inversion: …in regards to why aren't peple reacting
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical
- ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting
link to video 18:30
american-english formality speech inversion
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical
- ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting
link to video 18:30
american-english formality speech inversion
No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25
@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical
- ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting
link to video 18:30
american-english formality speech inversion
I'd like to know whether the following invesion is grammatical
- ...in regards to why aren't peple reacting
link to video 18:30
american-english formality speech inversion
american-english formality speech inversion
asked Nov 30 at 14:37
GJC
325210
325210
No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25
@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38
add a comment |
No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25
@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38
No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25
No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25
@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38
@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475094%2finversion-in-regards-to-why-arent-peple-reacting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
No, it should be "... to [why people aren't reacting]". Subordinate interrogatives (embedded questions) do not have subject-auxiliary inversion
– BillJ
Nov 30 at 15:25
@BillJ Why do you think he didn't uninverted it?
– GJC
Nov 30 at 15:38