs}_1 + cdots}{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 + cdots} \[5px]
text{SP} & {~=~} frac{N_1 C_1 + N_2 C_2}{C_1 + C_2} times text{Balance} + text{Base Gain}
end{align}
$$

where:




  • $N$ is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins);


  • $C$ is the calories of the food;


  • $text{Base Gain} = 12$ (in all cases);


  • $text{Balance} = frac{text{Sum Nutrients}}{2 times text{highest nutrition}} .$











share|improve this question









New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in itertools.combinations.
    $endgroup$
    – Reinderien
    Mar 17 at 20:52






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OOh, it's the knapsac problem! You're probably better off trying for a "good enough" solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    2 days ago














13












13








13


4



$begingroup$


I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.



Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.



Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.



import itertools
import sys
import time

sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']

global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =

def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]

totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)

def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])

for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)




Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the $text{SP} :$



$$
begin{align}
text{Carbs} & {~=~} frac{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 times text{carbs}_1 + cdots}{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 + cdots} \[5px]
text{SP} & {~=~} frac{N_1 C_1 + N_2 C_2}{C_1 + C_2} times text{Balance} + text{Base Gain}
end{align}
$$

where:




  • $N$ is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins);


  • $C$ is the calories of the food;


  • $text{Base Gain} = 12$ (in all cases);


  • $text{Balance} = frac{text{Sum Nutrients}}{2 times text{highest nutrition}} .$











share|improve this question









New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I've created the following code to try and find the optimum "diet" from a game called Eco. The maximum amount of calories you can have is 3000, as shown with MAXCALORIES.



Is there any way to make this code faster, since the time predicted for this code to compute 3000 calories is well over a few hundred years.



Note: I am trying to find the highest SP (skill points) you get from a diet, the optimum diet. To find this, I must go through every combination of diets and check how many skill points you receive through using it. The order of food does not matter, and I feel this is something that is slowing this program down.



import itertools
import sys
import time

sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

#["Name/Carbs/Protein/Fat/Vitamins/Calories"]
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']

global AllSP, AllNames
AllSP =
AllNames =

def findcombs(totalNames, totalCarbs, totalProtein, totalFat, totalVitamins, totalNutrients, totalCalories, MAXCALORIES):
doneit = False
for each in available:
each = each.split("/")
name = each[0]
carbs = float(each[1])
protein = float(each[2])
fat = float(each[3])
vitamins = float(each[4])
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins
calories = float(each[5])
# print(totalNames, totalCalories, calories, each)
if sum(totalCalories)+calories <= MAXCALORIES:
doneit = True
totalNames2 = totalNames[::]
totalCarbs2 = totalCarbs[::]
totalProtein2 = totalProtein[::]
totalFat2 = totalFat[::]
totalVitamins2 = totalVitamins[::]
totalCalories2 = totalCalories[::]
totalNutrients2 = totalNutrients[::]

totalNames2.append(name)
totalCarbs2.append(carbs)
totalProtein2.append(protein)
totalFat2.append(fat)
totalVitamins2.append(vitamins)
totalCalories2.append(calories)
totalNutrients2.append(nutrients)
# print(" ", totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2)
findcombs(totalNames2, totalCarbs2, totalProtein2, totalFat2, totalVitamins2, totalNutrients2, totalCalories2, MAXCALORIES)
else:
#find SP
try:
carbs = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalCarbs)]) / sum(totalCalories)
protein = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalProtein)]) / sum(totalCalories)
fat = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalFat)]) / sum(totalCalories)
vitamins = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalVitamins)]) / sum(totalCalories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max([carbs,protein,fat,vitamins]))
thisSP = sum([x * y for x, y in zip(totalCalories, totalNutrients)]) / sum(totalCalories) * balance + 12
except:
thisSP = 0
#add SP and names to two lists
AllSP.append(thisSP)
AllNames.append(totalNames)

def main(MAXCALORIES):
findcombs(, , , , , , , MAXCALORIES)
index = AllSP.index(max(AllSP))
print()
print(AllSP[index], " ", AllNames[index])

for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
main(i)
print("Calories:", i, ">>> Time:", time.time()-start)




Edit: On request, here is the formula for calculating the $text{SP} :$



$$
begin{align}
text{Carbs} & {~=~} frac{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 times text{carbs}_1 + cdots}{text{amount}_1 times text{calories}_1 + cdots} \[5px]
text{SP} & {~=~} frac{N_1 C_1 + N_2 C_2}{C_1 + C_2} times text{Balance} + text{Base Gain}
end{align}
$$

where:




  • $N$ is the nutrients of the food (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins);


  • $C$ is the calories of the food;


  • $text{Base Gain} = 12$ (in all cases);


  • $text{Balance} = frac{text{Sum Nutrients}}{2 times text{highest nutrition}} .$








python performance python-3.x






share|improve this question









New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Nat

163128




163128






New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 17 at 19:53









Ruler Of The WorldRuler Of The World

1689




1689




New contributor




Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ruler Of The World is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in itertools.combinations.
    $endgroup$
    – Reinderien
    Mar 17 at 20:52






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OOh, it's the knapsac problem! You're probably better off trying for a "good enough" solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    2 days ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in itertools.combinations.
    $endgroup$
    – Reinderien
    Mar 17 at 20:52






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OOh, it's the knapsac problem! You're probably better off trying for a "good enough" solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    2 days ago








1




1




$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
Mar 17 at 20:11




$begingroup$
I didn't even know you could set the recursion limit to be so huge... :O Yeah keeping it at 1000 forces you to write safer code btw :)
$endgroup$
– Peilonrayz
Mar 17 at 20:11












$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
Mar 17 at 20:12




$begingroup$
Good point, when you set it that high it usually means the code is very inefficient! :P @Peilonrayz
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
Mar 17 at 20:12












$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in itertools.combinations.
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
Mar 17 at 20:52




$begingroup$
Let's try to be more specific about your constraints. You need to select between 1 and n foods so long as the calorie count is smaller than or equal to 3000? This doesn't need recursion if you use Python's built-in itertools.combinations.
$endgroup$
– Reinderien
Mar 17 at 20:52




2




2




$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
Mar 17 at 20:58




$begingroup$
@greybeard These values are all for a game called "Eco", not for real life!
$endgroup$
– Ruler Of The World
Mar 17 at 20:58




1




1




$begingroup$
OOh, it's the knapsac problem! You're probably better off trying for a "good enough" solution.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
2 days ago




$begingroup$
OOh, it's the knapsac problem! You're probably better off trying for a "good enough" solution.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

Readability is #1





  1. Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.



    If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.



  2. You should load available into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.


  3. Using the above you can simplify all your totalNames, totalCarbs into one list.

  4. Rather than using AllSP and AllNames you can add a tuple to one list.

  5. You should put all your code into a main so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1).

  6. Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.


All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:



import itertools
import sys
import time
import collections

sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

_Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')

class Food(_Food):
@property
def nutrients(self):
return sum(self[1:5])


def read_foods(foods):
for food in foods:
name, *other = food.split('/')
yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])


def tot_avg(food, attr):
return (
sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
/ sum(f.calories for f in food)
)


def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
all_combinations =
def inner(total):
for food in available:
total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
inner(total[:] + [food])
else:
try:
nutrients = [
tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
]
balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
except ZeroDivisionError:
continue
sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
all_combinations.append((sp, total))
inner()
return all_combinations


def main(available):
for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time.time()
all_ = find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES)
amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
print('Calories:', amount, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)


if __name__ == '__main__':
available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
main(list(read_foods(available)))


How to optimizing the algorithm



Firstly the equations are:



$$g(f, a) = frac{Sigma(f_{a_i} times f_{text{calories}_i})}{Sigma(f_{text{calories}_i})}$$
$$n = {g(f, text{carbs}), g(f, text{protein}), g(f, text{fat}), g(f, text{vitimins})}$$
$$text{SP} = g(f, text{nutrients}) times frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)} + text{Base gain}$$



From here we have to find the maximums.





  1. What's the maximum and minimum that $frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)}$ can be?



    $$ frac{n + n + n + n}{2 times n} = frac{4n}{2n} = 2$$
    $$ frac{n + 0 + 0 + 0}{2 times n} = frac{n}{2n} = 0.5$$



    This means all we need to do is ensure the calorie average of all the different nutrients are the same. It doesn't matter what value this average is, only that all have the same.




  2. What's the maximum that $g(f, text{nutrients})$ can be?



    Firstly taking into account:



    $$frac{Sigma(a_i times b_i)}{Sigma(b_i)} = Sigma(a_i times frac{b_i}{Sigma(b_i)})$$



    We know that these are the calorie average of the foods nutritional value. To maximize this you just want the foods with the highest nutritional value.




Lets work through an example lets say we have the following five foods:




  • a/10/0/0/0/1

  • b/0/10/0/0/1

  • c/0/0/10/0/1

  • d/0/0/0/10/1

  • e/1/1/1/1/4


What's the way to maximize SP?



Eating 1 e would give you $4 times 2 = 8$.

Eating 4 a would give you $10 times 0.5 = 5$.

Eating 1 a, b, c and d would give you $10 times 2 = 20$.



And so from here we have deduced eating a, b, c and d in ratios of 1:1:1:1 give the most SP.



This means the rough solution is to find the foods that have the same calorie average for their individual nutrients where you select foods with a bias for ones with high total nutrients.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 23:46












  • $begingroup$
    If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    2 days ago



















7












$begingroup$

Data representation



Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.



available = (
('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
# ...
)


But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.



main isn't main



You've written a main function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__' check.



list duplication



This:



totalNames[::]


should simply be



list(totalNames)


snake_case



Your names should follow the format total_names, rather than totalNames.



Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global.



Suggested



This doesn't at all tackle the main issue of algorithmic complexity, only Python usage. It isn't a good implementation, it's just to illustrate some stylistic improvements.



Note a few things:




  • Having a shebang at the top is very important to indicate to the shell and other programmers what's being executed

  • Use csv

  • Use tuple unpacking in your loops where possible

  • Abbreviate the formation of new lists by doing appends inline

  • Never except:; at a minimum except Exception: although even this should be more specific

  • Use f-strings where appropriate

  • Drop inner lists in list comprehensions when you don't need them


foods.csv



name,carbs,protein,fat,vitamins,calories
Fiddleheads,3,1,0,3,80
Fireweed Shoots,3,0,0,4,150
Prickly Pear Fruit,2,1,1,3,190
Huckleberries,2,0,0,6,80
Rice,7,1,0,0,90
Camas Bulb,1,2,5,0,120
Beans,1,4,3,0,120
Wheat,6,2,0,0,130
Crimini Mushrooms,3,3,1,1,200
Corn,5,2,0,1,230
Beet,3,1,1,3,230
Tomato,4,1,0,3,240
Raw Fish,0,3,7,0,200
Raw Meat,0,7,3,0,250
Tallow,0,0,8,0,200
Scrap Meat,0,5,5,0,50
Prepared Meat,0,4,6,0,600
Raw Roast,0,6,5,0,800
Raw Sausage,0,4,8,0,500
Raw Bacon,0,3,9,0,600
Prime Cut,0,9,4,0,600
Cereal Germ,5,0,7,3,20
Bean Paste,3,5,7,0,40
Flour,15,0,0,0,50
Sugar,15,0,0,0,50
Camas Paste,3,2,10,0,60
Cornmeal,9,3,3,0,60
Huckleberry Extract,0,0,0,15,60
Yeast,0,8,0,7,60
Oil,0,0,15,0,120
Infused Oil,0,0,12,3,120
Simple Syrup,12,0,3,0,400
Rice Sludge,10,1,0,2,450
Charred Beet,3,0,3,7,470
Camas Mash,1,2,9,1,500
Campfire Beans,1,9,3,0,500
Wilted Fiddleheads,4,1,0,8,500
Boiled Shoots,3,0,1,9,510
Charred Camas Bulb,2,3,7,1,510
Charred Tomato,8,1,0,4,510
Charred Corn,8,1,0,4,530
Charred Fish,0,9,4,0,550
Charred Meat,0,10,10,0,550
Wheat Porridge,10,4,0,10,510
Charred Sausage,0,11,15,0,500
Fried Tomatoes,12,3,9,2,560
Bannock,15,3,8,0,600
Fiddlehead Salad,6,6,0,14,970
Campfire Roast,0,16,12,0,1000
Campfire Stew,5,12,9,4,1200
Wild Stew,8,5,5,12,1200
Fruit Salad,8,2,2,10,900
Meat Stock,5,8,9,3,700
Vegetable Stock,11,1,2,11,700
Camas Bulb Bake,12,7,5,4,400
Flatbread,17,8,3,0,500
Huckleberry Muffin,10,5,4,11,450
Baked Meat,0,13,17,0,600
Baked Roast,4,13,8,7,900
Huckleberry Pie,9,5,4,16,1300
Meat Pie,7,11,11,5,1300
Basic Salad,13,6,6,13,800
Simmered Meat,6,18,13,5,900
Vegetable Medley,9,5,8,20,900
Vegetable Soup,12,4,7,19,1200
Crispy Bacon,0,18,26,0,600
Stuffed Turkey,9,16,12,7,1500


Python



#!/usr/bin/env python3

import csv
from time import time

ALL_SP =
ALL_NAMES =


def read(fn):
with open('foods.csv') as f:
reader = csv.reader(f, newline='')
next(reader) # ignore title
return tuple(
(name, float(carbs), float(protein), float(fat), float(vitamins), float(calories))
for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in reader
)


AVAILABLE = read('foods.csv')


def find_combs(total_names, total_carbs, total_protein, total_fat, total_vitamins, total_nutrients,
total_calories, max_calories):
for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in AVAILABLE:
nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins

if sum(total_calories) + calories <= max_calories:
find_combs(total_names + [name],
total_carbs + [carbs],
total_protein + [protein],
total_fat + [fat],
total_vitamins + [vitamins],
total_nutrients + [nutrients],
total_calories + [calories],
max_calories)
else:
# find SP
try:
carbs = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_carbs)) / sum(total_calories)
protein = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_protein)) / sum(total_calories)
fat = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_fat)) / sum(total_calories)
vitamins = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_vitamins)) / sum(total_calories)
balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max(carbs,protein,fat,vitamins))
thisSP = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_nutrients)) / sum(total_calories) * balance + 12
except Exception:
thisSP = 0

# add SP and names to two lists
ALL_SP.append(thisSP)
ALL_NAMES.append(total_names)


def calc(max_calories):
find_combs(, , , , , , , max_calories)
index = ALL_SP.index(max(ALL_SP))
print()
print(f'{ALL_SP[index]:.2f} {ALL_NAMES[index]}')


def main():
for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
start = time()
calc(i)
print(f'Calories: {i} >>> Time: {time()-start:.3f}')


if __name__ == '__main__':
main()


I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:10






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
    $endgroup$
    – greybeard
    Mar 17 at 21:03












  • $begingroup$
    @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 21:11





















2












$begingroup$

I see some replies with general tips for optimization, but I don't see anyone recommending a specific approach called memoization. It works wonders just for this kind of problems (results in some finite range around the <1M mark, 3000 is far below the upper limit).



Basically you would do something like this:



Create a sort of array (this one will be struxtured differently depending on whether you just need the value of the result, only one combination of food items or all combinations). Since no food has negative calories, you can only make it 0-3000



Then you do something like this (pseudocode):



for foodItem in foodItems:
for value in caloriesArray:
if caloriesArray[value] != 0: #has been reached before, so I can expand on it
caloriesArray[value]+foodItems[foodItem] = ... #whatever you need, can be just True


There are plenty of sites explaining memoization and I'm not very good at explanations, but if this doesn't help you then I can include a simple example.



Then just find the highest reached value of the array.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215626%2foptimising-a-list-searching-algorithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17












    $begingroup$

    Readability is #1





    1. Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.



      If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.



    2. You should load available into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.


    3. Using the above you can simplify all your totalNames, totalCarbs into one list.

    4. Rather than using AllSP and AllNames you can add a tuple to one list.

    5. You should put all your code into a main so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1).

    6. Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.


    All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:



    import itertools
    import sys
    import time
    import collections

    sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

    _Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')

    class Food(_Food):
    @property
    def nutrients(self):
    return sum(self[1:5])


    def read_foods(foods):
    for food in foods:
    name, *other = food.split('/')
    yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])


    def tot_avg(food, attr):
    return (
    sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
    / sum(f.calories for f in food)
    )


    def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
    all_combinations =
    def inner(total):
    for food in available:
    total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
    if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
    inner(total[:] + [food])
    else:
    try:
    nutrients = [
    tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
    tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
    tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
    tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
    ]
    balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
    except ZeroDivisionError:
    continue
    sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
    all_combinations.append((sp, total))
    inner()
    return all_combinations


    def main(available):
    for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time.time()
    all_ = find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES)
    amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
    print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
    print('Calories:', amount, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
    main(list(read_foods(available)))


    How to optimizing the algorithm



    Firstly the equations are:



    $$g(f, a) = frac{Sigma(f_{a_i} times f_{text{calories}_i})}{Sigma(f_{text{calories}_i})}$$
    $$n = {g(f, text{carbs}), g(f, text{protein}), g(f, text{fat}), g(f, text{vitimins})}$$
    $$text{SP} = g(f, text{nutrients}) times frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)} + text{Base gain}$$



    From here we have to find the maximums.





    1. What's the maximum and minimum that $frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)}$ can be?



      $$ frac{n + n + n + n}{2 times n} = frac{4n}{2n} = 2$$
      $$ frac{n + 0 + 0 + 0}{2 times n} = frac{n}{2n} = 0.5$$



      This means all we need to do is ensure the calorie average of all the different nutrients are the same. It doesn't matter what value this average is, only that all have the same.




    2. What's the maximum that $g(f, text{nutrients})$ can be?



      Firstly taking into account:



      $$frac{Sigma(a_i times b_i)}{Sigma(b_i)} = Sigma(a_i times frac{b_i}{Sigma(b_i)})$$



      We know that these are the calorie average of the foods nutritional value. To maximize this you just want the foods with the highest nutritional value.




    Lets work through an example lets say we have the following five foods:




    • a/10/0/0/0/1

    • b/0/10/0/0/1

    • c/0/0/10/0/1

    • d/0/0/0/10/1

    • e/1/1/1/1/4


    What's the way to maximize SP?



    Eating 1 e would give you $4 times 2 = 8$.

    Eating 4 a would give you $10 times 0.5 = 5$.

    Eating 1 a, b, c and d would give you $10 times 2 = 20$.



    And so from here we have deduced eating a, b, c and d in ratios of 1:1:1:1 give the most SP.



    This means the rough solution is to find the foods that have the same calorie average for their individual nutrients where you select foods with a bias for ones with high total nutrients.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 23:43










    • $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
      $endgroup$
      – Peilonrayz
      Mar 17 at 23:46












    • $begingroup$
      If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Cordes
      2 days ago
















    17












    $begingroup$

    Readability is #1





    1. Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.



      If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.



    2. You should load available into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.


    3. Using the above you can simplify all your totalNames, totalCarbs into one list.

    4. Rather than using AllSP and AllNames you can add a tuple to one list.

    5. You should put all your code into a main so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1).

    6. Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.


    All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:



    import itertools
    import sys
    import time
    import collections

    sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

    _Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')

    class Food(_Food):
    @property
    def nutrients(self):
    return sum(self[1:5])


    def read_foods(foods):
    for food in foods:
    name, *other = food.split('/')
    yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])


    def tot_avg(food, attr):
    return (
    sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
    / sum(f.calories for f in food)
    )


    def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
    all_combinations =
    def inner(total):
    for food in available:
    total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
    if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
    inner(total[:] + [food])
    else:
    try:
    nutrients = [
    tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
    tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
    tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
    tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
    ]
    balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
    except ZeroDivisionError:
    continue
    sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
    all_combinations.append((sp, total))
    inner()
    return all_combinations


    def main(available):
    for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time.time()
    all_ = find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES)
    amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
    print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
    print('Calories:', amount, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
    main(list(read_foods(available)))


    How to optimizing the algorithm



    Firstly the equations are:



    $$g(f, a) = frac{Sigma(f_{a_i} times f_{text{calories}_i})}{Sigma(f_{text{calories}_i})}$$
    $$n = {g(f, text{carbs}), g(f, text{protein}), g(f, text{fat}), g(f, text{vitimins})}$$
    $$text{SP} = g(f, text{nutrients}) times frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)} + text{Base gain}$$



    From here we have to find the maximums.





    1. What's the maximum and minimum that $frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)}$ can be?



      $$ frac{n + n + n + n}{2 times n} = frac{4n}{2n} = 2$$
      $$ frac{n + 0 + 0 + 0}{2 times n} = frac{n}{2n} = 0.5$$



      This means all we need to do is ensure the calorie average of all the different nutrients are the same. It doesn't matter what value this average is, only that all have the same.




    2. What's the maximum that $g(f, text{nutrients})$ can be?



      Firstly taking into account:



      $$frac{Sigma(a_i times b_i)}{Sigma(b_i)} = Sigma(a_i times frac{b_i}{Sigma(b_i)})$$



      We know that these are the calorie average of the foods nutritional value. To maximize this you just want the foods with the highest nutritional value.




    Lets work through an example lets say we have the following five foods:




    • a/10/0/0/0/1

    • b/0/10/0/0/1

    • c/0/0/10/0/1

    • d/0/0/0/10/1

    • e/1/1/1/1/4


    What's the way to maximize SP?



    Eating 1 e would give you $4 times 2 = 8$.

    Eating 4 a would give you $10 times 0.5 = 5$.

    Eating 1 a, b, c and d would give you $10 times 2 = 20$.



    And so from here we have deduced eating a, b, c and d in ratios of 1:1:1:1 give the most SP.



    This means the rough solution is to find the foods that have the same calorie average for their individual nutrients where you select foods with a bias for ones with high total nutrients.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 23:43










    • $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
      $endgroup$
      – Peilonrayz
      Mar 17 at 23:46












    • $begingroup$
      If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Cordes
      2 days ago














    17












    17








    17





    $begingroup$

    Readability is #1





    1. Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.



      If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.



    2. You should load available into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.


    3. Using the above you can simplify all your totalNames, totalCarbs into one list.

    4. Rather than using AllSP and AllNames you can add a tuple to one list.

    5. You should put all your code into a main so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1).

    6. Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.


    All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:



    import itertools
    import sys
    import time
    import collections

    sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

    _Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')

    class Food(_Food):
    @property
    def nutrients(self):
    return sum(self[1:5])


    def read_foods(foods):
    for food in foods:
    name, *other = food.split('/')
    yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])


    def tot_avg(food, attr):
    return (
    sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
    / sum(f.calories for f in food)
    )


    def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
    all_combinations =
    def inner(total):
    for food in available:
    total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
    if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
    inner(total[:] + [food])
    else:
    try:
    nutrients = [
    tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
    tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
    tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
    tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
    ]
    balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
    except ZeroDivisionError:
    continue
    sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
    all_combinations.append((sp, total))
    inner()
    return all_combinations


    def main(available):
    for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time.time()
    all_ = find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES)
    amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
    print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
    print('Calories:', amount, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
    main(list(read_foods(available)))


    How to optimizing the algorithm



    Firstly the equations are:



    $$g(f, a) = frac{Sigma(f_{a_i} times f_{text{calories}_i})}{Sigma(f_{text{calories}_i})}$$
    $$n = {g(f, text{carbs}), g(f, text{protein}), g(f, text{fat}), g(f, text{vitimins})}$$
    $$text{SP} = g(f, text{nutrients}) times frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)} + text{Base gain}$$



    From here we have to find the maximums.





    1. What's the maximum and minimum that $frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)}$ can be?



      $$ frac{n + n + n + n}{2 times n} = frac{4n}{2n} = 2$$
      $$ frac{n + 0 + 0 + 0}{2 times n} = frac{n}{2n} = 0.5$$



      This means all we need to do is ensure the calorie average of all the different nutrients are the same. It doesn't matter what value this average is, only that all have the same.




    2. What's the maximum that $g(f, text{nutrients})$ can be?



      Firstly taking into account:



      $$frac{Sigma(a_i times b_i)}{Sigma(b_i)} = Sigma(a_i times frac{b_i}{Sigma(b_i)})$$



      We know that these are the calorie average of the foods nutritional value. To maximize this you just want the foods with the highest nutritional value.




    Lets work through an example lets say we have the following five foods:




    • a/10/0/0/0/1

    • b/0/10/0/0/1

    • c/0/0/10/0/1

    • d/0/0/0/10/1

    • e/1/1/1/1/4


    What's the way to maximize SP?



    Eating 1 e would give you $4 times 2 = 8$.

    Eating 4 a would give you $10 times 0.5 = 5$.

    Eating 1 a, b, c and d would give you $10 times 2 = 20$.



    And so from here we have deduced eating a, b, c and d in ratios of 1:1:1:1 give the most SP.



    This means the rough solution is to find the foods that have the same calorie average for their individual nutrients where you select foods with a bias for ones with high total nutrients.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Readability is #1





    1. Global variables are bad. Don't use them. I have to spend a long while looking at your code to tell what uses them and when. When your code becomes hundreds of lines long this is tedious and unmaintainable.



      If you need to use recursion and add to something not in the recursive function use a closure.



    2. You should load available into an object, rather than extract the information from it each and every time you use it.


    3. Using the above you can simplify all your totalNames, totalCarbs into one list.

    4. Rather than using AllSP and AllNames you can add a tuple to one list.

    5. You should put all your code into a main so that you reduce the amount of variables in the global scope. This goes hand in hand with (1).

    6. Rather than copying and pasting the same line multiple times you can create a function.


    All this gets the following. Which should be easier for you to increase the performance from:



    import itertools
    import sys
    import time
    import collections

    sys.setrecursionlimit(10000000)

    _Food = collections.namedtuple('Food', 'name carbs protein fat vitamins calories')

    class Food(_Food):
    @property
    def nutrients(self):
    return sum(self[1:5])


    def read_foods(foods):
    for food in foods:
    name, *other = food.split('/')
    yield Food(name, *[float(v) for v in other])


    def tot_avg(food, attr):
    return (
    sum(f.calories * getattr(f, attr) for f in food)
    / sum(f.calories for f in food)
    )


    def find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES):
    all_combinations =
    def inner(total):
    for food in available:
    total_calories = [f.calories for f in total]
    if sum(total_calories) + food.calories <= MAXCALORIES:
    inner(total[:] + [food])
    else:
    try:
    nutrients = [
    tot_avg(total, 'carbs'),
    tot_avg(total, 'protein'),
    tot_avg(total, 'fat'),
    tot_avg(total, 'vitamins')
    ]
    balance = sum(nutrients) / 2 / max(nutrients)
    except ZeroDivisionError:
    continue
    sp = tot_avg(total, 'nutrients') * balance + 12
    all_combinations.append((sp, total))
    inner()
    return all_combinations


    def main(available):
    for MAXCALORIES in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time.time()
    all_ = find_combs(available, MAXCALORIES)
    amount, foods = max(all_, key=lambda i: i[0])
    print(amount, ' ', [f.name for f in foods])
    print('Calories:', amount, '>>> Time:', time.time()-start)


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    available = ['Fiddleheads/3/1/0/3/80', 'Fireweed Shoots/3/0/0/4/150', 'Prickly Pear Fruit/2/1/1/3/190', 'Huckleberries/2/0/0/6/80', 'Rice/7/1/0/0/90', 'Camas Bulb/1/2/5/0/120', 'Beans/1/4/3/0/120', 'Wheat/6/2/0/0/130', 'Crimini Mushrooms/3/3/1/1/200', 'Corn/5/2/0/1/230', 'Beet/3/1/1/3/230', 'Tomato/4/1/0/3/240', 'Raw Fish/0/3/7/0/200', 'Raw Meat/0/7/3/0/250', 'Tallow/0/0/8/0/200', 'Scrap Meat/0/5/5/0/50', 'Prepared Meat/0/4/6/0/600', 'Raw Roast/0/6/5/0/800', 'Raw Sausage/0/4/8/0/500', 'Raw Bacon/0/3/9/0/600', 'Prime Cut/0/9/4/0/600', 'Cereal Germ/5/0/7/3/20', 'Bean Paste/3/5/7/0/40', 'Flour/15/0/0/0/50', 'Sugar/15/0/0/0/50', 'Camas Paste/3/2/10/0/60', 'Cornmeal/9/3/3/0/60', 'Huckleberry Extract/0/0/0/15/60', 'Yeast/0/8/0/7/60', 'Oil/0/0/15/0/120', 'Infused Oil/0/0/12/3/120', 'Simple Syrup/12/0/3/0/400', 'Rice Sludge/10/1/0/2/450', 'Charred Beet/3/0/3/7/470', 'Camas Mash/1/2/9/1/500', 'Campfire Beans/1/9/3/0/500', 'Wilted Fiddleheads/4/1/0/8/500', 'Boiled Shoots/3/0/1/9/510', 'Charred Camas Bulb/2/3/7/1/510', 'Charred Tomato/8/1/0/4/510', 'Charred Corn/8/1/0/4/530', 'Charred Fish/0/9/4/0/550', 'Charred Meat/0/10/10/0/550', 'Wheat Porridge/10/4/0/10/510', 'Charred Sausage/0/11/15/0/500', 'Fried Tomatoes/12/3/9/2/560', 'Bannock/15/3/8/0/600', 'Fiddlehead Salad/6/6/0/14/970', 'Campfire Roast/0/16/12/0/1000', 'Campfire Stew/5/12/9/4/1200', 'Wild Stew/8/5/5/12/1200', 'Fruit Salad/8/2/2/10/900', 'Meat Stock/5/8/9/3/700', 'Vegetable Stock/11/1/2/11/700', 'Camas Bulb Bake/12/7/5/4/400', 'Flatbread/17/8/3/0/500', 'Huckleberry Muffin/10/5/4/11/450', 'Baked Meat/0/13/17/0/600', 'Baked Roast/4/13/8/7/900', 'Huckleberry Pie/9/5/4/16/1300', 'Meat Pie/7/11/11/5/1300', 'Basic Salad/13/6/6/13/800', 'Simmered Meat/6/18/13/5/900', 'Vegetable Medley/9/5/8/20/900', 'Vegetable Soup/12/4/7/19/1200', 'Crispy Bacon/0/18/26/0/600', 'Stuffed Turkey/9/16/12/7/1500']
    main(list(read_foods(available)))


    How to optimizing the algorithm



    Firstly the equations are:



    $$g(f, a) = frac{Sigma(f_{a_i} times f_{text{calories}_i})}{Sigma(f_{text{calories}_i})}$$
    $$n = {g(f, text{carbs}), g(f, text{protein}), g(f, text{fat}), g(f, text{vitimins})}$$
    $$text{SP} = g(f, text{nutrients}) times frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)} + text{Base gain}$$



    From here we have to find the maximums.





    1. What's the maximum and minimum that $frac{Sigma n}{2max(n)}$ can be?



      $$ frac{n + n + n + n}{2 times n} = frac{4n}{2n} = 2$$
      $$ frac{n + 0 + 0 + 0}{2 times n} = frac{n}{2n} = 0.5$$



      This means all we need to do is ensure the calorie average of all the different nutrients are the same. It doesn't matter what value this average is, only that all have the same.




    2. What's the maximum that $g(f, text{nutrients})$ can be?



      Firstly taking into account:



      $$frac{Sigma(a_i times b_i)}{Sigma(b_i)} = Sigma(a_i times frac{b_i}{Sigma(b_i)})$$



      We know that these are the calorie average of the foods nutritional value. To maximize this you just want the foods with the highest nutritional value.




    Lets work through an example lets say we have the following five foods:




    • a/10/0/0/0/1

    • b/0/10/0/0/1

    • c/0/0/10/0/1

    • d/0/0/0/10/1

    • e/1/1/1/1/4


    What's the way to maximize SP?



    Eating 1 e would give you $4 times 2 = 8$.

    Eating 4 a would give you $10 times 0.5 = 5$.

    Eating 1 a, b, c and d would give you $10 times 2 = 20$.



    And so from here we have deduced eating a, b, c and d in ratios of 1:1:1:1 give the most SP.



    This means the rough solution is to find the foods that have the same calorie average for their individual nutrients where you select foods with a bias for ones with high total nutrients.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered Mar 17 at 23:04









    PeilonrayzPeilonrayz

    26k338110




    26k338110












    • $begingroup$
      I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 23:43










    • $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
      $endgroup$
      – Peilonrayz
      Mar 17 at 23:46












    • $begingroup$
      If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Cordes
      2 days ago


















    • $begingroup$
      I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 23:43










    • $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
      $endgroup$
      – Peilonrayz
      Mar 17 at 23:46












    • $begingroup$
      If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Cordes
      2 days ago
















    $begingroup$
    I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 23:43




    $begingroup$
    I'm going to leave it a little while until I accept this amazing answer, just in case there are any massive developments. Thanks for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 23:43












    $begingroup$
    @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 23:46






    $begingroup$
    @RulerOfTheWorld It's always good to wait a while before accepting. :) If someone comes along and posts something better than the above I'd encourage you to give them the tick rather than me. I posted my answer halfway through so others can have easier to read code to work from.
    $endgroup$
    – Peilonrayz
    Mar 17 at 23:46














    $begingroup$
    If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    If someone posts a better answer later, you can change your accept vote. I think it makes sense to accept once you've read and understood an answer to make sure it's actually good, and think it's comprehensive enough. Having an accepted answer doesn't close a question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    2 days ago













    7












    $begingroup$

    Data representation



    Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.



    available = (
    ('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
    # ...
    )


    But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.



    main isn't main



    You've written a main function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__' check.



    list duplication



    This:



    totalNames[::]


    should simply be



    list(totalNames)


    snake_case



    Your names should follow the format total_names, rather than totalNames.



    Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global.



    Suggested



    This doesn't at all tackle the main issue of algorithmic complexity, only Python usage. It isn't a good implementation, it's just to illustrate some stylistic improvements.



    Note a few things:




    • Having a shebang at the top is very important to indicate to the shell and other programmers what's being executed

    • Use csv

    • Use tuple unpacking in your loops where possible

    • Abbreviate the formation of new lists by doing appends inline

    • Never except:; at a minimum except Exception: although even this should be more specific

    • Use f-strings where appropriate

    • Drop inner lists in list comprehensions when you don't need them


    foods.csv



    name,carbs,protein,fat,vitamins,calories
    Fiddleheads,3,1,0,3,80
    Fireweed Shoots,3,0,0,4,150
    Prickly Pear Fruit,2,1,1,3,190
    Huckleberries,2,0,0,6,80
    Rice,7,1,0,0,90
    Camas Bulb,1,2,5,0,120
    Beans,1,4,3,0,120
    Wheat,6,2,0,0,130
    Crimini Mushrooms,3,3,1,1,200
    Corn,5,2,0,1,230
    Beet,3,1,1,3,230
    Tomato,4,1,0,3,240
    Raw Fish,0,3,7,0,200
    Raw Meat,0,7,3,0,250
    Tallow,0,0,8,0,200
    Scrap Meat,0,5,5,0,50
    Prepared Meat,0,4,6,0,600
    Raw Roast,0,6,5,0,800
    Raw Sausage,0,4,8,0,500
    Raw Bacon,0,3,9,0,600
    Prime Cut,0,9,4,0,600
    Cereal Germ,5,0,7,3,20
    Bean Paste,3,5,7,0,40
    Flour,15,0,0,0,50
    Sugar,15,0,0,0,50
    Camas Paste,3,2,10,0,60
    Cornmeal,9,3,3,0,60
    Huckleberry Extract,0,0,0,15,60
    Yeast,0,8,0,7,60
    Oil,0,0,15,0,120
    Infused Oil,0,0,12,3,120
    Simple Syrup,12,0,3,0,400
    Rice Sludge,10,1,0,2,450
    Charred Beet,3,0,3,7,470
    Camas Mash,1,2,9,1,500
    Campfire Beans,1,9,3,0,500
    Wilted Fiddleheads,4,1,0,8,500
    Boiled Shoots,3,0,1,9,510
    Charred Camas Bulb,2,3,7,1,510
    Charred Tomato,8,1,0,4,510
    Charred Corn,8,1,0,4,530
    Charred Fish,0,9,4,0,550
    Charred Meat,0,10,10,0,550
    Wheat Porridge,10,4,0,10,510
    Charred Sausage,0,11,15,0,500
    Fried Tomatoes,12,3,9,2,560
    Bannock,15,3,8,0,600
    Fiddlehead Salad,6,6,0,14,970
    Campfire Roast,0,16,12,0,1000
    Campfire Stew,5,12,9,4,1200
    Wild Stew,8,5,5,12,1200
    Fruit Salad,8,2,2,10,900
    Meat Stock,5,8,9,3,700
    Vegetable Stock,11,1,2,11,700
    Camas Bulb Bake,12,7,5,4,400
    Flatbread,17,8,3,0,500
    Huckleberry Muffin,10,5,4,11,450
    Baked Meat,0,13,17,0,600
    Baked Roast,4,13,8,7,900
    Huckleberry Pie,9,5,4,16,1300
    Meat Pie,7,11,11,5,1300
    Basic Salad,13,6,6,13,800
    Simmered Meat,6,18,13,5,900
    Vegetable Medley,9,5,8,20,900
    Vegetable Soup,12,4,7,19,1200
    Crispy Bacon,0,18,26,0,600
    Stuffed Turkey,9,16,12,7,1500


    Python



    #!/usr/bin/env python3

    import csv
    from time import time

    ALL_SP =
    ALL_NAMES =


    def read(fn):
    with open('foods.csv') as f:
    reader = csv.reader(f, newline='')
    next(reader) # ignore title
    return tuple(
    (name, float(carbs), float(protein), float(fat), float(vitamins), float(calories))
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in reader
    )


    AVAILABLE = read('foods.csv')


    def find_combs(total_names, total_carbs, total_protein, total_fat, total_vitamins, total_nutrients,
    total_calories, max_calories):
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in AVAILABLE:
    nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins

    if sum(total_calories) + calories <= max_calories:
    find_combs(total_names + [name],
    total_carbs + [carbs],
    total_protein + [protein],
    total_fat + [fat],
    total_vitamins + [vitamins],
    total_nutrients + [nutrients],
    total_calories + [calories],
    max_calories)
    else:
    # find SP
    try:
    carbs = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_carbs)) / sum(total_calories)
    protein = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_protein)) / sum(total_calories)
    fat = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_fat)) / sum(total_calories)
    vitamins = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_vitamins)) / sum(total_calories)
    balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max(carbs,protein,fat,vitamins))
    thisSP = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_nutrients)) / sum(total_calories) * balance + 12
    except Exception:
    thisSP = 0

    # add SP and names to two lists
    ALL_SP.append(thisSP)
    ALL_NAMES.append(total_names)


    def calc(max_calories):
    find_combs(, , , , , , , max_calories)
    index = ALL_SP.index(max(ALL_SP))
    print()
    print(f'{ALL_SP[index]:.2f} {ALL_NAMES[index]}')


    def main():
    for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time()
    calc(i)
    print(f'Calories: {i} >>> Time: {time()-start:.3f}')


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()


    I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 20:10






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
      $endgroup$
      – greybeard
      Mar 17 at 21:03












    • $begingroup$
      @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 21:11


















    7












    $begingroup$

    Data representation



    Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.



    available = (
    ('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
    # ...
    )


    But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.



    main isn't main



    You've written a main function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__' check.



    list duplication



    This:



    totalNames[::]


    should simply be



    list(totalNames)


    snake_case



    Your names should follow the format total_names, rather than totalNames.



    Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global.



    Suggested



    This doesn't at all tackle the main issue of algorithmic complexity, only Python usage. It isn't a good implementation, it's just to illustrate some stylistic improvements.



    Note a few things:




    • Having a shebang at the top is very important to indicate to the shell and other programmers what's being executed

    • Use csv

    • Use tuple unpacking in your loops where possible

    • Abbreviate the formation of new lists by doing appends inline

    • Never except:; at a minimum except Exception: although even this should be more specific

    • Use f-strings where appropriate

    • Drop inner lists in list comprehensions when you don't need them


    foods.csv



    name,carbs,protein,fat,vitamins,calories
    Fiddleheads,3,1,0,3,80
    Fireweed Shoots,3,0,0,4,150
    Prickly Pear Fruit,2,1,1,3,190
    Huckleberries,2,0,0,6,80
    Rice,7,1,0,0,90
    Camas Bulb,1,2,5,0,120
    Beans,1,4,3,0,120
    Wheat,6,2,0,0,130
    Crimini Mushrooms,3,3,1,1,200
    Corn,5,2,0,1,230
    Beet,3,1,1,3,230
    Tomato,4,1,0,3,240
    Raw Fish,0,3,7,0,200
    Raw Meat,0,7,3,0,250
    Tallow,0,0,8,0,200
    Scrap Meat,0,5,5,0,50
    Prepared Meat,0,4,6,0,600
    Raw Roast,0,6,5,0,800
    Raw Sausage,0,4,8,0,500
    Raw Bacon,0,3,9,0,600
    Prime Cut,0,9,4,0,600
    Cereal Germ,5,0,7,3,20
    Bean Paste,3,5,7,0,40
    Flour,15,0,0,0,50
    Sugar,15,0,0,0,50
    Camas Paste,3,2,10,0,60
    Cornmeal,9,3,3,0,60
    Huckleberry Extract,0,0,0,15,60
    Yeast,0,8,0,7,60
    Oil,0,0,15,0,120
    Infused Oil,0,0,12,3,120
    Simple Syrup,12,0,3,0,400
    Rice Sludge,10,1,0,2,450
    Charred Beet,3,0,3,7,470
    Camas Mash,1,2,9,1,500
    Campfire Beans,1,9,3,0,500
    Wilted Fiddleheads,4,1,0,8,500
    Boiled Shoots,3,0,1,9,510
    Charred Camas Bulb,2,3,7,1,510
    Charred Tomato,8,1,0,4,510
    Charred Corn,8,1,0,4,530
    Charred Fish,0,9,4,0,550
    Charred Meat,0,10,10,0,550
    Wheat Porridge,10,4,0,10,510
    Charred Sausage,0,11,15,0,500
    Fried Tomatoes,12,3,9,2,560
    Bannock,15,3,8,0,600
    Fiddlehead Salad,6,6,0,14,970
    Campfire Roast,0,16,12,0,1000
    Campfire Stew,5,12,9,4,1200
    Wild Stew,8,5,5,12,1200
    Fruit Salad,8,2,2,10,900
    Meat Stock,5,8,9,3,700
    Vegetable Stock,11,1,2,11,700
    Camas Bulb Bake,12,7,5,4,400
    Flatbread,17,8,3,0,500
    Huckleberry Muffin,10,5,4,11,450
    Baked Meat,0,13,17,0,600
    Baked Roast,4,13,8,7,900
    Huckleberry Pie,9,5,4,16,1300
    Meat Pie,7,11,11,5,1300
    Basic Salad,13,6,6,13,800
    Simmered Meat,6,18,13,5,900
    Vegetable Medley,9,5,8,20,900
    Vegetable Soup,12,4,7,19,1200
    Crispy Bacon,0,18,26,0,600
    Stuffed Turkey,9,16,12,7,1500


    Python



    #!/usr/bin/env python3

    import csv
    from time import time

    ALL_SP =
    ALL_NAMES =


    def read(fn):
    with open('foods.csv') as f:
    reader = csv.reader(f, newline='')
    next(reader) # ignore title
    return tuple(
    (name, float(carbs), float(protein), float(fat), float(vitamins), float(calories))
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in reader
    )


    AVAILABLE = read('foods.csv')


    def find_combs(total_names, total_carbs, total_protein, total_fat, total_vitamins, total_nutrients,
    total_calories, max_calories):
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in AVAILABLE:
    nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins

    if sum(total_calories) + calories <= max_calories:
    find_combs(total_names + [name],
    total_carbs + [carbs],
    total_protein + [protein],
    total_fat + [fat],
    total_vitamins + [vitamins],
    total_nutrients + [nutrients],
    total_calories + [calories],
    max_calories)
    else:
    # find SP
    try:
    carbs = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_carbs)) / sum(total_calories)
    protein = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_protein)) / sum(total_calories)
    fat = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_fat)) / sum(total_calories)
    vitamins = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_vitamins)) / sum(total_calories)
    balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max(carbs,protein,fat,vitamins))
    thisSP = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_nutrients)) / sum(total_calories) * balance + 12
    except Exception:
    thisSP = 0

    # add SP and names to two lists
    ALL_SP.append(thisSP)
    ALL_NAMES.append(total_names)


    def calc(max_calories):
    find_combs(, , , , , , , max_calories)
    index = ALL_SP.index(max(ALL_SP))
    print()
    print(f'{ALL_SP[index]:.2f} {ALL_NAMES[index]}')


    def main():
    for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time()
    calc(i)
    print(f'Calories: {i} >>> Time: {time()-start:.3f}')


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()


    I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 20:10






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
      $endgroup$
      – greybeard
      Mar 17 at 21:03












    • $begingroup$
      @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 21:11
















    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    Data representation



    Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.



    available = (
    ('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
    # ...
    )


    But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.



    main isn't main



    You've written a main function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__' check.



    list duplication



    This:



    totalNames[::]


    should simply be



    list(totalNames)


    snake_case



    Your names should follow the format total_names, rather than totalNames.



    Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global.



    Suggested



    This doesn't at all tackle the main issue of algorithmic complexity, only Python usage. It isn't a good implementation, it's just to illustrate some stylistic improvements.



    Note a few things:




    • Having a shebang at the top is very important to indicate to the shell and other programmers what's being executed

    • Use csv

    • Use tuple unpacking in your loops where possible

    • Abbreviate the formation of new lists by doing appends inline

    • Never except:; at a minimum except Exception: although even this should be more specific

    • Use f-strings where appropriate

    • Drop inner lists in list comprehensions when you don't need them


    foods.csv



    name,carbs,protein,fat,vitamins,calories
    Fiddleheads,3,1,0,3,80
    Fireweed Shoots,3,0,0,4,150
    Prickly Pear Fruit,2,1,1,3,190
    Huckleberries,2,0,0,6,80
    Rice,7,1,0,0,90
    Camas Bulb,1,2,5,0,120
    Beans,1,4,3,0,120
    Wheat,6,2,0,0,130
    Crimini Mushrooms,3,3,1,1,200
    Corn,5,2,0,1,230
    Beet,3,1,1,3,230
    Tomato,4,1,0,3,240
    Raw Fish,0,3,7,0,200
    Raw Meat,0,7,3,0,250
    Tallow,0,0,8,0,200
    Scrap Meat,0,5,5,0,50
    Prepared Meat,0,4,6,0,600
    Raw Roast,0,6,5,0,800
    Raw Sausage,0,4,8,0,500
    Raw Bacon,0,3,9,0,600
    Prime Cut,0,9,4,0,600
    Cereal Germ,5,0,7,3,20
    Bean Paste,3,5,7,0,40
    Flour,15,0,0,0,50
    Sugar,15,0,0,0,50
    Camas Paste,3,2,10,0,60
    Cornmeal,9,3,3,0,60
    Huckleberry Extract,0,0,0,15,60
    Yeast,0,8,0,7,60
    Oil,0,0,15,0,120
    Infused Oil,0,0,12,3,120
    Simple Syrup,12,0,3,0,400
    Rice Sludge,10,1,0,2,450
    Charred Beet,3,0,3,7,470
    Camas Mash,1,2,9,1,500
    Campfire Beans,1,9,3,0,500
    Wilted Fiddleheads,4,1,0,8,500
    Boiled Shoots,3,0,1,9,510
    Charred Camas Bulb,2,3,7,1,510
    Charred Tomato,8,1,0,4,510
    Charred Corn,8,1,0,4,530
    Charred Fish,0,9,4,0,550
    Charred Meat,0,10,10,0,550
    Wheat Porridge,10,4,0,10,510
    Charred Sausage,0,11,15,0,500
    Fried Tomatoes,12,3,9,2,560
    Bannock,15,3,8,0,600
    Fiddlehead Salad,6,6,0,14,970
    Campfire Roast,0,16,12,0,1000
    Campfire Stew,5,12,9,4,1200
    Wild Stew,8,5,5,12,1200
    Fruit Salad,8,2,2,10,900
    Meat Stock,5,8,9,3,700
    Vegetable Stock,11,1,2,11,700
    Camas Bulb Bake,12,7,5,4,400
    Flatbread,17,8,3,0,500
    Huckleberry Muffin,10,5,4,11,450
    Baked Meat,0,13,17,0,600
    Baked Roast,4,13,8,7,900
    Huckleberry Pie,9,5,4,16,1300
    Meat Pie,7,11,11,5,1300
    Basic Salad,13,6,6,13,800
    Simmered Meat,6,18,13,5,900
    Vegetable Medley,9,5,8,20,900
    Vegetable Soup,12,4,7,19,1200
    Crispy Bacon,0,18,26,0,600
    Stuffed Turkey,9,16,12,7,1500


    Python



    #!/usr/bin/env python3

    import csv
    from time import time

    ALL_SP =
    ALL_NAMES =


    def read(fn):
    with open('foods.csv') as f:
    reader = csv.reader(f, newline='')
    next(reader) # ignore title
    return tuple(
    (name, float(carbs), float(protein), float(fat), float(vitamins), float(calories))
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in reader
    )


    AVAILABLE = read('foods.csv')


    def find_combs(total_names, total_carbs, total_protein, total_fat, total_vitamins, total_nutrients,
    total_calories, max_calories):
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in AVAILABLE:
    nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins

    if sum(total_calories) + calories <= max_calories:
    find_combs(total_names + [name],
    total_carbs + [carbs],
    total_protein + [protein],
    total_fat + [fat],
    total_vitamins + [vitamins],
    total_nutrients + [nutrients],
    total_calories + [calories],
    max_calories)
    else:
    # find SP
    try:
    carbs = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_carbs)) / sum(total_calories)
    protein = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_protein)) / sum(total_calories)
    fat = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_fat)) / sum(total_calories)
    vitamins = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_vitamins)) / sum(total_calories)
    balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max(carbs,protein,fat,vitamins))
    thisSP = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_nutrients)) / sum(total_calories) * balance + 12
    except Exception:
    thisSP = 0

    # add SP and names to two lists
    ALL_SP.append(thisSP)
    ALL_NAMES.append(total_names)


    def calc(max_calories):
    find_combs(, , , , , , , max_calories)
    index = ALL_SP.index(max(ALL_SP))
    print()
    print(f'{ALL_SP[index]:.2f} {ALL_NAMES[index]}')


    def main():
    for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time()
    calc(i)
    print(f'Calories: {i} >>> Time: {time()-start:.3f}')


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()


    I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Data representation



    Your choice of data representation is curious. It's a middle ground between a fully-serialized text format and a fully-deserialized in-memory format (such as nested tuples or dictionaries). I'd offer that it's not as good as either of the above. If you're going for micro-optimization, you need to do "pre-deserialized" literal variable initialization that doesn't require parsing at all. The best option would probably be named tuples or even plain tuples, i.e.



    available = (
    ('Fiddleheads', 3, 1, 0, 3, 80),
    # ...
    )


    But this won't yield any noticeable benefit, and it's not as maintainable as the alternative: just write a CSV file.



    main isn't main



    You've written a main function that isn't actually top-level code. This is not advisable. Rename it to something else, and put your top-level code in an actual main function, called from global scope with a standard if __name__ == '__main__' check.



    list duplication



    This:



    totalNames[::]


    should simply be



    list(totalNames)


    snake_case



    Your names should follow the format total_names, rather than totalNames.



    Also, variables in global scope (i.e. AllSP) should be all-caps; and you shouldn't need to declare them global.



    Suggested



    This doesn't at all tackle the main issue of algorithmic complexity, only Python usage. It isn't a good implementation, it's just to illustrate some stylistic improvements.



    Note a few things:




    • Having a shebang at the top is very important to indicate to the shell and other programmers what's being executed

    • Use csv

    • Use tuple unpacking in your loops where possible

    • Abbreviate the formation of new lists by doing appends inline

    • Never except:; at a minimum except Exception: although even this should be more specific

    • Use f-strings where appropriate

    • Drop inner lists in list comprehensions when you don't need them


    foods.csv



    name,carbs,protein,fat,vitamins,calories
    Fiddleheads,3,1,0,3,80
    Fireweed Shoots,3,0,0,4,150
    Prickly Pear Fruit,2,1,1,3,190
    Huckleberries,2,0,0,6,80
    Rice,7,1,0,0,90
    Camas Bulb,1,2,5,0,120
    Beans,1,4,3,0,120
    Wheat,6,2,0,0,130
    Crimini Mushrooms,3,3,1,1,200
    Corn,5,2,0,1,230
    Beet,3,1,1,3,230
    Tomato,4,1,0,3,240
    Raw Fish,0,3,7,0,200
    Raw Meat,0,7,3,0,250
    Tallow,0,0,8,0,200
    Scrap Meat,0,5,5,0,50
    Prepared Meat,0,4,6,0,600
    Raw Roast,0,6,5,0,800
    Raw Sausage,0,4,8,0,500
    Raw Bacon,0,3,9,0,600
    Prime Cut,0,9,4,0,600
    Cereal Germ,5,0,7,3,20
    Bean Paste,3,5,7,0,40
    Flour,15,0,0,0,50
    Sugar,15,0,0,0,50
    Camas Paste,3,2,10,0,60
    Cornmeal,9,3,3,0,60
    Huckleberry Extract,0,0,0,15,60
    Yeast,0,8,0,7,60
    Oil,0,0,15,0,120
    Infused Oil,0,0,12,3,120
    Simple Syrup,12,0,3,0,400
    Rice Sludge,10,1,0,2,450
    Charred Beet,3,0,3,7,470
    Camas Mash,1,2,9,1,500
    Campfire Beans,1,9,3,0,500
    Wilted Fiddleheads,4,1,0,8,500
    Boiled Shoots,3,0,1,9,510
    Charred Camas Bulb,2,3,7,1,510
    Charred Tomato,8,1,0,4,510
    Charred Corn,8,1,0,4,530
    Charred Fish,0,9,4,0,550
    Charred Meat,0,10,10,0,550
    Wheat Porridge,10,4,0,10,510
    Charred Sausage,0,11,15,0,500
    Fried Tomatoes,12,3,9,2,560
    Bannock,15,3,8,0,600
    Fiddlehead Salad,6,6,0,14,970
    Campfire Roast,0,16,12,0,1000
    Campfire Stew,5,12,9,4,1200
    Wild Stew,8,5,5,12,1200
    Fruit Salad,8,2,2,10,900
    Meat Stock,5,8,9,3,700
    Vegetable Stock,11,1,2,11,700
    Camas Bulb Bake,12,7,5,4,400
    Flatbread,17,8,3,0,500
    Huckleberry Muffin,10,5,4,11,450
    Baked Meat,0,13,17,0,600
    Baked Roast,4,13,8,7,900
    Huckleberry Pie,9,5,4,16,1300
    Meat Pie,7,11,11,5,1300
    Basic Salad,13,6,6,13,800
    Simmered Meat,6,18,13,5,900
    Vegetable Medley,9,5,8,20,900
    Vegetable Soup,12,4,7,19,1200
    Crispy Bacon,0,18,26,0,600
    Stuffed Turkey,9,16,12,7,1500


    Python



    #!/usr/bin/env python3

    import csv
    from time import time

    ALL_SP =
    ALL_NAMES =


    def read(fn):
    with open('foods.csv') as f:
    reader = csv.reader(f, newline='')
    next(reader) # ignore title
    return tuple(
    (name, float(carbs), float(protein), float(fat), float(vitamins), float(calories))
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in reader
    )


    AVAILABLE = read('foods.csv')


    def find_combs(total_names, total_carbs, total_protein, total_fat, total_vitamins, total_nutrients,
    total_calories, max_calories):
    for name, carbs, protein, fat, vitamins, calories in AVAILABLE:
    nutrients = carbs+protein+fat+vitamins

    if sum(total_calories) + calories <= max_calories:
    find_combs(total_names + [name],
    total_carbs + [carbs],
    total_protein + [protein],
    total_fat + [fat],
    total_vitamins + [vitamins],
    total_nutrients + [nutrients],
    total_calories + [calories],
    max_calories)
    else:
    # find SP
    try:
    carbs = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_carbs)) / sum(total_calories)
    protein = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_protein)) / sum(total_calories)
    fat = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_fat)) / sum(total_calories)
    vitamins = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_vitamins)) / sum(total_calories)
    balance = (carbs+protein+fat+vitamins)/(2*max(carbs,protein,fat,vitamins))
    thisSP = sum(x * y for x, y in zip(total_calories, total_nutrients)) / sum(total_calories) * balance + 12
    except Exception:
    thisSP = 0

    # add SP and names to two lists
    ALL_SP.append(thisSP)
    ALL_NAMES.append(total_names)


    def calc(max_calories):
    find_combs(, , , , , , , max_calories)
    index = ALL_SP.index(max(ALL_SP))
    print()
    print(f'{ALL_SP[index]:.2f} {ALL_NAMES[index]}')


    def main():
    for i in range(100, 3000, 10):
    start = time()
    calc(i)
    print(f'Calories: {i} >>> Time: {time()-start:.3f}')


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()


    I'm going to do some reading and see what you're doing in terms of algorithm and submit a second answer to suggest a saner one.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered Mar 17 at 20:08









    ReinderienReinderien

    4,355822




    4,355822












    • $begingroup$
      Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 20:10






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
      $endgroup$
      – greybeard
      Mar 17 at 21:03












    • $begingroup$
      @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 21:11




















    • $begingroup$
      Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 20:10






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
      $endgroup$
      – greybeard
      Mar 17 at 21:03












    • $begingroup$
      @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruler Of The World
      Mar 17 at 21:11


















    $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:10




    $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks a lot! I'll edit my code following your advice now. Let me know if you find a way to optimise the algorithm!
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 20:10




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
    $endgroup$
    – greybeard
    Mar 17 at 21:03






    $begingroup$
    @RulerOfTheWorld Please do not edit the code in your question once reviewing started.
    $endgroup$
    – greybeard
    Mar 17 at 21:03














    $begingroup$
    @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 21:11






    $begingroup$
    @greybeard Of course, my apologies. I was not editing the code, but explaining the functions behind it in a section marked as an edit at the end of my post, so it wouldn't affect the previous code.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruler Of The World
    Mar 17 at 21:11













    2












    $begingroup$

    I see some replies with general tips for optimization, but I don't see anyone recommending a specific approach called memoization. It works wonders just for this kind of problems (results in some finite range around the <1M mark, 3000 is far below the upper limit).



    Basically you would do something like this:



    Create a sort of array (this one will be struxtured differently depending on whether you just need the value of the result, only one combination of food items or all combinations). Since no food has negative calories, you can only make it 0-3000



    Then you do something like this (pseudocode):



    for foodItem in foodItems:
    for value in caloriesArray:
    if caloriesArray[value] != 0: #has been reached before, so I can expand on it
    caloriesArray[value]+foodItems[foodItem] = ... #whatever you need, can be just True


    There are plenty of sites explaining memoization and I'm not very good at explanations, but if this doesn't help you then I can include a simple example.



    Then just find the highest reached value of the array.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      I see some replies with general tips for optimization, but I don't see anyone recommending a specific approach called memoization. It works wonders just for this kind of problems (results in some finite range around the <1M mark, 3000 is far below the upper limit).



      Basically you would do something like this:



      Create a sort of array (this one will be struxtured differently depending on whether you just need the value of the result, only one combination of food items or all combinations). Since no food has negative calories, you can only make it 0-3000



      Then you do something like this (pseudocode):



      for foodItem in foodItems:
      for value in caloriesArray:
      if caloriesArray[value] != 0: #has been reached before, so I can expand on it
      caloriesArray[value]+foodItems[foodItem] = ... #whatever you need, can be just True


      There are plenty of sites explaining memoization and I'm not very good at explanations, but if this doesn't help you then I can include a simple example.



      Then just find the highest reached value of the array.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        I see some replies with general tips for optimization, but I don't see anyone recommending a specific approach called memoization. It works wonders just for this kind of problems (results in some finite range around the <1M mark, 3000 is far below the upper limit).



        Basically you would do something like this:



        Create a sort of array (this one will be struxtured differently depending on whether you just need the value of the result, only one combination of food items or all combinations). Since no food has negative calories, you can only make it 0-3000



        Then you do something like this (pseudocode):



        for foodItem in foodItems:
        for value in caloriesArray:
        if caloriesArray[value] != 0: #has been reached before, so I can expand on it
        caloriesArray[value]+foodItems[foodItem] = ... #whatever you need, can be just True


        There are plenty of sites explaining memoization and I'm not very good at explanations, but if this doesn't help you then I can include a simple example.



        Then just find the highest reached value of the array.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I see some replies with general tips for optimization, but I don't see anyone recommending a specific approach called memoization. It works wonders just for this kind of problems (results in some finite range around the <1M mark, 3000 is far below the upper limit).



        Basically you would do something like this:



        Create a sort of array (this one will be struxtured differently depending on whether you just need the value of the result, only one combination of food items or all combinations). Since no food has negative calories, you can only make it 0-3000



        Then you do something like this (pseudocode):



        for foodItem in foodItems:
        for value in caloriesArray:
        if caloriesArray[value] != 0: #has been reached before, so I can expand on it
        caloriesArray[value]+foodItems[foodItem] = ... #whatever you need, can be just True


        There are plenty of sites explaining memoization and I'm not very good at explanations, but if this doesn't help you then I can include a simple example.



        Then just find the highest reached value of the array.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago









        Ludisposed

        8,85422267




        8,85422267






        New contributor




        sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 days ago









        sqlnoobsqlnoob

        211




        211




        New contributor




        sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        sqlnoob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ruler Of The World is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215626%2foptimising-a-list-searching-algorithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?