Is (baseline performance * # of cores) the only factor that determines the average performance of T type...












0















I always thought 1 vCPU of T2.nano is equal to 1 vCPU of T2.xlarge, because the only number I found about CPU on EC2 Instance Types documentation is number of CPUs.



However, after reading Tx unlimited mode example, I think I didn't understood the performance of Tx instances at all.



What I understood from that documentation is, a vCPU core in T3.nano is different to T3.micro's core in terms of baseline performance. And that baseline performance is related to CPU Credit in these ways:




  1. When your vCPU utilization is exactly same to baseline performance, you don't lose or accumulate any CPU credit.


  2. When your vCPU utilization is lower than baseline performance, you gain CPU Credit at rate of (baseline - CPU Utilization).


  3. When your vCPU utilization is higher than baseline performance, you spend CPU Credit to make up additional utilization, and if you have no remaining CPU credit and Unlimited disabled you can't utilize your CPU over baseline performance.



So, to sum up what I've understood, in terms of CPU performance:





  1. A Tx instance's peak performance is determined by number of cores.



    For example t3.nano~t3.large which has 2 vCPU cores has same peak performance. (unless you disable Hyperthreading...?)



  2. A Tx instance's average performance is determined by CPU credits earned per hour(=vCPU * baseline).



Is this correct?










share|improve this question



























    0















    I always thought 1 vCPU of T2.nano is equal to 1 vCPU of T2.xlarge, because the only number I found about CPU on EC2 Instance Types documentation is number of CPUs.



    However, after reading Tx unlimited mode example, I think I didn't understood the performance of Tx instances at all.



    What I understood from that documentation is, a vCPU core in T3.nano is different to T3.micro's core in terms of baseline performance. And that baseline performance is related to CPU Credit in these ways:




    1. When your vCPU utilization is exactly same to baseline performance, you don't lose or accumulate any CPU credit.


    2. When your vCPU utilization is lower than baseline performance, you gain CPU Credit at rate of (baseline - CPU Utilization).


    3. When your vCPU utilization is higher than baseline performance, you spend CPU Credit to make up additional utilization, and if you have no remaining CPU credit and Unlimited disabled you can't utilize your CPU over baseline performance.



    So, to sum up what I've understood, in terms of CPU performance:





    1. A Tx instance's peak performance is determined by number of cores.



      For example t3.nano~t3.large which has 2 vCPU cores has same peak performance. (unless you disable Hyperthreading...?)



    2. A Tx instance's average performance is determined by CPU credits earned per hour(=vCPU * baseline).



    Is this correct?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      1






      I always thought 1 vCPU of T2.nano is equal to 1 vCPU of T2.xlarge, because the only number I found about CPU on EC2 Instance Types documentation is number of CPUs.



      However, after reading Tx unlimited mode example, I think I didn't understood the performance of Tx instances at all.



      What I understood from that documentation is, a vCPU core in T3.nano is different to T3.micro's core in terms of baseline performance. And that baseline performance is related to CPU Credit in these ways:




      1. When your vCPU utilization is exactly same to baseline performance, you don't lose or accumulate any CPU credit.


      2. When your vCPU utilization is lower than baseline performance, you gain CPU Credit at rate of (baseline - CPU Utilization).


      3. When your vCPU utilization is higher than baseline performance, you spend CPU Credit to make up additional utilization, and if you have no remaining CPU credit and Unlimited disabled you can't utilize your CPU over baseline performance.



      So, to sum up what I've understood, in terms of CPU performance:





      1. A Tx instance's peak performance is determined by number of cores.



        For example t3.nano~t3.large which has 2 vCPU cores has same peak performance. (unless you disable Hyperthreading...?)



      2. A Tx instance's average performance is determined by CPU credits earned per hour(=vCPU * baseline).



      Is this correct?










      share|improve this question














      I always thought 1 vCPU of T2.nano is equal to 1 vCPU of T2.xlarge, because the only number I found about CPU on EC2 Instance Types documentation is number of CPUs.



      However, after reading Tx unlimited mode example, I think I didn't understood the performance of Tx instances at all.



      What I understood from that documentation is, a vCPU core in T3.nano is different to T3.micro's core in terms of baseline performance. And that baseline performance is related to CPU Credit in these ways:




      1. When your vCPU utilization is exactly same to baseline performance, you don't lose or accumulate any CPU credit.


      2. When your vCPU utilization is lower than baseline performance, you gain CPU Credit at rate of (baseline - CPU Utilization).


      3. When your vCPU utilization is higher than baseline performance, you spend CPU Credit to make up additional utilization, and if you have no remaining CPU credit and Unlimited disabled you can't utilize your CPU over baseline performance.



      So, to sum up what I've understood, in terms of CPU performance:





      1. A Tx instance's peak performance is determined by number of cores.



        For example t3.nano~t3.large which has 2 vCPU cores has same peak performance. (unless you disable Hyperthreading...?)



      2. A Tx instance's average performance is determined by CPU credits earned per hour(=vCPU * baseline).



      Is this correct?







      amazon-web-services amazon-ec2






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 6:43









      ik1neik1ne

      10016




      10016
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53406541%2fis-baseline-performance-of-cores-the-only-factor-that-determines-the-avera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53406541%2fis-baseline-performance-of-cores-the-only-factor-that-determines-the-avera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?