Making a Perfect Cusp Tikz











up vote
8
down vote

favorite












This Cusp I made came out awkward and I can not fix it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5);
draw (1.5,2.5) to [out=-80, in=175] (2.75,.4);
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


This outputs:



enter image description here



I am trying to achieve:



enter image description here



Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.










share|improve this question
























  • What precisely do you want to achieve? (The top is tilted since you have in=80 and out=-80 instead of 90.)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 14:30










  • @Marmot, I posted above what I am trying to achieve, I didn't think I'd have to ask a question on this but I also tried 90 and could not get the look I wanted.
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:09












  • How about draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5) to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);?
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:13















up vote
8
down vote

favorite












This Cusp I made came out awkward and I can not fix it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5);
draw (1.5,2.5) to [out=-80, in=175] (2.75,.4);
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


This outputs:



enter image description here



I am trying to achieve:



enter image description here



Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.










share|improve this question
























  • What precisely do you want to achieve? (The top is tilted since you have in=80 and out=-80 instead of 90.)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 14:30










  • @Marmot, I posted above what I am trying to achieve, I didn't think I'd have to ask a question on this but I also tried 90 and could not get the look I wanted.
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:09












  • How about draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5) to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);?
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:13













up vote
8
down vote

favorite









up vote
8
down vote

favorite











This Cusp I made came out awkward and I can not fix it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5);
draw (1.5,2.5) to [out=-80, in=175] (2.75,.4);
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


This outputs:



enter image description here



I am trying to achieve:



enter image description here



Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.










share|improve this question















This Cusp I made came out awkward and I can not fix it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5);
draw (1.5,2.5) to [out=-80, in=175] (2.75,.4);
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


This outputs:



enter image description here



I am trying to achieve:



enter image description here



Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.







tikz-pgf






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 30 at 15:08

























asked Nov 30 at 14:19









MathScholar

4658




4658












  • What precisely do you want to achieve? (The top is tilted since you have in=80 and out=-80 instead of 90.)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 14:30










  • @Marmot, I posted above what I am trying to achieve, I didn't think I'd have to ask a question on this but I also tried 90 and could not get the look I wanted.
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:09












  • How about draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5) to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);?
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:13


















  • What precisely do you want to achieve? (The top is tilted since you have in=80 and out=-80 instead of 90.)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 14:30










  • @Marmot, I posted above what I am trying to achieve, I didn't think I'd have to ask a question on this but I also tried 90 and could not get the look I wanted.
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:09












  • How about draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5) to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);?
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:13
















What precisely do you want to achieve? (The top is tilted since you have in=80 and out=-80 instead of 90.)
– marmot
Nov 30 at 14:30




What precisely do you want to achieve? (The top is tilted since you have in=80 and out=-80 instead of 90.)
– marmot
Nov 30 at 14:30












@Marmot, I posted above what I am trying to achieve, I didn't think I'd have to ask a question on this but I also tried 90 and could not get the look I wanted.
– MathScholar
Nov 30 at 15:09






@Marmot, I posted above what I am trying to achieve, I didn't think I'd have to ask a question on this but I also tried 90 and could not get the look I wanted.
– MathScholar
Nov 30 at 15:09














How about draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5) to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);?
– marmot
Nov 30 at 15:13




How about draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5) to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);?
– marmot
Nov 30 at 15:13










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I guess the sign of 80 in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is the culprit.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5)
to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);
draw[thin] (1.5,2.5) -- ++ (0.2,0.6) node[above]{$f'(a)$ does not exist};
draw (1.5,0.2) -- (1.5,-0.2) node[below]{$a$};
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
    – gusbrs
    Nov 30 at 15:17












  • @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:20












  • @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:21










  • @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:22










  • Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 30 at 15:23


















up vote
4
down vote













Here is a solution using the pgfplots package, which extends tikz to include a wide variety of plotting options:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{pgfplots}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,xtick={0.5},xticklabels=$a$,axis lines=left,ymajorticks=false,xlabel=$x$,ylabel=$y$,clip=false]
addplot [domain=0.1:0.5] {0.1+x^2} node [pos=0.2,above left] {$f$};
addplot [domain=0.5:0.9] {0.1+(x-1)^2} node[pin={90: $f'(a)$ does not exist.} ] at (axis cs:0.5,0.35) {};
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:41




















up vote
2
down vote













A PSTricks solution just for comparison purposes.



documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-plot,pst-plot}
deff#1{(x-#1)^2+1}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}[algebraic,ticks=none,labels=none](-.4,-.5)(4.5,3.5)
psaxes{->}(0,0)(-.3,-.4)(4,3)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
psplot{1}{2}{f{1}}
psplot{2}{3}{f{3}}
psxTick[labelsep=1pt](2){a}
rput(2.2,3){rnode[b]{a}{$f'(a)$ does not exist}}
pcline[nodesep=2pt]{->}(a)(*2 {f{1}})
end{pspicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462564%2fmaking-a-perfect-cusp-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    I guess the sign of 80 in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is the culprit.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
    tikzset{axes/.style={}}
    % The graphic
    begin{scope}[style=axes]
    draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
    draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
    draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5)
    to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);
    draw[thin] (1.5,2.5) -- ++ (0.2,0.6) node[above]{$f'(a)$ does not exist};
    draw (1.5,0.2) -- (1.5,-0.2) node[below]{$a$};
    %%%
    end{scope}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:17












    • @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:20












    • @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:21










    • @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:22










    • Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:23















    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    I guess the sign of 80 in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is the culprit.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
    tikzset{axes/.style={}}
    % The graphic
    begin{scope}[style=axes]
    draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
    draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
    draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5)
    to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);
    draw[thin] (1.5,2.5) -- ++ (0.2,0.6) node[above]{$f'(a)$ does not exist};
    draw (1.5,0.2) -- (1.5,-0.2) node[below]{$a$};
    %%%
    end{scope}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:17












    • @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:20












    • @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:21










    • @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:22










    • Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:23













    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted






    I guess the sign of 80 in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is the culprit.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
    tikzset{axes/.style={}}
    % The graphic
    begin{scope}[style=axes]
    draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
    draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
    draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5)
    to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);
    draw[thin] (1.5,2.5) -- ++ (0.2,0.6) node[above]{$f'(a)$ does not exist};
    draw (1.5,0.2) -- (1.5,-0.2) node[below]{$a$};
    %%%
    end{scope}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer














    I guess the sign of 80 in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is the culprit.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1,cap=round]
    tikzset{axes/.style={}}
    % The graphic
    begin{scope}[style=axes]
    draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (3,0) node[below] {$x$};
    draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
    draw[thick] (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=-90] (1.5,2.5)
    to [out=-90, in=175] (2.75,.4);
    draw[thin] (1.5,2.5) -- ++ (0.2,0.6) node[above]{$f'(a)$ does not exist};
    draw (1.5,0.2) -- (1.5,-0.2) node[below]{$a$};
    %%%
    end{scope}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 30 at 15:24

























    answered Nov 30 at 15:16









    marmot

    80.5k491172




    80.5k491172








    • 1




      marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:17












    • @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:20












    • @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:21










    • @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:22










    • Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:23














    • 1




      marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:17












    • @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:20












    • @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:21










    • @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
      – marmot
      Nov 30 at 15:22










    • Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
      – gusbrs
      Nov 30 at 15:23








    1




    1




    marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
    – gusbrs
    Nov 30 at 15:17






    marmot, why does it have to be 90? (Side note $f'(a)$ does not exist).
    – gusbrs
    Nov 30 at 15:17














    @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:20






    @gusbrs Well, that's how I interpreted "Note it is not exactly symmetric either but the head is cleaner.". I thought the OP wants to have it symmetric. (And thanks for the note!)
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:20














    @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:21




    @Marmot, that works but I thought I tried that. Eyes playing tricks on me. Not sure exactly what we changed Thanks Marmot!
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:21












    @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:22




    @MathScholar I guess the sign of in in draw (0.25,0.4) to [out=10,in=80] (1.5,2.5); is crucial. I have a - there.
    – marmot
    Nov 30 at 15:22












    Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 30 at 15:23




    Well, conceptually, we could still have side derivatives (is this how this is said in english?...) reaching "a" at 80 degrees and the derivative in a would not exist. The graphic would be symmetric like this. But the question is why doesn't tikz accept it?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 30 at 15:23










    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Here is a solution using the pgfplots package, which extends tikz to include a wide variety of plotting options:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{pgfplots}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,xtick={0.5},xticklabels=$a$,axis lines=left,ymajorticks=false,xlabel=$x$,ylabel=$y$,clip=false]
    addplot [domain=0.1:0.5] {0.1+x^2} node [pos=0.2,above left] {$f$};
    addplot [domain=0.5:0.9] {0.1+(x-1)^2} node[pin={90: $f'(a)$ does not exist.} ] at (axis cs:0.5,0.35) {};
    end{axis}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:41

















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Here is a solution using the pgfplots package, which extends tikz to include a wide variety of plotting options:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{pgfplots}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,xtick={0.5},xticklabels=$a$,axis lines=left,ymajorticks=false,xlabel=$x$,ylabel=$y$,clip=false]
    addplot [domain=0.1:0.5] {0.1+x^2} node [pos=0.2,above left] {$f$};
    addplot [domain=0.5:0.9] {0.1+(x-1)^2} node[pin={90: $f'(a)$ does not exist.} ] at (axis cs:0.5,0.35) {};
    end{axis}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:41















    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    Here is a solution using the pgfplots package, which extends tikz to include a wide variety of plotting options:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{pgfplots}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,xtick={0.5},xticklabels=$a$,axis lines=left,ymajorticks=false,xlabel=$x$,ylabel=$y$,clip=false]
    addplot [domain=0.1:0.5] {0.1+x^2} node [pos=0.2,above left] {$f$};
    addplot [domain=0.5:0.9] {0.1+(x-1)^2} node[pin={90: $f'(a)$ does not exist.} ] at (axis cs:0.5,0.35) {};
    end{axis}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer












    Here is a solution using the pgfplots package, which extends tikz to include a wide variety of plotting options:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{pgfplots}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,xtick={0.5},xticklabels=$a$,axis lines=left,ymajorticks=false,xlabel=$x$,ylabel=$y$,clip=false]
    addplot [domain=0.1:0.5] {0.1+x^2} node [pos=0.2,above left] {$f$};
    addplot [domain=0.5:0.9] {0.1+(x-1)^2} node[pin={90: $f'(a)$ does not exist.} ] at (axis cs:0.5,0.35) {};
    end{axis}
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 30 at 15:32









    Ubiquitous

    1,6391020




    1,6391020












    • @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:41




















    • @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
      – MathScholar
      Nov 30 at 15:41


















    @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:41






    @Ubiquitos Thank you for your answer. I needed a corner with a more vertical right and left tangent, but someone else will find this very useful to them. Thanks for sharing
    – MathScholar
    Nov 30 at 15:41












    up vote
    2
    down vote













    A PSTricks solution just for comparison purposes.



    documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
    usepackage{pst-plot,pst-plot}
    deff#1{(x-#1)^2+1}
    begin{document}
    begin{pspicture}[algebraic,ticks=none,labels=none](-.4,-.5)(4.5,3.5)
    psaxes{->}(0,0)(-.3,-.4)(4,3)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
    psplot{1}{2}{f{1}}
    psplot{2}{3}{f{3}}
    psxTick[labelsep=1pt](2){a}
    rput(2.2,3){rnode[b]{a}{$f'(a)$ does not exist}}
    pcline[nodesep=2pt]{->}(a)(*2 {f{1}})
    end{pspicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      A PSTricks solution just for comparison purposes.



      documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
      usepackage{pst-plot,pst-plot}
      deff#1{(x-#1)^2+1}
      begin{document}
      begin{pspicture}[algebraic,ticks=none,labels=none](-.4,-.5)(4.5,3.5)
      psaxes{->}(0,0)(-.3,-.4)(4,3)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
      psplot{1}{2}{f{1}}
      psplot{2}{3}{f{3}}
      psxTick[labelsep=1pt](2){a}
      rput(2.2,3){rnode[b]{a}{$f'(a)$ does not exist}}
      pcline[nodesep=2pt]{->}(a)(*2 {f{1}})
      end{pspicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        A PSTricks solution just for comparison purposes.



        documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
        usepackage{pst-plot,pst-plot}
        deff#1{(x-#1)^2+1}
        begin{document}
        begin{pspicture}[algebraic,ticks=none,labels=none](-.4,-.5)(4.5,3.5)
        psaxes{->}(0,0)(-.3,-.4)(4,3)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
        psplot{1}{2}{f{1}}
        psplot{2}{3}{f{3}}
        psxTick[labelsep=1pt](2){a}
        rput(2.2,3){rnode[b]{a}{$f'(a)$ does not exist}}
        pcline[nodesep=2pt]{->}(a)(*2 {f{1}})
        end{pspicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer












        A PSTricks solution just for comparison purposes.



        documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
        usepackage{pst-plot,pst-plot}
        deff#1{(x-#1)^2+1}
        begin{document}
        begin{pspicture}[algebraic,ticks=none,labels=none](-.4,-.5)(4.5,3.5)
        psaxes{->}(0,0)(-.3,-.4)(4,3)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
        psplot{1}{2}{f{1}}
        psplot{2}{3}{f{3}}
        psxTick[labelsep=1pt](2){a}
        rput(2.2,3){rnode[b]{a}{$f'(a)$ does not exist}}
        pcline[nodesep=2pt]{->}(a)(*2 {f{1}})
        end{pspicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 at 16:54









        Artificial Stupidity

        4,32611037




        4,32611037






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462564%2fmaking-a-perfect-cusp-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]