inversion: …in regards to why aren't peple reacting





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical




  • ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting


link to video 18:30










share|improve this question






















  • No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
    – BillJ
    Nov 30 at 15:25










  • @BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
    – GJC
    Nov 30 at 15:38

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical




  • ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting


link to video 18:30










share|improve this question






















  • No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
    – BillJ
    Nov 30 at 15:25










  • @BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
    – GJC
    Nov 30 at 15:38













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical




  • ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting


link to video 18:30










share|improve this question













I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical




  • ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting


link to video 18:30







american-english formality speech inversion






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 30 at 14:37









GJC

325210




325210












  • No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
    – BillJ
    Nov 30 at 15:25










  • @BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
    – GJC
    Nov 30 at 15:38


















  • No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
    – BillJ
    Nov 30 at 15:25










  • @BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
    – GJC
    Nov 30 at 15:38
















No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25




No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25












@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38




@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475094%2finversion-in-regards-to-why-arent-peple-reacting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475094%2finversion-in-regards-to-why-arent-peple-reacting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

RAC Tourist Trophy