Why has the 777x been designed with folding wingtips?
I recently visited the Boeing factory outside Seattle, WA and noted in the distance a new 777x being built with, what looked like very large wingtips.
However, on closer inspection they're not - the ends of the wings are designed to fold up.
Source: aviation today
I didn't get a chance to ask our tour guide, so I was wondering if anyone here can explain why this aircraft has been designed with folding wingtips. I'm presuming this is only for ground operations, and my guess is something to do with size - but are they really so big that they need to fold up? I would have imagined that other large wide body jetliners would have similar dimensions.
Please note that I'm not asking about whether this should have winglets, or if winglets provide any benefits, I'm asking specifically why the ends of these wings fold up rather than just fixed as per previous 777 models.
aircraft-design boeing boeing-777
add a comment |
I recently visited the Boeing factory outside Seattle, WA and noted in the distance a new 777x being built with, what looked like very large wingtips.
However, on closer inspection they're not - the ends of the wings are designed to fold up.
Source: aviation today
I didn't get a chance to ask our tour guide, so I was wondering if anyone here can explain why this aircraft has been designed with folding wingtips. I'm presuming this is only for ground operations, and my guess is something to do with size - but are they really so big that they need to fold up? I would have imagined that other large wide body jetliners would have similar dimensions.
Please note that I'm not asking about whether this should have winglets, or if winglets provide any benefits, I'm asking specifically why the ends of these wings fold up rather than just fixed as per previous 777 models.
aircraft-design boeing boeing-777
I think (which is why this isn't an answer) is that they need to fit into certain stands, otherwise they could use larger (more expensive) stands that have less density. Here is a video about the 777x folding wingtips.
– Ron Beyer
Dec 17 '18 at 16:38
1
Closely related and might even answer this?
– Pondlife
Dec 17 '18 at 20:25
2
Only way it would fit through the factory doors ;)
– Harper
Dec 17 '18 at 21:51
add a comment |
I recently visited the Boeing factory outside Seattle, WA and noted in the distance a new 777x being built with, what looked like very large wingtips.
However, on closer inspection they're not - the ends of the wings are designed to fold up.
Source: aviation today
I didn't get a chance to ask our tour guide, so I was wondering if anyone here can explain why this aircraft has been designed with folding wingtips. I'm presuming this is only for ground operations, and my guess is something to do with size - but are they really so big that they need to fold up? I would have imagined that other large wide body jetliners would have similar dimensions.
Please note that I'm not asking about whether this should have winglets, or if winglets provide any benefits, I'm asking specifically why the ends of these wings fold up rather than just fixed as per previous 777 models.
aircraft-design boeing boeing-777
I recently visited the Boeing factory outside Seattle, WA and noted in the distance a new 777x being built with, what looked like very large wingtips.
However, on closer inspection they're not - the ends of the wings are designed to fold up.
Source: aviation today
I didn't get a chance to ask our tour guide, so I was wondering if anyone here can explain why this aircraft has been designed with folding wingtips. I'm presuming this is only for ground operations, and my guess is something to do with size - but are they really so big that they need to fold up? I would have imagined that other large wide body jetliners would have similar dimensions.
Please note that I'm not asking about whether this should have winglets, or if winglets provide any benefits, I'm asking specifically why the ends of these wings fold up rather than just fixed as per previous 777 models.
aircraft-design boeing boeing-777
aircraft-design boeing boeing-777
edited Dec 18 '18 at 15:15
fooot
51.6k17166312
51.6k17166312
asked Dec 17 '18 at 16:33
Jamiec♦Jamiec
14.5k45990
14.5k45990
I think (which is why this isn't an answer) is that they need to fit into certain stands, otherwise they could use larger (more expensive) stands that have less density. Here is a video about the 777x folding wingtips.
– Ron Beyer
Dec 17 '18 at 16:38
1
Closely related and might even answer this?
– Pondlife
Dec 17 '18 at 20:25
2
Only way it would fit through the factory doors ;)
– Harper
Dec 17 '18 at 21:51
add a comment |
I think (which is why this isn't an answer) is that they need to fit into certain stands, otherwise they could use larger (more expensive) stands that have less density. Here is a video about the 777x folding wingtips.
– Ron Beyer
Dec 17 '18 at 16:38
1
Closely related and might even answer this?
– Pondlife
Dec 17 '18 at 20:25
2
Only way it would fit through the factory doors ;)
– Harper
Dec 17 '18 at 21:51
I think (which is why this isn't an answer) is that they need to fit into certain stands, otherwise they could use larger (more expensive) stands that have less density. Here is a video about the 777x folding wingtips.
– Ron Beyer
Dec 17 '18 at 16:38
I think (which is why this isn't an answer) is that they need to fit into certain stands, otherwise they could use larger (more expensive) stands that have less density. Here is a video about the 777x folding wingtips.
– Ron Beyer
Dec 17 '18 at 16:38
1
1
Closely related and might even answer this?
– Pondlife
Dec 17 '18 at 20:25
Closely related and might even answer this?
– Pondlife
Dec 17 '18 at 20:25
2
2
Only way it would fit through the factory doors ;)
– Harper
Dec 17 '18 at 21:51
Only way it would fit through the factory doors ;)
– Harper
Dec 17 '18 at 21:51
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The Boeing 777X website states that this is to enable a more efficient wing (read: wider span) while maintaining the airport gate and taxi footprint of the classic 777 (which ensures airlines can use the 777X on roughly the same airports and intermix operations with the classic fleet).
add a comment |
Many modern aircraft have been designed with winglets, and older ones have been retrofitted with them. They allow a wing to produce more lift with less drag. However, the benefit is even greater if the wingspan is simply extended.
The downside of increasing wingspan is that wingspan affects many aspects of airport infrastructure, especially taxiways and gates. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 covers airport design, and includes an "Airplane Design Group" categorization, from I to VI. Group V has an upper cutoff of 214 feet (65 m) wingspan.
The 777-200LR and 777-300ER have the largest wingspan of the existing 777 family, at 212 ft 7 in. The 777X will have a wingspan of 212 ft 9 in when the wingtips are folded. This ensures that the 777X will be able to fit on every taxiway and into every gate that the current 777 can, while gaining the benefits of an increased wingspan in flight with the wingtips folded down.
8
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
1
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
1
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex. So, take of and landing planes can be stacked closer together without encountering wake turbulence.
Then fold them out in the cruise to benefit from the bigger wing area.
1
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)
– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58159%2fwhy-has-the-777x-been-designed-with-folding-wingtips%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The Boeing 777X website states that this is to enable a more efficient wing (read: wider span) while maintaining the airport gate and taxi footprint of the classic 777 (which ensures airlines can use the 777X on roughly the same airports and intermix operations with the classic fleet).
add a comment |
The Boeing 777X website states that this is to enable a more efficient wing (read: wider span) while maintaining the airport gate and taxi footprint of the classic 777 (which ensures airlines can use the 777X on roughly the same airports and intermix operations with the classic fleet).
add a comment |
The Boeing 777X website states that this is to enable a more efficient wing (read: wider span) while maintaining the airport gate and taxi footprint of the classic 777 (which ensures airlines can use the 777X on roughly the same airports and intermix operations with the classic fleet).
The Boeing 777X website states that this is to enable a more efficient wing (read: wider span) while maintaining the airport gate and taxi footprint of the classic 777 (which ensures airlines can use the 777X on roughly the same airports and intermix operations with the classic fleet).
answered Dec 17 '18 at 17:22
Cpt ReynoldsCpt Reynolds
2,60011015
2,60011015
add a comment |
add a comment |
Many modern aircraft have been designed with winglets, and older ones have been retrofitted with them. They allow a wing to produce more lift with less drag. However, the benefit is even greater if the wingspan is simply extended.
The downside of increasing wingspan is that wingspan affects many aspects of airport infrastructure, especially taxiways and gates. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 covers airport design, and includes an "Airplane Design Group" categorization, from I to VI. Group V has an upper cutoff of 214 feet (65 m) wingspan.
The 777-200LR and 777-300ER have the largest wingspan of the existing 777 family, at 212 ft 7 in. The 777X will have a wingspan of 212 ft 9 in when the wingtips are folded. This ensures that the 777X will be able to fit on every taxiway and into every gate that the current 777 can, while gaining the benefits of an increased wingspan in flight with the wingtips folded down.
8
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
1
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
1
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
Many modern aircraft have been designed with winglets, and older ones have been retrofitted with them. They allow a wing to produce more lift with less drag. However, the benefit is even greater if the wingspan is simply extended.
The downside of increasing wingspan is that wingspan affects many aspects of airport infrastructure, especially taxiways and gates. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 covers airport design, and includes an "Airplane Design Group" categorization, from I to VI. Group V has an upper cutoff of 214 feet (65 m) wingspan.
The 777-200LR and 777-300ER have the largest wingspan of the existing 777 family, at 212 ft 7 in. The 777X will have a wingspan of 212 ft 9 in when the wingtips are folded. This ensures that the 777X will be able to fit on every taxiway and into every gate that the current 777 can, while gaining the benefits of an increased wingspan in flight with the wingtips folded down.
8
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
1
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
1
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
Many modern aircraft have been designed with winglets, and older ones have been retrofitted with them. They allow a wing to produce more lift with less drag. However, the benefit is even greater if the wingspan is simply extended.
The downside of increasing wingspan is that wingspan affects many aspects of airport infrastructure, especially taxiways and gates. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 covers airport design, and includes an "Airplane Design Group" categorization, from I to VI. Group V has an upper cutoff of 214 feet (65 m) wingspan.
The 777-200LR and 777-300ER have the largest wingspan of the existing 777 family, at 212 ft 7 in. The 777X will have a wingspan of 212 ft 9 in when the wingtips are folded. This ensures that the 777X will be able to fit on every taxiway and into every gate that the current 777 can, while gaining the benefits of an increased wingspan in flight with the wingtips folded down.
Many modern aircraft have been designed with winglets, and older ones have been retrofitted with them. They allow a wing to produce more lift with less drag. However, the benefit is even greater if the wingspan is simply extended.
The downside of increasing wingspan is that wingspan affects many aspects of airport infrastructure, especially taxiways and gates. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 covers airport design, and includes an "Airplane Design Group" categorization, from I to VI. Group V has an upper cutoff of 214 feet (65 m) wingspan.
The 777-200LR and 777-300ER have the largest wingspan of the existing 777 family, at 212 ft 7 in. The 777X will have a wingspan of 212 ft 9 in when the wingtips are folded. This ensures that the 777X will be able to fit on every taxiway and into every gate that the current 777 can, while gaining the benefits of an increased wingspan in flight with the wingtips folded down.
edited Dec 17 '18 at 19:58
answered Dec 17 '18 at 17:31
foootfooot
51.6k17166312
51.6k17166312
8
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
1
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
1
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
8
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
1
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
1
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
8
8
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
Exactly. The folding wingtips allows the 777X to use stands and taxiways designed for ADG V aircraft, rather than needing ADG VI stands and taxiways like the A380 and 747-8. Even airports designed to accommodate A380s and 747-8s still typically have far more ADG V stands than ADG VI stands. ADG VI is basically just the 747-8 and A380, while ADG V is all 777s, 787s, A330s, A350s, and 747s prior to the -8. Bumping the 777X into ADG VI would have been a massive cost increase to operators, making the aircraft much less competitive.
– reirab
Dec 17 '18 at 22:08
1
1
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
But will the folded wingtips unfold in the air during flight or do they stay folded?
– undefined
Dec 18 '18 at 10:52
1
1
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
They would unfold on the ground when it's safe during taxi operations but before entering the runway. This ensures that the crew can confirm they are locked in place without running the risk of interfering in airport operations by taking up an active runway.
– NetworkLlama
Dec 18 '18 at 14:38
add a comment |
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex. So, take of and landing planes can be stacked closer together without encountering wake turbulence.
Then fold them out in the cruise to benefit from the bigger wing area.
1
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)
– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
add a comment |
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex. So, take of and landing planes can be stacked closer together without encountering wake turbulence.
Then fold them out in the cruise to benefit from the bigger wing area.
1
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)
– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
add a comment |
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex. So, take of and landing planes can be stacked closer together without encountering wake turbulence.
Then fold them out in the cruise to benefit from the bigger wing area.
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex. So, take of and landing planes can be stacked closer together without encountering wake turbulence.
Then fold them out in the cruise to benefit from the bigger wing area.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 12:34
user36137user36137
1
1
1
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)
– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
add a comment |
1
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)
– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
1
1
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
Folding them up reduces wing tip vortex
this is the opposite of true. (nevermind that the wingtips don't fold or unfold in flight)– Jules
Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58159%2fwhy-has-the-777x-been-designed-with-folding-wingtips%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think (which is why this isn't an answer) is that they need to fit into certain stands, otherwise they could use larger (more expensive) stands that have less density. Here is a video about the 777x folding wingtips.
– Ron Beyer
Dec 17 '18 at 16:38
1
Closely related and might even answer this?
– Pondlife
Dec 17 '18 at 20:25
2
Only way it would fit through the factory doors ;)
– Harper
Dec 17 '18 at 21:51