Is this sentence grammatically correct? 69 [on hold]
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
New contributor
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
commas
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
abby68abby68
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday