Term for the ending consonant of one word connected/disconnected from the next leading to different yet...












2















In his 2013 TEDx Houston talk The tyranny of the rocket equation, astronaut and International Space Station Flight Engineer Don Pettit humorously introduces two categories of mass launched from Earth into space:



At about 10:46 in the video:




So this brings me to my final slide.



The tyranny of the rocket equation; it involves the magnitude of gravity, and the energy in chemical bonds, which hold this tyrannical grip on our ability to even make rockets, and it’s very difficult to even leave Earth, and it’s particularly so to leave Earth with significant payload.



If the magnitude of Earth’s gravity were slightly larger you could reach a point where we couldn’t even get off the planet using rockets.



So the question that I’d like to plant in all of you guys and gals minds is something to do with rethinking rockets. Is there some other way to get off of Earth without using a rocket; hence you could break the tyranny of the rocket equation, or if we’re not clever enough to think of an answer, and we have to use rockets, could we minimize the tyranny simply by we don’t bring our dumb mass.





  • "smart mass": computers, life-support..

  • "dumb mass": (extra) air, water, bricks...


An ongoing question in space exploration is that of the smartness of sending people versus robotic spacecraft to space. And so a twist on astronaut Pettit's last line in his talk would be:




we don’t bring our dumb ass




meaning that all of the air, water, life-support, humans and waste can be avoided. Leave your dumb-ass on Earth and just send the robot to space, implying it's stupid to send humans to space.



Question: What is it called when the ending consonant of one word being connected or disconnected from the next word can lead to two different but related terms?



enter image description here










share|improve this question

























  • I may need some help with proper tagging.

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 14:19






  • 1





    english.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aa+metanalysis

    – tchrist
    Oct 5 '18 at 17:48











  • @tchrist The process by which the division between words or parts of words is changed, resulting in the creation of a new word As far as I can tell, that seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 18:28











  • @tchrist I'm never sure what to do with questions answered in comments rather than in answers. Sometimes people may perceive this as "too obvious to be here" and start down-voting. I'm thinking of just deleting this rather than let it attract more down votes.

    – uhoh
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:20






  • 1





    I was hoping that some community member would make a proper answer.

    – tchrist
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:32
















2















In his 2013 TEDx Houston talk The tyranny of the rocket equation, astronaut and International Space Station Flight Engineer Don Pettit humorously introduces two categories of mass launched from Earth into space:



At about 10:46 in the video:




So this brings me to my final slide.



The tyranny of the rocket equation; it involves the magnitude of gravity, and the energy in chemical bonds, which hold this tyrannical grip on our ability to even make rockets, and it’s very difficult to even leave Earth, and it’s particularly so to leave Earth with significant payload.



If the magnitude of Earth’s gravity were slightly larger you could reach a point where we couldn’t even get off the planet using rockets.



So the question that I’d like to plant in all of you guys and gals minds is something to do with rethinking rockets. Is there some other way to get off of Earth without using a rocket; hence you could break the tyranny of the rocket equation, or if we’re not clever enough to think of an answer, and we have to use rockets, could we minimize the tyranny simply by we don’t bring our dumb mass.





  • "smart mass": computers, life-support..

  • "dumb mass": (extra) air, water, bricks...


An ongoing question in space exploration is that of the smartness of sending people versus robotic spacecraft to space. And so a twist on astronaut Pettit's last line in his talk would be:




we don’t bring our dumb ass




meaning that all of the air, water, life-support, humans and waste can be avoided. Leave your dumb-ass on Earth and just send the robot to space, implying it's stupid to send humans to space.



Question: What is it called when the ending consonant of one word being connected or disconnected from the next word can lead to two different but related terms?



enter image description here










share|improve this question

























  • I may need some help with proper tagging.

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 14:19






  • 1





    english.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aa+metanalysis

    – tchrist
    Oct 5 '18 at 17:48











  • @tchrist The process by which the division between words or parts of words is changed, resulting in the creation of a new word As far as I can tell, that seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 18:28











  • @tchrist I'm never sure what to do with questions answered in comments rather than in answers. Sometimes people may perceive this as "too obvious to be here" and start down-voting. I'm thinking of just deleting this rather than let it attract more down votes.

    – uhoh
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:20






  • 1





    I was hoping that some community member would make a proper answer.

    – tchrist
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:32














2












2








2








In his 2013 TEDx Houston talk The tyranny of the rocket equation, astronaut and International Space Station Flight Engineer Don Pettit humorously introduces two categories of mass launched from Earth into space:



At about 10:46 in the video:




So this brings me to my final slide.



The tyranny of the rocket equation; it involves the magnitude of gravity, and the energy in chemical bonds, which hold this tyrannical grip on our ability to even make rockets, and it’s very difficult to even leave Earth, and it’s particularly so to leave Earth with significant payload.



If the magnitude of Earth’s gravity were slightly larger you could reach a point where we couldn’t even get off the planet using rockets.



So the question that I’d like to plant in all of you guys and gals minds is something to do with rethinking rockets. Is there some other way to get off of Earth without using a rocket; hence you could break the tyranny of the rocket equation, or if we’re not clever enough to think of an answer, and we have to use rockets, could we minimize the tyranny simply by we don’t bring our dumb mass.





  • "smart mass": computers, life-support..

  • "dumb mass": (extra) air, water, bricks...


An ongoing question in space exploration is that of the smartness of sending people versus robotic spacecraft to space. And so a twist on astronaut Pettit's last line in his talk would be:




we don’t bring our dumb ass




meaning that all of the air, water, life-support, humans and waste can be avoided. Leave your dumb-ass on Earth and just send the robot to space, implying it's stupid to send humans to space.



Question: What is it called when the ending consonant of one word being connected or disconnected from the next word can lead to two different but related terms?



enter image description here










share|improve this question
















In his 2013 TEDx Houston talk The tyranny of the rocket equation, astronaut and International Space Station Flight Engineer Don Pettit humorously introduces two categories of mass launched from Earth into space:



At about 10:46 in the video:




So this brings me to my final slide.



The tyranny of the rocket equation; it involves the magnitude of gravity, and the energy in chemical bonds, which hold this tyrannical grip on our ability to even make rockets, and it’s very difficult to even leave Earth, and it’s particularly so to leave Earth with significant payload.



If the magnitude of Earth’s gravity were slightly larger you could reach a point where we couldn’t even get off the planet using rockets.



So the question that I’d like to plant in all of you guys and gals minds is something to do with rethinking rockets. Is there some other way to get off of Earth without using a rocket; hence you could break the tyranny of the rocket equation, or if we’re not clever enough to think of an answer, and we have to use rockets, could we minimize the tyranny simply by we don’t bring our dumb mass.





  • "smart mass": computers, life-support..

  • "dumb mass": (extra) air, water, bricks...


An ongoing question in space exploration is that of the smartness of sending people versus robotic spacecraft to space. And so a twist on astronaut Pettit's last line in his talk would be:




we don’t bring our dumb ass




meaning that all of the air, water, life-support, humans and waste can be avoided. Leave your dumb-ass on Earth and just send the robot to space, implying it's stupid to send humans to space.



Question: What is it called when the ending consonant of one word being connected or disconnected from the next word can lead to two different but related terms?



enter image description here







terminology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 0:58







uhoh

















asked Oct 5 '18 at 14:19









uhohuhoh

350113




350113













  • I may need some help with proper tagging.

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 14:19






  • 1





    english.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aa+metanalysis

    – tchrist
    Oct 5 '18 at 17:48











  • @tchrist The process by which the division between words or parts of words is changed, resulting in the creation of a new word As far as I can tell, that seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 18:28











  • @tchrist I'm never sure what to do with questions answered in comments rather than in answers. Sometimes people may perceive this as "too obvious to be here" and start down-voting. I'm thinking of just deleting this rather than let it attract more down votes.

    – uhoh
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:20






  • 1





    I was hoping that some community member would make a proper answer.

    – tchrist
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:32



















  • I may need some help with proper tagging.

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 14:19






  • 1





    english.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aa+metanalysis

    – tchrist
    Oct 5 '18 at 17:48











  • @tchrist The process by which the division between words or parts of words is changed, resulting in the creation of a new word As far as I can tell, that seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!

    – uhoh
    Oct 5 '18 at 18:28











  • @tchrist I'm never sure what to do with questions answered in comments rather than in answers. Sometimes people may perceive this as "too obvious to be here" and start down-voting. I'm thinking of just deleting this rather than let it attract more down votes.

    – uhoh
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:20






  • 1





    I was hoping that some community member would make a proper answer.

    – tchrist
    Oct 7 '18 at 1:32

















I may need some help with proper tagging.

– uhoh
Oct 5 '18 at 14:19





I may need some help with proper tagging.

– uhoh
Oct 5 '18 at 14:19




1




1





english.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aa+metanalysis

– tchrist
Oct 5 '18 at 17:48





english.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aa+metanalysis

– tchrist
Oct 5 '18 at 17:48













@tchrist The process by which the division between words or parts of words is changed, resulting in the creation of a new word As far as I can tell, that seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!

– uhoh
Oct 5 '18 at 18:28





@tchrist The process by which the division between words or parts of words is changed, resulting in the creation of a new word As far as I can tell, that seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!

– uhoh
Oct 5 '18 at 18:28













@tchrist I'm never sure what to do with questions answered in comments rather than in answers. Sometimes people may perceive this as "too obvious to be here" and start down-voting. I'm thinking of just deleting this rather than let it attract more down votes.

– uhoh
Oct 7 '18 at 1:20





@tchrist I'm never sure what to do with questions answered in comments rather than in answers. Sometimes people may perceive this as "too obvious to be here" and start down-voting. I'm thinking of just deleting this rather than let it attract more down votes.

– uhoh
Oct 7 '18 at 1:20




1




1





I was hoping that some community member would make a proper answer.

– tchrist
Oct 7 '18 at 1:32





I was hoping that some community member would make a proper answer.

– tchrist
Oct 7 '18 at 1:32










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466998%2fterm-for-the-ending-consonant-of-one-word-connected-disconnected-from-the-next-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466998%2fterm-for-the-ending-consonant-of-one-word-connected-disconnected-from-the-next-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?