Plausibility of squid whales
$begingroup$
I am considering the possibility of having massive cephalopods evolving on my world and having them fill the niche of whales.
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the purpose of obtaining more food. I've also read about the giant and colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to evolve to the size of whales. The reason why whales can grow to such ridiculous sizes is that they don't have to support their own weight.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them to swim in the same manner as whales.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever else is small and form schools on my world. My other idea is that they have webbed arms that close onto food and guide it into their beaks, which have been redesigned as a mechanism to trap large amounts of prey.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create long chains of eggs. Whaling would be more sustainable on these creatures. They are fed upon by sharks and other smaller predators, as well as larger sea monsters. Their ability to consume smaller creatures lower on the food chain makes them more numerous and thus a more sustainable source of food.
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
reality-check creature-design anatomy sea-creatures
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am considering the possibility of having massive cephalopods evolving on my world and having them fill the niche of whales.
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the purpose of obtaining more food. I've also read about the giant and colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to evolve to the size of whales. The reason why whales can grow to such ridiculous sizes is that they don't have to support their own weight.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them to swim in the same manner as whales.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever else is small and form schools on my world. My other idea is that they have webbed arms that close onto food and guide it into their beaks, which have been redesigned as a mechanism to trap large amounts of prey.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create long chains of eggs. Whaling would be more sustainable on these creatures. They are fed upon by sharks and other smaller predators, as well as larger sea monsters. Their ability to consume smaller creatures lower on the food chain makes them more numerous and thus a more sustainable source of food.
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
reality-check creature-design anatomy sea-creatures
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Hmm, the one thing that strikes me as questionable is the mass-birthing. First of all, there's a reason that whales birth few singles. It's generally seen that big animals tend to have few offspring they invest a lot of energy in, while smaller animals tend to "spam". [a read on how our real giant squids reproduce will give you a more definitive answer tho]
$endgroup$
– Hobbamok
Apr 1 at 9:58
$begingroup$
@Hobbamok That applies to viviparous organisms only. Consider sauropods, which had many, many tiny offspring.
$endgroup$
– SealBoi
Apr 1 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Kraken
$endgroup$
– Jon.D.
Apr 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
actually there are many stories about evidence of even bigger squids, such as reports of stranded squids bigger than the official record, pieces of oversized tentacles found in sperm whale stomachs and oversized sucker ring marks on whale skin. This site disputes such claims: cameronmccormick.blogspot.com/2007/03/…
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
Apr 1 at 18:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am considering the possibility of having massive cephalopods evolving on my world and having them fill the niche of whales.
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the purpose of obtaining more food. I've also read about the giant and colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to evolve to the size of whales. The reason why whales can grow to such ridiculous sizes is that they don't have to support their own weight.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them to swim in the same manner as whales.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever else is small and form schools on my world. My other idea is that they have webbed arms that close onto food and guide it into their beaks, which have been redesigned as a mechanism to trap large amounts of prey.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create long chains of eggs. Whaling would be more sustainable on these creatures. They are fed upon by sharks and other smaller predators, as well as larger sea monsters. Their ability to consume smaller creatures lower on the food chain makes them more numerous and thus a more sustainable source of food.
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
reality-check creature-design anatomy sea-creatures
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
$endgroup$
I am considering the possibility of having massive cephalopods evolving on my world and having them fill the niche of whales.
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the purpose of obtaining more food. I've also read about the giant and colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to evolve to the size of whales. The reason why whales can grow to such ridiculous sizes is that they don't have to support their own weight.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them to swim in the same manner as whales.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever else is small and form schools on my world. My other idea is that they have webbed arms that close onto food and guide it into their beaks, which have been redesigned as a mechanism to trap large amounts of prey.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create long chains of eggs. Whaling would be more sustainable on these creatures. They are fed upon by sharks and other smaller predators, as well as larger sea monsters. Their ability to consume smaller creatures lower on the food chain makes them more numerous and thus a more sustainable source of food.
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
reality-check creature-design anatomy sea-creatures
reality-check creature-design anatomy sea-creatures
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
edited Apr 1 at 4:22
Cyn
11.5k12456
11.5k12456
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
asked Apr 1 at 4:04
John LewisJohn Lewis
5613
5613
3
$begingroup$
Hmm, the one thing that strikes me as questionable is the mass-birthing. First of all, there's a reason that whales birth few singles. It's generally seen that big animals tend to have few offspring they invest a lot of energy in, while smaller animals tend to "spam". [a read on how our real giant squids reproduce will give you a more definitive answer tho]
$endgroup$
– Hobbamok
Apr 1 at 9:58
$begingroup$
@Hobbamok That applies to viviparous organisms only. Consider sauropods, which had many, many tiny offspring.
$endgroup$
– SealBoi
Apr 1 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Kraken
$endgroup$
– Jon.D.
Apr 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
actually there are many stories about evidence of even bigger squids, such as reports of stranded squids bigger than the official record, pieces of oversized tentacles found in sperm whale stomachs and oversized sucker ring marks on whale skin. This site disputes such claims: cameronmccormick.blogspot.com/2007/03/…
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
Apr 1 at 18:15
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Hmm, the one thing that strikes me as questionable is the mass-birthing. First of all, there's a reason that whales birth few singles. It's generally seen that big animals tend to have few offspring they invest a lot of energy in, while smaller animals tend to "spam". [a read on how our real giant squids reproduce will give you a more definitive answer tho]
$endgroup$
– Hobbamok
Apr 1 at 9:58
$begingroup$
@Hobbamok That applies to viviparous organisms only. Consider sauropods, which had many, many tiny offspring.
$endgroup$
– SealBoi
Apr 1 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Kraken
$endgroup$
– Jon.D.
Apr 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
actually there are many stories about evidence of even bigger squids, such as reports of stranded squids bigger than the official record, pieces of oversized tentacles found in sperm whale stomachs and oversized sucker ring marks on whale skin. This site disputes such claims: cameronmccormick.blogspot.com/2007/03/…
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
Apr 1 at 18:15
3
3
$begingroup$
Hmm, the one thing that strikes me as questionable is the mass-birthing. First of all, there's a reason that whales birth few singles. It's generally seen that big animals tend to have few offspring they invest a lot of energy in, while smaller animals tend to "spam". [a read on how our real giant squids reproduce will give you a more definitive answer tho]
$endgroup$
– Hobbamok
Apr 1 at 9:58
$begingroup$
Hmm, the one thing that strikes me as questionable is the mass-birthing. First of all, there's a reason that whales birth few singles. It's generally seen that big animals tend to have few offspring they invest a lot of energy in, while smaller animals tend to "spam". [a read on how our real giant squids reproduce will give you a more definitive answer tho]
$endgroup$
– Hobbamok
Apr 1 at 9:58
$begingroup$
@Hobbamok That applies to viviparous organisms only. Consider sauropods, which had many, many tiny offspring.
$endgroup$
– SealBoi
Apr 1 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@Hobbamok That applies to viviparous organisms only. Consider sauropods, which had many, many tiny offspring.
$endgroup$
– SealBoi
Apr 1 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Kraken
$endgroup$
– Jon.D.
Apr 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
Kraken
$endgroup$
– Jon.D.
Apr 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
actually there are many stories about evidence of even bigger squids, such as reports of stranded squids bigger than the official record, pieces of oversized tentacles found in sperm whale stomachs and oversized sucker ring marks on whale skin. This site disputes such claims: cameronmccormick.blogspot.com/2007/03/…
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
Apr 1 at 18:15
$begingroup$
actually there are many stories about evidence of even bigger squids, such as reports of stranded squids bigger than the official record, pieces of oversized tentacles found in sperm whale stomachs and oversized sucker ring marks on whale skin. This site disputes such claims: cameronmccormick.blogspot.com/2007/03/…
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
Apr 1 at 18:15
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
https://www.livescience.com/54870-giant-squid-may-be-school-bus-size.html suggests that existing giant squid could reach 20 meters in length. Given a lack of whales and the biological variations you've listed it seems entirely plausible for squid to reach the sizes you describe.
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
1
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the
purpose of obtaining more food.
Well, partially, but it's also for thermoregulatory purposes, and for defense against now-extinct "megatooth sharks" like the various Carcharocles species, Isurus hastalis and Hemipristis serra.
I've also read about the giant and
colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to
evolve to the size of whales.
No, not all. Although it should be noted, there would still have to be some significant increase in size, as squids are not very dense for their length. For comparison, a giant squid can be as long as a humpback whale, but the largest recorded individual was a hundredth of a humpback's mass.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them
to swim in the same manner as whales.
This I find unlikely. Modern cephalopods move using jet propulsion, sucking water in and expulsing it backwards through their siphons. Meanwhile, cetaceans move by undulating their spine up and down (because of their mammalian vertebrae - consider that mosasaurs and icthyosaurs had tail paddles which beat from side to side).
These are very, very different methods of locomotion, and the latter is very difficult without a flexible spine (a gladius wouldn't cut it). I'd advise you just have them use jet propulsion, perhaps beating their wings for extra boost.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to
repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of
baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever
else is small and form schools on my world.
This sounds a lot like the "baleen squids" of the Speculative Dinosaur Project. These animals (one of the greatest creative triumphs of the project) have two modified tentacles ending in a feather duster-like cluster of filaments which they use for filter-feeding.
I would recommend a filter-feeding lifestyle over your other idea. However, rather than copying the idea from the baleen squids, you should probably put your own spin on it. My suggestion is that they use their gills as baleen; if you look at a squid gill on an anatomy diagram, you could see how it could be repurposed as a filtering organ. This would also be consistent with your siphoning-in idea.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of
whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile
when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create
long chains of eggs.
Sounds good. William J. Sanders actually linked the large brood size of sauropods to their large size; the more offspring you can have, the higher the reproductive rate. a high reproductive rate means that there's a reduced extinction risk, and thus an opportunity to grow large.
(Also, the more offspring you have, the smaller they will likely be - in other words, the more different they'll look from the adult form. This means that they'll probably undergo an ontogenetic niche shift, where the young occupy a different niche to the adults. This also reduces the risk of extinction.)
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
Except for the locomotion bit, it all checks out. Welcome to WB.SE, by the way.
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see nothing inherently wrong with this idea. In the absence of whales and other sea mammals something would fill the niche. Prior to mammals there were very similar reptiles, so why not squid.
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was pondering giant molluscan filter feeders in the context of the giant nudibranch I proposed for this question.
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Really, specifically gastropod (slugs) or cephalopod (squid) filter feeders - bivalve clams are mollusks too and of course they are all filter feeders. How to change the feeding plan of a cephalopod or gastropod to filter feed? Of course there is one that does. Fortunately for the rule of cool, it is super cool too.
Your giant creature is a cephalopod filter feeder, but not a squid or octopus.
It is a giant vampire squid.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926133239.htm
Hoving soon found that if he placed bits and pieces of microscopic
animals into a tank with a vampire squid, the food particles would
stick to one of the string-like filaments that the animal sometimes
extends outward from its body. The vampire squid would then draw the
filament through its arms, removing the particles from the filament
and enveloping them in mucus. Finally, the squid would transfer the
glob of mucus and particles to its mouth and consume it.
So cool. These things live in the abyss. There is no reason they could not get huge because they live a low energy lifestyle. Maybe they do. They have long filaments which capture plankton and detritus and that is what they eat.
I could imagine something like this in an Ordovician world. Probably the jellyfish had been living in essentially this same way for eons but the giant Vampire Squid outdoes the jellyfish at their game, its molluscan body plan allowing larger size than a jelly could accomplish. Its feeding tentacles would be great for pulling in jellyfish as well as the rich broth of those ancient seas.
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/03/10/newfound-fossil-octopus-and-squid-were-giants/
seems to indicate that larger ancestors to squid may have lived in the past:
"The other fossil beak sat in the mouth of an even larger cephalopod. Named Haboroteuthis poseidon by the researchers, the creature was a Cretaceous member of the lineage that contains modern squid. And from its jaw size, it was quite an impressive invertebrate.
Measuring a ridge that runs up the front of squid beaks, Tanabe and coworkers found that Haboroteuthis had a “crest length” of about 2.4 inches. A 25-foot-long giant squid caught off New Zealand, by contrast, had a crest length of only 1.8 inches, and a Humbolt squid with a mantle length of almost five feet had a crest length of 1.9 inches. Haboroteuthis was at least comparable to these modern heavyweights. We may never know for sure exactly how large Haboroteuthis was, but, if its jaw is anything to go by, it was as big as some of today’s undersea giants."
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142918%2fplausibility-of-squid-whales%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
https://www.livescience.com/54870-giant-squid-may-be-school-bus-size.html suggests that existing giant squid could reach 20 meters in length. Given a lack of whales and the biological variations you've listed it seems entirely plausible for squid to reach the sizes you describe.
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
1
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
https://www.livescience.com/54870-giant-squid-may-be-school-bus-size.html suggests that existing giant squid could reach 20 meters in length. Given a lack of whales and the biological variations you've listed it seems entirely plausible for squid to reach the sizes you describe.
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
1
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
https://www.livescience.com/54870-giant-squid-may-be-school-bus-size.html suggests that existing giant squid could reach 20 meters in length. Given a lack of whales and the biological variations you've listed it seems entirely plausible for squid to reach the sizes you describe.
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
$endgroup$
https://www.livescience.com/54870-giant-squid-may-be-school-bus-size.html suggests that existing giant squid could reach 20 meters in length. Given a lack of whales and the biological variations you've listed it seems entirely plausible for squid to reach the sizes you describe.
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
answered Apr 1 at 6:02
krbkrb
4595
4595
5
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
1
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
|
show 1 more comment
5
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
1
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
5
5
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
$begingroup$
It is suspected that giant squid might prey on deep-diving whales such as sperm whales, picking off the smaller ones when they are running low on oxygen and about to return to the surface. Certainly, whales have been spotted with scars consistent with the tooth-like projections on squid suckers, and the spacing of those scars suggests fights with squid of 15m in length or more. If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
Apr 1 at 9:34
1
1
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
$begingroup$
"If there are no whales, your squid might find themselves short on food; you'd have to explain what they eat that provides enough energy and nutrition to grow to such a size." The things that the missing whales would have eaten to get to the same size?
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 12:29
2
2
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@ColinYoung: I'm not sure how much a squid's shape lends itself to filter feeding; whales have their mouth at the front so they can just filter small animals as they swim along, whereas squid's mouths are at their rear. That said, there is a solution to "what do they eat" that also solves the k/r reproduction problem that squids have (i.e. an apex predator that potentially spawns thousands of young in a single breeding season is problematic for its ecosystem): cannibalism.
$endgroup$
– sharur
Apr 1 at 16:20
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@sharur if we're talking about evolving a new species here, there's no reason why the mouth couldn't move/adapt. Or maybe the prey fish are abundant enough to support a large population. And yes, it seems like cannibalism is something real squid do engage in.
$endgroup$
– Colin Young
Apr 1 at 17:36
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
$begingroup$
@anaximander The articles I've read have the sperm whale (and possibly other large toothed whales) preying on the giant squid. The "sucker-scars" on the whales would be from the squids attempts to avoid being swallowed.
$endgroup$
– Michael Richardson
Apr 1 at 18:05
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the
purpose of obtaining more food.
Well, partially, but it's also for thermoregulatory purposes, and for defense against now-extinct "megatooth sharks" like the various Carcharocles species, Isurus hastalis and Hemipristis serra.
I've also read about the giant and
colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to
evolve to the size of whales.
No, not all. Although it should be noted, there would still have to be some significant increase in size, as squids are not very dense for their length. For comparison, a giant squid can be as long as a humpback whale, but the largest recorded individual was a hundredth of a humpback's mass.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them
to swim in the same manner as whales.
This I find unlikely. Modern cephalopods move using jet propulsion, sucking water in and expulsing it backwards through their siphons. Meanwhile, cetaceans move by undulating their spine up and down (because of their mammalian vertebrae - consider that mosasaurs and icthyosaurs had tail paddles which beat from side to side).
These are very, very different methods of locomotion, and the latter is very difficult without a flexible spine (a gladius wouldn't cut it). I'd advise you just have them use jet propulsion, perhaps beating their wings for extra boost.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to
repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of
baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever
else is small and form schools on my world.
This sounds a lot like the "baleen squids" of the Speculative Dinosaur Project. These animals (one of the greatest creative triumphs of the project) have two modified tentacles ending in a feather duster-like cluster of filaments which they use for filter-feeding.
I would recommend a filter-feeding lifestyle over your other idea. However, rather than copying the idea from the baleen squids, you should probably put your own spin on it. My suggestion is that they use their gills as baleen; if you look at a squid gill on an anatomy diagram, you could see how it could be repurposed as a filtering organ. This would also be consistent with your siphoning-in idea.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of
whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile
when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create
long chains of eggs.
Sounds good. William J. Sanders actually linked the large brood size of sauropods to their large size; the more offspring you can have, the higher the reproductive rate. a high reproductive rate means that there's a reduced extinction risk, and thus an opportunity to grow large.
(Also, the more offspring you have, the smaller they will likely be - in other words, the more different they'll look from the adult form. This means that they'll probably undergo an ontogenetic niche shift, where the young occupy a different niche to the adults. This also reduces the risk of extinction.)
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
Except for the locomotion bit, it all checks out. Welcome to WB.SE, by the way.
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the
purpose of obtaining more food.
Well, partially, but it's also for thermoregulatory purposes, and for defense against now-extinct "megatooth sharks" like the various Carcharocles species, Isurus hastalis and Hemipristis serra.
I've also read about the giant and
colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to
evolve to the size of whales.
No, not all. Although it should be noted, there would still have to be some significant increase in size, as squids are not very dense for their length. For comparison, a giant squid can be as long as a humpback whale, but the largest recorded individual was a hundredth of a humpback's mass.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them
to swim in the same manner as whales.
This I find unlikely. Modern cephalopods move using jet propulsion, sucking water in and expulsing it backwards through their siphons. Meanwhile, cetaceans move by undulating their spine up and down (because of their mammalian vertebrae - consider that mosasaurs and icthyosaurs had tail paddles which beat from side to side).
These are very, very different methods of locomotion, and the latter is very difficult without a flexible spine (a gladius wouldn't cut it). I'd advise you just have them use jet propulsion, perhaps beating their wings for extra boost.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to
repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of
baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever
else is small and form schools on my world.
This sounds a lot like the "baleen squids" of the Speculative Dinosaur Project. These animals (one of the greatest creative triumphs of the project) have two modified tentacles ending in a feather duster-like cluster of filaments which they use for filter-feeding.
I would recommend a filter-feeding lifestyle over your other idea. However, rather than copying the idea from the baleen squids, you should probably put your own spin on it. My suggestion is that they use their gills as baleen; if you look at a squid gill on an anatomy diagram, you could see how it could be repurposed as a filtering organ. This would also be consistent with your siphoning-in idea.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of
whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile
when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create
long chains of eggs.
Sounds good. William J. Sanders actually linked the large brood size of sauropods to their large size; the more offspring you can have, the higher the reproductive rate. a high reproductive rate means that there's a reduced extinction risk, and thus an opportunity to grow large.
(Also, the more offspring you have, the smaller they will likely be - in other words, the more different they'll look from the adult form. This means that they'll probably undergo an ontogenetic niche shift, where the young occupy a different niche to the adults. This also reduces the risk of extinction.)
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
Except for the locomotion bit, it all checks out. Welcome to WB.SE, by the way.
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the
purpose of obtaining more food.
Well, partially, but it's also for thermoregulatory purposes, and for defense against now-extinct "megatooth sharks" like the various Carcharocles species, Isurus hastalis and Hemipristis serra.
I've also read about the giant and
colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to
evolve to the size of whales.
No, not all. Although it should be noted, there would still have to be some significant increase in size, as squids are not very dense for their length. For comparison, a giant squid can be as long as a humpback whale, but the largest recorded individual was a hundredth of a humpback's mass.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them
to swim in the same manner as whales.
This I find unlikely. Modern cephalopods move using jet propulsion, sucking water in and expulsing it backwards through their siphons. Meanwhile, cetaceans move by undulating their spine up and down (because of their mammalian vertebrae - consider that mosasaurs and icthyosaurs had tail paddles which beat from side to side).
These are very, very different methods of locomotion, and the latter is very difficult without a flexible spine (a gladius wouldn't cut it). I'd advise you just have them use jet propulsion, perhaps beating their wings for extra boost.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to
repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of
baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever
else is small and form schools on my world.
This sounds a lot like the "baleen squids" of the Speculative Dinosaur Project. These animals (one of the greatest creative triumphs of the project) have two modified tentacles ending in a feather duster-like cluster of filaments which they use for filter-feeding.
I would recommend a filter-feeding lifestyle over your other idea. However, rather than copying the idea from the baleen squids, you should probably put your own spin on it. My suggestion is that they use their gills as baleen; if you look at a squid gill on an anatomy diagram, you could see how it could be repurposed as a filtering organ. This would also be consistent with your siphoning-in idea.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of
whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile
when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create
long chains of eggs.
Sounds good. William J. Sanders actually linked the large brood size of sauropods to their large size; the more offspring you can have, the higher the reproductive rate. a high reproductive rate means that there's a reduced extinction risk, and thus an opportunity to grow large.
(Also, the more offspring you have, the smaller they will likely be - in other words, the more different they'll look from the adult form. This means that they'll probably undergo an ontogenetic niche shift, where the young occupy a different niche to the adults. This also reduces the risk of extinction.)
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
Except for the locomotion bit, it all checks out. Welcome to WB.SE, by the way.
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
$endgroup$
I've heard about how whales have evolved to increase in size for the
purpose of obtaining more food.
Well, partially, but it's also for thermoregulatory purposes, and for defense against now-extinct "megatooth sharks" like the various Carcharocles species, Isurus hastalis and Hemipristis serra.
I've also read about the giant and
colossal squid, so it doesn't seem too outlandish for a squid to
evolve to the size of whales.
No, not all. Although it should be noted, there would still have to be some significant increase in size, as squids are not very dense for their length. For comparison, a giant squid can be as long as a humpback whale, but the largest recorded individual was a hundredth of a humpback's mass.
For locomotion, I'm thinking of elongating their mantles to allow them
to swim in the same manner as whales.
This I find unlikely. Modern cephalopods move using jet propulsion, sucking water in and expulsing it backwards through their siphons. Meanwhile, cetaceans move by undulating their spine up and down (because of their mammalian vertebrae - consider that mosasaurs and icthyosaurs had tail paddles which beat from side to side).
These are very, very different methods of locomotion, and the latter is very difficult without a flexible spine (a gladius wouldn't cut it). I'd advise you just have them use jet propulsion, perhaps beating their wings for extra boost.
As for feeding, I'm considering two main ideas. They are able to
repurpose their siphon to take in water, and then keep some sort of
baleen like mechanism that filters out krill, small fish, or whatever
else is small and form schools on my world.
This sounds a lot like the "baleen squids" of the Speculative Dinosaur Project. These animals (one of the greatest creative triumphs of the project) have two modified tentacles ending in a feather duster-like cluster of filaments which they use for filter-feeding.
I would recommend a filter-feeding lifestyle over your other idea. However, rather than copying the idea from the baleen squids, you should probably put your own spin on it. My suggestion is that they use their gills as baleen; if you look at a squid gill on an anatomy diagram, you could see how it could be repurposed as a filtering organ. This would also be consistent with your siphoning-in idea.
They play an important role in the ecosystem, similar to that of
whales, but more stable. They reproduce faster and are more fertile
when young. Instead of birthing single helpless calves, the create
long chains of eggs.
Sounds good. William J. Sanders actually linked the large brood size of sauropods to their large size; the more offspring you can have, the higher the reproductive rate. a high reproductive rate means that there's a reduced extinction risk, and thus an opportunity to grow large.
(Also, the more offspring you have, the smaller they will likely be - in other words, the more different they'll look from the adult form. This means that they'll probably undergo an ontogenetic niche shift, where the young occupy a different niche to the adults. This also reduces the risk of extinction.)
Does anything about this sound implausible? Let me know.
Except for the locomotion bit, it all checks out. Welcome to WB.SE, by the way.
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
answered Apr 1 at 17:20
SealBoiSealBoi
6,96112570
6,96112570
1
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
1
1
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
$begingroup$
Man, do I miss Spec World.
$endgroup$
– notovny
Apr 1 at 18:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see nothing inherently wrong with this idea. In the absence of whales and other sea mammals something would fill the niche. Prior to mammals there were very similar reptiles, so why not squid.
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see nothing inherently wrong with this idea. In the absence of whales and other sea mammals something would fill the niche. Prior to mammals there were very similar reptiles, so why not squid.
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see nothing inherently wrong with this idea. In the absence of whales and other sea mammals something would fill the niche. Prior to mammals there were very similar reptiles, so why not squid.
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
$endgroup$
I see nothing inherently wrong with this idea. In the absence of whales and other sea mammals something would fill the niche. Prior to mammals there were very similar reptiles, so why not squid.
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
answered Apr 1 at 4:09
KilisiKilisi
13.9k12261
13.9k12261
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was pondering giant molluscan filter feeders in the context of the giant nudibranch I proposed for this question.
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Really, specifically gastropod (slugs) or cephalopod (squid) filter feeders - bivalve clams are mollusks too and of course they are all filter feeders. How to change the feeding plan of a cephalopod or gastropod to filter feed? Of course there is one that does. Fortunately for the rule of cool, it is super cool too.
Your giant creature is a cephalopod filter feeder, but not a squid or octopus.
It is a giant vampire squid.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926133239.htm
Hoving soon found that if he placed bits and pieces of microscopic
animals into a tank with a vampire squid, the food particles would
stick to one of the string-like filaments that the animal sometimes
extends outward from its body. The vampire squid would then draw the
filament through its arms, removing the particles from the filament
and enveloping them in mucus. Finally, the squid would transfer the
glob of mucus and particles to its mouth and consume it.
So cool. These things live in the abyss. There is no reason they could not get huge because they live a low energy lifestyle. Maybe they do. They have long filaments which capture plankton and detritus and that is what they eat.
I could imagine something like this in an Ordovician world. Probably the jellyfish had been living in essentially this same way for eons but the giant Vampire Squid outdoes the jellyfish at their game, its molluscan body plan allowing larger size than a jelly could accomplish. Its feeding tentacles would be great for pulling in jellyfish as well as the rich broth of those ancient seas.
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was pondering giant molluscan filter feeders in the context of the giant nudibranch I proposed for this question.
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Really, specifically gastropod (slugs) or cephalopod (squid) filter feeders - bivalve clams are mollusks too and of course they are all filter feeders. How to change the feeding plan of a cephalopod or gastropod to filter feed? Of course there is one that does. Fortunately for the rule of cool, it is super cool too.
Your giant creature is a cephalopod filter feeder, but not a squid or octopus.
It is a giant vampire squid.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926133239.htm
Hoving soon found that if he placed bits and pieces of microscopic
animals into a tank with a vampire squid, the food particles would
stick to one of the string-like filaments that the animal sometimes
extends outward from its body. The vampire squid would then draw the
filament through its arms, removing the particles from the filament
and enveloping them in mucus. Finally, the squid would transfer the
glob of mucus and particles to its mouth and consume it.
So cool. These things live in the abyss. There is no reason they could not get huge because they live a low energy lifestyle. Maybe they do. They have long filaments which capture plankton and detritus and that is what they eat.
I could imagine something like this in an Ordovician world. Probably the jellyfish had been living in essentially this same way for eons but the giant Vampire Squid outdoes the jellyfish at their game, its molluscan body plan allowing larger size than a jelly could accomplish. Its feeding tentacles would be great for pulling in jellyfish as well as the rich broth of those ancient seas.
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was pondering giant molluscan filter feeders in the context of the giant nudibranch I proposed for this question.
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Really, specifically gastropod (slugs) or cephalopod (squid) filter feeders - bivalve clams are mollusks too and of course they are all filter feeders. How to change the feeding plan of a cephalopod or gastropod to filter feed? Of course there is one that does. Fortunately for the rule of cool, it is super cool too.
Your giant creature is a cephalopod filter feeder, but not a squid or octopus.
It is a giant vampire squid.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926133239.htm
Hoving soon found that if he placed bits and pieces of microscopic
animals into a tank with a vampire squid, the food particles would
stick to one of the string-like filaments that the animal sometimes
extends outward from its body. The vampire squid would then draw the
filament through its arms, removing the particles from the filament
and enveloping them in mucus. Finally, the squid would transfer the
glob of mucus and particles to its mouth and consume it.
So cool. These things live in the abyss. There is no reason they could not get huge because they live a low energy lifestyle. Maybe they do. They have long filaments which capture plankton and detritus and that is what they eat.
I could imagine something like this in an Ordovician world. Probably the jellyfish had been living in essentially this same way for eons but the giant Vampire Squid outdoes the jellyfish at their game, its molluscan body plan allowing larger size than a jelly could accomplish. Its feeding tentacles would be great for pulling in jellyfish as well as the rich broth of those ancient seas.
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
$endgroup$
I was pondering giant molluscan filter feeders in the context of the giant nudibranch I proposed for this question.
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Really, specifically gastropod (slugs) or cephalopod (squid) filter feeders - bivalve clams are mollusks too and of course they are all filter feeders. How to change the feeding plan of a cephalopod or gastropod to filter feed? Of course there is one that does. Fortunately for the rule of cool, it is super cool too.
Your giant creature is a cephalopod filter feeder, but not a squid or octopus.
It is a giant vampire squid.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926133239.htm
Hoving soon found that if he placed bits and pieces of microscopic
animals into a tank with a vampire squid, the food particles would
stick to one of the string-like filaments that the animal sometimes
extends outward from its body. The vampire squid would then draw the
filament through its arms, removing the particles from the filament
and enveloping them in mucus. Finally, the squid would transfer the
glob of mucus and particles to its mouth and consume it.
So cool. These things live in the abyss. There is no reason they could not get huge because they live a low energy lifestyle. Maybe they do. They have long filaments which capture plankton and detritus and that is what they eat.
I could imagine something like this in an Ordovician world. Probably the jellyfish had been living in essentially this same way for eons but the giant Vampire Squid outdoes the jellyfish at their game, its molluscan body plan allowing larger size than a jelly could accomplish. Its feeding tentacles would be great for pulling in jellyfish as well as the rich broth of those ancient seas.
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
answered Apr 1 at 16:43
WillkWillk
117k28221489
117k28221489
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/03/10/newfound-fossil-octopus-and-squid-were-giants/
seems to indicate that larger ancestors to squid may have lived in the past:
"The other fossil beak sat in the mouth of an even larger cephalopod. Named Haboroteuthis poseidon by the researchers, the creature was a Cretaceous member of the lineage that contains modern squid. And from its jaw size, it was quite an impressive invertebrate.
Measuring a ridge that runs up the front of squid beaks, Tanabe and coworkers found that Haboroteuthis had a “crest length” of about 2.4 inches. A 25-foot-long giant squid caught off New Zealand, by contrast, had a crest length of only 1.8 inches, and a Humbolt squid with a mantle length of almost five feet had a crest length of 1.9 inches. Haboroteuthis was at least comparable to these modern heavyweights. We may never know for sure exactly how large Haboroteuthis was, but, if its jaw is anything to go by, it was as big as some of today’s undersea giants."
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/03/10/newfound-fossil-octopus-and-squid-were-giants/
seems to indicate that larger ancestors to squid may have lived in the past:
"The other fossil beak sat in the mouth of an even larger cephalopod. Named Haboroteuthis poseidon by the researchers, the creature was a Cretaceous member of the lineage that contains modern squid. And from its jaw size, it was quite an impressive invertebrate.
Measuring a ridge that runs up the front of squid beaks, Tanabe and coworkers found that Haboroteuthis had a “crest length” of about 2.4 inches. A 25-foot-long giant squid caught off New Zealand, by contrast, had a crest length of only 1.8 inches, and a Humbolt squid with a mantle length of almost five feet had a crest length of 1.9 inches. Haboroteuthis was at least comparable to these modern heavyweights. We may never know for sure exactly how large Haboroteuthis was, but, if its jaw is anything to go by, it was as big as some of today’s undersea giants."
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/03/10/newfound-fossil-octopus-and-squid-were-giants/
seems to indicate that larger ancestors to squid may have lived in the past:
"The other fossil beak sat in the mouth of an even larger cephalopod. Named Haboroteuthis poseidon by the researchers, the creature was a Cretaceous member of the lineage that contains modern squid. And from its jaw size, it was quite an impressive invertebrate.
Measuring a ridge that runs up the front of squid beaks, Tanabe and coworkers found that Haboroteuthis had a “crest length” of about 2.4 inches. A 25-foot-long giant squid caught off New Zealand, by contrast, had a crest length of only 1.8 inches, and a Humbolt squid with a mantle length of almost five feet had a crest length of 1.9 inches. Haboroteuthis was at least comparable to these modern heavyweights. We may never know for sure exactly how large Haboroteuthis was, but, if its jaw is anything to go by, it was as big as some of today’s undersea giants."
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/03/10/newfound-fossil-octopus-and-squid-were-giants/
seems to indicate that larger ancestors to squid may have lived in the past:
"The other fossil beak sat in the mouth of an even larger cephalopod. Named Haboroteuthis poseidon by the researchers, the creature was a Cretaceous member of the lineage that contains modern squid. And from its jaw size, it was quite an impressive invertebrate.
Measuring a ridge that runs up the front of squid beaks, Tanabe and coworkers found that Haboroteuthis had a “crest length” of about 2.4 inches. A 25-foot-long giant squid caught off New Zealand, by contrast, had a crest length of only 1.8 inches, and a Humbolt squid with a mantle length of almost five feet had a crest length of 1.9 inches. Haboroteuthis was at least comparable to these modern heavyweights. We may never know for sure exactly how large Haboroteuthis was, but, if its jaw is anything to go by, it was as big as some of today’s undersea giants."
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
answered Apr 1 at 12:38
jk.jk.
19815
19815
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142918%2fplausibility-of-squid-whales%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Hmm, the one thing that strikes me as questionable is the mass-birthing. First of all, there's a reason that whales birth few singles. It's generally seen that big animals tend to have few offspring they invest a lot of energy in, while smaller animals tend to "spam". [a read on how our real giant squids reproduce will give you a more definitive answer tho]
$endgroup$
– Hobbamok
Apr 1 at 9:58
$begingroup$
@Hobbamok That applies to viviparous organisms only. Consider sauropods, which had many, many tiny offspring.
$endgroup$
– SealBoi
Apr 1 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Kraken
$endgroup$
– Jon.D.
Apr 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
actually there are many stories about evidence of even bigger squids, such as reports of stranded squids bigger than the official record, pieces of oversized tentacles found in sperm whale stomachs and oversized sucker ring marks on whale skin. This site disputes such claims: cameronmccormick.blogspot.com/2007/03/…
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
Apr 1 at 18:15