How to express succinctly “You plan you succeed if the conditions were like you expected”












0















You succeed at everything you plan (very short term) to do but only succeed if the condition were as like you had initially or you expected the conditions to be like



A bit like a pyrrhic victory- you are so good that you always succeed in any task but your actions may be misdirected or target of your actions simply isn't there at all when execution of the plan is set in motion- you are set in your plan.



Here is an example- you view a rock face for climbing: If the rocks don't move then you climb it without any trouble; If you expected the rocks to move as they do then you also climb it without a problem; but if you didn't expect the rock movement then you fall to ground. I guess you are inflexible planner.










share|improve this question

























  • So they always hit their target, they just choose the wrong targets?

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:27











  • They hit the target if it is where they expected to be.

    – user2617804
    Mar 21 at 3:43











  • I don’t know what that means.

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:50











  • The description seems self-contradictory. Either they succeed or they don't. But let's say this. (1) I want to be a successful writer. (2) I think that in order to accomplish that I need to have amazing handwriting. (3) I train myself to have critically acclaimed handwriting. (4) My use of grammar and prose is still terrible. (5) I don't become a successful writer. Am I a failure or a success? I obviously failed at what I wanted to do, but I succeeded at what I actually did. Is that what you're saying? If so, it seems entirely a matter of perspective.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:23
















0















You succeed at everything you plan (very short term) to do but only succeed if the condition were as like you had initially or you expected the conditions to be like



A bit like a pyrrhic victory- you are so good that you always succeed in any task but your actions may be misdirected or target of your actions simply isn't there at all when execution of the plan is set in motion- you are set in your plan.



Here is an example- you view a rock face for climbing: If the rocks don't move then you climb it without any trouble; If you expected the rocks to move as they do then you also climb it without a problem; but if you didn't expect the rock movement then you fall to ground. I guess you are inflexible planner.










share|improve this question

























  • So they always hit their target, they just choose the wrong targets?

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:27











  • They hit the target if it is where they expected to be.

    – user2617804
    Mar 21 at 3:43











  • I don’t know what that means.

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:50











  • The description seems self-contradictory. Either they succeed or they don't. But let's say this. (1) I want to be a successful writer. (2) I think that in order to accomplish that I need to have amazing handwriting. (3) I train myself to have critically acclaimed handwriting. (4) My use of grammar and prose is still terrible. (5) I don't become a successful writer. Am I a failure or a success? I obviously failed at what I wanted to do, but I succeeded at what I actually did. Is that what you're saying? If so, it seems entirely a matter of perspective.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:23














0












0








0








You succeed at everything you plan (very short term) to do but only succeed if the condition were as like you had initially or you expected the conditions to be like



A bit like a pyrrhic victory- you are so good that you always succeed in any task but your actions may be misdirected or target of your actions simply isn't there at all when execution of the plan is set in motion- you are set in your plan.



Here is an example- you view a rock face for climbing: If the rocks don't move then you climb it without any trouble; If you expected the rocks to move as they do then you also climb it without a problem; but if you didn't expect the rock movement then you fall to ground. I guess you are inflexible planner.










share|improve this question
















You succeed at everything you plan (very short term) to do but only succeed if the condition were as like you had initially or you expected the conditions to be like



A bit like a pyrrhic victory- you are so good that you always succeed in any task but your actions may be misdirected or target of your actions simply isn't there at all when execution of the plan is set in motion- you are set in your plan.



Here is an example- you view a rock face for climbing: If the rocks don't move then you climb it without any trouble; If you expected the rocks to move as they do then you also climb it without a problem; but if you didn't expect the rock movement then you fall to ground. I guess you are inflexible planner.







expressions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 8:27







user2617804

















asked Mar 21 at 0:47









user2617804user2617804

1428




1428













  • So they always hit their target, they just choose the wrong targets?

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:27











  • They hit the target if it is where they expected to be.

    – user2617804
    Mar 21 at 3:43











  • I don’t know what that means.

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:50











  • The description seems self-contradictory. Either they succeed or they don't. But let's say this. (1) I want to be a successful writer. (2) I think that in order to accomplish that I need to have amazing handwriting. (3) I train myself to have critically acclaimed handwriting. (4) My use of grammar and prose is still terrible. (5) I don't become a successful writer. Am I a failure or a success? I obviously failed at what I wanted to do, but I succeeded at what I actually did. Is that what you're saying? If so, it seems entirely a matter of perspective.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:23



















  • So they always hit their target, they just choose the wrong targets?

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:27











  • They hit the target if it is where they expected to be.

    – user2617804
    Mar 21 at 3:43











  • I don’t know what that means.

    – Jim
    Mar 21 at 3:50











  • The description seems self-contradictory. Either they succeed or they don't. But let's say this. (1) I want to be a successful writer. (2) I think that in order to accomplish that I need to have amazing handwriting. (3) I train myself to have critically acclaimed handwriting. (4) My use of grammar and prose is still terrible. (5) I don't become a successful writer. Am I a failure or a success? I obviously failed at what I wanted to do, but I succeeded at what I actually did. Is that what you're saying? If so, it seems entirely a matter of perspective.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:23

















So they always hit their target, they just choose the wrong targets?

– Jim
Mar 21 at 3:27





So they always hit their target, they just choose the wrong targets?

– Jim
Mar 21 at 3:27













They hit the target if it is where they expected to be.

– user2617804
Mar 21 at 3:43





They hit the target if it is where they expected to be.

– user2617804
Mar 21 at 3:43













I don’t know what that means.

– Jim
Mar 21 at 3:50





I don’t know what that means.

– Jim
Mar 21 at 3:50













The description seems self-contradictory. Either they succeed or they don't. But let's say this. (1) I want to be a successful writer. (2) I think that in order to accomplish that I need to have amazing handwriting. (3) I train myself to have critically acclaimed handwriting. (4) My use of grammar and prose is still terrible. (5) I don't become a successful writer. Am I a failure or a success? I obviously failed at what I wanted to do, but I succeeded at what I actually did. Is that what you're saying? If so, it seems entirely a matter of perspective.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 21 at 5:23





The description seems self-contradictory. Either they succeed or they don't. But let's say this. (1) I want to be a successful writer. (2) I think that in order to accomplish that I need to have amazing handwriting. (3) I train myself to have critically acclaimed handwriting. (4) My use of grammar and prose is still terrible. (5) I don't become a successful writer. Am I a failure or a success? I obviously failed at what I wanted to do, but I succeeded at what I actually did. Is that what you're saying? If so, it seems entirely a matter of perspective.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 21 at 5:23










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490653%2fhow-to-express-succinctly-you-plan-you-succeed-if-the-conditions-were-like-you%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490653%2fhow-to-express-succinctly-you-plan-you-succeed-if-the-conditions-were-like-you%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]