What is the word that means to accuse someone of a crime, to divert attention from the guilt of the accuser












14















I know there is a word for this, e.g. when someone is stealing from their employer, they tell their employer that they have noticed xyz and they think so-and-so is doing it.



It's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    This question is very similar and 'Frame' is one of the answers.

    – landocalrissian
    Jun 29 '15 at 19:56






  • 4





    No, it's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.

    – Gina
    Jun 29 '15 at 20:11






  • 1





    Hypocrisy? There's not really a verb for that though.

    – nollidge
    Jun 29 '15 at 21:30






  • 1





    Misdirection is the term I'd use. It's more generic than the specific case of accusation, hence I'm only leaving as a comment.

    – Keith
    Jun 30 '15 at 0:16






  • 3





    I find this Chinese idiom interesting: 做賊喊抓賊. It literally means the thief is calling out to catch a thief

    – RexYuan
    Jun 30 '15 at 7:04


















14















I know there is a word for this, e.g. when someone is stealing from their employer, they tell their employer that they have noticed xyz and they think so-and-so is doing it.



It's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    This question is very similar and 'Frame' is one of the answers.

    – landocalrissian
    Jun 29 '15 at 19:56






  • 4





    No, it's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.

    – Gina
    Jun 29 '15 at 20:11






  • 1





    Hypocrisy? There's not really a verb for that though.

    – nollidge
    Jun 29 '15 at 21:30






  • 1





    Misdirection is the term I'd use. It's more generic than the specific case of accusation, hence I'm only leaving as a comment.

    – Keith
    Jun 30 '15 at 0:16






  • 3





    I find this Chinese idiom interesting: 做賊喊抓賊. It literally means the thief is calling out to catch a thief

    – RexYuan
    Jun 30 '15 at 7:04
















14












14








14


7






I know there is a word for this, e.g. when someone is stealing from their employer, they tell their employer that they have noticed xyz and they think so-and-so is doing it.



It's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.










share|improve this question
















I know there is a word for this, e.g. when someone is stealing from their employer, they tell their employer that they have noticed xyz and they think so-and-so is doing it.



It's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 20 at 1:38









Laurel

33.8k667118




33.8k667118










asked Jun 29 '15 at 19:43









GinaGina

71114




71114








  • 1





    This question is very similar and 'Frame' is one of the answers.

    – landocalrissian
    Jun 29 '15 at 19:56






  • 4





    No, it's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.

    – Gina
    Jun 29 '15 at 20:11






  • 1





    Hypocrisy? There's not really a verb for that though.

    – nollidge
    Jun 29 '15 at 21:30






  • 1





    Misdirection is the term I'd use. It's more generic than the specific case of accusation, hence I'm only leaving as a comment.

    – Keith
    Jun 30 '15 at 0:16






  • 3





    I find this Chinese idiom interesting: 做賊喊抓賊. It literally means the thief is calling out to catch a thief

    – RexYuan
    Jun 30 '15 at 7:04
















  • 1





    This question is very similar and 'Frame' is one of the answers.

    – landocalrissian
    Jun 29 '15 at 19:56






  • 4





    No, it's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.

    – Gina
    Jun 29 '15 at 20:11






  • 1





    Hypocrisy? There's not really a verb for that though.

    – nollidge
    Jun 29 '15 at 21:30






  • 1





    Misdirection is the term I'd use. It's more generic than the specific case of accusation, hence I'm only leaving as a comment.

    – Keith
    Jun 30 '15 at 0:16






  • 3





    I find this Chinese idiom interesting: 做賊喊抓賊. It literally means the thief is calling out to catch a thief

    – RexYuan
    Jun 30 '15 at 7:04










1




1





This question is very similar and 'Frame' is one of the answers.

– landocalrissian
Jun 29 '15 at 19:56





This question is very similar and 'Frame' is one of the answers.

– landocalrissian
Jun 29 '15 at 19:56




4




4





No, it's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.

– Gina
Jun 29 '15 at 20:11





No, it's a very specific word that I've also seen used in the context of politicians accusing their rivals of various dodgy things that the first person was eventually shown to be doing. It's not a word that has broader meaning - frame, for example, does not rely on the accuser's guilt. Lie, divert, manipulate etc are all on the wrong track.

– Gina
Jun 29 '15 at 20:11




1




1





Hypocrisy? There's not really a verb for that though.

– nollidge
Jun 29 '15 at 21:30





Hypocrisy? There's not really a verb for that though.

– nollidge
Jun 29 '15 at 21:30




1




1





Misdirection is the term I'd use. It's more generic than the specific case of accusation, hence I'm only leaving as a comment.

– Keith
Jun 30 '15 at 0:16





Misdirection is the term I'd use. It's more generic than the specific case of accusation, hence I'm only leaving as a comment.

– Keith
Jun 30 '15 at 0:16




3




3





I find this Chinese idiom interesting: 做賊喊抓賊. It literally means the thief is calling out to catch a thief

– RexYuan
Jun 30 '15 at 7:04







I find this Chinese idiom interesting: 做賊喊抓賊. It literally means the thief is calling out to catch a thief

– RexYuan
Jun 30 '15 at 7:04












14 Answers
14






active

oldest

votes


















17














Scapegoating?



From Wikipedia:




Scapegoating (from the verb "to scapegoat") is the practice of singling out any party for unmerited negative treatment or blame as a scapegoat. Scapegoating may be conducted by individuals against individuals (e.g. "he did it, not me!"), individuals against groups (e.g., "I couldn't see anything because of all the tall people"), groups against individuals (e.g., "Jane was the reason our team didn't win"), and groups against groups.



A scapegoat may be an adult, child, sibling, employee, peer, ethnic, political or religious group, or country. A whipping boy, identified patient or "fall guy" are forms of scapegoat.




On many occasions, scapegoating does rely on the accuser's guilt.






share|improve this answer


























  • Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

    – technosaurus
    Jul 1 '15 at 8:44



















16














To frame someone





  1. Informal. to incriminate (an innocent person) through the use of false
    evidence, information, etc.




(dictionary.reference.com/)






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

    – T.J. Crowder
    Jun 30 '15 at 9:30



















15














Wiktionary has




blameshift verb (biblical)



To blame another for one's own wrong-doing. Blameshifting ... pointing
the finger at another when trying to save one's skin.




Dictionary.com only gives the noun:




blameshifting noun



the act of transferring responsibility for an error or problem to
another; also written blame shifting







share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

    – Hugh
    Jun 30 '15 at 4:09











  • What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

    – Potatoswatter
    Jun 30 '15 at 4:50











  • The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

    – Brian Hitchcock
    Jun 30 '15 at 9:54











  • I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 30 '15 at 16:33



















8














Not quite what you want perhaps: a misdirect, a diversionary tactic used by magicians.



I can't find a good dictionary definition of this usage, but
Wikipedia
defines it for magic, and
The Guardian
uses it well:




Bankers, bosses, selfish politicians; all are masters of misdirection. It allows them to escape blame-free.




Dictionary.com:




a wrong or incorrect direction, guidance, or instruction.







share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

    – Papa Poule
    Jun 29 '15 at 21:48











  • Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

    – dwjohnston
    Jun 29 '15 at 21:51



















7














I agree with Avon that "frame" (or "frame up") is the best short term for the tactic that the OP asks about. A longer phrase that suggests the same thing is "set [someone] up to be the fall guy." Although a "fall guy" in some instances is a willing participant in a conspiracy to obstruct justice—pleading guilty to a crime in order to let others off the hook—when "fall guy" is linked to the verbal phrase "set up," the usual sense of the expression is that the fall guy is an unwitting dupe or scapegoat of the actual criminal or criminals.



A Google Books search for the phrase "set him up to be the fall guy" finds a number of fairly recent matches, all in the above sense. Some examples: From Margaret Daley, Security Breach (2015):




Selena nodded. “But Sid Huntington insists he's innocent, that someone set him up to be the fall guy, and Michael believed him.”




From Diana Kaye, The Power of Trust (2013):




He was fully absorbed in his own cleverness, by now: "I've done it before. I can make it look as if you've been a victim. It's simple; really; just a matter of planting evidence and letting the right people know where it is. I can forge anyone's handwriting; too, that'll come in handy. Leave it to me; I can make anyone appear guilty as Hell. We'll need someone to put the blame on, though ... Hey, I've got it! Rob, he'll do! I can set him up to be the fall guy ... what are you doing?” She'd pushed him away, violently.




From James Campbell, Southern Gold (2011):




Slim laughed softly. "What's going to happen hen your cop boyfriend finds out that he has been misled by you all along? Wonder what he's going to think about you when he learn that you and his brother set him up to be the fall-guy if the shit really hit the fan?....I'm just wondering, when will you really tell him that the joke is on him?”




From Jeff Blackburn, Huitt's Trail (2010):




Dwayne Reed had been a childhood friend, who followed the boys everywhere. Reed was a simpleton, who did everything that the boys told him to. They in turn had treated Reed with great contempt, they teased him, and set him up to be the fall guy for all their devious pranks. Reed believed the boys to be his only friends and had followed them down the path to wrongdoing.




From David Rosenfelt, Bury the Lead (2007):




"Lassiter, whether on his own or with Eliot's approval, murdered the other women to deflect attention from the main target, Rosalie. Then, to get revenge against Daniel, Lassiter set him up to be the fall guy. I'm sure he found it fit together quite well.”




From H. Paul Jeffers, History's Greatest Conspiracies (2004):




More than seventy years after Bruno Richard Hauptmann was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the two-year-old son of aviation hero Charles A. Lindbergh, some students of what was known as "the crime of the century," which the famed muckraking journalist H. L. Mencken termed the greatest story since the Resurrection of Christ, believe that Hauptmann was in fact the victim of a conspiracy involving faked evidence to set him up to be the fall guy.




From Jan Delasara, PopLit, PopCult and The X-Files: A Critical Exploration (2000):




There is, however, another possibility. The intelligence forces of the Parallax Corporation may have been aware that Frady was investigating the group, and then simply set him up to be the fall guy for yet another political assassination.







share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

    – Matt Nordhoff
    Jun 30 '15 at 6:40






  • 1





    What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

    – Mari-Lou A
    Jun 30 '15 at 7:27











  • @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

    – Sven Yargs
    Jun 30 '15 at 7:37













  • It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

    – Mari-Lou A
    Jun 30 '15 at 11:45





















4














The psychological term for this is 'projection'.




Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.







share|improve this answer

































    3















    slander



    Slander is the act of making a false, negative spoken statement about
    someone. Words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another.




    In law, the word slander is contrasted with libel, which is the act of making a false written statement about someone.




    If you misrepresent or malign someone, particularly in a public way,
    that's a hatchet job.



    hatchet job (n) : a false accusation of an offense




    (vocabulary.com)






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

      – Kristina Lopez
      Jun 29 '15 at 21:17



















    1














    How about --

    red herring: to intentionally mislead or deceive.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

      – EleventhDoctor
      Jun 30 '15 at 7:28



















    1














    perhaps "the pot calling the kettle black"






    share|improve this answer
























    • I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

      – ScotM
      Jun 30 '15 at 20:20



















    1














    How about Impute?



    From Merriam Webster:




    Verb im·pute im-ˈpyüt




    1. to lay the responsibility or blame for often falsely or unjustly




    Was also thinking about inculpate, but impute seems a better fit.






    share|improve this answer

































      0














      Your edit sounds a little like a tu quoque, a Latin phrase that is sometimes used in English. It literally means "you, too." If someone accuses you of something that you're actually guilty of, and your only defense is to point out that the accuser is guilty of the same thing, that's a tu quoque. It's considered a logical fallacy if you think someone else's guilt absolves you of your own guilt.






      share|improve this answer































        0















        sub·ter·fuge
        /ˈsəbtərˌfyo͞oj/
        noun
        noun: subterfuge; plural noun: subterfuges



        deceit used in order to achieve one's goal.
        Oxford Dictionaries







        share|improve this answer

































          0














          I would use the word demagogue or demagogy for this act as politicians are mentioned. I am also in favor of Red herring.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

            – j.i.h.
            Jun 30 '15 at 13:38



















          -1














          How about fabricate?



          From Oxford Dictionaries:




          Invent (something) in order to deceive:
          ‘officers fabricated evidence’



          synonyms: forge, falsify, fake, counterfeit




          Counterfeit may also be suitable here.






          share|improve this answer
























            protected by Community Jun 30 '15 at 18:15



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














            14 Answers
            14






            active

            oldest

            votes








            14 Answers
            14






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            17














            Scapegoating?



            From Wikipedia:




            Scapegoating (from the verb "to scapegoat") is the practice of singling out any party for unmerited negative treatment or blame as a scapegoat. Scapegoating may be conducted by individuals against individuals (e.g. "he did it, not me!"), individuals against groups (e.g., "I couldn't see anything because of all the tall people"), groups against individuals (e.g., "Jane was the reason our team didn't win"), and groups against groups.



            A scapegoat may be an adult, child, sibling, employee, peer, ethnic, political or religious group, or country. A whipping boy, identified patient or "fall guy" are forms of scapegoat.




            On many occasions, scapegoating does rely on the accuser's guilt.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

              – technosaurus
              Jul 1 '15 at 8:44
















            17














            Scapegoating?



            From Wikipedia:




            Scapegoating (from the verb "to scapegoat") is the practice of singling out any party for unmerited negative treatment or blame as a scapegoat. Scapegoating may be conducted by individuals against individuals (e.g. "he did it, not me!"), individuals against groups (e.g., "I couldn't see anything because of all the tall people"), groups against individuals (e.g., "Jane was the reason our team didn't win"), and groups against groups.



            A scapegoat may be an adult, child, sibling, employee, peer, ethnic, political or religious group, or country. A whipping boy, identified patient or "fall guy" are forms of scapegoat.




            On many occasions, scapegoating does rely on the accuser's guilt.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

              – technosaurus
              Jul 1 '15 at 8:44














            17












            17








            17







            Scapegoating?



            From Wikipedia:




            Scapegoating (from the verb "to scapegoat") is the practice of singling out any party for unmerited negative treatment or blame as a scapegoat. Scapegoating may be conducted by individuals against individuals (e.g. "he did it, not me!"), individuals against groups (e.g., "I couldn't see anything because of all the tall people"), groups against individuals (e.g., "Jane was the reason our team didn't win"), and groups against groups.



            A scapegoat may be an adult, child, sibling, employee, peer, ethnic, political or religious group, or country. A whipping boy, identified patient or "fall guy" are forms of scapegoat.




            On many occasions, scapegoating does rely on the accuser's guilt.






            share|improve this answer















            Scapegoating?



            From Wikipedia:




            Scapegoating (from the verb "to scapegoat") is the practice of singling out any party for unmerited negative treatment or blame as a scapegoat. Scapegoating may be conducted by individuals against individuals (e.g. "he did it, not me!"), individuals against groups (e.g., "I couldn't see anything because of all the tall people"), groups against individuals (e.g., "Jane was the reason our team didn't win"), and groups against groups.



            A scapegoat may be an adult, child, sibling, employee, peer, ethnic, political or religious group, or country. A whipping boy, identified patient or "fall guy" are forms of scapegoat.




            On many occasions, scapegoating does rely on the accuser's guilt.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jul 1 '15 at 5:32

























            answered Jun 29 '15 at 21:44









            Tushar RajTushar Raj

            18.9k964114




            18.9k964114













            • Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

              – technosaurus
              Jul 1 '15 at 8:44



















            • Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

              – technosaurus
              Jul 1 '15 at 8:44

















            Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

            – technosaurus
            Jul 1 '15 at 8:44





            Often a scapegoat is part of the guilty party that takes all of the blame rather than just their fair share. OTOH, A "red herring" can be anyone.

            – technosaurus
            Jul 1 '15 at 8:44













            16














            To frame someone





            1. Informal. to incriminate (an innocent person) through the use of false
              evidence, information, etc.




            (dictionary.reference.com/)






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

              – T.J. Crowder
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:30
















            16














            To frame someone





            1. Informal. to incriminate (an innocent person) through the use of false
              evidence, information, etc.




            (dictionary.reference.com/)






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

              – T.J. Crowder
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:30














            16












            16








            16







            To frame someone





            1. Informal. to incriminate (an innocent person) through the use of false
              evidence, information, etc.




            (dictionary.reference.com/)






            share|improve this answer













            To frame someone





            1. Informal. to incriminate (an innocent person) through the use of false
              evidence, information, etc.




            (dictionary.reference.com/)







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 29 '15 at 19:46









            AvonAvon

            5,0981237




            5,0981237








            • 1





              It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

              – T.J. Crowder
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:30














            • 1





              It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

              – T.J. Crowder
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:30








            1




            1





            It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

            – T.J. Crowder
            Jun 30 '15 at 9:30





            It's related, but it's not the same thing. It's one reason to frame someone, but not necessarily the reason.

            – T.J. Crowder
            Jun 30 '15 at 9:30











            15














            Wiktionary has




            blameshift verb (biblical)



            To blame another for one's own wrong-doing. Blameshifting ... pointing
            the finger at another when trying to save one's skin.




            Dictionary.com only gives the noun:




            blameshifting noun



            the act of transferring responsibility for an error or problem to
            another; also written blame shifting







            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

              – Hugh
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:09











            • What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

              – Potatoswatter
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:50











            • The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

              – Brian Hitchcock
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:54











            • I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              Jun 30 '15 at 16:33
















            15














            Wiktionary has




            blameshift verb (biblical)



            To blame another for one's own wrong-doing. Blameshifting ... pointing
            the finger at another when trying to save one's skin.




            Dictionary.com only gives the noun:




            blameshifting noun



            the act of transferring responsibility for an error or problem to
            another; also written blame shifting







            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

              – Hugh
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:09











            • What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

              – Potatoswatter
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:50











            • The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

              – Brian Hitchcock
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:54











            • I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              Jun 30 '15 at 16:33














            15












            15








            15







            Wiktionary has




            blameshift verb (biblical)



            To blame another for one's own wrong-doing. Blameshifting ... pointing
            the finger at another when trying to save one's skin.




            Dictionary.com only gives the noun:




            blameshifting noun



            the act of transferring responsibility for an error or problem to
            another; also written blame shifting







            share|improve this answer















            Wiktionary has




            blameshift verb (biblical)



            To blame another for one's own wrong-doing. Blameshifting ... pointing
            the finger at another when trying to save one's skin.




            Dictionary.com only gives the noun:




            blameshifting noun



            the act of transferring responsibility for an error or problem to
            another; also written blame shifting








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 20 at 1:46









            Laurel

            33.8k667118




            33.8k667118










            answered Jun 29 '15 at 21:51









            Edwin AshworthEdwin Ashworth

            49.2k1090155




            49.2k1090155








            • 1





              Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

              – Hugh
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:09











            • What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

              – Potatoswatter
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:50











            • The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

              – Brian Hitchcock
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:54











            • I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              Jun 30 '15 at 16:33














            • 1





              Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

              – Hugh
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:09











            • What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

              – Potatoswatter
              Jun 30 '15 at 4:50











            • The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

              – Brian Hitchcock
              Jun 30 '15 at 9:54











            • I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              Jun 30 '15 at 16:33








            1




            1





            Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

            – Hugh
            Jun 30 '15 at 4:09





            Sorry; definitely not biblical. That's an invention of some Blame Shift fans.

            – Hugh
            Jun 30 '15 at 4:09













            What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

            – Potatoswatter
            Jun 30 '15 at 4:50





            What does biblical etymology even mean? That the word was coined by someone translating a Christian bible? Why would new words be coined in that context?

            – Potatoswatter
            Jun 30 '15 at 4:50













            The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

            – Brian Hitchcock
            Jun 30 '15 at 9:54





            The concept occurs many times in the Bible, but the phrase does not. For example, when God asks Adam if he ate the forbidden fruit, he first says "the woman...gave me..."

            – Brian Hitchcock
            Jun 30 '15 at 9:54













            I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

            – Edwin Ashworth
            Jun 30 '15 at 16:33





            I'd agree that 'biblical' is unhelpful here; 'found in the Bible' (or at least in any version I've read) is highly unlikely. Though some people might be surprised to discover which of the following three words doesn't appear: Trinity, pajamas, boomerang.

            – Edwin Ashworth
            Jun 30 '15 at 16:33











            8














            Not quite what you want perhaps: a misdirect, a diversionary tactic used by magicians.



            I can't find a good dictionary definition of this usage, but
            Wikipedia
            defines it for magic, and
            The Guardian
            uses it well:




            Bankers, bosses, selfish politicians; all are masters of misdirection. It allows them to escape blame-free.




            Dictionary.com:




            a wrong or incorrect direction, guidance, or instruction.







            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

              – Papa Poule
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:48











            • Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

              – dwjohnston
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:51
















            8














            Not quite what you want perhaps: a misdirect, a diversionary tactic used by magicians.



            I can't find a good dictionary definition of this usage, but
            Wikipedia
            defines it for magic, and
            The Guardian
            uses it well:




            Bankers, bosses, selfish politicians; all are masters of misdirection. It allows them to escape blame-free.




            Dictionary.com:




            a wrong or incorrect direction, guidance, or instruction.







            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

              – Papa Poule
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:48











            • Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

              – dwjohnston
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:51














            8












            8








            8







            Not quite what you want perhaps: a misdirect, a diversionary tactic used by magicians.



            I can't find a good dictionary definition of this usage, but
            Wikipedia
            defines it for magic, and
            The Guardian
            uses it well:




            Bankers, bosses, selfish politicians; all are masters of misdirection. It allows them to escape blame-free.




            Dictionary.com:




            a wrong or incorrect direction, guidance, or instruction.







            share|improve this answer















            Not quite what you want perhaps: a misdirect, a diversionary tactic used by magicians.



            I can't find a good dictionary definition of this usage, but
            Wikipedia
            defines it for magic, and
            The Guardian
            uses it well:




            Bankers, bosses, selfish politicians; all are masters of misdirection. It allows them to escape blame-free.




            Dictionary.com:




            a wrong or incorrect direction, guidance, or instruction.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 20 at 1:47









            Laurel

            33.8k667118




            33.8k667118










            answered Jun 29 '15 at 20:51









            meuhmeuh

            38137




            38137








            • 2





              +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

              – Papa Poule
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:48











            • Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

              – dwjohnston
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:51














            • 2





              +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

              – Papa Poule
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:48











            • Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

              – dwjohnston
              Jun 29 '15 at 21:51








            2




            2





            +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

            – Papa Poule
            Jun 29 '15 at 21:48





            +1 for "misdirect[ion], which fits well in this quote: "Let me tell you, they know their jobs well. [Fill-in with your least-favorite party] are expert flim-flam artists, skilled at misdirection and preemptive accusation".

            – Papa Poule
            Jun 29 '15 at 21:48













            Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

            – dwjohnston
            Jun 29 '15 at 21:51





            Misdirect is a good answer. You should expand your answer to include a definition and example usage though.

            – dwjohnston
            Jun 29 '15 at 21:51











            7














            I agree with Avon that "frame" (or "frame up") is the best short term for the tactic that the OP asks about. A longer phrase that suggests the same thing is "set [someone] up to be the fall guy." Although a "fall guy" in some instances is a willing participant in a conspiracy to obstruct justice—pleading guilty to a crime in order to let others off the hook—when "fall guy" is linked to the verbal phrase "set up," the usual sense of the expression is that the fall guy is an unwitting dupe or scapegoat of the actual criminal or criminals.



            A Google Books search for the phrase "set him up to be the fall guy" finds a number of fairly recent matches, all in the above sense. Some examples: From Margaret Daley, Security Breach (2015):




            Selena nodded. “But Sid Huntington insists he's innocent, that someone set him up to be the fall guy, and Michael believed him.”




            From Diana Kaye, The Power of Trust (2013):




            He was fully absorbed in his own cleverness, by now: "I've done it before. I can make it look as if you've been a victim. It's simple; really; just a matter of planting evidence and letting the right people know where it is. I can forge anyone's handwriting; too, that'll come in handy. Leave it to me; I can make anyone appear guilty as Hell. We'll need someone to put the blame on, though ... Hey, I've got it! Rob, he'll do! I can set him up to be the fall guy ... what are you doing?” She'd pushed him away, violently.




            From James Campbell, Southern Gold (2011):




            Slim laughed softly. "What's going to happen hen your cop boyfriend finds out that he has been misled by you all along? Wonder what he's going to think about you when he learn that you and his brother set him up to be the fall-guy if the shit really hit the fan?....I'm just wondering, when will you really tell him that the joke is on him?”




            From Jeff Blackburn, Huitt's Trail (2010):




            Dwayne Reed had been a childhood friend, who followed the boys everywhere. Reed was a simpleton, who did everything that the boys told him to. They in turn had treated Reed with great contempt, they teased him, and set him up to be the fall guy for all their devious pranks. Reed believed the boys to be his only friends and had followed them down the path to wrongdoing.




            From David Rosenfelt, Bury the Lead (2007):




            "Lassiter, whether on his own or with Eliot's approval, murdered the other women to deflect attention from the main target, Rosalie. Then, to get revenge against Daniel, Lassiter set him up to be the fall guy. I'm sure he found it fit together quite well.”




            From H. Paul Jeffers, History's Greatest Conspiracies (2004):




            More than seventy years after Bruno Richard Hauptmann was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the two-year-old son of aviation hero Charles A. Lindbergh, some students of what was known as "the crime of the century," which the famed muckraking journalist H. L. Mencken termed the greatest story since the Resurrection of Christ, believe that Hauptmann was in fact the victim of a conspiracy involving faked evidence to set him up to be the fall guy.




            From Jan Delasara, PopLit, PopCult and The X-Files: A Critical Exploration (2000):




            There is, however, another possibility. The intelligence forces of the Parallax Corporation may have been aware that Frady was investigating the group, and then simply set him up to be the fall guy for yet another political assassination.







            share|improve this answer



















            • 2





              "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

              – Matt Nordhoff
              Jun 30 '15 at 6:40






            • 1





              What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:27











            • @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

              – Sven Yargs
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:37













            • It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 11:45


















            7














            I agree with Avon that "frame" (or "frame up") is the best short term for the tactic that the OP asks about. A longer phrase that suggests the same thing is "set [someone] up to be the fall guy." Although a "fall guy" in some instances is a willing participant in a conspiracy to obstruct justice—pleading guilty to a crime in order to let others off the hook—when "fall guy" is linked to the verbal phrase "set up," the usual sense of the expression is that the fall guy is an unwitting dupe or scapegoat of the actual criminal or criminals.



            A Google Books search for the phrase "set him up to be the fall guy" finds a number of fairly recent matches, all in the above sense. Some examples: From Margaret Daley, Security Breach (2015):




            Selena nodded. “But Sid Huntington insists he's innocent, that someone set him up to be the fall guy, and Michael believed him.”




            From Diana Kaye, The Power of Trust (2013):




            He was fully absorbed in his own cleverness, by now: "I've done it before. I can make it look as if you've been a victim. It's simple; really; just a matter of planting evidence and letting the right people know where it is. I can forge anyone's handwriting; too, that'll come in handy. Leave it to me; I can make anyone appear guilty as Hell. We'll need someone to put the blame on, though ... Hey, I've got it! Rob, he'll do! I can set him up to be the fall guy ... what are you doing?” She'd pushed him away, violently.




            From James Campbell, Southern Gold (2011):




            Slim laughed softly. "What's going to happen hen your cop boyfriend finds out that he has been misled by you all along? Wonder what he's going to think about you when he learn that you and his brother set him up to be the fall-guy if the shit really hit the fan?....I'm just wondering, when will you really tell him that the joke is on him?”




            From Jeff Blackburn, Huitt's Trail (2010):




            Dwayne Reed had been a childhood friend, who followed the boys everywhere. Reed was a simpleton, who did everything that the boys told him to. They in turn had treated Reed with great contempt, they teased him, and set him up to be the fall guy for all their devious pranks. Reed believed the boys to be his only friends and had followed them down the path to wrongdoing.




            From David Rosenfelt, Bury the Lead (2007):




            "Lassiter, whether on his own or with Eliot's approval, murdered the other women to deflect attention from the main target, Rosalie. Then, to get revenge against Daniel, Lassiter set him up to be the fall guy. I'm sure he found it fit together quite well.”




            From H. Paul Jeffers, History's Greatest Conspiracies (2004):




            More than seventy years after Bruno Richard Hauptmann was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the two-year-old son of aviation hero Charles A. Lindbergh, some students of what was known as "the crime of the century," which the famed muckraking journalist H. L. Mencken termed the greatest story since the Resurrection of Christ, believe that Hauptmann was in fact the victim of a conspiracy involving faked evidence to set him up to be the fall guy.




            From Jan Delasara, PopLit, PopCult and The X-Files: A Critical Exploration (2000):




            There is, however, another possibility. The intelligence forces of the Parallax Corporation may have been aware that Frady was investigating the group, and then simply set him up to be the fall guy for yet another political assassination.







            share|improve this answer



















            • 2





              "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

              – Matt Nordhoff
              Jun 30 '15 at 6:40






            • 1





              What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:27











            • @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

              – Sven Yargs
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:37













            • It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 11:45
















            7












            7








            7







            I agree with Avon that "frame" (or "frame up") is the best short term for the tactic that the OP asks about. A longer phrase that suggests the same thing is "set [someone] up to be the fall guy." Although a "fall guy" in some instances is a willing participant in a conspiracy to obstruct justice—pleading guilty to a crime in order to let others off the hook—when "fall guy" is linked to the verbal phrase "set up," the usual sense of the expression is that the fall guy is an unwitting dupe or scapegoat of the actual criminal or criminals.



            A Google Books search for the phrase "set him up to be the fall guy" finds a number of fairly recent matches, all in the above sense. Some examples: From Margaret Daley, Security Breach (2015):




            Selena nodded. “But Sid Huntington insists he's innocent, that someone set him up to be the fall guy, and Michael believed him.”




            From Diana Kaye, The Power of Trust (2013):




            He was fully absorbed in his own cleverness, by now: "I've done it before. I can make it look as if you've been a victim. It's simple; really; just a matter of planting evidence and letting the right people know where it is. I can forge anyone's handwriting; too, that'll come in handy. Leave it to me; I can make anyone appear guilty as Hell. We'll need someone to put the blame on, though ... Hey, I've got it! Rob, he'll do! I can set him up to be the fall guy ... what are you doing?” She'd pushed him away, violently.




            From James Campbell, Southern Gold (2011):




            Slim laughed softly. "What's going to happen hen your cop boyfriend finds out that he has been misled by you all along? Wonder what he's going to think about you when he learn that you and his brother set him up to be the fall-guy if the shit really hit the fan?....I'm just wondering, when will you really tell him that the joke is on him?”




            From Jeff Blackburn, Huitt's Trail (2010):




            Dwayne Reed had been a childhood friend, who followed the boys everywhere. Reed was a simpleton, who did everything that the boys told him to. They in turn had treated Reed with great contempt, they teased him, and set him up to be the fall guy for all their devious pranks. Reed believed the boys to be his only friends and had followed them down the path to wrongdoing.




            From David Rosenfelt, Bury the Lead (2007):




            "Lassiter, whether on his own or with Eliot's approval, murdered the other women to deflect attention from the main target, Rosalie. Then, to get revenge against Daniel, Lassiter set him up to be the fall guy. I'm sure he found it fit together quite well.”




            From H. Paul Jeffers, History's Greatest Conspiracies (2004):




            More than seventy years after Bruno Richard Hauptmann was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the two-year-old son of aviation hero Charles A. Lindbergh, some students of what was known as "the crime of the century," which the famed muckraking journalist H. L. Mencken termed the greatest story since the Resurrection of Christ, believe that Hauptmann was in fact the victim of a conspiracy involving faked evidence to set him up to be the fall guy.




            From Jan Delasara, PopLit, PopCult and The X-Files: A Critical Exploration (2000):




            There is, however, another possibility. The intelligence forces of the Parallax Corporation may have been aware that Frady was investigating the group, and then simply set him up to be the fall guy for yet another political assassination.







            share|improve this answer













            I agree with Avon that "frame" (or "frame up") is the best short term for the tactic that the OP asks about. A longer phrase that suggests the same thing is "set [someone] up to be the fall guy." Although a "fall guy" in some instances is a willing participant in a conspiracy to obstruct justice—pleading guilty to a crime in order to let others off the hook—when "fall guy" is linked to the verbal phrase "set up," the usual sense of the expression is that the fall guy is an unwitting dupe or scapegoat of the actual criminal or criminals.



            A Google Books search for the phrase "set him up to be the fall guy" finds a number of fairly recent matches, all in the above sense. Some examples: From Margaret Daley, Security Breach (2015):




            Selena nodded. “But Sid Huntington insists he's innocent, that someone set him up to be the fall guy, and Michael believed him.”




            From Diana Kaye, The Power of Trust (2013):




            He was fully absorbed in his own cleverness, by now: "I've done it before. I can make it look as if you've been a victim. It's simple; really; just a matter of planting evidence and letting the right people know where it is. I can forge anyone's handwriting; too, that'll come in handy. Leave it to me; I can make anyone appear guilty as Hell. We'll need someone to put the blame on, though ... Hey, I've got it! Rob, he'll do! I can set him up to be the fall guy ... what are you doing?” She'd pushed him away, violently.




            From James Campbell, Southern Gold (2011):




            Slim laughed softly. "What's going to happen hen your cop boyfriend finds out that he has been misled by you all along? Wonder what he's going to think about you when he learn that you and his brother set him up to be the fall-guy if the shit really hit the fan?....I'm just wondering, when will you really tell him that the joke is on him?”




            From Jeff Blackburn, Huitt's Trail (2010):




            Dwayne Reed had been a childhood friend, who followed the boys everywhere. Reed was a simpleton, who did everything that the boys told him to. They in turn had treated Reed with great contempt, they teased him, and set him up to be the fall guy for all their devious pranks. Reed believed the boys to be his only friends and had followed them down the path to wrongdoing.




            From David Rosenfelt, Bury the Lead (2007):




            "Lassiter, whether on his own or with Eliot's approval, murdered the other women to deflect attention from the main target, Rosalie. Then, to get revenge against Daniel, Lassiter set him up to be the fall guy. I'm sure he found it fit together quite well.”




            From H. Paul Jeffers, History's Greatest Conspiracies (2004):




            More than seventy years after Bruno Richard Hauptmann was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the two-year-old son of aviation hero Charles A. Lindbergh, some students of what was known as "the crime of the century," which the famed muckraking journalist H. L. Mencken termed the greatest story since the Resurrection of Christ, believe that Hauptmann was in fact the victim of a conspiracy involving faked evidence to set him up to be the fall guy.




            From Jan Delasara, PopLit, PopCult and The X-Files: A Critical Exploration (2000):




            There is, however, another possibility. The intelligence forces of the Parallax Corporation may have been aware that Frady was investigating the group, and then simply set him up to be the fall guy for yet another political assassination.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 29 '15 at 21:32









            Sven YargsSven Yargs

            114k20248506




            114k20248506








            • 2





              "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

              – Matt Nordhoff
              Jun 30 '15 at 6:40






            • 1





              What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:27











            • @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

              – Sven Yargs
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:37













            • It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 11:45
















            • 2





              "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

              – Matt Nordhoff
              Jun 30 '15 at 6:40






            • 1





              What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:27











            • @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

              – Sven Yargs
              Jun 30 '15 at 7:37













            • It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

              – Mari-Lou A
              Jun 30 '15 at 11:45










            2




            2





            "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

            – Matt Nordhoff
            Jun 30 '15 at 6:40





            "Set them up to take the fall" avoids the potential ambiguity with willing conspirators, I think.

            – Matt Nordhoff
            Jun 30 '15 at 6:40




            1




            1





            What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

            – Mari-Lou A
            Jun 30 '15 at 7:27





            What about a "cover up"? Would that fit, too?

            – Mari-Lou A
            Jun 30 '15 at 7:27













            @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

            – Sven Yargs
            Jun 30 '15 at 7:37







            @Mari-LouA: At least in U.S. parlance, "cover up" is inextricably linked to the circumstances of the Watergate affair of 1972, where the focus of the obstruction of justice was not specifically to pick an innocent (or even somewhat guilty) individual to serve as a sacrificial victim while everyone else got away scot free. Instead, I think the goal of the conspiracy was to deny any wrongdoing, stonewall investigators, and hide ("cover up") or minimize the significance of as much incriminating evidence as they could. But a coverup can go hand in hand with a frame up, certainly.

            – Sven Yargs
            Jun 30 '15 at 7:37















            It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

            – Mari-Lou A
            Jun 30 '15 at 11:45







            It's "coverup", one word, silly of me not to see that. Thank you for the insightful definition/explanation.Well, I'm curious to know what "missing" word is, and if the OP will ever tell us. (I suspect not)

            – Mari-Lou A
            Jun 30 '15 at 11:45













            4














            The psychological term for this is 'projection'.




            Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.







            share|improve this answer






























              4














              The psychological term for this is 'projection'.




              Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.







              share|improve this answer




























                4












                4








                4







                The psychological term for this is 'projection'.




                Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.







                share|improve this answer















                The psychological term for this is 'projection'.




                Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.








                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 24 '17 at 6:23









                Tushar Raj

                18.9k964114




                18.9k964114










                answered Jun 30 '15 at 18:15









                arachnode.netarachnode.net

                1412




                1412























                    3















                    slander



                    Slander is the act of making a false, negative spoken statement about
                    someone. Words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another.




                    In law, the word slander is contrasted with libel, which is the act of making a false written statement about someone.




                    If you misrepresent or malign someone, particularly in a public way,
                    that's a hatchet job.



                    hatchet job (n) : a false accusation of an offense




                    (vocabulary.com)






                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 1





                      Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

                      – Kristina Lopez
                      Jun 29 '15 at 21:17
















                    3















                    slander



                    Slander is the act of making a false, negative spoken statement about
                    someone. Words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another.




                    In law, the word slander is contrasted with libel, which is the act of making a false written statement about someone.




                    If you misrepresent or malign someone, particularly in a public way,
                    that's a hatchet job.



                    hatchet job (n) : a false accusation of an offense




                    (vocabulary.com)






                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 1





                      Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

                      – Kristina Lopez
                      Jun 29 '15 at 21:17














                    3












                    3








                    3








                    slander



                    Slander is the act of making a false, negative spoken statement about
                    someone. Words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another.




                    In law, the word slander is contrasted with libel, which is the act of making a false written statement about someone.




                    If you misrepresent or malign someone, particularly in a public way,
                    that's a hatchet job.



                    hatchet job (n) : a false accusation of an offense




                    (vocabulary.com)






                    share|improve this answer














                    slander



                    Slander is the act of making a false, negative spoken statement about
                    someone. Words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another.




                    In law, the word slander is contrasted with libel, which is the act of making a false written statement about someone.




                    If you misrepresent or malign someone, particularly in a public way,
                    that's a hatchet job.



                    hatchet job (n) : a false accusation of an offense




                    (vocabulary.com)







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 29 '15 at 20:47









                    MistiMisti

                    13k42458




                    13k42458








                    • 1





                      Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

                      – Kristina Lopez
                      Jun 29 '15 at 21:17














                    • 1





                      Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

                      – Kristina Lopez
                      Jun 29 '15 at 21:17








                    1




                    1





                    Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

                    – Kristina Lopez
                    Jun 29 '15 at 21:17





                    Slander and hatchet job are fine for the falsely accusing part of the question but don't really address the "diverting the attention from the accuser" part of the question.

                    – Kristina Lopez
                    Jun 29 '15 at 21:17











                    1














                    How about --

                    red herring: to intentionally mislead or deceive.






                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 3





                      Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

                      – EleventhDoctor
                      Jun 30 '15 at 7:28
















                    1














                    How about --

                    red herring: to intentionally mislead or deceive.






                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 3





                      Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

                      – EleventhDoctor
                      Jun 30 '15 at 7:28














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    How about --

                    red herring: to intentionally mislead or deceive.






                    share|improve this answer













                    How about --

                    red herring: to intentionally mislead or deceive.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 30 '15 at 6:52









                    PeterPeter

                    161113




                    161113








                    • 3





                      Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

                      – EleventhDoctor
                      Jun 30 '15 at 7:28














                    • 3





                      Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

                      – EleventhDoctor
                      Jun 30 '15 at 7:28








                    3




                    3





                    Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

                    – EleventhDoctor
                    Jun 30 '15 at 7:28





                    Welcome to the site! 'Red herring' is a good suggestion - can you improve your answer with citations and/or examples of usage?

                    – EleventhDoctor
                    Jun 30 '15 at 7:28











                    1














                    perhaps "the pot calling the kettle black"






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

                      – ScotM
                      Jun 30 '15 at 20:20
















                    1














                    perhaps "the pot calling the kettle black"






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

                      – ScotM
                      Jun 30 '15 at 20:20














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    perhaps "the pot calling the kettle black"






                    share|improve this answer













                    perhaps "the pot calling the kettle black"







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 30 '15 at 17:35









                    user127286user127286

                    111




                    111













                    • I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

                      – ScotM
                      Jun 30 '15 at 20:20



















                    • I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

                      – ScotM
                      Jun 30 '15 at 20:20

















                    I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

                    – ScotM
                    Jun 30 '15 at 20:20





                    I could imagine that phrase being used in that way, user 127286. Perhaps you could add some explanation about how it might apply to the specific question.

                    – ScotM
                    Jun 30 '15 at 20:20











                    1














                    How about Impute?



                    From Merriam Webster:




                    Verb im·pute im-ˈpyüt




                    1. to lay the responsibility or blame for often falsely or unjustly




                    Was also thinking about inculpate, but impute seems a better fit.






                    share|improve this answer






























                      1














                      How about Impute?



                      From Merriam Webster:




                      Verb im·pute im-ˈpyüt




                      1. to lay the responsibility or blame for often falsely or unjustly




                      Was also thinking about inculpate, but impute seems a better fit.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        1












                        1








                        1







                        How about Impute?



                        From Merriam Webster:




                        Verb im·pute im-ˈpyüt




                        1. to lay the responsibility or blame for often falsely or unjustly




                        Was also thinking about inculpate, but impute seems a better fit.






                        share|improve this answer















                        How about Impute?



                        From Merriam Webster:




                        Verb im·pute im-ˈpyüt




                        1. to lay the responsibility or blame for often falsely or unjustly




                        Was also thinking about inculpate, but impute seems a better fit.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Mar 20 at 1:37









                        Laurel

                        33.8k667118




                        33.8k667118










                        answered Jun 30 '15 at 17:12









                        Laconic DroidLaconic Droid

                        1,114412




                        1,114412























                            0














                            Your edit sounds a little like a tu quoque, a Latin phrase that is sometimes used in English. It literally means "you, too." If someone accuses you of something that you're actually guilty of, and your only defense is to point out that the accuser is guilty of the same thing, that's a tu quoque. It's considered a logical fallacy if you think someone else's guilt absolves you of your own guilt.






                            share|improve this answer




























                              0














                              Your edit sounds a little like a tu quoque, a Latin phrase that is sometimes used in English. It literally means "you, too." If someone accuses you of something that you're actually guilty of, and your only defense is to point out that the accuser is guilty of the same thing, that's a tu quoque. It's considered a logical fallacy if you think someone else's guilt absolves you of your own guilt.






                              share|improve this answer


























                                0












                                0








                                0







                                Your edit sounds a little like a tu quoque, a Latin phrase that is sometimes used in English. It literally means "you, too." If someone accuses you of something that you're actually guilty of, and your only defense is to point out that the accuser is guilty of the same thing, that's a tu quoque. It's considered a logical fallacy if you think someone else's guilt absolves you of your own guilt.






                                share|improve this answer













                                Your edit sounds a little like a tu quoque, a Latin phrase that is sometimes used in English. It literally means "you, too." If someone accuses you of something that you're actually guilty of, and your only defense is to point out that the accuser is guilty of the same thing, that's a tu quoque. It's considered a logical fallacy if you think someone else's guilt absolves you of your own guilt.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered Jul 1 '15 at 9:49









                                Kevin KrumwiedeKevin Krumwiede

                                944411




                                944411























                                    0















                                    sub·ter·fuge
                                    /ˈsəbtərˌfyo͞oj/
                                    noun
                                    noun: subterfuge; plural noun: subterfuges



                                    deceit used in order to achieve one's goal.
                                    Oxford Dictionaries







                                    share|improve this answer






























                                      0















                                      sub·ter·fuge
                                      /ˈsəbtərˌfyo͞oj/
                                      noun
                                      noun: subterfuge; plural noun: subterfuges



                                      deceit used in order to achieve one's goal.
                                      Oxford Dictionaries







                                      share|improve this answer




























                                        0












                                        0








                                        0








                                        sub·ter·fuge
                                        /ˈsəbtərˌfyo͞oj/
                                        noun
                                        noun: subterfuge; plural noun: subterfuges



                                        deceit used in order to achieve one's goal.
                                        Oxford Dictionaries







                                        share|improve this answer
















                                        sub·ter·fuge
                                        /ˈsəbtərˌfyo͞oj/
                                        noun
                                        noun: subterfuge; plural noun: subterfuges



                                        deceit used in order to achieve one's goal.
                                        Oxford Dictionaries








                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited Mar 20 at 1:37









                                        Laurel

                                        33.8k667118




                                        33.8k667118










                                        answered Jun 30 '15 at 14:31









                                        SkipBerneSkipBerne

                                        1552




                                        1552























                                            0














                                            I would use the word demagogue or demagogy for this act as politicians are mentioned. I am also in favor of Red herring.






                                            share|improve this answer


























                                            • I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

                                              – j.i.h.
                                              Jun 30 '15 at 13:38
















                                            0














                                            I would use the word demagogue or demagogy for this act as politicians are mentioned. I am also in favor of Red herring.






                                            share|improve this answer


























                                            • I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

                                              – j.i.h.
                                              Jun 30 '15 at 13:38














                                            0












                                            0








                                            0







                                            I would use the word demagogue or demagogy for this act as politicians are mentioned. I am also in favor of Red herring.






                                            share|improve this answer















                                            I would use the word demagogue or demagogy for this act as politicians are mentioned. I am also in favor of Red herring.







                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Mar 20 at 1:49









                                            Laurel

                                            33.8k667118




                                            33.8k667118










                                            answered Jun 30 '15 at 9:37









                                            percussepercusse

                                            1




                                            1













                                            • I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

                                              – j.i.h.
                                              Jun 30 '15 at 13:38



















                                            • I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

                                              – j.i.h.
                                              Jun 30 '15 at 13:38

















                                            I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

                                            – j.i.h.
                                            Jun 30 '15 at 13:38





                                            I've never heard of demagogy, I always have heard the noun demagoguery. Apparently they're used interchangeably (although in different regions)

                                            – j.i.h.
                                            Jun 30 '15 at 13:38











                                            -1














                                            How about fabricate?



                                            From Oxford Dictionaries:




                                            Invent (something) in order to deceive:
                                            ‘officers fabricated evidence’



                                            synonyms: forge, falsify, fake, counterfeit




                                            Counterfeit may also be suitable here.






                                            share|improve this answer






























                                              -1














                                              How about fabricate?



                                              From Oxford Dictionaries:




                                              Invent (something) in order to deceive:
                                              ‘officers fabricated evidence’



                                              synonyms: forge, falsify, fake, counterfeit




                                              Counterfeit may also be suitable here.






                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                -1












                                                -1








                                                -1







                                                How about fabricate?



                                                From Oxford Dictionaries:




                                                Invent (something) in order to deceive:
                                                ‘officers fabricated evidence’



                                                synonyms: forge, falsify, fake, counterfeit




                                                Counterfeit may also be suitable here.






                                                share|improve this answer















                                                How about fabricate?



                                                From Oxford Dictionaries:




                                                Invent (something) in order to deceive:
                                                ‘officers fabricated evidence’



                                                synonyms: forge, falsify, fake, counterfeit




                                                Counterfeit may also be suitable here.







                                                share|improve this answer














                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer








                                                edited Jan 24 '17 at 9:18









                                                Wrzlprmft

                                                3,4772141




                                                3,4772141










                                                answered Jan 24 '17 at 7:24









                                                Vladimir MarkievVladimir Markiev

                                                859




                                                859

















                                                    protected by Community Jun 30 '15 at 18:15



                                                    Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                                    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                                    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                                    Alcedinidae

                                                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]