adequate/sufficient + amount of time












2














When should I put "amount of" after "sufficient" or "adequate"?



I have found a mix of both and I couldn't figure out a pattern or logic in the usage.




  1. Many villagers had also felt that the proposal did not offer adequate parking.


  2. These boys are not brought up with an adequate amount of respect for the opposite sex.


  3. Allocation of adequate resources for research in these fields is highly desirable.


  4. If I had not had sufficient cash on me I would have had to find my own way to the nearest cash machine.


  5. Therefore, if a sufficient amount of fiat money is supplied, the fixed asset (land) need not play the role of commodity money in the equilibrium.


  6. This means that by employing only a user corpus, we cannot obtain a sufficient amount of data to construct a good language model.


  7. If not all, then a sufficient amount of material could be made available.


  8. They are assumed to save during working periods to ensure they have sufficient income when not working.


  9. One of the major stumbling blocks may be the availability of sufficient capital to fund the company's start up operations.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/example/english/sufficient-amount



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sufficient



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/adequate



so let say we talk about water, then which one of the followings is right?



i. During summer, make sure you drink enough water.



ii. During summer, make sure you drink adequate amount of water.



iii. During summer, make sure you drink sufficient amount of water.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • All are acceptable, except that it needs to be an adequate/a sufficient amount.
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • I'd say amount of is superfluous. It doesn't add anything, but it is not ungrammatical to have it there.
    – Kris
    2 days ago
















2














When should I put "amount of" after "sufficient" or "adequate"?



I have found a mix of both and I couldn't figure out a pattern or logic in the usage.




  1. Many villagers had also felt that the proposal did not offer adequate parking.


  2. These boys are not brought up with an adequate amount of respect for the opposite sex.


  3. Allocation of adequate resources for research in these fields is highly desirable.


  4. If I had not had sufficient cash on me I would have had to find my own way to the nearest cash machine.


  5. Therefore, if a sufficient amount of fiat money is supplied, the fixed asset (land) need not play the role of commodity money in the equilibrium.


  6. This means that by employing only a user corpus, we cannot obtain a sufficient amount of data to construct a good language model.


  7. If not all, then a sufficient amount of material could be made available.


  8. They are assumed to save during working periods to ensure they have sufficient income when not working.


  9. One of the major stumbling blocks may be the availability of sufficient capital to fund the company's start up operations.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/example/english/sufficient-amount



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sufficient



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/adequate



so let say we talk about water, then which one of the followings is right?



i. During summer, make sure you drink enough water.



ii. During summer, make sure you drink adequate amount of water.



iii. During summer, make sure you drink sufficient amount of water.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • All are acceptable, except that it needs to be an adequate/a sufficient amount.
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • I'd say amount of is superfluous. It doesn't add anything, but it is not ungrammatical to have it there.
    – Kris
    2 days ago














2












2








2







When should I put "amount of" after "sufficient" or "adequate"?



I have found a mix of both and I couldn't figure out a pattern or logic in the usage.




  1. Many villagers had also felt that the proposal did not offer adequate parking.


  2. These boys are not brought up with an adequate amount of respect for the opposite sex.


  3. Allocation of adequate resources for research in these fields is highly desirable.


  4. If I had not had sufficient cash on me I would have had to find my own way to the nearest cash machine.


  5. Therefore, if a sufficient amount of fiat money is supplied, the fixed asset (land) need not play the role of commodity money in the equilibrium.


  6. This means that by employing only a user corpus, we cannot obtain a sufficient amount of data to construct a good language model.


  7. If not all, then a sufficient amount of material could be made available.


  8. They are assumed to save during working periods to ensure they have sufficient income when not working.


  9. One of the major stumbling blocks may be the availability of sufficient capital to fund the company's start up operations.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/example/english/sufficient-amount



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sufficient



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/adequate



so let say we talk about water, then which one of the followings is right?



i. During summer, make sure you drink enough water.



ii. During summer, make sure you drink adequate amount of water.



iii. During summer, make sure you drink sufficient amount of water.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











When should I put "amount of" after "sufficient" or "adequate"?



I have found a mix of both and I couldn't figure out a pattern or logic in the usage.




  1. Many villagers had also felt that the proposal did not offer adequate parking.


  2. These boys are not brought up with an adequate amount of respect for the opposite sex.


  3. Allocation of adequate resources for research in these fields is highly desirable.


  4. If I had not had sufficient cash on me I would have had to find my own way to the nearest cash machine.


  5. Therefore, if a sufficient amount of fiat money is supplied, the fixed asset (land) need not play the role of commodity money in the equilibrium.


  6. This means that by employing only a user corpus, we cannot obtain a sufficient amount of data to construct a good language model.


  7. If not all, then a sufficient amount of material could be made available.


  8. They are assumed to save during working periods to ensure they have sufficient income when not working.


  9. One of the major stumbling blocks may be the availability of sufficient capital to fund the company's start up operations.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/example/english/sufficient-amount



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sufficient



https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/adequate



so let say we talk about water, then which one of the followings is right?



i. During summer, make sure you drink enough water.



ii. During summer, make sure you drink adequate amount of water.



iii. During summer, make sure you drink sufficient amount of water.







grammar






share|improve this question









New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









KarlG

19.7k52855




19.7k52855






New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Cornelius ChanCornelius Chan

112




112




New contributor




Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Cornelius Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • All are acceptable, except that it needs to be an adequate/a sufficient amount.
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • I'd say amount of is superfluous. It doesn't add anything, but it is not ungrammatical to have it there.
    – Kris
    2 days ago


















  • All are acceptable, except that it needs to be an adequate/a sufficient amount.
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • I'd say amount of is superfluous. It doesn't add anything, but it is not ungrammatical to have it there.
    – Kris
    2 days ago
















All are acceptable, except that it needs to be an adequate/a sufficient amount.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago




All are acceptable, except that it needs to be an adequate/a sufficient amount.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago












I'd say amount of is superfluous. It doesn't add anything, but it is not ungrammatical to have it there.
– Kris
2 days ago




I'd say amount of is superfluous. It doesn't add anything, but it is not ungrammatical to have it there.
– Kris
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I can't agree with Kris and Poetically Psychotic that "amount of" is superfluous in all cases.



sufficient means as much as is needed for a particular purpose, so "sufficient water" and "a sufficient amount of water" do actually mean the same.



But adequate has two definitions: enough in quantity or of a good enough quality for a particular purpose. So, in theory, "adequate water" could equally mean "water of a good enough quality" (say, potable water as opposed to process water). Arguably, "drink good enough water" is a less likely thing to say than "drink enough water". But I'd still go with "an adequate amount of water", as --to me-- it also sounds more natural.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    0














    I think it comes down to a combination of formality and flow. Adding "amount of" makes the phrase slightly more informal, but the difference is subtle enough that much of the time the speaker or writer will choose to include it or not based on which way they feel will make the sentence flow better. Ultimately, either would be correct in any context I can think of.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • See also my comment at OP.
      – Kris
      2 days ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Cornelius Chan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480309%2fadequate-sufficient-amount-of-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    I can't agree with Kris and Poetically Psychotic that "amount of" is superfluous in all cases.



    sufficient means as much as is needed for a particular purpose, so "sufficient water" and "a sufficient amount of water" do actually mean the same.



    But adequate has two definitions: enough in quantity or of a good enough quality for a particular purpose. So, in theory, "adequate water" could equally mean "water of a good enough quality" (say, potable water as opposed to process water). Arguably, "drink good enough water" is a less likely thing to say than "drink enough water". But I'd still go with "an adequate amount of water", as --to me-- it also sounds more natural.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      1














      I can't agree with Kris and Poetically Psychotic that "amount of" is superfluous in all cases.



      sufficient means as much as is needed for a particular purpose, so "sufficient water" and "a sufficient amount of water" do actually mean the same.



      But adequate has two definitions: enough in quantity or of a good enough quality for a particular purpose. So, in theory, "adequate water" could equally mean "water of a good enough quality" (say, potable water as opposed to process water). Arguably, "drink good enough water" is a less likely thing to say than "drink enough water". But I'd still go with "an adequate amount of water", as --to me-- it also sounds more natural.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        1












        1








        1






        I can't agree with Kris and Poetically Psychotic that "amount of" is superfluous in all cases.



        sufficient means as much as is needed for a particular purpose, so "sufficient water" and "a sufficient amount of water" do actually mean the same.



        But adequate has two definitions: enough in quantity or of a good enough quality for a particular purpose. So, in theory, "adequate water" could equally mean "water of a good enough quality" (say, potable water as opposed to process water). Arguably, "drink good enough water" is a less likely thing to say than "drink enough water". But I'd still go with "an adequate amount of water", as --to me-- it also sounds more natural.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        I can't agree with Kris and Poetically Psychotic that "amount of" is superfluous in all cases.



        sufficient means as much as is needed for a particular purpose, so "sufficient water" and "a sufficient amount of water" do actually mean the same.



        But adequate has two definitions: enough in quantity or of a good enough quality for a particular purpose. So, in theory, "adequate water" could equally mean "water of a good enough quality" (say, potable water as opposed to process water). Arguably, "drink good enough water" is a less likely thing to say than "drink enough water". But I'd still go with "an adequate amount of water", as --to me-- it also sounds more natural.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago





















        New contributor




        lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 days ago









        lupolupo

        112




        112




        New contributor




        lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        lupo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.

























            0














            I think it comes down to a combination of formality and flow. Adding "amount of" makes the phrase slightly more informal, but the difference is subtle enough that much of the time the speaker or writer will choose to include it or not based on which way they feel will make the sentence flow better. Ultimately, either would be correct in any context I can think of.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • See also my comment at OP.
              – Kris
              2 days ago
















            0














            I think it comes down to a combination of formality and flow. Adding "amount of" makes the phrase slightly more informal, but the difference is subtle enough that much of the time the speaker or writer will choose to include it or not based on which way they feel will make the sentence flow better. Ultimately, either would be correct in any context I can think of.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • See also my comment at OP.
              – Kris
              2 days ago














            0












            0








            0






            I think it comes down to a combination of formality and flow. Adding "amount of" makes the phrase slightly more informal, but the difference is subtle enough that much of the time the speaker or writer will choose to include it or not based on which way they feel will make the sentence flow better. Ultimately, either would be correct in any context I can think of.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            I think it comes down to a combination of formality and flow. Adding "amount of" makes the phrase slightly more informal, but the difference is subtle enough that much of the time the speaker or writer will choose to include it or not based on which way they feel will make the sentence flow better. Ultimately, either would be correct in any context I can think of.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 2 days ago









            Poetically PsychoticPoetically Psychotic

            1012




            1012




            New contributor




            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Poetically Psychotic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.












            • See also my comment at OP.
              – Kris
              2 days ago


















            • See also my comment at OP.
              – Kris
              2 days ago
















            See also my comment at OP.
            – Kris
            2 days ago




            See also my comment at OP.
            – Kris
            2 days ago










            Cornelius Chan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Cornelius Chan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Cornelius Chan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Cornelius Chan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480309%2fadequate-sufficient-amount-of-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]