Alignment of six matrices
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
Note: I'm aware that most of the {}
are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
Note: I'm aware that most of the {}
are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
Note: I'm aware that most of the {}
are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
New contributor
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
I _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 2 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
J _ { 3 } &&=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
Note: I'm aware that most of the {}
are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
align
New contributor
New contributor
edited Mar 20 at 18:38
Bernard
174k776207
174k776207
New contributor
asked Mar 20 at 18:10
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
404
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I just moved the &
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
|
show 3 more comments
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
usepackage{tabstackengine}
setstacktabbedgap{1ex}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & { 1 } \
0 & 0 & { - 1 } & 0
},&
I _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
}, &
I _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
}, \
J _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & { - 1 } \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
}.
end{align*}
end{document}
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&
before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&
should, by default, follow the=
rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480550%2falignment-of-six-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I just moved the &
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
|
show 3 more comments
I just moved the &
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
|
show 3 more comments
I just moved the &
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
I just moved the &
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&I _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 1 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { -1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}, \
J _ { 1 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 2 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { -1} & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ -1} & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix},
&J _ { 3 } &=
begin{pmatrix}
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { - 1 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 } \
{ - 1 } & { 0 } & { 0 } & { 0 }
end{pmatrix}.
end{align*}
end{document}
answered Mar 20 at 18:25
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
496k4111421889
496k4111421889
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
|
show 3 more comments
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
Mar 20 at 18:33
1
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the
&
) but what about them?– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the
&
) but what about them?– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 19:26
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:10
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
Mar 20 at 20:15
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
Mar 20 at 20:43
|
show 3 more comments
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
usepackage{tabstackengine}
setstacktabbedgap{1ex}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & { 1 } \
0 & 0 & { - 1 } & 0
},&
I _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
}, &
I _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
}, \
J _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & { - 1 } \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
}.
end{align*}
end{document}
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&
before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&
should, by default, follow the=
rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
add a comment |
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
usepackage{tabstackengine}
setstacktabbedgap{1ex}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & { 1 } \
0 & 0 & { - 1 } & 0
},&
I _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
}, &
I _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
}, \
J _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & { - 1 } \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
}.
end{align*}
end{document}
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&
before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&
should, by default, follow the=
rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
add a comment |
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
usepackage{tabstackengine}
setstacktabbedgap{1ex}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & { 1 } \
0 & 0 & { - 1 } & 0
},&
I _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
}, &
I _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
}, \
J _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & { - 1 } \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
}.
end{align*}
end{document}
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, mathtools}
usepackage{tabstackengine}
setstacktabbedgap{1ex}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
begin{align*}
I _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & { 1 } \
0 & 0 & { - 1 } & 0
},&
I _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
}, &
I _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
}, \
J _ { 1 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 2 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
},&
J _ { 3 } =&
parenMatrixstack[r]{
0 & 0 & 0 & { - 1 } \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
}.
end{align*}
end{document}
edited Mar 21 at 1:31
answered Mar 20 at 19:11
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204413
159k9204413
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&
before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&
should, by default, follow the=
rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
add a comment |
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&
before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&
should, by default, follow the=
rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
2
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"
&
before the = sign in each instance.– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"
&
before the = sign in each instance.– barbara beeton
Mar 20 at 23:40
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the
&
should, by default, follow the =
rather than precede it.– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the
&
should, by default, follow the =
rather than precede it.– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 1:32
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
Mar 21 at 4:31
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 21 at 4:36
add a comment |
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480550%2falignment-of-six-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown