Is this sentence grammatically correct? 69 [on hold]
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Qui facit per alium facit per se means that, he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.
commas
commas
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ede/e2ede088cab5099086966db953e911d0e7d02aff" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ede/e2ede088cab5099086966db953e911d0e7d02aff" alt=""
abby68abby68
1
1
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
abby68 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – JonMark Perry, Hot Licks, Mitch, choster, Laurel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's too poorly formatted/punctuated to judge. And "69" is impolite.
– Hot Licks
yesterday