alignat align two sums under each other












4














This



begin{alignat*}{2}
f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y &\
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} &Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &\
& & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &Bigg} \
end{alignat*}


Produces this:
enter image description here



Obviously, the space between the fraction and curly bracket is not intended, what I wanted to do was to align the second sum under the first one like it is done here. What is incorrect? (I want to do it with alignat without getting too complex like nested alignemets)










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    While code snippets are useful in explanations, it is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the documentclass and the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.
    – Peter Grill
    Dec 18 at 19:28
















4














This



begin{alignat*}{2}
f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y &\
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} &Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &\
& & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &Bigg} \
end{alignat*}


Produces this:
enter image description here



Obviously, the space between the fraction and curly bracket is not intended, what I wanted to do was to align the second sum under the first one like it is done here. What is incorrect? (I want to do it with alignat without getting too complex like nested alignemets)










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    While code snippets are useful in explanations, it is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the documentclass and the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.
    – Peter Grill
    Dec 18 at 19:28














4












4








4







This



begin{alignat*}{2}
f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y &\
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} &Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &\
& & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &Bigg} \
end{alignat*}


Produces this:
enter image description here



Obviously, the space between the fraction and curly bracket is not intended, what I wanted to do was to align the second sum under the first one like it is done here. What is incorrect? (I want to do it with alignat without getting too complex like nested alignemets)










share|improve this question













This



begin{alignat*}{2}
f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y &\
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} &Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &\
& & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y &Bigg} \
end{alignat*}


Produces this:
enter image description here



Obviously, the space between the fraction and curly bracket is not intended, what I wanted to do was to align the second sum under the first one like it is done here. What is incorrect? (I want to do it with alignat without getting too complex like nested alignemets)







align amsmath alignat






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 18 at 19:20









leosenko

1836




1836








  • 1




    While code snippets are useful in explanations, it is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the documentclass and the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.
    – Peter Grill
    Dec 18 at 19:28














  • 1




    While code snippets are useful in explanations, it is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the documentclass and the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.
    – Peter Grill
    Dec 18 at 19:28








1




1




While code snippets are useful in explanations, it is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the documentclass and the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.
– Peter Grill
Dec 18 at 19:28




While code snippets are useful in explanations, it is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the documentclass and the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.
– Peter Grill
Dec 18 at 19:28










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














A combination of an hphantom{Bigg{} and some additional alignment points gives good results:



enter image description here



Notes:




  • The alignat*= environment produces as many rl (right/left) pairs as specified in the first parameter and does not insert additional space that the align environment does, so you need to insert the space that is desired between the alignment points (this was not needed in this case).

  • The double && ensure that the subsequent columns are also left aligned.


Code



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% include amsmath

begin{document}
begin{alignat*}{4}
f(a)
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} && int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y & \
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} && Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & \
& && hphantom{Bigg{} sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & Bigg} \
end{alignat*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer























  • Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
    – leosenko
    Dec 18 at 21:31










  • @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
    – Peter Grill
    Dec 18 at 22:07





















4














This is a case for split with a nested aligned or multlined environment.



A couple of notes




  1. dx should be preceded by a thin space; it's easy to forget it, so I provide a diff command that adds it automatically;


  2. Bigg is too large and it should be in the Biggl and Biggr varieties anyhow; I used biggl and biggr;


  3. in the aligned solution, there should be a ! before sum to avoid an unwanted thin space.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

newcommanddiff{mathop{}!d}

begin{document}

begin{equation*}
begin{split}
f(a)
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
\
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
begin{aligned}[t]
&!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
&!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
biggr}
end{aligned}
end{split}
end{equation*}

begin{equation*}
begin{split}
f(a)
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
\
&= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
begin{multlined}[t]
sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
biggr}
end{multlined}
end{split}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    1














    A solution with an aligned environment nested in a align*. I also propose a different alignment, and an improvement for the spacing of differential symbols:



        documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    begin{align*}
    f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q), d x,d y &\
    &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{ & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y \
    & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x, d y , d x, d y, Bigg}end{aligned}
    end{align*}
    bigskip

    begin{align*}
    f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y &\
    &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y & \
    sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q),d x,d y,d x,d y &,Bigg}end{aligned}
    end{align*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466418%2falignat-align-two-sums-under-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      A combination of an hphantom{Bigg{} and some additional alignment points gives good results:



      enter image description here



      Notes:




      • The alignat*= environment produces as many rl (right/left) pairs as specified in the first parameter and does not insert additional space that the align environment does, so you need to insert the space that is desired between the alignment points (this was not needed in this case).

      • The double && ensure that the subsequent columns are also left aligned.


      Code



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools}% include amsmath

      begin{document}
      begin{alignat*}{4}
      f(a)
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} && int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y & \
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} && Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & \
      & && hphantom{Bigg{} sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & Bigg} \
      end{alignat*}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer























      • Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
        – leosenko
        Dec 18 at 21:31










      • @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
        – Peter Grill
        Dec 18 at 22:07


















      4














      A combination of an hphantom{Bigg{} and some additional alignment points gives good results:



      enter image description here



      Notes:




      • The alignat*= environment produces as many rl (right/left) pairs as specified in the first parameter and does not insert additional space that the align environment does, so you need to insert the space that is desired between the alignment points (this was not needed in this case).

      • The double && ensure that the subsequent columns are also left aligned.


      Code



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools}% include amsmath

      begin{document}
      begin{alignat*}{4}
      f(a)
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} && int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y & \
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} && Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & \
      & && hphantom{Bigg{} sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & Bigg} \
      end{alignat*}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer























      • Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
        – leosenko
        Dec 18 at 21:31










      • @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
        – Peter Grill
        Dec 18 at 22:07
















      4












      4








      4






      A combination of an hphantom{Bigg{} and some additional alignment points gives good results:



      enter image description here



      Notes:




      • The alignat*= environment produces as many rl (right/left) pairs as specified in the first parameter and does not insert additional space that the align environment does, so you need to insert the space that is desired between the alignment points (this was not needed in this case).

      • The double && ensure that the subsequent columns are also left aligned.


      Code



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools}% include amsmath

      begin{document}
      begin{alignat*}{4}
      f(a)
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} && int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y & \
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} && Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & \
      & && hphantom{Bigg{} sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & Bigg} \
      end{alignat*}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer














      A combination of an hphantom{Bigg{} and some additional alignment points gives good results:



      enter image description here



      Notes:




      • The alignat*= environment produces as many rl (right/left) pairs as specified in the first parameter and does not insert additional space that the align environment does, so you need to insert the space that is desired between the alignment points (this was not needed in this case).

      • The double && ensure that the subsequent columns are also left aligned.


      Code



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools}% include amsmath

      begin{document}
      begin{alignat*}{4}
      f(a)
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} && int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y & \
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} && Bigg{ sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & \
      & && hphantom{Bigg{} sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) d x d y d x d y & Bigg} \
      end{alignat*}
      end{document}






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Dec 18 at 22:07

























      answered Dec 18 at 19:26









      Peter Grill

      163k25434745




      163k25434745












      • Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
        – leosenko
        Dec 18 at 21:31










      • @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
        – Peter Grill
        Dec 18 at 22:07




















      • Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
        – leosenko
        Dec 18 at 21:31










      • @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
        – Peter Grill
        Dec 18 at 22:07


















      Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
      – leosenko
      Dec 18 at 21:31




      Why does the solution with simple alignat not work, since i merely copied what works from the link that I mention in the question and just used different content?
      – leosenko
      Dec 18 at 21:31












      @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
      – Peter Grill
      Dec 18 at 22:07






      @leosenko: The solution you linked to employs mathrlap so what you have here is not really identical to that solution. There are lots of different way to do alignments -- I only presented what came naturally to me: Select the desired alighnemt points and use a single & where you want the text before to be r aligned and the text following to be l aligned. A double &&skips the r align component and make the text following l aligned. Also updated answer to attempt to explain this.
      – Peter Grill
      Dec 18 at 22:07













      4














      This is a case for split with a nested aligned or multlined environment.



      A couple of notes




      1. dx should be preceded by a thin space; it's easy to forget it, so I provide a diff command that adds it automatically;


      2. Bigg is too large and it should be in the Biggl and Biggr varieties anyhow; I used biggl and biggr;


      3. in the aligned solution, there should be a ! before sum to avoid an unwanted thin space.



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

      newcommanddiff{mathop{}!d}

      begin{document}

      begin{equation*}
      begin{split}
      f(a)
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
      \
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
      begin{aligned}[t]
      &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
      &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
      biggr}
      end{aligned}
      end{split}
      end{equation*}

      begin{equation*}
      begin{split}
      f(a)
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
      \
      &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
      begin{multlined}[t]
      sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
      sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
      biggr}
      end{multlined}
      end{split}
      end{equation*}

      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        4














        This is a case for split with a nested aligned or multlined environment.



        A couple of notes




        1. dx should be preceded by a thin space; it's easy to forget it, so I provide a diff command that adds it automatically;


        2. Bigg is too large and it should be in the Biggl and Biggr varieties anyhow; I used biggl and biggr;


        3. in the aligned solution, there should be a ! before sum to avoid an unwanted thin space.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

        newcommanddiff{mathop{}!d}

        begin{document}

        begin{equation*}
        begin{split}
        f(a)
        &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
        \
        &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
        begin{aligned}[t]
        &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
        &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
        biggr}
        end{aligned}
        end{split}
        end{equation*}

        begin{equation*}
        begin{split}
        f(a)
        &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
        \
        &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
        begin{multlined}[t]
        sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
        sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
        biggr}
        end{multlined}
        end{split}
        end{equation*}

        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer
























          4












          4








          4






          This is a case for split with a nested aligned or multlined environment.



          A couple of notes




          1. dx should be preceded by a thin space; it's easy to forget it, so I provide a diff command that adds it automatically;


          2. Bigg is too large and it should be in the Biggl and Biggr varieties anyhow; I used biggl and biggr;


          3. in the aligned solution, there should be a ! before sum to avoid an unwanted thin space.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

          newcommanddiff{mathop{}!d}

          begin{document}

          begin{equation*}
          begin{split}
          f(a)
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
          \
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
          begin{aligned}[t]
          &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
          &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
          biggr}
          end{aligned}
          end{split}
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          begin{split}
          f(a)
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
          \
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
          begin{multlined}[t]
          sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
          sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
          biggr}
          end{multlined}
          end{split}
          end{equation*}

          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer












          This is a case for split with a nested aligned or multlined environment.



          A couple of notes




          1. dx should be preceded by a thin space; it's easy to forget it, so I provide a diff command that adds it automatically;


          2. Bigg is too large and it should be in the Biggl and Biggr varieties anyhow; I used biggl and biggr;


          3. in the aligned solution, there should be a ! before sum to avoid an unwanted thin space.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

          newcommanddiff{mathop{}!d}

          begin{document}

          begin{equation*}
          begin{split}
          f(a)
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
          \
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
          begin{aligned}[t]
          &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
          &!sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
          biggr}
          end{aligned}
          end{split}
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          begin{split}
          f(a)
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q)diff xdiff y
          \
          &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s} biggl{
          begin{multlined}[t]
          sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y \
          sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) diff x diff y diff x diff y
          biggr}
          end{multlined}
          end{split}
          end{equation*}

          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 18 at 23:15









          egreg

          706k8618783160




          706k8618783160























              1














              A solution with an aligned environment nested in a align*. I also propose a different alignment, and an improvement for the spacing of differential symbols:



                  documentclass{article}
              usepackage{amsmath}

              begin{document}

              begin{align*}
              f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q), d x,d y &\
              &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{ & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y \
              & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x, d y , d x, d y, Bigg}end{aligned}
              end{align*}
              bigskip

              begin{align*}
              f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y &\
              &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y & \
              sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q),d x,d y,d x,d y &,Bigg}end{aligned}
              end{align*}

              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer


























                1














                A solution with an aligned environment nested in a align*. I also propose a different alignment, and an improvement for the spacing of differential symbols:



                    documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}

                begin{document}

                begin{align*}
                f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q), d x,d y &\
                &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{ & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y \
                & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x, d y , d x, d y, Bigg}end{aligned}
                end{align*}
                bigskip

                begin{align*}
                f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y &\
                &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y & \
                sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q),d x,d y,d x,d y &,Bigg}end{aligned}
                end{align*}

                end{document}


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  A solution with an aligned environment nested in a align*. I also propose a different alignment, and an improvement for the spacing of differential symbols:



                      documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{amsmath}

                  begin{document}

                  begin{align*}
                  f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q), d x,d y &\
                  &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{ & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y \
                  & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x, d y , d x, d y, Bigg}end{aligned}
                  end{align*}
                  bigskip

                  begin{align*}
                  f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y &\
                  &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y & \
                  sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q),d x,d y,d x,d y &,Bigg}end{aligned}
                  end{align*}

                  end{document}


                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer












                  A solution with an aligned environment nested in a align*. I also propose a different alignment, and an improvement for the spacing of differential symbols:



                      documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{amsmath}

                  begin{document}

                  begin{align*}
                  f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q), d x,d y &\
                  &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{ & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y \
                  & sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x, d y , d x, d y, Bigg}end{aligned}
                  end{align*}
                  bigskip

                  begin{align*}
                  f(a) &= lim_{s} frac{1}{2 z} int_{-w}^{+e}int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y &\
                  &= lim_{s} frac{1}{3s}begin{aligned}[t]Bigg{sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q+e)cdot h(q) ,d x,d y,d x,d y & \
                  sum_{w} int_{-r}^{+t} g(q)cdot h(q),d x,d y,d x,d y &,Bigg}end{aligned}
                  end{align*}

                  end{document}


                  enter image description here







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 18 at 19:40









                  Bernard

                  165k769193




                  165k769193






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466418%2falignat-align-two-sums-under-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                      Alcedinidae

                      RAC Tourist Trophy