Metric for 2D de Sitter?












3














What is the correct metric to use for two dimensional de Sitter? If one starts with the following metric, which looks similar to de Sitter in 4 dimensions:



$$ds^2 = -dt^2 + e^{2H t} dx^2,$$



one can calculate $R = 2H^2$, and $R_{00} = -H^2$, which gives the $Lambda = 0$, which is not the solution one is looking for. What should be the correct metric to use for the same?










share|cite|improve this question





























    3














    What is the correct metric to use for two dimensional de Sitter? If one starts with the following metric, which looks similar to de Sitter in 4 dimensions:



    $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + e^{2H t} dx^2,$$



    one can calculate $R = 2H^2$, and $R_{00} = -H^2$, which gives the $Lambda = 0$, which is not the solution one is looking for. What should be the correct metric to use for the same?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3


      3





      What is the correct metric to use for two dimensional de Sitter? If one starts with the following metric, which looks similar to de Sitter in 4 dimensions:



      $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + e^{2H t} dx^2,$$



      one can calculate $R = 2H^2$, and $R_{00} = -H^2$, which gives the $Lambda = 0$, which is not the solution one is looking for. What should be the correct metric to use for the same?










      share|cite|improve this question















      What is the correct metric to use for two dimensional de Sitter? If one starts with the following metric, which looks similar to de Sitter in 4 dimensions:



      $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + e^{2H t} dx^2,$$



      one can calculate $R = 2H^2$, and $R_{00} = -H^2$, which gives the $Lambda = 0$, which is not the solution one is looking for. What should be the correct metric to use for the same?







      general-relativity differential-geometry metric-tensor de-sitter-spacetime






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 10 at 5:46









      Qmechanic

      101k121831145




      101k121831145










      asked Dec 10 at 1:59









      Michael Williams

      11810




      11810






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          In two-dimensional spacetime, the Einstein tensor $R_{ab}-frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R$ is identically zero , which explains why you get $Lambda=0$.



          In any number $D$ of spacetime dimensions, including $D=2$, de Sitter spacetime can be constructed like this. Start with the $D+1$ dimensional Minkowski metric
          $$
          -(mathrm dX^0)^2+sum_{k=1}^D(mathrm dX^k)^2.
          tag{1}
          $$

          The submanifold defined by the condition
          $$
          sum_{k=1}^D(X^k)^2=L^2+(X^0)^2
          tag{2}
          $$

          is $D$-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The length parameter $L$ is related to the cosmological constant $Lambda$ by
          $$
          Lambda = frac{(D-2)(D-1)}{2L^2}.
          tag{3}
          $$

          This is equation (4) in "Les Houches Lectures on de Sitter Space". Setting $D=2$ recovers your result $Lambda=0$.



          By the way, equations (13)-(14) in the same paper show how to derive the de Sitter metric in the form
          $$
          -mathrm dt^2+e^{2t}sum_{k=1}^{D-1}(mathrm dx^k)^2
          $$

          starting from equations (1)-(2). For $D=2$, this reduces to the form shown in the question.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f446259%2fmetric-for-2d-de-sitter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            In two-dimensional spacetime, the Einstein tensor $R_{ab}-frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R$ is identically zero , which explains why you get $Lambda=0$.



            In any number $D$ of spacetime dimensions, including $D=2$, de Sitter spacetime can be constructed like this. Start with the $D+1$ dimensional Minkowski metric
            $$
            -(mathrm dX^0)^2+sum_{k=1}^D(mathrm dX^k)^2.
            tag{1}
            $$

            The submanifold defined by the condition
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^D(X^k)^2=L^2+(X^0)^2
            tag{2}
            $$

            is $D$-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The length parameter $L$ is related to the cosmological constant $Lambda$ by
            $$
            Lambda = frac{(D-2)(D-1)}{2L^2}.
            tag{3}
            $$

            This is equation (4) in "Les Houches Lectures on de Sitter Space". Setting $D=2$ recovers your result $Lambda=0$.



            By the way, equations (13)-(14) in the same paper show how to derive the de Sitter metric in the form
            $$
            -mathrm dt^2+e^{2t}sum_{k=1}^{D-1}(mathrm dx^k)^2
            $$

            starting from equations (1)-(2). For $D=2$, this reduces to the form shown in the question.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              5














              In two-dimensional spacetime, the Einstein tensor $R_{ab}-frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R$ is identically zero , which explains why you get $Lambda=0$.



              In any number $D$ of spacetime dimensions, including $D=2$, de Sitter spacetime can be constructed like this. Start with the $D+1$ dimensional Minkowski metric
              $$
              -(mathrm dX^0)^2+sum_{k=1}^D(mathrm dX^k)^2.
              tag{1}
              $$

              The submanifold defined by the condition
              $$
              sum_{k=1}^D(X^k)^2=L^2+(X^0)^2
              tag{2}
              $$

              is $D$-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The length parameter $L$ is related to the cosmological constant $Lambda$ by
              $$
              Lambda = frac{(D-2)(D-1)}{2L^2}.
              tag{3}
              $$

              This is equation (4) in "Les Houches Lectures on de Sitter Space". Setting $D=2$ recovers your result $Lambda=0$.



              By the way, equations (13)-(14) in the same paper show how to derive the de Sitter metric in the form
              $$
              -mathrm dt^2+e^{2t}sum_{k=1}^{D-1}(mathrm dx^k)^2
              $$

              starting from equations (1)-(2). For $D=2$, this reduces to the form shown in the question.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                5












                5








                5






                In two-dimensional spacetime, the Einstein tensor $R_{ab}-frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R$ is identically zero , which explains why you get $Lambda=0$.



                In any number $D$ of spacetime dimensions, including $D=2$, de Sitter spacetime can be constructed like this. Start with the $D+1$ dimensional Minkowski metric
                $$
                -(mathrm dX^0)^2+sum_{k=1}^D(mathrm dX^k)^2.
                tag{1}
                $$

                The submanifold defined by the condition
                $$
                sum_{k=1}^D(X^k)^2=L^2+(X^0)^2
                tag{2}
                $$

                is $D$-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The length parameter $L$ is related to the cosmological constant $Lambda$ by
                $$
                Lambda = frac{(D-2)(D-1)}{2L^2}.
                tag{3}
                $$

                This is equation (4) in "Les Houches Lectures on de Sitter Space". Setting $D=2$ recovers your result $Lambda=0$.



                By the way, equations (13)-(14) in the same paper show how to derive the de Sitter metric in the form
                $$
                -mathrm dt^2+e^{2t}sum_{k=1}^{D-1}(mathrm dx^k)^2
                $$

                starting from equations (1)-(2). For $D=2$, this reduces to the form shown in the question.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                In two-dimensional spacetime, the Einstein tensor $R_{ab}-frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R$ is identically zero , which explains why you get $Lambda=0$.



                In any number $D$ of spacetime dimensions, including $D=2$, de Sitter spacetime can be constructed like this. Start with the $D+1$ dimensional Minkowski metric
                $$
                -(mathrm dX^0)^2+sum_{k=1}^D(mathrm dX^k)^2.
                tag{1}
                $$

                The submanifold defined by the condition
                $$
                sum_{k=1}^D(X^k)^2=L^2+(X^0)^2
                tag{2}
                $$

                is $D$-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The length parameter $L$ is related to the cosmological constant $Lambda$ by
                $$
                Lambda = frac{(D-2)(D-1)}{2L^2}.
                tag{3}
                $$

                This is equation (4) in "Les Houches Lectures on de Sitter Space". Setting $D=2$ recovers your result $Lambda=0$.



                By the way, equations (13)-(14) in the same paper show how to derive the de Sitter metric in the form
                $$
                -mathrm dt^2+e^{2t}sum_{k=1}^{D-1}(mathrm dx^k)^2
                $$

                starting from equations (1)-(2). For $D=2$, this reduces to the form shown in the question.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 10 at 8:25









                Lorenzo B.

                1765




                1765










                answered Dec 10 at 3:53









                Dan Yand

                6,6441830




                6,6441830






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f446259%2fmetric-for-2d-de-sitter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                    Alcedinidae

                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]