how to exclude queue messages like azure storage explorer?
Our code is just a copy paste from some online tutorial in getting the messages from an azure storage queue.
public int? GetQueueMessageCount(CloudQueue queue, TextWriter textWriter)
{
int? messageCount;
try
{
queue.FetchAttributes();
// Retrieve the cached approximate message count.
messageCount = queue.ApproximateMessageCount;
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
LogHelper.LogInfo(logger, textWriter, $"GetQueueMessageCount failed for {queue.Name}." + exception);
throw;
}
return messageCount;
}
However, we found that randomly some messages may get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired.
public static void ProcessUnitsForCacheItem(
[QueueTrigger(QueueClient.RefreshUnitsQueue)] string projectUnitsMessage, TextWriter textWriter)
When I open my queue with storage explorer, I can see the explorer will not show any message, instead just display a status text "displaying 0 of 199 messages". So storage explorer must somehow know that these messages are not right (expired or something).
Is there some status I can retrieve to see the status of the message or anyone know how storage explorer decide to show a message or not?
azure azure-storage azure-queues
add a comment |
Our code is just a copy paste from some online tutorial in getting the messages from an azure storage queue.
public int? GetQueueMessageCount(CloudQueue queue, TextWriter textWriter)
{
int? messageCount;
try
{
queue.FetchAttributes();
// Retrieve the cached approximate message count.
messageCount = queue.ApproximateMessageCount;
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
LogHelper.LogInfo(logger, textWriter, $"GetQueueMessageCount failed for {queue.Name}." + exception);
throw;
}
return messageCount;
}
However, we found that randomly some messages may get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired.
public static void ProcessUnitsForCacheItem(
[QueueTrigger(QueueClient.RefreshUnitsQueue)] string projectUnitsMessage, TextWriter textWriter)
When I open my queue with storage explorer, I can see the explorer will not show any message, instead just display a status text "displaying 0 of 199 messages". So storage explorer must somehow know that these messages are not right (expired or something).
Is there some status I can retrieve to see the status of the message or anyone know how storage explorer decide to show a message or not?
azure azure-storage azure-queues
Feel free to ask if you have further questions, otherwise could you accept the explanation for others to refer?
– Jerry Liu
Nov 27 '18 at 3:44
add a comment |
Our code is just a copy paste from some online tutorial in getting the messages from an azure storage queue.
public int? GetQueueMessageCount(CloudQueue queue, TextWriter textWriter)
{
int? messageCount;
try
{
queue.FetchAttributes();
// Retrieve the cached approximate message count.
messageCount = queue.ApproximateMessageCount;
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
LogHelper.LogInfo(logger, textWriter, $"GetQueueMessageCount failed for {queue.Name}." + exception);
throw;
}
return messageCount;
}
However, we found that randomly some messages may get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired.
public static void ProcessUnitsForCacheItem(
[QueueTrigger(QueueClient.RefreshUnitsQueue)] string projectUnitsMessage, TextWriter textWriter)
When I open my queue with storage explorer, I can see the explorer will not show any message, instead just display a status text "displaying 0 of 199 messages". So storage explorer must somehow know that these messages are not right (expired or something).
Is there some status I can retrieve to see the status of the message or anyone know how storage explorer decide to show a message or not?
azure azure-storage azure-queues
Our code is just a copy paste from some online tutorial in getting the messages from an azure storage queue.
public int? GetQueueMessageCount(CloudQueue queue, TextWriter textWriter)
{
int? messageCount;
try
{
queue.FetchAttributes();
// Retrieve the cached approximate message count.
messageCount = queue.ApproximateMessageCount;
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
LogHelper.LogInfo(logger, textWriter, $"GetQueueMessageCount failed for {queue.Name}." + exception);
throw;
}
return messageCount;
}
However, we found that randomly some messages may get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired.
public static void ProcessUnitsForCacheItem(
[QueueTrigger(QueueClient.RefreshUnitsQueue)] string projectUnitsMessage, TextWriter textWriter)
When I open my queue with storage explorer, I can see the explorer will not show any message, instead just display a status text "displaying 0 of 199 messages". So storage explorer must somehow know that these messages are not right (expired or something).
Is there some status I can retrieve to see the status of the message or anyone know how storage explorer decide to show a message or not?
azure azure-storage azure-queues
azure azure-storage azure-queues
edited Nov 24 '18 at 5:02
Jerry Liu
11.3k11232
11.3k11232
asked Nov 22 '18 at 16:16
daxudaxu
82811231
82811231
Feel free to ask if you have further questions, otherwise could you accept the explanation for others to refer?
– Jerry Liu
Nov 27 '18 at 3:44
add a comment |
Feel free to ask if you have further questions, otherwise could you accept the explanation for others to refer?
– Jerry Liu
Nov 27 '18 at 3:44
Feel free to ask if you have further questions, otherwise could you accept the explanation for others to refer?
– Jerry Liu
Nov 27 '18 at 3:44
Feel free to ask if you have further questions, otherwise could you accept the explanation for others to refer?
– Jerry Liu
Nov 27 '18 at 3:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Storage explorer shows info exactly what it retrieves from Storage account/emulator.
displaying 0 of 199 messages
means the messages are invisible for now because they have been dequeued and being processed, it's a feature of queue message and handled by Storage service automatically once your queue trigger gets messages from a queue. See Storage queue doc.
Typically, when a consumer retrieves a message via Get Messages, that message is usually reserved for deletion until the visibilitytimeout interval expires, but this behavior is not guaranteed. After the visibilitytimeout interval expires, the message again becomes visible to other consumers.
As for the problem
get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired
If I understand correctly, your code from some tutorial is a custom queuetrigger, which may have no guarantee on the behavior. Have a look at Azure Function Queuetrigger example.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434873%2fhow-to-exclude-queue-messages-like-azure-storage-explorer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Storage explorer shows info exactly what it retrieves from Storage account/emulator.
displaying 0 of 199 messages
means the messages are invisible for now because they have been dequeued and being processed, it's a feature of queue message and handled by Storage service automatically once your queue trigger gets messages from a queue. See Storage queue doc.
Typically, when a consumer retrieves a message via Get Messages, that message is usually reserved for deletion until the visibilitytimeout interval expires, but this behavior is not guaranteed. After the visibilitytimeout interval expires, the message again becomes visible to other consumers.
As for the problem
get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired
If I understand correctly, your code from some tutorial is a custom queuetrigger, which may have no guarantee on the behavior. Have a look at Azure Function Queuetrigger example.
add a comment |
Storage explorer shows info exactly what it retrieves from Storage account/emulator.
displaying 0 of 199 messages
means the messages are invisible for now because they have been dequeued and being processed, it's a feature of queue message and handled by Storage service automatically once your queue trigger gets messages from a queue. See Storage queue doc.
Typically, when a consumer retrieves a message via Get Messages, that message is usually reserved for deletion until the visibilitytimeout interval expires, but this behavior is not guaranteed. After the visibilitytimeout interval expires, the message again becomes visible to other consumers.
As for the problem
get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired
If I understand correctly, your code from some tutorial is a custom queuetrigger, which may have no guarantee on the behavior. Have a look at Azure Function Queuetrigger example.
add a comment |
Storage explorer shows info exactly what it retrieves from Storage account/emulator.
displaying 0 of 199 messages
means the messages are invisible for now because they have been dequeued and being processed, it's a feature of queue message and handled by Storage service automatically once your queue trigger gets messages from a queue. See Storage queue doc.
Typically, when a consumer retrieves a message via Get Messages, that message is usually reserved for deletion until the visibilitytimeout interval expires, but this behavior is not guaranteed. After the visibilitytimeout interval expires, the message again becomes visible to other consumers.
As for the problem
get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired
If I understand correctly, your code from some tutorial is a custom queuetrigger, which may have no guarantee on the behavior. Have a look at Azure Function Queuetrigger example.
Storage explorer shows info exactly what it retrieves from Storage account/emulator.
displaying 0 of 199 messages
means the messages are invisible for now because they have been dequeued and being processed, it's a feature of queue message and handled by Storage service automatically once your queue trigger gets messages from a queue. See Storage queue doc.
Typically, when a consumer retrieves a message via Get Messages, that message is usually reserved for deletion until the visibilitytimeout interval expires, but this behavior is not guaranteed. After the visibilitytimeout interval expires, the message again becomes visible to other consumers.
As for the problem
get stuck in the queue and our queue trigger never got fired
If I understand correctly, your code from some tutorial is a custom queuetrigger, which may have no guarantee on the behavior. Have a look at Azure Function Queuetrigger example.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 4:55
Jerry LiuJerry Liu
11.3k11232
11.3k11232
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434873%2fhow-to-exclude-queue-messages-like-azure-storage-explorer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Feel free to ask if you have further questions, otherwise could you accept the explanation for others to refer?
– Jerry Liu
Nov 27 '18 at 3:44