Three coins for the fair king [duplicate]












3















This question already has an answer here:




  • Eight coins for the fair king

    6 answers




Based on the question Eight coins for the fair king:



I saw a comment saying "There isn't a good solution known even with three coins in all cases".



So the challenge here is to try to solve the same problem placed above, except with only 3 coins.



The rules are:





  1. You must create 3 coins of different value, no more.


  2. Any sum of money must be paid with only 3 coins. This sum should be paid without giving change.


  3. You must set N such that no price is allowed to be greater than N.





I've tried to solve it myself and the best combination I could get to was




Coins of 1, 2 and 5, which can get me to a maximum of N = 12.




The highest number that follows the rules wins, and if there's proof that it's definitely the highest answer possible, it gets the tick.



Note: You may only use up to 3 coins to pay every amount, rather than 8.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin, JonMark Perry, n_palum yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 4




    Can you repeat the context of the original problem here? Relying on a link to maintain that context isn't the best idea.
    – THiebert
    2 days ago










  • It's different in the way that this one is simple enough that you can solve it without using a computer, so it does change a bit on the dynamics of the problem.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago










  • @THiebert Added the rules from the original post.
    – S. M.
    yesterday
















3















This question already has an answer here:




  • Eight coins for the fair king

    6 answers




Based on the question Eight coins for the fair king:



I saw a comment saying "There isn't a good solution known even with three coins in all cases".



So the challenge here is to try to solve the same problem placed above, except with only 3 coins.



The rules are:





  1. You must create 3 coins of different value, no more.


  2. Any sum of money must be paid with only 3 coins. This sum should be paid without giving change.


  3. You must set N such that no price is allowed to be greater than N.





I've tried to solve it myself and the best combination I could get to was




Coins of 1, 2 and 5, which can get me to a maximum of N = 12.




The highest number that follows the rules wins, and if there's proof that it's definitely the highest answer possible, it gets the tick.



Note: You may only use up to 3 coins to pay every amount, rather than 8.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin, JonMark Perry, n_palum yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 4




    Can you repeat the context of the original problem here? Relying on a link to maintain that context isn't the best idea.
    – THiebert
    2 days ago










  • It's different in the way that this one is simple enough that you can solve it without using a computer, so it does change a bit on the dynamics of the problem.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago










  • @THiebert Added the rules from the original post.
    – S. M.
    yesterday














3












3








3


3






This question already has an answer here:




  • Eight coins for the fair king

    6 answers




Based on the question Eight coins for the fair king:



I saw a comment saying "There isn't a good solution known even with three coins in all cases".



So the challenge here is to try to solve the same problem placed above, except with only 3 coins.



The rules are:





  1. You must create 3 coins of different value, no more.


  2. Any sum of money must be paid with only 3 coins. This sum should be paid without giving change.


  3. You must set N such that no price is allowed to be greater than N.





I've tried to solve it myself and the best combination I could get to was




Coins of 1, 2 and 5, which can get me to a maximum of N = 12.




The highest number that follows the rules wins, and if there's proof that it's definitely the highest answer possible, it gets the tick.



Note: You may only use up to 3 coins to pay every amount, rather than 8.










share|improve this question
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Eight coins for the fair king

    6 answers




Based on the question Eight coins for the fair king:



I saw a comment saying "There isn't a good solution known even with three coins in all cases".



So the challenge here is to try to solve the same problem placed above, except with only 3 coins.



The rules are:





  1. You must create 3 coins of different value, no more.


  2. Any sum of money must be paid with only 3 coins. This sum should be paid without giving change.


  3. You must set N such that no price is allowed to be greater than N.





I've tried to solve it myself and the best combination I could get to was




Coins of 1, 2 and 5, which can get me to a maximum of N = 12.




The highest number that follows the rules wins, and if there's proof that it's definitely the highest answer possible, it gets the tick.



Note: You may only use up to 3 coins to pay every amount, rather than 8.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Eight coins for the fair king

    6 answers








mathematics combinatorics optimization open-ended






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday

























asked 2 days ago









S. M.

933419




933419




marked as duplicate by Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin, JonMark Perry, n_palum yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin, JonMark Perry, n_palum yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 4




    Can you repeat the context of the original problem here? Relying on a link to maintain that context isn't the best idea.
    – THiebert
    2 days ago










  • It's different in the way that this one is simple enough that you can solve it without using a computer, so it does change a bit on the dynamics of the problem.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago










  • @THiebert Added the rules from the original post.
    – S. M.
    yesterday














  • 4




    Can you repeat the context of the original problem here? Relying on a link to maintain that context isn't the best idea.
    – THiebert
    2 days ago










  • It's different in the way that this one is simple enough that you can solve it without using a computer, so it does change a bit on the dynamics of the problem.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago










  • @THiebert Added the rules from the original post.
    – S. M.
    yesterday








4




4




Can you repeat the context of the original problem here? Relying on a link to maintain that context isn't the best idea.
– THiebert
2 days ago




Can you repeat the context of the original problem here? Relying on a link to maintain that context isn't the best idea.
– THiebert
2 days ago












It's different in the way that this one is simple enough that you can solve it without using a computer, so it does change a bit on the dynamics of the problem.
– S. M.
2 days ago




It's different in the way that this one is simple enough that you can solve it without using a computer, so it does change a bit on the dynamics of the problem.
– S. M.
2 days ago












@THiebert Added the rules from the original post.
– S. M.
yesterday




@THiebert Added the rules from the original post.
– S. M.
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














Fact 1:




There must be a $1 coin




Fact 2:




2nd-value coin <=4, else would overflow




Proof:




Exhaustion...




Maximizing possibilities:




Notation: (x,y,z) : highest possible value




Possibility 1: (1,2,?)




(1,2,3):9
(1,2,4):10
(1,2,5):12(@S.M. in question)
(1,2,6):10
(1,2,7):11
(1,2,8+):7
For (1,2,?), (1,2,5):12=greatest




Possibility 2: (1,3,?)




(1,3,4):12
(1,3,5):11
(1,3,6):10
(1,3,7):11
(1,3,8):12
(1,3,9+):7
For (1,3,?), (1,3,8):12=greatest




Possibility 3: (1,4,?)




(1,4,5):15(Credits to @M)
(1,4,6):13
(1,4,7):9
(1,4,8+):6
For (1,4,?), (1,4,5):15=greatest




Overall:




(1,4,5):15=greatest







share|improve this answer























  • This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago










  • Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
    – asgallant
    2 days ago










  • Edited, thanks!
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago



















6














Anders Kaseorg's answer on the 8/8 list has the most optimal N/N answers up to N = 7 in a spoiler. And he has...




{1, 4, 5}




With a little enumeration, it's easy to see that you can use that set to get up to...




15.




EDIT
It's actually pretty simple to reason this out without brute forcing it (too much).




Say you have three denominations of coins - A, B, and C. Then clearly one of them has to be worth #1, or else you can't pay for things that are worth #1. So let's let A be worth #1. Now, assuming that C is the most valuable form of coinage, the most you can pay is #3C.


However, what if you want to pay #3C-1? We can safely assume that you'd have to use either 2C+A or 2C+B. But if you can use A, then C would have to be worth #2, which you can rule out with some quick figuring ({1,2,3} can get you #9, which {1, 1 < n < 2, 2} can't). So you're left with B being C-1.


As a result, you only need to check triples of the form {1, N, N+1}, where N can be at most 4.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • "The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
    – Tibos
    22 hours ago



















3














This is a little bit (read: a lot bit) of trickery, but




I can get up to 44 with coins of -1, 1, 10. The -1 helps because it allows you to get a units digit of 6 through 9.




I can't prove this is optimal, but it's a start (and I'm not sure if this is even good for the kingdom to have this type of coin :P)






share|improve this answer





















  • I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
    – Thomas Blue
    2 days ago










  • Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
    – S. M.
    2 days ago


















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














Fact 1:




There must be a $1 coin




Fact 2:




2nd-value coin <=4, else would overflow




Proof:




Exhaustion...




Maximizing possibilities:




Notation: (x,y,z) : highest possible value




Possibility 1: (1,2,?)




(1,2,3):9
(1,2,4):10
(1,2,5):12(@S.M. in question)
(1,2,6):10
(1,2,7):11
(1,2,8+):7
For (1,2,?), (1,2,5):12=greatest




Possibility 2: (1,3,?)




(1,3,4):12
(1,3,5):11
(1,3,6):10
(1,3,7):11
(1,3,8):12
(1,3,9+):7
For (1,3,?), (1,3,8):12=greatest




Possibility 3: (1,4,?)




(1,4,5):15(Credits to @M)
(1,4,6):13
(1,4,7):9
(1,4,8+):6
For (1,4,?), (1,4,5):15=greatest




Overall:




(1,4,5):15=greatest







share|improve this answer























  • This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago










  • Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
    – asgallant
    2 days ago










  • Edited, thanks!
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago
















8














Fact 1:




There must be a $1 coin




Fact 2:




2nd-value coin <=4, else would overflow




Proof:




Exhaustion...




Maximizing possibilities:




Notation: (x,y,z) : highest possible value




Possibility 1: (1,2,?)




(1,2,3):9
(1,2,4):10
(1,2,5):12(@S.M. in question)
(1,2,6):10
(1,2,7):11
(1,2,8+):7
For (1,2,?), (1,2,5):12=greatest




Possibility 2: (1,3,?)




(1,3,4):12
(1,3,5):11
(1,3,6):10
(1,3,7):11
(1,3,8):12
(1,3,9+):7
For (1,3,?), (1,3,8):12=greatest




Possibility 3: (1,4,?)




(1,4,5):15(Credits to @M)
(1,4,6):13
(1,4,7):9
(1,4,8+):6
For (1,4,?), (1,4,5):15=greatest




Overall:




(1,4,5):15=greatest







share|improve this answer























  • This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago










  • Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
    – asgallant
    2 days ago










  • Edited, thanks!
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago














8












8








8






Fact 1:




There must be a $1 coin




Fact 2:




2nd-value coin <=4, else would overflow




Proof:




Exhaustion...




Maximizing possibilities:




Notation: (x,y,z) : highest possible value




Possibility 1: (1,2,?)




(1,2,3):9
(1,2,4):10
(1,2,5):12(@S.M. in question)
(1,2,6):10
(1,2,7):11
(1,2,8+):7
For (1,2,?), (1,2,5):12=greatest




Possibility 2: (1,3,?)




(1,3,4):12
(1,3,5):11
(1,3,6):10
(1,3,7):11
(1,3,8):12
(1,3,9+):7
For (1,3,?), (1,3,8):12=greatest




Possibility 3: (1,4,?)




(1,4,5):15(Credits to @M)
(1,4,6):13
(1,4,7):9
(1,4,8+):6
For (1,4,?), (1,4,5):15=greatest




Overall:




(1,4,5):15=greatest







share|improve this answer














Fact 1:




There must be a $1 coin




Fact 2:




2nd-value coin <=4, else would overflow




Proof:




Exhaustion...




Maximizing possibilities:




Notation: (x,y,z) : highest possible value




Possibility 1: (1,2,?)




(1,2,3):9
(1,2,4):10
(1,2,5):12(@S.M. in question)
(1,2,6):10
(1,2,7):11
(1,2,8+):7
For (1,2,?), (1,2,5):12=greatest




Possibility 2: (1,3,?)




(1,3,4):12
(1,3,5):11
(1,3,6):10
(1,3,7):11
(1,3,8):12
(1,3,9+):7
For (1,3,?), (1,3,8):12=greatest




Possibility 3: (1,4,?)




(1,4,5):15(Credits to @M)
(1,4,6):13
(1,4,7):9
(1,4,8+):6
For (1,4,?), (1,4,5):15=greatest




Overall:




(1,4,5):15=greatest








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Omega Krypton

2,1561225




2,1561225












  • This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago










  • Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
    – asgallant
    2 days ago










  • Edited, thanks!
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago


















  • This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago










  • Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
    – S. M.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
    – asgallant
    2 days ago










  • Edited, thanks!
    – Omega Krypton
    2 days ago
















This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
– S. M.
2 days ago




This is basically a properly organized version of the scribbles I made trying to figure it out (plus you found an extra answer). The explanation is very straight-forward and seems correct, so I'll attribute it a tick.
– S. M.
2 days ago




1




1




thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
– Omega Krypton
2 days ago




thanks a lot +1 to question! @S.M.
– Omega Krypton
2 days ago












Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
– S. M.
2 days ago




Man, there was a lot I didn't see either, my bad. xD Still think it's the best explained answer and with further edits will get to the best answer.
– S. M.
2 days ago




1




1




Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
– asgallant
2 days ago




Fact 3 is not a true statement. 1,2,7 can generate all values up to 11 (not the best, but still...).
– asgallant
2 days ago












Edited, thanks!
– Omega Krypton
2 days ago




Edited, thanks!
– Omega Krypton
2 days ago











6














Anders Kaseorg's answer on the 8/8 list has the most optimal N/N answers up to N = 7 in a spoiler. And he has...




{1, 4, 5}




With a little enumeration, it's easy to see that you can use that set to get up to...




15.




EDIT
It's actually pretty simple to reason this out without brute forcing it (too much).




Say you have three denominations of coins - A, B, and C. Then clearly one of them has to be worth #1, or else you can't pay for things that are worth #1. So let's let A be worth #1. Now, assuming that C is the most valuable form of coinage, the most you can pay is #3C.


However, what if you want to pay #3C-1? We can safely assume that you'd have to use either 2C+A or 2C+B. But if you can use A, then C would have to be worth #2, which you can rule out with some quick figuring ({1,2,3} can get you #9, which {1, 1 < n < 2, 2} can't). So you're left with B being C-1.


As a result, you only need to check triples of the form {1, N, N+1}, where N can be at most 4.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • "The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
    – Tibos
    22 hours ago
















6














Anders Kaseorg's answer on the 8/8 list has the most optimal N/N answers up to N = 7 in a spoiler. And he has...




{1, 4, 5}




With a little enumeration, it's easy to see that you can use that set to get up to...




15.




EDIT
It's actually pretty simple to reason this out without brute forcing it (too much).




Say you have three denominations of coins - A, B, and C. Then clearly one of them has to be worth #1, or else you can't pay for things that are worth #1. So let's let A be worth #1. Now, assuming that C is the most valuable form of coinage, the most you can pay is #3C.


However, what if you want to pay #3C-1? We can safely assume that you'd have to use either 2C+A or 2C+B. But if you can use A, then C would have to be worth #2, which you can rule out with some quick figuring ({1,2,3} can get you #9, which {1, 1 < n < 2, 2} can't). So you're left with B being C-1.


As a result, you only need to check triples of the form {1, N, N+1}, where N can be at most 4.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • "The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
    – Tibos
    22 hours ago














6












6








6






Anders Kaseorg's answer on the 8/8 list has the most optimal N/N answers up to N = 7 in a spoiler. And he has...




{1, 4, 5}




With a little enumeration, it's easy to see that you can use that set to get up to...




15.




EDIT
It's actually pretty simple to reason this out without brute forcing it (too much).




Say you have three denominations of coins - A, B, and C. Then clearly one of them has to be worth #1, or else you can't pay for things that are worth #1. So let's let A be worth #1. Now, assuming that C is the most valuable form of coinage, the most you can pay is #3C.


However, what if you want to pay #3C-1? We can safely assume that you'd have to use either 2C+A or 2C+B. But if you can use A, then C would have to be worth #2, which you can rule out with some quick figuring ({1,2,3} can get you #9, which {1, 1 < n < 2, 2} can't). So you're left with B being C-1.


As a result, you only need to check triples of the form {1, N, N+1}, where N can be at most 4.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Anders Kaseorg's answer on the 8/8 list has the most optimal N/N answers up to N = 7 in a spoiler. And he has...




{1, 4, 5}




With a little enumeration, it's easy to see that you can use that set to get up to...




15.




EDIT
It's actually pretty simple to reason this out without brute forcing it (too much).




Say you have three denominations of coins - A, B, and C. Then clearly one of them has to be worth #1, or else you can't pay for things that are worth #1. So let's let A be worth #1. Now, assuming that C is the most valuable form of coinage, the most you can pay is #3C.


However, what if you want to pay #3C-1? We can safely assume that you'd have to use either 2C+A or 2C+B. But if you can use A, then C would have to be worth #2, which you can rule out with some quick figuring ({1,2,3} can get you #9, which {1, 1 < n < 2, 2} can't). So you're left with B being C-1.


As a result, you only need to check triples of the form {1, N, N+1}, where N can be at most 4.








share|improve this answer










New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago





















New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 days ago









M Dirr

612




612




New contributor




M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






M Dirr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • "The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
    – Tibos
    22 hours ago


















  • "The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
    – Tibos
    22 hours ago
















"The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
– Tibos
22 hours ago




"The most you can pay is 3C". What if i choose {A,B,D} with D > C, but i can't pay 3D-1. The most i can pay is 3D-2 > 3C, which still makes it a better solution? The answer is correct, but the logic at the end is flawed
– Tibos
22 hours ago











3














This is a little bit (read: a lot bit) of trickery, but




I can get up to 44 with coins of -1, 1, 10. The -1 helps because it allows you to get a units digit of 6 through 9.




I can't prove this is optimal, but it's a start (and I'm not sure if this is even good for the kingdom to have this type of coin :P)






share|improve this answer





















  • I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
    – Thomas Blue
    2 days ago










  • Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
    – S. M.
    2 days ago
















3














This is a little bit (read: a lot bit) of trickery, but




I can get up to 44 with coins of -1, 1, 10. The -1 helps because it allows you to get a units digit of 6 through 9.




I can't prove this is optimal, but it's a start (and I'm not sure if this is even good for the kingdom to have this type of coin :P)






share|improve this answer





















  • I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
    – Thomas Blue
    2 days ago










  • Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
    – S. M.
    2 days ago














3












3








3






This is a little bit (read: a lot bit) of trickery, but




I can get up to 44 with coins of -1, 1, 10. The -1 helps because it allows you to get a units digit of 6 through 9.




I can't prove this is optimal, but it's a start (and I'm not sure if this is even good for the kingdom to have this type of coin :P)






share|improve this answer












This is a little bit (read: a lot bit) of trickery, but




I can get up to 44 with coins of -1, 1, 10. The -1 helps because it allows you to get a units digit of 6 through 9.




I can't prove this is optimal, but it's a start (and I'm not sure if this is even good for the kingdom to have this type of coin :P)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Excited Raichu

5,5782860




5,5782860












  • I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
    – Thomas Blue
    2 days ago










  • Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
    – S. M.
    2 days ago


















  • I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
    – Thomas Blue
    2 days ago










  • Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
    – S. M.
    2 days ago
















I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
– Thomas Blue
2 days ago




I do think he means it as 3/3 problem, not a 3/8 problem
– Thomas Blue
2 days ago












Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
– S. M.
2 days ago




Yes, I mean it as a 3/3 problem, I'll specify it in the post just in case :p Very out-of-the-box answer though!
– S. M.
2 days ago



Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?