How does origin/HEAD get set?
I have a branch set up to track a ref in origin. git checkout <branchname>
switches to that branch, and a git status
will show me how far ahead or behind my branch is from origin, but I'm surprised that origin/HEAD
still points at origin/master
, and not origin/<branchname>
So my question is, under what circumstances does origin/HEAD get moved?
EDIT:
I appreciate the answers about how to move origin/HEAD, but I'm interested in what "organically" moves it, outside of me explicitly telling it to do so.
For example, when I switch branches, git makes HEAD point at the branch I'm checking out, so I'm surprised that origin/HEAD doesn't move in the same manner.
git
add a comment |
I have a branch set up to track a ref in origin. git checkout <branchname>
switches to that branch, and a git status
will show me how far ahead or behind my branch is from origin, but I'm surprised that origin/HEAD
still points at origin/master
, and not origin/<branchname>
So my question is, under what circumstances does origin/HEAD get moved?
EDIT:
I appreciate the answers about how to move origin/HEAD, but I'm interested in what "organically" moves it, outside of me explicitly telling it to do so.
For example, when I switch branches, git makes HEAD point at the branch I'm checking out, so I'm surprised that origin/HEAD doesn't move in the same manner.
git
Note that this question is about local symbolic references on remotes, likerefs/origin/HEAD
. It is not about how a repository's own symbolic referenceHEAD
gets set.
– clacke
Mar 28 '17 at 16:53
add a comment |
I have a branch set up to track a ref in origin. git checkout <branchname>
switches to that branch, and a git status
will show me how far ahead or behind my branch is from origin, but I'm surprised that origin/HEAD
still points at origin/master
, and not origin/<branchname>
So my question is, under what circumstances does origin/HEAD get moved?
EDIT:
I appreciate the answers about how to move origin/HEAD, but I'm interested in what "organically" moves it, outside of me explicitly telling it to do so.
For example, when I switch branches, git makes HEAD point at the branch I'm checking out, so I'm surprised that origin/HEAD doesn't move in the same manner.
git
I have a branch set up to track a ref in origin. git checkout <branchname>
switches to that branch, and a git status
will show me how far ahead or behind my branch is from origin, but I'm surprised that origin/HEAD
still points at origin/master
, and not origin/<branchname>
So my question is, under what circumstances does origin/HEAD get moved?
EDIT:
I appreciate the answers about how to move origin/HEAD, but I'm interested in what "organically" moves it, outside of me explicitly telling it to do so.
For example, when I switch branches, git makes HEAD point at the branch I'm checking out, so I'm surprised that origin/HEAD doesn't move in the same manner.
git
git
edited Jan 12 '12 at 18:48
ecoffey
asked Jan 12 '12 at 18:03
ecoffeyecoffey
1,44341622
1,44341622
Note that this question is about local symbolic references on remotes, likerefs/origin/HEAD
. It is not about how a repository's own symbolic referenceHEAD
gets set.
– clacke
Mar 28 '17 at 16:53
add a comment |
Note that this question is about local symbolic references on remotes, likerefs/origin/HEAD
. It is not about how a repository's own symbolic referenceHEAD
gets set.
– clacke
Mar 28 '17 at 16:53
Note that this question is about local symbolic references on remotes, like
refs/origin/HEAD
. It is not about how a repository's own symbolic reference HEAD
gets set.– clacke
Mar 28 '17 at 16:53
Note that this question is about local symbolic references on remotes, like
refs/origin/HEAD
. It is not about how a repository's own symbolic reference HEAD
gets set.– clacke
Mar 28 '17 at 16:53
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Note first that your question shows a bit of misunderstanding. origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, i.e. the HEAD that's in that remote repository you're calling origin. When you switch branches in your repo, you're not affecting that. The same is true for remote branches; you might have master
and origin/master
in your repo, where origin/master
represents a local copy of the master
branch in the remote repository.
origin's HEAD will only change if you or someone else actually changes it in the remote repository, which should basically never happen - you want the default branch a public repo to stay constant, on the stable branch (probably master). origin/HEAD is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. (Its full name is refs/remotes/origin/HEAD.)
I think the above answers what you actually wanted to know, but to go ahead and answer the question you explicitly asked... origin/HEAD is set automatically when you clone a repository, and that's about it. Bizarrely, that it's not set by commands like git remote update
- I believe the only way it will change is if you manually change it. (By change I mean point to a different branch; obviously the commit it points to changes if that branch changes, which might happen on fetch/pull/remote update.)
Edit: The problem discussed below was corrected in Git 1.8.4.3; see this update.
There is a tiny caveat, though. HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit, but the git remote transfer protocols only report commits for refs. So Git knows the SHA1 of the commit pointed to by HEAD and all other refs; it then has to deduce the value of HEAD by finding a branch that points to the same commit. This means that if two branches happen to point there, it's ambiguous. (I believe it picks master if possible, then falls back to first alphabetically.) You'll see this reported in the output of git remote show origin
:
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: ...
Push URL: ...
HEAD branch (remote HEAD is ambiguous, may be one of the following):
foo
master
Oddly, although the notion of HEAD printed this way will change if things change on the remote (e.g. if foo is removed), it doesn't actually update refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
. This can lead to really odd situations. Say that in the above example origin/HEAD actually pointed to foo, and origin's foo branch was then removed. We can then do this:
$ git remote show origin
...
HEAD branch: master
$ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
refs/remotes/origin/foo
$ git remote update --prune origin
Fetching origin
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(refs/remotes/origin/HEAD has become dangling)
So even though remote show knows HEAD is master, it doesn't update anything. The stale foo branch is correctly pruned, and HEAD becomes dangling (pointing to a nonexistent branch), and it still doesn't update it to point to master. If you want to fix this, use git remote set-head origin -a
, which automatically determines origin's HEAD as above, and then actually sets origin/HEAD to point to the appropriate remote branch.
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
1
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
2
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me
– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
add a comment |
It is your setting as the owner of your local repo. Change it like this:
git remote set-head origin some_branch
And origin/HEAD will point to your branch instead of master. This would then apply to your repo only and not for others. By default, it will point to master, unless something else has been configured on the remote repo.
Manual entry for remote set-head provides some good information on this.
Edit: to emphasize: without you telling it to, the only way it would "move" would be a case like renaming the master branch, which I don't think is considered "organic". So, I would say organically it does not move.
1
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
add a comment |
What moves origin/HEAD "organically"?
git clone
sets it once to the spot where HEAD is on origin
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
git clone
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
What does HEAD on origin represent?
- on bare repositories (often repositories “on servers”) it serves as a marker for the default branch, because
git clone
uses it in such a way - on non-bare repositories (local or remote), it reflects the repository’s current checkout
What sets origin/HEAD?
git clone
fetches and sets it- it would make sense if
git fetch
updates it like any other reference, but it doesn’t
git remote set-head origin -a
fetches and sets it
- useful to update the local knowledge of what remote considers the “default branch”
Trivia
origin/HEAD
can also be set to any other value without contacting the remote:git remote set-head origin <branch>
- I see no use-case for this, except for testing
- unfortunately nothing is able to set HEAD on the remote
- older versions of git did not know which branch HEAD points to on the remote, only which commit hash it finally has: so it just hopefully picked a branch name pointing to the same hash
I had lost reference toorigin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!
– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I disagree withgit fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.
– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Disclaimer: this is an update to Jefromi's answer, which I'm writing to save the curious some time.
I tried in vain to replicate (in Git 2.0.1) the remote HEAD is ambiguous
message that Jefromi mentions in his answer; so I did a bit of digging (by cloning https://github.com/git/git and searching the log). It used to be that
Determining HEAD is ambiguous since it is done by comparing SHA1s.
In the case of multiple matches we return refs/heads/master if it
matches, else we return the first match we encounter. builtin-remote
needs all matches returned to it, so add a flag for it to request such.
(Commit 4229f1fa325870d6b24fe2a4c7d2ed5f14c6f771
, dated Feb 27, 2009, found with git log --reverse --grep="HEAD is ambiguous"
)
However, the ambiguity in question has since been lifted:
One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol used by "git
clone" was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch
"HEAD" points at, and the receiving end needed to guess. A new
capability has been defined in the pack protocol to convey this
information so that cloning from a repository with more than one
branches pointing at the same commit where the HEAD is at now
reliably sets the initial branch in the resulting repository.
(Commit 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
, dated Nov 8, 2013, found with git log --grep="ambiguous" --grep="HEAD" --all-match
)
Edit (thanks to torek):
$ git name-rev --name-only 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
tags/v1.8.4.3~3
This means that, if you're using Git v1.8.4.3 or later, you shouldn't run into any ambiguous-remote-HEAD problem.
1
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
add a comment |
Remember there are two independent git repos we are talking about. Your local repo with your code and the remote running somewhere else.
Your are right, when you change a branch, HEAD points to your current branch. All of this is happening on your local git repo. Not the remote repo, which could be owned by another developer, or siting on a sever in your office, or github, or another directory on the filesystem, or etc...
Your computer (local repo) has no business changing the HEAD pointer on the remote git repo. It could be owned by a different developer for example.
One more thing, what your computer calls origin/XXX is your computer's understanding of the state of the remote at the time of the last fetch.
So what would "organically" update origin/HEAD? It would be activity on the remote git repo. Not your local repo.
People have mentioned
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/head/my_other_branch
Normally, that is used when there is a shared central git repo on a server for use by the development team. It would be a command executed on the remote computer. You would see this as activity on the remote git repo.
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f8839958%2fhow-does-origin-head-get-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note first that your question shows a bit of misunderstanding. origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, i.e. the HEAD that's in that remote repository you're calling origin. When you switch branches in your repo, you're not affecting that. The same is true for remote branches; you might have master
and origin/master
in your repo, where origin/master
represents a local copy of the master
branch in the remote repository.
origin's HEAD will only change if you or someone else actually changes it in the remote repository, which should basically never happen - you want the default branch a public repo to stay constant, on the stable branch (probably master). origin/HEAD is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. (Its full name is refs/remotes/origin/HEAD.)
I think the above answers what you actually wanted to know, but to go ahead and answer the question you explicitly asked... origin/HEAD is set automatically when you clone a repository, and that's about it. Bizarrely, that it's not set by commands like git remote update
- I believe the only way it will change is if you manually change it. (By change I mean point to a different branch; obviously the commit it points to changes if that branch changes, which might happen on fetch/pull/remote update.)
Edit: The problem discussed below was corrected in Git 1.8.4.3; see this update.
There is a tiny caveat, though. HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit, but the git remote transfer protocols only report commits for refs. So Git knows the SHA1 of the commit pointed to by HEAD and all other refs; it then has to deduce the value of HEAD by finding a branch that points to the same commit. This means that if two branches happen to point there, it's ambiguous. (I believe it picks master if possible, then falls back to first alphabetically.) You'll see this reported in the output of git remote show origin
:
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: ...
Push URL: ...
HEAD branch (remote HEAD is ambiguous, may be one of the following):
foo
master
Oddly, although the notion of HEAD printed this way will change if things change on the remote (e.g. if foo is removed), it doesn't actually update refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
. This can lead to really odd situations. Say that in the above example origin/HEAD actually pointed to foo, and origin's foo branch was then removed. We can then do this:
$ git remote show origin
...
HEAD branch: master
$ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
refs/remotes/origin/foo
$ git remote update --prune origin
Fetching origin
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(refs/remotes/origin/HEAD has become dangling)
So even though remote show knows HEAD is master, it doesn't update anything. The stale foo branch is correctly pruned, and HEAD becomes dangling (pointing to a nonexistent branch), and it still doesn't update it to point to master. If you want to fix this, use git remote set-head origin -a
, which automatically determines origin's HEAD as above, and then actually sets origin/HEAD to point to the appropriate remote branch.
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
1
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
2
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me
– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
add a comment |
Note first that your question shows a bit of misunderstanding. origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, i.e. the HEAD that's in that remote repository you're calling origin. When you switch branches in your repo, you're not affecting that. The same is true for remote branches; you might have master
and origin/master
in your repo, where origin/master
represents a local copy of the master
branch in the remote repository.
origin's HEAD will only change if you or someone else actually changes it in the remote repository, which should basically never happen - you want the default branch a public repo to stay constant, on the stable branch (probably master). origin/HEAD is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. (Its full name is refs/remotes/origin/HEAD.)
I think the above answers what you actually wanted to know, but to go ahead and answer the question you explicitly asked... origin/HEAD is set automatically when you clone a repository, and that's about it. Bizarrely, that it's not set by commands like git remote update
- I believe the only way it will change is if you manually change it. (By change I mean point to a different branch; obviously the commit it points to changes if that branch changes, which might happen on fetch/pull/remote update.)
Edit: The problem discussed below was corrected in Git 1.8.4.3; see this update.
There is a tiny caveat, though. HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit, but the git remote transfer protocols only report commits for refs. So Git knows the SHA1 of the commit pointed to by HEAD and all other refs; it then has to deduce the value of HEAD by finding a branch that points to the same commit. This means that if two branches happen to point there, it's ambiguous. (I believe it picks master if possible, then falls back to first alphabetically.) You'll see this reported in the output of git remote show origin
:
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: ...
Push URL: ...
HEAD branch (remote HEAD is ambiguous, may be one of the following):
foo
master
Oddly, although the notion of HEAD printed this way will change if things change on the remote (e.g. if foo is removed), it doesn't actually update refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
. This can lead to really odd situations. Say that in the above example origin/HEAD actually pointed to foo, and origin's foo branch was then removed. We can then do this:
$ git remote show origin
...
HEAD branch: master
$ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
refs/remotes/origin/foo
$ git remote update --prune origin
Fetching origin
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(refs/remotes/origin/HEAD has become dangling)
So even though remote show knows HEAD is master, it doesn't update anything. The stale foo branch is correctly pruned, and HEAD becomes dangling (pointing to a nonexistent branch), and it still doesn't update it to point to master. If you want to fix this, use git remote set-head origin -a
, which automatically determines origin's HEAD as above, and then actually sets origin/HEAD to point to the appropriate remote branch.
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
1
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
2
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me
– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
add a comment |
Note first that your question shows a bit of misunderstanding. origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, i.e. the HEAD that's in that remote repository you're calling origin. When you switch branches in your repo, you're not affecting that. The same is true for remote branches; you might have master
and origin/master
in your repo, where origin/master
represents a local copy of the master
branch in the remote repository.
origin's HEAD will only change if you or someone else actually changes it in the remote repository, which should basically never happen - you want the default branch a public repo to stay constant, on the stable branch (probably master). origin/HEAD is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. (Its full name is refs/remotes/origin/HEAD.)
I think the above answers what you actually wanted to know, but to go ahead and answer the question you explicitly asked... origin/HEAD is set automatically when you clone a repository, and that's about it. Bizarrely, that it's not set by commands like git remote update
- I believe the only way it will change is if you manually change it. (By change I mean point to a different branch; obviously the commit it points to changes if that branch changes, which might happen on fetch/pull/remote update.)
Edit: The problem discussed below was corrected in Git 1.8.4.3; see this update.
There is a tiny caveat, though. HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit, but the git remote transfer protocols only report commits for refs. So Git knows the SHA1 of the commit pointed to by HEAD and all other refs; it then has to deduce the value of HEAD by finding a branch that points to the same commit. This means that if two branches happen to point there, it's ambiguous. (I believe it picks master if possible, then falls back to first alphabetically.) You'll see this reported in the output of git remote show origin
:
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: ...
Push URL: ...
HEAD branch (remote HEAD is ambiguous, may be one of the following):
foo
master
Oddly, although the notion of HEAD printed this way will change if things change on the remote (e.g. if foo is removed), it doesn't actually update refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
. This can lead to really odd situations. Say that in the above example origin/HEAD actually pointed to foo, and origin's foo branch was then removed. We can then do this:
$ git remote show origin
...
HEAD branch: master
$ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
refs/remotes/origin/foo
$ git remote update --prune origin
Fetching origin
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(refs/remotes/origin/HEAD has become dangling)
So even though remote show knows HEAD is master, it doesn't update anything. The stale foo branch is correctly pruned, and HEAD becomes dangling (pointing to a nonexistent branch), and it still doesn't update it to point to master. If you want to fix this, use git remote set-head origin -a
, which automatically determines origin's HEAD as above, and then actually sets origin/HEAD to point to the appropriate remote branch.
Note first that your question shows a bit of misunderstanding. origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, i.e. the HEAD that's in that remote repository you're calling origin. When you switch branches in your repo, you're not affecting that. The same is true for remote branches; you might have master
and origin/master
in your repo, where origin/master
represents a local copy of the master
branch in the remote repository.
origin's HEAD will only change if you or someone else actually changes it in the remote repository, which should basically never happen - you want the default branch a public repo to stay constant, on the stable branch (probably master). origin/HEAD is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. (Its full name is refs/remotes/origin/HEAD.)
I think the above answers what you actually wanted to know, but to go ahead and answer the question you explicitly asked... origin/HEAD is set automatically when you clone a repository, and that's about it. Bizarrely, that it's not set by commands like git remote update
- I believe the only way it will change is if you manually change it. (By change I mean point to a different branch; obviously the commit it points to changes if that branch changes, which might happen on fetch/pull/remote update.)
Edit: The problem discussed below was corrected in Git 1.8.4.3; see this update.
There is a tiny caveat, though. HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit, but the git remote transfer protocols only report commits for refs. So Git knows the SHA1 of the commit pointed to by HEAD and all other refs; it then has to deduce the value of HEAD by finding a branch that points to the same commit. This means that if two branches happen to point there, it's ambiguous. (I believe it picks master if possible, then falls back to first alphabetically.) You'll see this reported in the output of git remote show origin
:
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: ...
Push URL: ...
HEAD branch (remote HEAD is ambiguous, may be one of the following):
foo
master
Oddly, although the notion of HEAD printed this way will change if things change on the remote (e.g. if foo is removed), it doesn't actually update refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
. This can lead to really odd situations. Say that in the above example origin/HEAD actually pointed to foo, and origin's foo branch was then removed. We can then do this:
$ git remote show origin
...
HEAD branch: master
$ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
refs/remotes/origin/foo
$ git remote update --prune origin
Fetching origin
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(refs/remotes/origin/HEAD has become dangling)
So even though remote show knows HEAD is master, it doesn't update anything. The stale foo branch is correctly pruned, and HEAD becomes dangling (pointing to a nonexistent branch), and it still doesn't update it to point to master. If you want to fix this, use git remote set-head origin -a
, which automatically determines origin's HEAD as above, and then actually sets origin/HEAD to point to the appropriate remote branch.
edited May 23 '17 at 10:31
Community♦
11
11
answered Jan 12 '12 at 19:22
CascabelCascabel
332k56325293
332k56325293
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
1
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
2
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me
– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
add a comment |
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
1
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
2
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me
– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
@jefromi Awesome answer! Just a remark: you write that HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit [...], but it might be worth mentioning "detached HEAD state", for completeness.
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 13:26
1
1
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
Please see my update: stackoverflow.com/a/25430727/2541573
– jubobs
Aug 21 '14 at 16:18
2
2
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
@Jubobs Thanks! If my answer needs updating, please feel free to simply edit it, though - it'll certainly save people time to read a brief summary of how things actually work, rather than having to sort through what was true two years ago and what's true now.
– Cascabel
Aug 21 '14 at 18:35
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
have read this at least 5 times and still do no understand a bit of it
– krb686
Feb 26 '15 at 15:19
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
git remote set-head origin -a
did the job for me– Shujito
May 29 '18 at 19:09
add a comment |
It is your setting as the owner of your local repo. Change it like this:
git remote set-head origin some_branch
And origin/HEAD will point to your branch instead of master. This would then apply to your repo only and not for others. By default, it will point to master, unless something else has been configured on the remote repo.
Manual entry for remote set-head provides some good information on this.
Edit: to emphasize: without you telling it to, the only way it would "move" would be a case like renaming the master branch, which I don't think is considered "organic". So, I would say organically it does not move.
1
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
add a comment |
It is your setting as the owner of your local repo. Change it like this:
git remote set-head origin some_branch
And origin/HEAD will point to your branch instead of master. This would then apply to your repo only and not for others. By default, it will point to master, unless something else has been configured on the remote repo.
Manual entry for remote set-head provides some good information on this.
Edit: to emphasize: without you telling it to, the only way it would "move" would be a case like renaming the master branch, which I don't think is considered "organic". So, I would say organically it does not move.
1
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
add a comment |
It is your setting as the owner of your local repo. Change it like this:
git remote set-head origin some_branch
And origin/HEAD will point to your branch instead of master. This would then apply to your repo only and not for others. By default, it will point to master, unless something else has been configured on the remote repo.
Manual entry for remote set-head provides some good information on this.
Edit: to emphasize: without you telling it to, the only way it would "move" would be a case like renaming the master branch, which I don't think is considered "organic". So, I would say organically it does not move.
It is your setting as the owner of your local repo. Change it like this:
git remote set-head origin some_branch
And origin/HEAD will point to your branch instead of master. This would then apply to your repo only and not for others. By default, it will point to master, unless something else has been configured on the remote repo.
Manual entry for remote set-head provides some good information on this.
Edit: to emphasize: without you telling it to, the only way it would "move" would be a case like renaming the master branch, which I don't think is considered "organic". So, I would say organically it does not move.
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:33
answered Jan 12 '12 at 18:42
eiseis
34.7k896144
34.7k896144
1
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
add a comment |
1
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
1
1
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
The edit emphasis isn't completely correct here. It can also change if you clone from a local copy that isn't on master branch.
– mphair
May 15 '14 at 7:13
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
I don't consider a clone "moving", but I guess we can disagree on that :)
– eis
Sep 1 '17 at 7:06
add a comment |
What moves origin/HEAD "organically"?
git clone
sets it once to the spot where HEAD is on origin
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
git clone
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
What does HEAD on origin represent?
- on bare repositories (often repositories “on servers”) it serves as a marker for the default branch, because
git clone
uses it in such a way - on non-bare repositories (local or remote), it reflects the repository’s current checkout
What sets origin/HEAD?
git clone
fetches and sets it- it would make sense if
git fetch
updates it like any other reference, but it doesn’t
git remote set-head origin -a
fetches and sets it
- useful to update the local knowledge of what remote considers the “default branch”
Trivia
origin/HEAD
can also be set to any other value without contacting the remote:git remote set-head origin <branch>
- I see no use-case for this, except for testing
- unfortunately nothing is able to set HEAD on the remote
- older versions of git did not know which branch HEAD points to on the remote, only which commit hash it finally has: so it just hopefully picked a branch name pointing to the same hash
I had lost reference toorigin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!
– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I disagree withgit fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.
– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
What moves origin/HEAD "organically"?
git clone
sets it once to the spot where HEAD is on origin
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
git clone
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
What does HEAD on origin represent?
- on bare repositories (often repositories “on servers”) it serves as a marker for the default branch, because
git clone
uses it in such a way - on non-bare repositories (local or remote), it reflects the repository’s current checkout
What sets origin/HEAD?
git clone
fetches and sets it- it would make sense if
git fetch
updates it like any other reference, but it doesn’t
git remote set-head origin -a
fetches and sets it
- useful to update the local knowledge of what remote considers the “default branch”
Trivia
origin/HEAD
can also be set to any other value without contacting the remote:git remote set-head origin <branch>
- I see no use-case for this, except for testing
- unfortunately nothing is able to set HEAD on the remote
- older versions of git did not know which branch HEAD points to on the remote, only which commit hash it finally has: so it just hopefully picked a branch name pointing to the same hash
I had lost reference toorigin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!
– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I disagree withgit fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.
– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
What moves origin/HEAD "organically"?
git clone
sets it once to the spot where HEAD is on origin
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
git clone
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
What does HEAD on origin represent?
- on bare repositories (often repositories “on servers”) it serves as a marker for the default branch, because
git clone
uses it in such a way - on non-bare repositories (local or remote), it reflects the repository’s current checkout
What sets origin/HEAD?
git clone
fetches and sets it- it would make sense if
git fetch
updates it like any other reference, but it doesn’t
git remote set-head origin -a
fetches and sets it
- useful to update the local knowledge of what remote considers the “default branch”
Trivia
origin/HEAD
can also be set to any other value without contacting the remote:git remote set-head origin <branch>
- I see no use-case for this, except for testing
- unfortunately nothing is able to set HEAD on the remote
- older versions of git did not know which branch HEAD points to on the remote, only which commit hash it finally has: so it just hopefully picked a branch name pointing to the same hash
What moves origin/HEAD "organically"?
git clone
sets it once to the spot where HEAD is on origin
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
git clone
- it serves as the default branch to checkout after cloning with
What does HEAD on origin represent?
- on bare repositories (often repositories “on servers”) it serves as a marker for the default branch, because
git clone
uses it in such a way - on non-bare repositories (local or remote), it reflects the repository’s current checkout
What sets origin/HEAD?
git clone
fetches and sets it- it would make sense if
git fetch
updates it like any other reference, but it doesn’t
git remote set-head origin -a
fetches and sets it
- useful to update the local knowledge of what remote considers the “default branch”
Trivia
origin/HEAD
can also be set to any other value without contacting the remote:git remote set-head origin <branch>
- I see no use-case for this, except for testing
- unfortunately nothing is able to set HEAD on the remote
- older versions of git did not know which branch HEAD points to on the remote, only which commit hash it finally has: so it just hopefully picked a branch name pointing to the same hash
edited Mar 22 '17 at 16:23
answered Apr 2 '15 at 5:47
Robert SiemerRobert Siemer
17.5k74974
17.5k74974
I had lost reference toorigin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!
– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I disagree withgit fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.
– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
I had lost reference toorigin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!
– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I disagree withgit fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.
– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
I had lost reference to
origin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I had lost reference to
origin/HEAD
and your solution helped. Thanks!– java_dude
Apr 5 '15 at 23:32
I disagree with
git fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
I disagree with
git fetch
updating it, since it allows to configure a (local) shortcut. Quoting the doc: "Having a default branch for a remote is not required, but allows the name of the remote to be specified in lieu of a specific branch". It would be strange if a remote change would update locally configured shortcuts.– Micha Wiedenmann
Nov 21 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Disclaimer: this is an update to Jefromi's answer, which I'm writing to save the curious some time.
I tried in vain to replicate (in Git 2.0.1) the remote HEAD is ambiguous
message that Jefromi mentions in his answer; so I did a bit of digging (by cloning https://github.com/git/git and searching the log). It used to be that
Determining HEAD is ambiguous since it is done by comparing SHA1s.
In the case of multiple matches we return refs/heads/master if it
matches, else we return the first match we encounter. builtin-remote
needs all matches returned to it, so add a flag for it to request such.
(Commit 4229f1fa325870d6b24fe2a4c7d2ed5f14c6f771
, dated Feb 27, 2009, found with git log --reverse --grep="HEAD is ambiguous"
)
However, the ambiguity in question has since been lifted:
One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol used by "git
clone" was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch
"HEAD" points at, and the receiving end needed to guess. A new
capability has been defined in the pack protocol to convey this
information so that cloning from a repository with more than one
branches pointing at the same commit where the HEAD is at now
reliably sets the initial branch in the resulting repository.
(Commit 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
, dated Nov 8, 2013, found with git log --grep="ambiguous" --grep="HEAD" --all-match
)
Edit (thanks to torek):
$ git name-rev --name-only 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
tags/v1.8.4.3~3
This means that, if you're using Git v1.8.4.3 or later, you shouldn't run into any ambiguous-remote-HEAD problem.
1
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
add a comment |
Disclaimer: this is an update to Jefromi's answer, which I'm writing to save the curious some time.
I tried in vain to replicate (in Git 2.0.1) the remote HEAD is ambiguous
message that Jefromi mentions in his answer; so I did a bit of digging (by cloning https://github.com/git/git and searching the log). It used to be that
Determining HEAD is ambiguous since it is done by comparing SHA1s.
In the case of multiple matches we return refs/heads/master if it
matches, else we return the first match we encounter. builtin-remote
needs all matches returned to it, so add a flag for it to request such.
(Commit 4229f1fa325870d6b24fe2a4c7d2ed5f14c6f771
, dated Feb 27, 2009, found with git log --reverse --grep="HEAD is ambiguous"
)
However, the ambiguity in question has since been lifted:
One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol used by "git
clone" was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch
"HEAD" points at, and the receiving end needed to guess. A new
capability has been defined in the pack protocol to convey this
information so that cloning from a repository with more than one
branches pointing at the same commit where the HEAD is at now
reliably sets the initial branch in the resulting repository.
(Commit 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
, dated Nov 8, 2013, found with git log --grep="ambiguous" --grep="HEAD" --all-match
)
Edit (thanks to torek):
$ git name-rev --name-only 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
tags/v1.8.4.3~3
This means that, if you're using Git v1.8.4.3 or later, you shouldn't run into any ambiguous-remote-HEAD problem.
1
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
add a comment |
Disclaimer: this is an update to Jefromi's answer, which I'm writing to save the curious some time.
I tried in vain to replicate (in Git 2.0.1) the remote HEAD is ambiguous
message that Jefromi mentions in his answer; so I did a bit of digging (by cloning https://github.com/git/git and searching the log). It used to be that
Determining HEAD is ambiguous since it is done by comparing SHA1s.
In the case of multiple matches we return refs/heads/master if it
matches, else we return the first match we encounter. builtin-remote
needs all matches returned to it, so add a flag for it to request such.
(Commit 4229f1fa325870d6b24fe2a4c7d2ed5f14c6f771
, dated Feb 27, 2009, found with git log --reverse --grep="HEAD is ambiguous"
)
However, the ambiguity in question has since been lifted:
One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol used by "git
clone" was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch
"HEAD" points at, and the receiving end needed to guess. A new
capability has been defined in the pack protocol to convey this
information so that cloning from a repository with more than one
branches pointing at the same commit where the HEAD is at now
reliably sets the initial branch in the resulting repository.
(Commit 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
, dated Nov 8, 2013, found with git log --grep="ambiguous" --grep="HEAD" --all-match
)
Edit (thanks to torek):
$ git name-rev --name-only 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
tags/v1.8.4.3~3
This means that, if you're using Git v1.8.4.3 or later, you shouldn't run into any ambiguous-remote-HEAD problem.
Disclaimer: this is an update to Jefromi's answer, which I'm writing to save the curious some time.
I tried in vain to replicate (in Git 2.0.1) the remote HEAD is ambiguous
message that Jefromi mentions in his answer; so I did a bit of digging (by cloning https://github.com/git/git and searching the log). It used to be that
Determining HEAD is ambiguous since it is done by comparing SHA1s.
In the case of multiple matches we return refs/heads/master if it
matches, else we return the first match we encounter. builtin-remote
needs all matches returned to it, so add a flag for it to request such.
(Commit 4229f1fa325870d6b24fe2a4c7d2ed5f14c6f771
, dated Feb 27, 2009, found with git log --reverse --grep="HEAD is ambiguous"
)
However, the ambiguity in question has since been lifted:
One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol used by "git
clone" was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch
"HEAD" points at, and the receiving end needed to guess. A new
capability has been defined in the pack protocol to convey this
information so that cloning from a repository with more than one
branches pointing at the same commit where the HEAD is at now
reliably sets the initial branch in the resulting repository.
(Commit 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
, dated Nov 8, 2013, found with git log --grep="ambiguous" --grep="HEAD" --all-match
)
Edit (thanks to torek):
$ git name-rev --name-only 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
tags/v1.8.4.3~3
This means that, if you're using Git v1.8.4.3 or later, you shouldn't run into any ambiguous-remote-HEAD problem.
edited May 23 '17 at 12:02
Community♦
11
11
answered Aug 21 '14 at 15:53
jubobsjubobs
33.3k17104124
33.3k17104124
1
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
add a comment |
1
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
1
1
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
Based on the tags in the git source, this fix applies to git version 1.8.4.3 and later.
– torek
Aug 21 '14 at 18:08
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
I need 1.8.4.3 or later on both sides, right?
– Robert Siemer
Jan 20 '15 at 13:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
@RobertSiemer I'm not sure, but I think so, yes.
– jubobs
Jan 20 '15 at 14:00
add a comment |
Remember there are two independent git repos we are talking about. Your local repo with your code and the remote running somewhere else.
Your are right, when you change a branch, HEAD points to your current branch. All of this is happening on your local git repo. Not the remote repo, which could be owned by another developer, or siting on a sever in your office, or github, or another directory on the filesystem, or etc...
Your computer (local repo) has no business changing the HEAD pointer on the remote git repo. It could be owned by a different developer for example.
One more thing, what your computer calls origin/XXX is your computer's understanding of the state of the remote at the time of the last fetch.
So what would "organically" update origin/HEAD? It would be activity on the remote git repo. Not your local repo.
People have mentioned
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/head/my_other_branch
Normally, that is used when there is a shared central git repo on a server for use by the development team. It would be a command executed on the remote computer. You would see this as activity on the remote git repo.
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
add a comment |
Remember there are two independent git repos we are talking about. Your local repo with your code and the remote running somewhere else.
Your are right, when you change a branch, HEAD points to your current branch. All of this is happening on your local git repo. Not the remote repo, which could be owned by another developer, or siting on a sever in your office, or github, or another directory on the filesystem, or etc...
Your computer (local repo) has no business changing the HEAD pointer on the remote git repo. It could be owned by a different developer for example.
One more thing, what your computer calls origin/XXX is your computer's understanding of the state of the remote at the time of the last fetch.
So what would "organically" update origin/HEAD? It would be activity on the remote git repo. Not your local repo.
People have mentioned
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/head/my_other_branch
Normally, that is used when there is a shared central git repo on a server for use by the development team. It would be a command executed on the remote computer. You would see this as activity on the remote git repo.
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
add a comment |
Remember there are two independent git repos we are talking about. Your local repo with your code and the remote running somewhere else.
Your are right, when you change a branch, HEAD points to your current branch. All of this is happening on your local git repo. Not the remote repo, which could be owned by another developer, or siting on a sever in your office, or github, or another directory on the filesystem, or etc...
Your computer (local repo) has no business changing the HEAD pointer on the remote git repo. It could be owned by a different developer for example.
One more thing, what your computer calls origin/XXX is your computer's understanding of the state of the remote at the time of the last fetch.
So what would "organically" update origin/HEAD? It would be activity on the remote git repo. Not your local repo.
People have mentioned
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/head/my_other_branch
Normally, that is used when there is a shared central git repo on a server for use by the development team. It would be a command executed on the remote computer. You would see this as activity on the remote git repo.
Remember there are two independent git repos we are talking about. Your local repo with your code and the remote running somewhere else.
Your are right, when you change a branch, HEAD points to your current branch. All of this is happening on your local git repo. Not the remote repo, which could be owned by another developer, or siting on a sever in your office, or github, or another directory on the filesystem, or etc...
Your computer (local repo) has no business changing the HEAD pointer on the remote git repo. It could be owned by a different developer for example.
One more thing, what your computer calls origin/XXX is your computer's understanding of the state of the remote at the time of the last fetch.
So what would "organically" update origin/HEAD? It would be activity on the remote git repo. Not your local repo.
People have mentioned
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/head/my_other_branch
Normally, that is used when there is a shared central git repo on a server for use by the development team. It would be a command executed on the remote computer. You would see this as activity on the remote git repo.
edited Jan 12 '12 at 19:32
answered Jan 12 '12 at 19:22
Pablo MaurinPablo Maurin
1,16211725
1,16211725
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
add a comment |
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
Sorry, if I'm a little repetitive. I just want to point out the fact that git is a distributed version control system, and as such the two repos are independent.
– Pablo Maurin
Jan 12 '12 at 19:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f8839958%2fhow-does-origin-head-get-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Note that this question is about local symbolic references on remotes, like
refs/origin/HEAD
. It is not about how a repository's own symbolic referenceHEAD
gets set.– clacke
Mar 28 '17 at 16:53