Did Lord Vishnu spoke in support of birth-based or conduct-based varna?
Are there any instances of Lord Vishnu or any of his avatars speaking in favour of either conduct-based or birth-based varna?
vishnu caste-system varna
add a comment |
Are there any instances of Lord Vishnu or any of his avatars speaking in favour of either conduct-based or birth-based varna?
vishnu caste-system varna
I hope you don't mind me changing the term "guna" as "conduct". Because supporters of birth based varna say guna is involved in deriding one's varna too.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury all right
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Deriding? Did you mean deciding or degrading? According to birth-based varna supporters if a person is of good guna does he attain a higher varna in his/her current birth?
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
No, in their next birth.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
add a comment |
Are there any instances of Lord Vishnu or any of his avatars speaking in favour of either conduct-based or birth-based varna?
vishnu caste-system varna
Are there any instances of Lord Vishnu or any of his avatars speaking in favour of either conduct-based or birth-based varna?
vishnu caste-system varna
vishnu caste-system varna
edited 2 days ago
Ajay Varma
asked 2 days ago
Ajay VarmaAjay Varma
1386
1386
I hope you don't mind me changing the term "guna" as "conduct". Because supporters of birth based varna say guna is involved in deriding one's varna too.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury all right
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Deriding? Did you mean deciding or degrading? According to birth-based varna supporters if a person is of good guna does he attain a higher varna in his/her current birth?
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
No, in their next birth.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
add a comment |
I hope you don't mind me changing the term "guna" as "conduct". Because supporters of birth based varna say guna is involved in deriding one's varna too.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury all right
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Deriding? Did you mean deciding or degrading? According to birth-based varna supporters if a person is of good guna does he attain a higher varna in his/her current birth?
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
No, in their next birth.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
I hope you don't mind me changing the term "guna" as "conduct". Because supporters of birth based varna say guna is involved in deriding one's varna too.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
I hope you don't mind me changing the term "guna" as "conduct". Because supporters of birth based varna say guna is involved in deriding one's varna too.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury all right
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury all right
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Deriding? Did you mean deciding or degrading? According to birth-based varna supporters if a person is of good guna does he attain a higher varna in his/her current birth?
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Deriding? Did you mean deciding or degrading? According to birth-based varna supporters if a person is of good guna does he attain a higher varna in his/her current birth?
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
No, in their next birth.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
No, in their next birth.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Lord Vishnu in the form of Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita:
मां हि पार्थ ब्यापाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः।स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शूद्रासतेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्॥
English Translation: For finding refuge in Me, O Arjuna, even those who maybe of sinful birth, women, Vaishyas and similarly Shudras, even they reach the Supreme goal. (Bhagavad-Gita 9.32).
I think the very word paapyoni makes it clear that He accepts the birth-based varna system. Also, He did not protest at all when Arjuna spoke ill words about the Varnasankaras.
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
3
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
add a comment |
Yes, according to the Vishnu Smriti:
Viṣṇu (16.1).—‘On women equal in caste to their husbands, sons are
begotten who are equal in caste to their fathers.’
4
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
2
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
1
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Lord Vishnu in the form of Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita:
मां हि पार्थ ब्यापाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः।स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शूद्रासतेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्॥
English Translation: For finding refuge in Me, O Arjuna, even those who maybe of sinful birth, women, Vaishyas and similarly Shudras, even they reach the Supreme goal. (Bhagavad-Gita 9.32).
I think the very word paapyoni makes it clear that He accepts the birth-based varna system. Also, He did not protest at all when Arjuna spoke ill words about the Varnasankaras.
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
3
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
add a comment |
Lord Vishnu in the form of Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita:
मां हि पार्थ ब्यापाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः।स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शूद्रासतेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्॥
English Translation: For finding refuge in Me, O Arjuna, even those who maybe of sinful birth, women, Vaishyas and similarly Shudras, even they reach the Supreme goal. (Bhagavad-Gita 9.32).
I think the very word paapyoni makes it clear that He accepts the birth-based varna system. Also, He did not protest at all when Arjuna spoke ill words about the Varnasankaras.
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
3
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
add a comment |
Lord Vishnu in the form of Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita:
मां हि पार्थ ब्यापाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः।स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शूद्रासतेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्॥
English Translation: For finding refuge in Me, O Arjuna, even those who maybe of sinful birth, women, Vaishyas and similarly Shudras, even they reach the Supreme goal. (Bhagavad-Gita 9.32).
I think the very word paapyoni makes it clear that He accepts the birth-based varna system. Also, He did not protest at all when Arjuna spoke ill words about the Varnasankaras.
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Lord Vishnu in the form of Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita:
मां हि पार्थ ब्यापाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः।स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शूद्रासतेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्॥
English Translation: For finding refuge in Me, O Arjuna, even those who maybe of sinful birth, women, Vaishyas and similarly Shudras, even they reach the Supreme goal. (Bhagavad-Gita 9.32).
I think the very word paapyoni makes it clear that He accepts the birth-based varna system. Also, He did not protest at all when Arjuna spoke ill words about the Varnasankaras.
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
6,62331363
6,62331363
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
Partha BanerjeePartha Banerjee
379114
379114
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Partha Banerjee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
3
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
add a comment |
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
3
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
Good answer. And Krishna also did not protest at all when Duryodhana called Vidura a Shudra in front of Krishna.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
3
3
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/…
– Rakesh Joshi
yesterday
add a comment |
Yes, according to the Vishnu Smriti:
Viṣṇu (16.1).—‘On women equal in caste to their husbands, sons are
begotten who are equal in caste to their fathers.’
4
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
2
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
1
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
Yes, according to the Vishnu Smriti:
Viṣṇu (16.1).—‘On women equal in caste to their husbands, sons are
begotten who are equal in caste to their fathers.’
4
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
2
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
1
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
Yes, according to the Vishnu Smriti:
Viṣṇu (16.1).—‘On women equal in caste to their husbands, sons are
begotten who are equal in caste to their fathers.’
Yes, according to the Vishnu Smriti:
Viṣṇu (16.1).—‘On women equal in caste to their husbands, sons are
begotten who are equal in caste to their fathers.’
answered 2 days ago
IkshvakuIkshvaku
3,502429
3,502429
4
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
2
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
1
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
4
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
2
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
1
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
4
4
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
Are you sure Vishnu-smriti was composed by Lord Vishnu? I think it was written by some sage named Vishnu.
– Partha Banerjee
2 days ago
2
2
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
"the Vishnu Smriti is the work of a single Brahmin expert in the Dharmaśāstra tradition and also a devotee of Vishnu. Olivelle shows that the text was very likely composed between 700 and 1000 CE". So this doesn't qualify as an answer.
– sv.
2 days ago
1
1
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
@sv. Of course Patrick Olivelle and all other Indologists will say that everything, including the Vedas and Gita, were fabricated by Brahmins. That's just not what Hindus believe.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
1
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
@sv. No I don't need to do that, because it's well know the Vishnu Smriti is a dialogue of Vishnu.
– Ikshvaku
2 days ago
1
1
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
@Ikshvaku In that case can we consider Vajrasuchi upanishad as the word of Rama? Since Muktikā upanishads are part of dialogue between Rama and Hanuman. According to the wikipedia article anyone who reads one of the 108 upanishads with devotion would get status of union with Rama.
– Ajay Varma
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
I hope you don't mind me changing the term "guna" as "conduct". Because supporters of birth based varna say guna is involved in deriding one's varna too.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury all right
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
@Surya Kanta Bose Deriding? Did you mean deciding or degrading? According to birth-based varna supporters if a person is of good guna does he attain a higher varna in his/her current birth?
– Ajay Varma
2 days ago
No, in their next birth.
– Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
2 days ago