How many possible ways there are to assign $30$ students to $3$ instructors, where each instructor is...












7












$begingroup$


As the title states.



We have 30 people that need to be divided into 3 groups of same size. How many possibilities are there?



I found this problem when looking through old exams of my current subject.



Note: The title is exactly the translated formulation of the question.



It seemed simple enough but my answer doesn't match the solution.
The correct solution is 5,550,996,791,340. How does one solve this?






combinatorics







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For more information, look into multinomial coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$


As the title states.



We have 30 people that need to be divided into 3 groups of same size. How many possibilities are there?



I found this problem when looking through old exams of my current subject.



Note: The title is exactly the translated formulation of the question.



It seemed simple enough but my answer doesn't match the solution.
The correct solution is 5,550,996,791,340. How does one solve this?






combinatorics







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For more information, look into multinomial coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago














7












7








7


1



$begingroup$


As the title states.



We have 30 people that need to be divided into 3 groups of same size. How many possibilities are there?



I found this problem when looking through old exams of my current subject.



Note: The title is exactly the translated formulation of the question.



It seemed simple enough but my answer doesn't match the solution.
The correct solution is 5,550,996,791,340. How does one solve this?






combinatorics







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




As the title states.



We have 30 people that need to be divided into 3 groups of same size. How many possibilities are there?



I found this problem when looking through old exams of my current subject.



Note: The title is exactly the translated formulation of the question.



It seemed simple enough but my answer doesn't match the solution.
The correct solution is 5,550,996,791,340. How does one solve this?






combinatorics




combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









miracle173

7,33322247




7,33322247










asked 13 hours ago









KroyerKroyer

456




456












  • $begingroup$
    For more information, look into multinomial coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    For more information, look into multinomial coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    12 hours ago
















$begingroup$
For more information, look into multinomial coefficients.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
For more information, look into multinomial coefficients.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
12 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

First, we need to form the first group of $10$ people. There is $C_{30}^{10}$ ways to do this. Then, from the remaining $20$ people you form the second group of $10$ people. You can do it in $C_{20}^{10}$ ways. The remaining $10$ people all go to the third group. So the total number of ways to do this is by fundamental theorem of combinatorics $C_{30}^{10} C_{20}^{10} = frac{30!}{10!20!}frac{20!}{10!10!} = frac{30!}{{(10!)}^3}$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    11 hours ago





















11












$begingroup$

It's $frac {30!} {(10!)^3}$ - for each of $30!$ permutations, you set the people in row according to that order, first ten go to the first group, second ten to the second and third to third. In each of these groups order doesn't matter, so you divide by the number of possible orderings.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    5 hours ago



















7












$begingroup$

The answer on this is $$frac{30!}{10!10!10!}$$



First place the students on a row ($30!$ possibilities) and assign the first $10$ to instructor $1$, the second $10$ to instructor $2$ and the third $10$ to instructor $3$.



Now realize that every possible splitup will be counted $10!10!10!$ times.



So division by $10!10!10!$ will repair.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
    $endgroup$
    – user601297
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    10 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3106218%2fhow-many-possible-ways-there-are-to-assign-30-students-to-3-instructors-whe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

First, we need to form the first group of $10$ people. There is $C_{30}^{10}$ ways to do this. Then, from the remaining $20$ people you form the second group of $10$ people. You can do it in $C_{20}^{10}$ ways. The remaining $10$ people all go to the third group. So the total number of ways to do this is by fundamental theorem of combinatorics $C_{30}^{10} C_{20}^{10} = frac{30!}{10!20!}frac{20!}{10!10!} = frac{30!}{{(10!)}^3}$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    11 hours ago


















12












$begingroup$

First, we need to form the first group of $10$ people. There is $C_{30}^{10}$ ways to do this. Then, from the remaining $20$ people you form the second group of $10$ people. You can do it in $C_{20}^{10}$ ways. The remaining $10$ people all go to the third group. So the total number of ways to do this is by fundamental theorem of combinatorics $C_{30}^{10} C_{20}^{10} = frac{30!}{10!20!}frac{20!}{10!10!} = frac{30!}{{(10!)}^3}$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    11 hours ago
















12












12








12





$begingroup$

First, we need to form the first group of $10$ people. There is $C_{30}^{10}$ ways to do this. Then, from the remaining $20$ people you form the second group of $10$ people. You can do it in $C_{20}^{10}$ ways. The remaining $10$ people all go to the third group. So the total number of ways to do this is by fundamental theorem of combinatorics $C_{30}^{10} C_{20}^{10} = frac{30!}{10!20!}frac{20!}{10!10!} = frac{30!}{{(10!)}^3}$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First, we need to form the first group of $10$ people. There is $C_{30}^{10}$ ways to do this. Then, from the remaining $20$ people you form the second group of $10$ people. You can do it in $C_{20}^{10}$ ways. The remaining $10$ people all go to the third group. So the total number of ways to do this is by fundamental theorem of combinatorics $C_{30}^{10} C_{20}^{10} = frac{30!}{10!20!}frac{20!}{10!10!} = frac{30!}{{(10!)}^3}$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









jvdhooft

5,25561641




5,25561641










answered 12 hours ago









Yanior WegYanior Weg

1,76311138




1,76311138








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    11 hours ago
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    11 hours ago










3




3




$begingroup$
For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
11 hours ago






$begingroup$
For reference, it's $5 550 996 791 340$.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
11 hours ago













11












$begingroup$

It's $frac {30!} {(10!)^3}$ - for each of $30!$ permutations, you set the people in row according to that order, first ten go to the first group, second ten to the second and third to third. In each of these groups order doesn't matter, so you divide by the number of possible orderings.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    5 hours ago
















11












$begingroup$

It's $frac {30!} {(10!)^3}$ - for each of $30!$ permutations, you set the people in row according to that order, first ten go to the first group, second ten to the second and third to third. In each of these groups order doesn't matter, so you divide by the number of possible orderings.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    5 hours ago














11












11








11





$begingroup$

It's $frac {30!} {(10!)^3}$ - for each of $30!$ permutations, you set the people in row according to that order, first ten go to the first group, second ten to the second and third to third. In each of these groups order doesn't matter, so you divide by the number of possible orderings.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It's $frac {30!} {(10!)^3}$ - for each of $30!$ permutations, you set the people in row according to that order, first ten go to the first group, second ten to the second and third to third. In each of these groups order doesn't matter, so you divide by the number of possible orderings.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









enedilenedil

781418




781418












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    5 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
$endgroup$
– Kroyer
12 hours ago






$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, now its's clear to me.
$endgroup$
– Kroyer
12 hours ago














$begingroup$
@JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
$endgroup$
– enedil
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
@JanTugsbayar then you can mark this as correct answer
$endgroup$
– enedil
12 hours ago












$begingroup$
Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
$endgroup$
– Kroyer
12 hours ago






$begingroup$
Couldn't choose a correct answer straight away, had a time limit but I think one other later answer explains it more clearly.
$endgroup$
– Kroyer
12 hours ago














$begingroup$
This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
$endgroup$
– akozi
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is a nice intuituve explanation for the final answer as presented above.
$endgroup$
– akozi
5 hours ago











7












$begingroup$

The answer on this is $$frac{30!}{10!10!10!}$$



First place the students on a row ($30!$ possibilities) and assign the first $10$ to instructor $1$, the second $10$ to instructor $2$ and the third $10$ to instructor $3$.



Now realize that every possible splitup will be counted $10!10!10!$ times.



So division by $10!10!10!$ will repair.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
    $endgroup$
    – user601297
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    10 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$

The answer on this is $$frac{30!}{10!10!10!}$$



First place the students on a row ($30!$ possibilities) and assign the first $10$ to instructor $1$, the second $10$ to instructor $2$ and the third $10$ to instructor $3$.



Now realize that every possible splitup will be counted $10!10!10!$ times.



So division by $10!10!10!$ will repair.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
    $endgroup$
    – user601297
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    10 hours ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

The answer on this is $$frac{30!}{10!10!10!}$$



First place the students on a row ($30!$ possibilities) and assign the first $10$ to instructor $1$, the second $10$ to instructor $2$ and the third $10$ to instructor $3$.



Now realize that every possible splitup will be counted $10!10!10!$ times.



So division by $10!10!10!$ will repair.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The answer on this is $$frac{30!}{10!10!10!}$$



First place the students on a row ($30!$ possibilities) and assign the first $10$ to instructor $1$, the second $10$ to instructor $2$ and the third $10$ to instructor $3$.



Now realize that every possible splitup will be counted $10!10!10!$ times.



So division by $10!10!10!$ will repair.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









drhabdrhab

101k544130




101k544130












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
    $endgroup$
    – user601297
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    10 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
    $endgroup$
    – Kroyer
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
    $endgroup$
    – user601297
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    10 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
$endgroup$
– Kroyer
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you too, It was so simple after all.
$endgroup$
– Kroyer
12 hours ago












$begingroup$
Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
$endgroup$
– user601297
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Hey! After splitting them into 3 groups of 10 each won’t we multiply the multinomial by 3! For the number of ways in which these groups can be assigned to the instructors?
$endgroup$
– user601297
12 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
$endgroup$
– drhab
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
No. That is already included in our first move where we place the students in a row. To get more grip on this divide $3$ persons instead of $30$. Then the answer is $frac{3!}{1!1!1!}=6$ which is clear. No multiplication needed anymore.
$endgroup$
– drhab
10 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3106218%2fhow-many-possible-ways-there-are-to-assign-30-students-to-3-instructors-whe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness. ...
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout ...
Read more

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 17 1 Today, I found myself discussing what students should have "under their belts" during a lecture, and I wondered to myself if there was some inappropriate undertone here that I might be unaware of. Question : What is the origin of the phrase "under your belt"? A google search revealed some webpages (e.g. [1]) that assert its origin is related to consumption of food -- once a meal has been eaten, it's under your belt (which is a relief). However, with such websites, I have no way to determine fact from "random guy on the internet making stuff up". etymology idioms ...
Read more