How to say “All research projects conducted in a field”? [on hold]

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

up vote
0
down vote

favorite

I would like to mention that research in that field was at its highest peak in 2016. Is

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. This research reached its climax in 2016, when ...

a correct English sentence?

Is it better to say

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. Those researches reached their climax in 2016, when ...

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, David, Scott, choster yesterday

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – David, choster

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

This question is related, and suggests "research" would be better: english.stackexchange.com/questions/296286/…
– Stuart F
2 days ago

1

"Research" is better here. I'd also look for an alternative to "climax", too, depending on what actually happening in 2016.
– ralph.m
2 days ago

Thanks guys for the comments, I'll go for research.
– Théophile Pace
2 days ago

Using one word in one sentence and another in the other is awkward, as there is no direct reference for this (or those). Either use decades of research in the first sentence and this research in the second or use decades of work in the first sentence and this work in the second. The same applies to singularity and plurality. Whichever form is used in the first sentence, use the same in the second.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago

"Those researches" isn't English. @JasonBassford is correct, but I would put in a relative clause (which reached their climax in 2016) but then start a new sentence. No need for a comma after games, but replace then by ", subsequently,". But proof-reading questions are off-topic.
– David
2 days ago

|
show 2 more comments

up vote
0
down vote

favorite

I would like to mention that research in that field was at its highest peak in 2016. Is

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. This research reached its climax in 2016, when ...

a correct English sentence?

Is it better to say

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. Those researches reached their climax in 2016, when ...

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, David, Scott, choster yesterday

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – David, choster

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

This question is related, and suggests "research" would be better: english.stackexchange.com/questions/296286/…
– Stuart F
2 days ago

1

"Research" is better here. I'd also look for an alternative to "climax", too, depending on what actually happening in 2016.
– ralph.m
2 days ago

Thanks guys for the comments, I'll go for research.
– Théophile Pace
2 days ago

Using one word in one sentence and another in the other is awkward, as there is no direct reference for this (or those). Either use decades of research in the first sentence and this research in the second or use decades of work in the first sentence and this work in the second. The same applies to singularity and plurality. Whichever form is used in the first sentence, use the same in the second.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago

"Those researches" isn't English. @JasonBassford is correct, but I would put in a relative clause (which reached their climax in 2016) but then start a new sentence. No need for a comma after games, but replace then by ", subsequently,". But proof-reading questions are off-topic.
– David
2 days ago

|
show 2 more comments

up vote
0
down vote

favorite

I would like to mention that research in that field was at its highest peak in 2016. Is

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. This research reached its climax in 2016, when ...

a correct English sentence?

Is it better to say

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. Those researches reached their climax in 2016, when ...

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

I would like to mention that research in that field was at its highest peak in 2016. Is

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. This research reached its climax in 2016, when ...

a correct English sentence?

Is it better to say

This is the consequence of decades of work on AI in board games, and then video games. Those researches reached their climax in 2016, when ...

uncountable-nouns research

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

asked 2 days ago

Théophile Pace

1012

New contributor

Théophile Pace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, David, Scott, choster yesterday

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – David, choster

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, David, Scott, choster yesterday

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – David, choster

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

This question is related, and suggests "research" would be better: english.stackexchange.com/questions/296286/…
– Stuart F
2 days ago

1

"Research" is better here. I'd also look for an alternative to "climax", too, depending on what actually happening in 2016.
– ralph.m
2 days ago

Thanks guys for the comments, I'll go for research.
– Théophile Pace
2 days ago

Using one word in one sentence and another in the other is awkward, as there is no direct reference for this (or those). Either use decades of research in the first sentence and this research in the second or use decades of work in the first sentence and this work in the second. The same applies to singularity and plurality. Whichever form is used in the first sentence, use the same in the second.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago

"Those researches" isn't English. @JasonBassford is correct, but I would put in a relative clause (which reached their climax in 2016) but then start a new sentence. No need for a comma after games, but replace then by ", subsequently,". But proof-reading questions are off-topic.
– David
2 days ago

|
show 2 more comments

1

This question is related, and suggests "research" would be better: english.stackexchange.com/questions/296286/…
– Stuart F
2 days ago

1

"Research" is better here. I'd also look for an alternative to "climax", too, depending on what actually happening in 2016.
– ralph.m
2 days ago

Thanks guys for the comments, I'll go for research.
– Théophile Pace
2 days ago

Using one word in one sentence and another in the other is awkward, as there is no direct reference for this (or those). Either use decades of research in the first sentence and this research in the second or use decades of work in the first sentence and this work in the second. The same applies to singularity and plurality. Whichever form is used in the first sentence, use the same in the second.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago

"Those researches" isn't English. @JasonBassford is correct, but I would put in a relative clause (which reached their climax in 2016) but then start a new sentence. No need for a comma after games, but replace then by ", subsequently,". But proof-reading questions are off-topic.
– David
2 days ago

This question is related, and suggests "research" would be better: english.stackexchange.com/questions/296286/…
– Stuart F
2 days ago

"Research" is better here. I'd also look for an alternative to "climax", too, depending on what actually happening in 2016.
– ralph.m
2 days ago

Thanks guys for the comments, I'll go for research.
– Théophile Pace
2 days ago

Using one word in one sentence and another in the other is awkward, as there is no direct reference for this (or those). Either use decades of research in the first sentence and this research in the second or use decades of work in the first sentence and this work in the second. The same applies to singularity and plurality. Whichever form is used in the first sentence, use the same in the second.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago

"Those researches" isn't English. @JasonBassford is correct, but I would put in a relative clause (which reached their climax in 2016) but then start a new sentence. No need for a comma after games, but replace then by ", subsequently,". But proof-reading questions are off-topic.
– David
2 days ago

|
show 2 more comments

active

oldest

votes

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Argthtjtr