Access internal IP using public IP
I have a DSL modem with a public IP address (201.206.x.x
), and I have a web server in my internal network (192.168.0.50
).
I set up the modem to forward requests to port 80 to my web server, so, if I access 201.206.x.x
from outside my network, it shows my web page, the same happens if I access 192.168.0.50
from a computer inside my network.
Now, the problem is when I try to access 201.206.x.x
from my internal network, the browser tries to connect to the DSL modem configuration, instead of redirecting my request to my Web server.
Which settings do I have to change in the modem to set up this redirection?
routing webserver
migrated from serverfault.com Mar 20 '11 at 17:36
This question came from our site for system and network administrators.
add a comment |
I have a DSL modem with a public IP address (201.206.x.x
), and I have a web server in my internal network (192.168.0.50
).
I set up the modem to forward requests to port 80 to my web server, so, if I access 201.206.x.x
from outside my network, it shows my web page, the same happens if I access 192.168.0.50
from a computer inside my network.
Now, the problem is when I try to access 201.206.x.x
from my internal network, the browser tries to connect to the DSL modem configuration, instead of redirecting my request to my Web server.
Which settings do I have to change in the modem to set up this redirection?
routing webserver
migrated from serverfault.com Mar 20 '11 at 17:36
This question came from our site for system and network administrators.
A variation to the problem, I have multiple (2) hosting servers, and I have configured a DNS (BIND9) for the internal requests. How do I map (to different Hosting Server) external requests (to public IP) based on hostname?
– Kunal B.
Jan 22 '17 at 22:58
add a comment |
I have a DSL modem with a public IP address (201.206.x.x
), and I have a web server in my internal network (192.168.0.50
).
I set up the modem to forward requests to port 80 to my web server, so, if I access 201.206.x.x
from outside my network, it shows my web page, the same happens if I access 192.168.0.50
from a computer inside my network.
Now, the problem is when I try to access 201.206.x.x
from my internal network, the browser tries to connect to the DSL modem configuration, instead of redirecting my request to my Web server.
Which settings do I have to change in the modem to set up this redirection?
routing webserver
I have a DSL modem with a public IP address (201.206.x.x
), and I have a web server in my internal network (192.168.0.50
).
I set up the modem to forward requests to port 80 to my web server, so, if I access 201.206.x.x
from outside my network, it shows my web page, the same happens if I access 192.168.0.50
from a computer inside my network.
Now, the problem is when I try to access 201.206.x.x
from my internal network, the browser tries to connect to the DSL modem configuration, instead of redirecting my request to my Web server.
Which settings do I have to change in the modem to set up this redirection?
routing webserver
routing webserver
edited Mar 12 '15 at 7:15
JakeGould
31.6k1097139
31.6k1097139
asked Mar 19 '11 at 22:41
willvvwillvv
3333510
3333510
migrated from serverfault.com Mar 20 '11 at 17:36
This question came from our site for system and network administrators.
migrated from serverfault.com Mar 20 '11 at 17:36
This question came from our site for system and network administrators.
A variation to the problem, I have multiple (2) hosting servers, and I have configured a DNS (BIND9) for the internal requests. How do I map (to different Hosting Server) external requests (to public IP) based on hostname?
– Kunal B.
Jan 22 '17 at 22:58
add a comment |
A variation to the problem, I have multiple (2) hosting servers, and I have configured a DNS (BIND9) for the internal requests. How do I map (to different Hosting Server) external requests (to public IP) based on hostname?
– Kunal B.
Jan 22 '17 at 22:58
A variation to the problem, I have multiple (2) hosting servers, and I have configured a DNS (BIND9) for the internal requests. How do I map (to different Hosting Server) external requests (to public IP) based on hostname?
– Kunal B.
Jan 22 '17 at 22:58
A variation to the problem, I have multiple (2) hosting servers, and I have configured a DNS (BIND9) for the internal requests. How do I map (to different Hosting Server) external requests (to public IP) based on hostname?
– Kunal B.
Jan 22 '17 at 22:58
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
The problem is that the packet rewriting can generally only take place when traversing the firewall. Generally speaking routers cannot perform the necessary re-writing when the request is arriving from the same network the request would be re-written to. The common solution to this problem is to place a web proxy outside the network that loops the request back through your firewall.
I suspect your specific problem is that you would like to access the web site via its DNS host name. You can handle that by using "split-horizon" DNS, so it pays attention to where the request is coming from and answers appropriately: If the request is coming from inside your network, it hands out the 192.168.0.50 to requests coming from your network and the public IP to everyone else.
Either of these suggestions could be implemented on any host outside of your network, like a (free) Amazon EC2 micro instance.
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
3
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
add a comment |
I would say @Insyte is onto something when he/she talks about the issue being a DNS resolution issue .. which then means the problem is packet rewriting (read @Insyte post again for that explanation).
Assuming you have the following setup:
- Public IP:
201.206.x.y
- Private IP:
192.168.0.50
- Port forwarding for all 80 (and 443 if you're doing SSL) on IP
201.206.x.y
→192.168.0.50
You then type the following in your browser, while you're in your internal network:
http://www.yourwebsite.com
and the error occurs. So, solution: hack your hosts file.
On Windows, go to C:windowssystem32driversetchosts
(notice, there's no extension on that file). On Linux, the file is located in /etc/hosts
.
If you open that file up in Notepad, you can then see any entries that are used to override DNS. If you wish to update that file, you will need to open Notepad (or whatever program you're using to edit the file) with Administrator rights – otherwise you can't save the file.
Add this to your hosts file:
192.168.0.50 www.yourwebsite.com
Then restart your browser, enter the URL and violà! It's working. So this means, your browser doesn't rely on your DNS to resolve your domain to the IP. Instead, we're overriding this and saying: Browser, just go to my internal IP for that domain name, instead of asking DNS for the IP address.
If you're in an office, then you can get all the people who need to access this internal website, to hack their hosts file, or if you have an internal DNS, then you can add an entry into that.
Another idea is to have an internal proxy server (for all web surfing, etc) and then hack the hosts file on the proxy server. This means your browser will say, Proxy, can you please get me the resource http://www.mywebsite.com
and the proxy says Sure, and because I've been told to ignore DNS for that domain, I'll just give the IP which has been hard-coded in my hosts file.
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
3
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
add a comment |
This is a common problem with the way some routers handle traffic meant for their public address from an internal address - they don't follow the same port forwarding rules as requests from outside the network. What you need to look for in your routers is NAT reflection. This will allow the router to handle internal requests for the public IP to use the same port forwarding rules as if the request came from outside the network.
1
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
add a comment |
I could help you better if you could give me your modem make and model...
But what happens here is that normally a router or modem config page should only appear when visiting their internal IP (192.168.0.1)
But what seems to be happening here is that it Identifies the incoming request (201.206.x.x)
As coming from the inside so decides to give you the config page instead of the normal route to your web server...
Now if you're using a Consumer level modem, you probably aren't able to change this (sorry)
But maybe you can:
Try and see if there is 'listen' settings in your admin config page
There you can try to either change your administration page to another port
Or limit the adresses its listening for
add a comment |
Maybe the problem is that remote administration is allowed.
add a comment |
You can add a route to access the server's public IP directly through its local IP.
On Windows, the command is like
route add [public IP] mask 255.255.255.255 [the server's local IP]
To add a persistent route, add -p
parameter to above command.
Then each time when you visit the public IP, the computer will go thru the server's local IP as gateway.
Because the server knows its own public IP, it will process the package from itself, instead of forwarding it to the local network.
You have to make sure the server's local IP static.
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
add a comment |
Having this same issue. I was able to fix this by adding the DNS host name to my router's DNS Host Mapping list. I found these settings listed in the advanced options list of my router.
add a comment |
On my router, I had to turn off "NAT acceleration" (Cut Through Forwarding) as this broke NAT loopback...
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f260014%2faccess-internal-ip-using-public-ip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The problem is that the packet rewriting can generally only take place when traversing the firewall. Generally speaking routers cannot perform the necessary re-writing when the request is arriving from the same network the request would be re-written to. The common solution to this problem is to place a web proxy outside the network that loops the request back through your firewall.
I suspect your specific problem is that you would like to access the web site via its DNS host name. You can handle that by using "split-horizon" DNS, so it pays attention to where the request is coming from and answers appropriately: If the request is coming from inside your network, it hands out the 192.168.0.50 to requests coming from your network and the public IP to everyone else.
Either of these suggestions could be implemented on any host outside of your network, like a (free) Amazon EC2 micro instance.
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
3
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
add a comment |
The problem is that the packet rewriting can generally only take place when traversing the firewall. Generally speaking routers cannot perform the necessary re-writing when the request is arriving from the same network the request would be re-written to. The common solution to this problem is to place a web proxy outside the network that loops the request back through your firewall.
I suspect your specific problem is that you would like to access the web site via its DNS host name. You can handle that by using "split-horizon" DNS, so it pays attention to where the request is coming from and answers appropriately: If the request is coming from inside your network, it hands out the 192.168.0.50 to requests coming from your network and the public IP to everyone else.
Either of these suggestions could be implemented on any host outside of your network, like a (free) Amazon EC2 micro instance.
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
3
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
add a comment |
The problem is that the packet rewriting can generally only take place when traversing the firewall. Generally speaking routers cannot perform the necessary re-writing when the request is arriving from the same network the request would be re-written to. The common solution to this problem is to place a web proxy outside the network that loops the request back through your firewall.
I suspect your specific problem is that you would like to access the web site via its DNS host name. You can handle that by using "split-horizon" DNS, so it pays attention to where the request is coming from and answers appropriately: If the request is coming from inside your network, it hands out the 192.168.0.50 to requests coming from your network and the public IP to everyone else.
Either of these suggestions could be implemented on any host outside of your network, like a (free) Amazon EC2 micro instance.
The problem is that the packet rewriting can generally only take place when traversing the firewall. Generally speaking routers cannot perform the necessary re-writing when the request is arriving from the same network the request would be re-written to. The common solution to this problem is to place a web proxy outside the network that loops the request back through your firewall.
I suspect your specific problem is that you would like to access the web site via its DNS host name. You can handle that by using "split-horizon" DNS, so it pays attention to where the request is coming from and answers appropriately: If the request is coming from inside your network, it hands out the 192.168.0.50 to requests coming from your network and the public IP to everyone else.
Either of these suggestions could be implemented on any host outside of your network, like a (free) Amazon EC2 micro instance.
answered Mar 19 '11 at 23:02
InsyteInsyte
42124
42124
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
3
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
add a comment |
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
3
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
Thanks, although I think I will stick with the HOSTS file editing since it's basically a personal site that I use for tests of sites I'm working on. The PC isn't even up 24/7.
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:13
3
3
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
I solved this problem on my own home network by adding an A record with the same name as my external dyndns name on my own DNS server (also running on my home network). The A record points to the proper location in my home network, as does the reverse PTR record. But of course, not everyone is running their own home DNS...
– LawrenceC
Mar 21 '11 at 0:25
add a comment |
I would say @Insyte is onto something when he/she talks about the issue being a DNS resolution issue .. which then means the problem is packet rewriting (read @Insyte post again for that explanation).
Assuming you have the following setup:
- Public IP:
201.206.x.y
- Private IP:
192.168.0.50
- Port forwarding for all 80 (and 443 if you're doing SSL) on IP
201.206.x.y
→192.168.0.50
You then type the following in your browser, while you're in your internal network:
http://www.yourwebsite.com
and the error occurs. So, solution: hack your hosts file.
On Windows, go to C:windowssystem32driversetchosts
(notice, there's no extension on that file). On Linux, the file is located in /etc/hosts
.
If you open that file up in Notepad, you can then see any entries that are used to override DNS. If you wish to update that file, you will need to open Notepad (or whatever program you're using to edit the file) with Administrator rights – otherwise you can't save the file.
Add this to your hosts file:
192.168.0.50 www.yourwebsite.com
Then restart your browser, enter the URL and violà! It's working. So this means, your browser doesn't rely on your DNS to resolve your domain to the IP. Instead, we're overriding this and saying: Browser, just go to my internal IP for that domain name, instead of asking DNS for the IP address.
If you're in an office, then you can get all the people who need to access this internal website, to hack their hosts file, or if you have an internal DNS, then you can add an entry into that.
Another idea is to have an internal proxy server (for all web surfing, etc) and then hack the hosts file on the proxy server. This means your browser will say, Proxy, can you please get me the resource http://www.mywebsite.com
and the proxy says Sure, and because I've been told to ignore DNS for that domain, I'll just give the IP which has been hard-coded in my hosts file.
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
3
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
add a comment |
I would say @Insyte is onto something when he/she talks about the issue being a DNS resolution issue .. which then means the problem is packet rewriting (read @Insyte post again for that explanation).
Assuming you have the following setup:
- Public IP:
201.206.x.y
- Private IP:
192.168.0.50
- Port forwarding for all 80 (and 443 if you're doing SSL) on IP
201.206.x.y
→192.168.0.50
You then type the following in your browser, while you're in your internal network:
http://www.yourwebsite.com
and the error occurs. So, solution: hack your hosts file.
On Windows, go to C:windowssystem32driversetchosts
(notice, there's no extension on that file). On Linux, the file is located in /etc/hosts
.
If you open that file up in Notepad, you can then see any entries that are used to override DNS. If you wish to update that file, you will need to open Notepad (or whatever program you're using to edit the file) with Administrator rights – otherwise you can't save the file.
Add this to your hosts file:
192.168.0.50 www.yourwebsite.com
Then restart your browser, enter the URL and violà! It's working. So this means, your browser doesn't rely on your DNS to resolve your domain to the IP. Instead, we're overriding this and saying: Browser, just go to my internal IP for that domain name, instead of asking DNS for the IP address.
If you're in an office, then you can get all the people who need to access this internal website, to hack their hosts file, or if you have an internal DNS, then you can add an entry into that.
Another idea is to have an internal proxy server (for all web surfing, etc) and then hack the hosts file on the proxy server. This means your browser will say, Proxy, can you please get me the resource http://www.mywebsite.com
and the proxy says Sure, and because I've been told to ignore DNS for that domain, I'll just give the IP which has been hard-coded in my hosts file.
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
3
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
add a comment |
I would say @Insyte is onto something when he/she talks about the issue being a DNS resolution issue .. which then means the problem is packet rewriting (read @Insyte post again for that explanation).
Assuming you have the following setup:
- Public IP:
201.206.x.y
- Private IP:
192.168.0.50
- Port forwarding for all 80 (and 443 if you're doing SSL) on IP
201.206.x.y
→192.168.0.50
You then type the following in your browser, while you're in your internal network:
http://www.yourwebsite.com
and the error occurs. So, solution: hack your hosts file.
On Windows, go to C:windowssystem32driversetchosts
(notice, there's no extension on that file). On Linux, the file is located in /etc/hosts
.
If you open that file up in Notepad, you can then see any entries that are used to override DNS. If you wish to update that file, you will need to open Notepad (or whatever program you're using to edit the file) with Administrator rights – otherwise you can't save the file.
Add this to your hosts file:
192.168.0.50 www.yourwebsite.com
Then restart your browser, enter the URL and violà! It's working. So this means, your browser doesn't rely on your DNS to resolve your domain to the IP. Instead, we're overriding this and saying: Browser, just go to my internal IP for that domain name, instead of asking DNS for the IP address.
If you're in an office, then you can get all the people who need to access this internal website, to hack their hosts file, or if you have an internal DNS, then you can add an entry into that.
Another idea is to have an internal proxy server (for all web surfing, etc) and then hack the hosts file on the proxy server. This means your browser will say, Proxy, can you please get me the resource http://www.mywebsite.com
and the proxy says Sure, and because I've been told to ignore DNS for that domain, I'll just give the IP which has been hard-coded in my hosts file.
I would say @Insyte is onto something when he/she talks about the issue being a DNS resolution issue .. which then means the problem is packet rewriting (read @Insyte post again for that explanation).
Assuming you have the following setup:
- Public IP:
201.206.x.y
- Private IP:
192.168.0.50
- Port forwarding for all 80 (and 443 if you're doing SSL) on IP
201.206.x.y
→192.168.0.50
You then type the following in your browser, while you're in your internal network:
http://www.yourwebsite.com
and the error occurs. So, solution: hack your hosts file.
On Windows, go to C:windowssystem32driversetchosts
(notice, there's no extension on that file). On Linux, the file is located in /etc/hosts
.
If you open that file up in Notepad, you can then see any entries that are used to override DNS. If you wish to update that file, you will need to open Notepad (or whatever program you're using to edit the file) with Administrator rights – otherwise you can't save the file.
Add this to your hosts file:
192.168.0.50 www.yourwebsite.com
Then restart your browser, enter the URL and violà! It's working. So this means, your browser doesn't rely on your DNS to resolve your domain to the IP. Instead, we're overriding this and saying: Browser, just go to my internal IP for that domain name, instead of asking DNS for the IP address.
If you're in an office, then you can get all the people who need to access this internal website, to hack their hosts file, or if you have an internal DNS, then you can add an entry into that.
Another idea is to have an internal proxy server (for all web surfing, etc) and then hack the hosts file on the proxy server. This means your browser will say, Proxy, can you please get me the resource http://www.mywebsite.com
and the proxy says Sure, and because I've been told to ignore DNS for that domain, I'll just give the IP which has been hard-coded in my hosts file.
edited Nov 24 '12 at 17:50
slhck
162k47448470
162k47448470
answered Mar 20 '11 at 0:32
Pure.KromePure.Krome
95842032
95842032
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
3
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
add a comment |
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
3
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
Yep, I actually had this before I posted, I just wanted to be able to access it throught the actual IP, but I think I can live with that since my modem doesn't have NAT reflection (as suggested by @MaQleod).
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:12
3
3
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
What about a laptop or smartphone that is frequently accessing the same site via internal or external network?
– TREE
Mar 20 '11 at 13:23
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
@TREE can u please elabourate. I didn't quite understand your question.
– Pure.Krome
May 20 '11 at 11:43
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
I have a very similar setup, except I'm using domain names. So from outside the network my domain resolves to my external IP, and from inside, it resolves to the internal IP. I have laptops and smartphones that frequently access from inside and outside, so hacking the hosts file wouldn't work. What I have done is basically what your (Pure.Krome) other answer suggests, only instead of using an external server I'm just telling the DHCP server on the router to prepend an internal DNS server. It mostly works, but there are annoying lags when switching networks before things start resolving.
– TREE
May 22 '11 at 14:41
add a comment |
This is a common problem with the way some routers handle traffic meant for their public address from an internal address - they don't follow the same port forwarding rules as requests from outside the network. What you need to look for in your routers is NAT reflection. This will allow the router to handle internal requests for the public IP to use the same port forwarding rules as if the request came from outside the network.
1
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
add a comment |
This is a common problem with the way some routers handle traffic meant for their public address from an internal address - they don't follow the same port forwarding rules as requests from outside the network. What you need to look for in your routers is NAT reflection. This will allow the router to handle internal requests for the public IP to use the same port forwarding rules as if the request came from outside the network.
1
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
add a comment |
This is a common problem with the way some routers handle traffic meant for their public address from an internal address - they don't follow the same port forwarding rules as requests from outside the network. What you need to look for in your routers is NAT reflection. This will allow the router to handle internal requests for the public IP to use the same port forwarding rules as if the request came from outside the network.
This is a common problem with the way some routers handle traffic meant for their public address from an internal address - they don't follow the same port forwarding rules as requests from outside the network. What you need to look for in your routers is NAT reflection. This will allow the router to handle internal requests for the public IP to use the same port forwarding rules as if the request came from outside the network.
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:27
MaQleodMaQleod
12.3k43156
12.3k43156
1
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
add a comment |
1
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
1
1
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
NAT reflection. I think that's what I was looking for. Unfortunately my modem doesn't have that. Thanks!
– willvv
Mar 20 '11 at 5:10
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
what to do when your modem doesn't support NAT loopback??
– user2230470
Aug 19 '17 at 20:06
add a comment |
I could help you better if you could give me your modem make and model...
But what happens here is that normally a router or modem config page should only appear when visiting their internal IP (192.168.0.1)
But what seems to be happening here is that it Identifies the incoming request (201.206.x.x)
As coming from the inside so decides to give you the config page instead of the normal route to your web server...
Now if you're using a Consumer level modem, you probably aren't able to change this (sorry)
But maybe you can:
Try and see if there is 'listen' settings in your admin config page
There you can try to either change your administration page to another port
Or limit the adresses its listening for
add a comment |
I could help you better if you could give me your modem make and model...
But what happens here is that normally a router or modem config page should only appear when visiting their internal IP (192.168.0.1)
But what seems to be happening here is that it Identifies the incoming request (201.206.x.x)
As coming from the inside so decides to give you the config page instead of the normal route to your web server...
Now if you're using a Consumer level modem, you probably aren't able to change this (sorry)
But maybe you can:
Try and see if there is 'listen' settings in your admin config page
There you can try to either change your administration page to another port
Or limit the adresses its listening for
add a comment |
I could help you better if you could give me your modem make and model...
But what happens here is that normally a router or modem config page should only appear when visiting their internal IP (192.168.0.1)
But what seems to be happening here is that it Identifies the incoming request (201.206.x.x)
As coming from the inside so decides to give you the config page instead of the normal route to your web server...
Now if you're using a Consumer level modem, you probably aren't able to change this (sorry)
But maybe you can:
Try and see if there is 'listen' settings in your admin config page
There you can try to either change your administration page to another port
Or limit the adresses its listening for
I could help you better if you could give me your modem make and model...
But what happens here is that normally a router or modem config page should only appear when visiting their internal IP (192.168.0.1)
But what seems to be happening here is that it Identifies the incoming request (201.206.x.x)
As coming from the inside so decides to give you the config page instead of the normal route to your web server...
Now if you're using a Consumer level modem, you probably aren't able to change this (sorry)
But maybe you can:
Try and see if there is 'listen' settings in your admin config page
There you can try to either change your administration page to another port
Or limit the adresses its listening for
answered Mar 19 '11 at 23:00
HTDutchyHTDutchy
673312
673312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Maybe the problem is that remote administration is allowed.
add a comment |
Maybe the problem is that remote administration is allowed.
add a comment |
Maybe the problem is that remote administration is allowed.
Maybe the problem is that remote administration is allowed.
answered Mar 19 '11 at 23:08
PlamenPlamen
212
212
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can add a route to access the server's public IP directly through its local IP.
On Windows, the command is like
route add [public IP] mask 255.255.255.255 [the server's local IP]
To add a persistent route, add -p
parameter to above command.
Then each time when you visit the public IP, the computer will go thru the server's local IP as gateway.
Because the server knows its own public IP, it will process the package from itself, instead of forwarding it to the local network.
You have to make sure the server's local IP static.
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
add a comment |
You can add a route to access the server's public IP directly through its local IP.
On Windows, the command is like
route add [public IP] mask 255.255.255.255 [the server's local IP]
To add a persistent route, add -p
parameter to above command.
Then each time when you visit the public IP, the computer will go thru the server's local IP as gateway.
Because the server knows its own public IP, it will process the package from itself, instead of forwarding it to the local network.
You have to make sure the server's local IP static.
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
add a comment |
You can add a route to access the server's public IP directly through its local IP.
On Windows, the command is like
route add [public IP] mask 255.255.255.255 [the server's local IP]
To add a persistent route, add -p
parameter to above command.
Then each time when you visit the public IP, the computer will go thru the server's local IP as gateway.
Because the server knows its own public IP, it will process the package from itself, instead of forwarding it to the local network.
You have to make sure the server's local IP static.
You can add a route to access the server's public IP directly through its local IP.
On Windows, the command is like
route add [public IP] mask 255.255.255.255 [the server's local IP]
To add a persistent route, add -p
parameter to above command.
Then each time when you visit the public IP, the computer will go thru the server's local IP as gateway.
Because the server knows its own public IP, it will process the package from itself, instead of forwarding it to the local network.
You have to make sure the server's local IP static.
edited Mar 12 '15 at 7:07
answered Mar 12 '15 at 3:14
qevanqevan
212
212
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
add a comment |
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Why does the server know its own public IP address?
– G-Man
Mar 12 '15 at 5:49
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
Servers certainly know their IPs. Either static or dynamic IPs. I am not sure how routing exactly works. My guess is each machine has a route map. When it received packages, it decides whether it should process the package.
– qevan
Mar 14 '15 at 19:50
add a comment |
Having this same issue. I was able to fix this by adding the DNS host name to my router's DNS Host Mapping list. I found these settings listed in the advanced options list of my router.
add a comment |
Having this same issue. I was able to fix this by adding the DNS host name to my router's DNS Host Mapping list. I found these settings listed in the advanced options list of my router.
add a comment |
Having this same issue. I was able to fix this by adding the DNS host name to my router's DNS Host Mapping list. I found these settings listed in the advanced options list of my router.
Having this same issue. I was able to fix this by adding the DNS host name to my router's DNS Host Mapping list. I found these settings listed in the advanced options list of my router.
answered Dec 5 '15 at 5:31
GibadoGibado
1012
1012
add a comment |
add a comment |
On my router, I had to turn off "NAT acceleration" (Cut Through Forwarding) as this broke NAT loopback...
add a comment |
On my router, I had to turn off "NAT acceleration" (Cut Through Forwarding) as this broke NAT loopback...
add a comment |
On my router, I had to turn off "NAT acceleration" (Cut Through Forwarding) as this broke NAT loopback...
On my router, I had to turn off "NAT acceleration" (Cut Through Forwarding) as this broke NAT loopback...
answered Apr 9 '16 at 16:37
Gaymon Howard Wright IIIGaymon Howard Wright III
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f260014%2faccess-internal-ip-using-public-ip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
A variation to the problem, I have multiple (2) hosting servers, and I have configured a DNS (BIND9) for the internal requests. How do I map (to different Hosting Server) external requests (to public IP) based on hostname?
– Kunal B.
Jan 22 '17 at 22:58