Chicken Scheme: make-table unbound variable











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to declare a hash table. Based on this SRFI I believe that the form (define x (make-table)) ought to result in the correct behavior; however, I am getting the following error.



CHICKEN
(c) 2008-2017, The CHICKEN Team
(c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann
Version 4.12.0 (rev 6ea24b6)
linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ]
compiled 2017-02-19 on yves.more-magic.net (Linux)

#;1> (make-table)

Error: unbound variable: make-table

Call history:

eval.scm:211: ##sys#get
eval.scm:218: values
eval.scm:255: ##sys#alias-global-hook
modules.scm:769: ##sys#qualified-symbol?
modules.scm:777: ##sys#active-eval-environment
modules.scm:777: g2354
modules.scm:784: mrename
modules.scm:762: ##sys#current-module
eval.scm:259: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
eval.scm:265: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
library.scm:1668: after
eval.scm:857: g1785
<eval> (make-table)
library.scm:4051: ##sys#get-call-chain
library.scm:3834: ##sys#make-vector
library.scm:1371: ##sys#allocate-vector <--


In addition, I am getting similar errors for other functions. Is it possible I have installed the interpreter incorrectly?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I am trying to declare a hash table. Based on this SRFI I believe that the form (define x (make-table)) ought to result in the correct behavior; however, I am getting the following error.



    CHICKEN
    (c) 2008-2017, The CHICKEN Team
    (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann
    Version 4.12.0 (rev 6ea24b6)
    linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ]
    compiled 2017-02-19 on yves.more-magic.net (Linux)

    #;1> (make-table)

    Error: unbound variable: make-table

    Call history:

    eval.scm:211: ##sys#get
    eval.scm:218: values
    eval.scm:255: ##sys#alias-global-hook
    modules.scm:769: ##sys#qualified-symbol?
    modules.scm:777: ##sys#active-eval-environment
    modules.scm:777: g2354
    modules.scm:784: mrename
    modules.scm:762: ##sys#current-module
    eval.scm:259: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
    eval.scm:265: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
    library.scm:1668: after
    eval.scm:857: g1785
    <eval> (make-table)
    library.scm:4051: ##sys#get-call-chain
    library.scm:3834: ##sys#make-vector
    library.scm:1371: ##sys#allocate-vector <--


    In addition, I am getting similar errors for other functions. Is it possible I have installed the interpreter incorrectly?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I am trying to declare a hash table. Based on this SRFI I believe that the form (define x (make-table)) ought to result in the correct behavior; however, I am getting the following error.



      CHICKEN
      (c) 2008-2017, The CHICKEN Team
      (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann
      Version 4.12.0 (rev 6ea24b6)
      linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ]
      compiled 2017-02-19 on yves.more-magic.net (Linux)

      #;1> (make-table)

      Error: unbound variable: make-table

      Call history:

      eval.scm:211: ##sys#get
      eval.scm:218: values
      eval.scm:255: ##sys#alias-global-hook
      modules.scm:769: ##sys#qualified-symbol?
      modules.scm:777: ##sys#active-eval-environment
      modules.scm:777: g2354
      modules.scm:784: mrename
      modules.scm:762: ##sys#current-module
      eval.scm:259: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
      eval.scm:265: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
      library.scm:1668: after
      eval.scm:857: g1785
      <eval> (make-table)
      library.scm:4051: ##sys#get-call-chain
      library.scm:3834: ##sys#make-vector
      library.scm:1371: ##sys#allocate-vector <--


      In addition, I am getting similar errors for other functions. Is it possible I have installed the interpreter incorrectly?










      share|improve this question













      I am trying to declare a hash table. Based on this SRFI I believe that the form (define x (make-table)) ought to result in the correct behavior; however, I am getting the following error.



      CHICKEN
      (c) 2008-2017, The CHICKEN Team
      (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann
      Version 4.12.0 (rev 6ea24b6)
      linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ]
      compiled 2017-02-19 on yves.more-magic.net (Linux)

      #;1> (make-table)

      Error: unbound variable: make-table

      Call history:

      eval.scm:211: ##sys#get
      eval.scm:218: values
      eval.scm:255: ##sys#alias-global-hook
      modules.scm:769: ##sys#qualified-symbol?
      modules.scm:777: ##sys#active-eval-environment
      modules.scm:777: g2354
      modules.scm:784: mrename
      modules.scm:762: ##sys#current-module
      eval.scm:259: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
      eval.scm:265: ##sys#symbol-has-toplevel-binding?
      library.scm:1668: after
      eval.scm:857: g1785
      <eval> (make-table)
      library.scm:4051: ##sys#get-call-chain
      library.scm:3834: ##sys#make-vector
      library.scm:1371: ##sys#allocate-vector <--


      In addition, I am getting similar errors for other functions. Is it possible I have installed the interpreter incorrectly?







      chicken-scheme






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 9:17









      Banner

      588618




      588618
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          CHICKEN does not ship with SRFI 90, and as far as I can tell so far nobody has made an egg for it, either. An earlier and more commonly used hash table library, SRFI-69, is part of core, though. It is also not available by default, you'll need to use it like so:



          (use srfi-69)


          In CHICKEN 5 (which I highly recommend you install, as it has many many improvements and is the currently supported major version), SRFI-69 is no longer part of core but can be installed as an egg via chicken-install. There, use no longer exists. Instead, after installing the egg you can import it like so:



          (import srfi-69)


          As an aside, SRFIs are "requests for implementation", and not every Scheme system implements every single SRFI. Sometimes because people object to the SRFI (some are controversial), sometimes because nobody has gotten around to it, sometimes because the SRFI is unimplementable/does make sense for a particular Scheme (for example, a C FFI makes no sense in a Scheme running on the JVM).



          You'd have to check your Scheme's features to see if the SRFI you'd like to use is included. Note that for CHICKEN, many SRFIs are implemented outside of the core via eggs. CHICKEN core includes only a handful of SRFIs, like 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 30, 39, 55, 69. In CHICKEN 5, the SRFIs 1, 13, 14 and 69 have been taken out of core as they can be implemented externally quite easily. Check the list of eggs for more SRFI implementations.



          Edit: I forgot, there's a wiki page that strives to list all supported SRFIs exhaustively. It hasn't been updated for CHICKEN 5 yet, but the list should eventually be the same, as more and more eggs get ported from CHICKEN 4 to 5 (and even become longer, given that CHICKEN 5 sees much new development).






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
            – Banner
            Nov 23 at 5:14












          • Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 10:22










          • Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
            – Banner
            Nov 24 at 11:15










          • It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 11:43






          • 1




            Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
            – sjamaan
            19 hours ago











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53371487%2fchicken-scheme-make-table-unbound-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          CHICKEN does not ship with SRFI 90, and as far as I can tell so far nobody has made an egg for it, either. An earlier and more commonly used hash table library, SRFI-69, is part of core, though. It is also not available by default, you'll need to use it like so:



          (use srfi-69)


          In CHICKEN 5 (which I highly recommend you install, as it has many many improvements and is the currently supported major version), SRFI-69 is no longer part of core but can be installed as an egg via chicken-install. There, use no longer exists. Instead, after installing the egg you can import it like so:



          (import srfi-69)


          As an aside, SRFIs are "requests for implementation", and not every Scheme system implements every single SRFI. Sometimes because people object to the SRFI (some are controversial), sometimes because nobody has gotten around to it, sometimes because the SRFI is unimplementable/does make sense for a particular Scheme (for example, a C FFI makes no sense in a Scheme running on the JVM).



          You'd have to check your Scheme's features to see if the SRFI you'd like to use is included. Note that for CHICKEN, many SRFIs are implemented outside of the core via eggs. CHICKEN core includes only a handful of SRFIs, like 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 30, 39, 55, 69. In CHICKEN 5, the SRFIs 1, 13, 14 and 69 have been taken out of core as they can be implemented externally quite easily. Check the list of eggs for more SRFI implementations.



          Edit: I forgot, there's a wiki page that strives to list all supported SRFIs exhaustively. It hasn't been updated for CHICKEN 5 yet, but the list should eventually be the same, as more and more eggs get ported from CHICKEN 4 to 5 (and even become longer, given that CHICKEN 5 sees much new development).






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
            – Banner
            Nov 23 at 5:14












          • Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 10:22










          • Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
            – Banner
            Nov 24 at 11:15










          • It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 11:43






          • 1




            Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
            – sjamaan
            19 hours ago















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          CHICKEN does not ship with SRFI 90, and as far as I can tell so far nobody has made an egg for it, either. An earlier and more commonly used hash table library, SRFI-69, is part of core, though. It is also not available by default, you'll need to use it like so:



          (use srfi-69)


          In CHICKEN 5 (which I highly recommend you install, as it has many many improvements and is the currently supported major version), SRFI-69 is no longer part of core but can be installed as an egg via chicken-install. There, use no longer exists. Instead, after installing the egg you can import it like so:



          (import srfi-69)


          As an aside, SRFIs are "requests for implementation", and not every Scheme system implements every single SRFI. Sometimes because people object to the SRFI (some are controversial), sometimes because nobody has gotten around to it, sometimes because the SRFI is unimplementable/does make sense for a particular Scheme (for example, a C FFI makes no sense in a Scheme running on the JVM).



          You'd have to check your Scheme's features to see if the SRFI you'd like to use is included. Note that for CHICKEN, many SRFIs are implemented outside of the core via eggs. CHICKEN core includes only a handful of SRFIs, like 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 30, 39, 55, 69. In CHICKEN 5, the SRFIs 1, 13, 14 and 69 have been taken out of core as they can be implemented externally quite easily. Check the list of eggs for more SRFI implementations.



          Edit: I forgot, there's a wiki page that strives to list all supported SRFIs exhaustively. It hasn't been updated for CHICKEN 5 yet, but the list should eventually be the same, as more and more eggs get ported from CHICKEN 4 to 5 (and even become longer, given that CHICKEN 5 sees much new development).






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
            – Banner
            Nov 23 at 5:14












          • Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 10:22










          • Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
            – Banner
            Nov 24 at 11:15










          • It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 11:43






          • 1




            Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
            – sjamaan
            19 hours ago













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          CHICKEN does not ship with SRFI 90, and as far as I can tell so far nobody has made an egg for it, either. An earlier and more commonly used hash table library, SRFI-69, is part of core, though. It is also not available by default, you'll need to use it like so:



          (use srfi-69)


          In CHICKEN 5 (which I highly recommend you install, as it has many many improvements and is the currently supported major version), SRFI-69 is no longer part of core but can be installed as an egg via chicken-install. There, use no longer exists. Instead, after installing the egg you can import it like so:



          (import srfi-69)


          As an aside, SRFIs are "requests for implementation", and not every Scheme system implements every single SRFI. Sometimes because people object to the SRFI (some are controversial), sometimes because nobody has gotten around to it, sometimes because the SRFI is unimplementable/does make sense for a particular Scheme (for example, a C FFI makes no sense in a Scheme running on the JVM).



          You'd have to check your Scheme's features to see if the SRFI you'd like to use is included. Note that for CHICKEN, many SRFIs are implemented outside of the core via eggs. CHICKEN core includes only a handful of SRFIs, like 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 30, 39, 55, 69. In CHICKEN 5, the SRFIs 1, 13, 14 and 69 have been taken out of core as they can be implemented externally quite easily. Check the list of eggs for more SRFI implementations.



          Edit: I forgot, there's a wiki page that strives to list all supported SRFIs exhaustively. It hasn't been updated for CHICKEN 5 yet, but the list should eventually be the same, as more and more eggs get ported from CHICKEN 4 to 5 (and even become longer, given that CHICKEN 5 sees much new development).






          share|improve this answer














          CHICKEN does not ship with SRFI 90, and as far as I can tell so far nobody has made an egg for it, either. An earlier and more commonly used hash table library, SRFI-69, is part of core, though. It is also not available by default, you'll need to use it like so:



          (use srfi-69)


          In CHICKEN 5 (which I highly recommend you install, as it has many many improvements and is the currently supported major version), SRFI-69 is no longer part of core but can be installed as an egg via chicken-install. There, use no longer exists. Instead, after installing the egg you can import it like so:



          (import srfi-69)


          As an aside, SRFIs are "requests for implementation", and not every Scheme system implements every single SRFI. Sometimes because people object to the SRFI (some are controversial), sometimes because nobody has gotten around to it, sometimes because the SRFI is unimplementable/does make sense for a particular Scheme (for example, a C FFI makes no sense in a Scheme running on the JVM).



          You'd have to check your Scheme's features to see if the SRFI you'd like to use is included. Note that for CHICKEN, many SRFIs are implemented outside of the core via eggs. CHICKEN core includes only a handful of SRFIs, like 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 30, 39, 55, 69. In CHICKEN 5, the SRFIs 1, 13, 14 and 69 have been taken out of core as they can be implemented externally quite easily. Check the list of eggs for more SRFI implementations.



          Edit: I forgot, there's a wiki page that strives to list all supported SRFIs exhaustively. It hasn't been updated for CHICKEN 5 yet, but the list should eventually be the same, as more and more eggs get ported from CHICKEN 4 to 5 (and even become longer, given that CHICKEN 5 sees much new development).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 at 10:58

























          answered Nov 19 at 10:41









          sjamaan

          1,536516




          1,536516












          • Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
            – Banner
            Nov 23 at 5:14












          • Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 10:22










          • Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
            – Banner
            Nov 24 at 11:15










          • It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 11:43






          • 1




            Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
            – sjamaan
            19 hours ago


















          • Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
            – Banner
            Nov 23 at 5:14












          • Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 10:22










          • Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
            – Banner
            Nov 24 at 11:15










          • It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
            – sjamaan
            Nov 24 at 11:43






          • 1




            Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
            – sjamaan
            19 hours ago
















          Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
          – Banner
          Nov 23 at 5:14






          Thanks for your response. I got version 5 setup. I am having trouble installing srfi-69 (or any other egg) with chicken-install I get an error Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69". Is this a problem with not having the correct egg repository? I have tried with the sudo and verbose flag but the output is the same.
          – Banner
          Nov 23 at 5:14














          Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
          – sjamaan
          Nov 24 at 10:22




          Can you paste the full output of chicken-install -verbose srfi-69?
          – sjamaan
          Nov 24 at 10:22












          Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
          – Banner
          Nov 24 at 11:15




          Absolutely srfi-69 not cached Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-69"
          – Banner
          Nov 24 at 11:15












          It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
          – sjamaan
          Nov 24 at 11:43




          It looks like you installed CHICKEN with a PREFIX that is wrong (or you haven't installed CHICKEN yet?). Please try chicken-install -u, see if that gives an error.
          – sjamaan
          Nov 24 at 11:43




          1




          1




          Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
          – sjamaan
          19 hours ago




          Good to hear you at least found out the cause. Certainly you can set $PREFIX to whatever you want (can be /opt/chicken or ~/chicken, whichever you prefer). However, when you invoke make for the first time, it will write a chicken-config.h which contains these path settings (using the default PREFIX if you did not supply one). If later you call make again with a different PREFIX, it will not regenerate chicken-config.h, causing a mismatch between where it installs CHICKEN versus where it looks for data and config files; if you set PREFIX, use he same on every make call.
          – sjamaan
          19 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53371487%2fchicken-scheme-make-table-unbound-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?