Programming vs. Coding
As a programmer, I often hear "writing a program" and "writing code" used interchangeably. The way I understand it, a program is a file which contains code written to perform a task or a series of tasks. Those who write computer programs (like myself) are typically referred to as programmers. However, the slogan of the popular website CodeProject is "For those who code," not "For those who program." Is there any difference in meaning between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living"?
meaning programming
|
show 4 more comments
As a programmer, I often hear "writing a program" and "writing code" used interchangeably. The way I understand it, a program is a file which contains code written to perform a task or a series of tasks. Those who write computer programs (like myself) are typically referred to as programmers. However, the slogan of the popular website CodeProject is "For those who code," not "For those who program." Is there any difference in meaning between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living"?
meaning programming
1
They're interchangeable for most purposes.
– milestyle
Apr 24 '14 at 15:16
@milestyle: For what purposes are they not interchangeable?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 16:34
Slightly off-topic, but I want to comment that the word program is broader than file. I think the word program encompasses any piece of software, not just the particular file or files it is written in. I would refer to Firefox or Outlook as a program, even though they are probably written over many many files. The files are irrelevant here as I cannot even access the source code / files for closed-source programs.
– sgauria
Apr 24 '14 at 18:15
In stead of being used interchangeably, you could be just hearing the use of synecdoche, where a part is used to represent the whole. Just as "Give me a hand" never means that your hand and your entire body are considered identical.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:00
1
I'm unsure why there seems so much downvoting of these reasonable answers.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:03
|
show 4 more comments
As a programmer, I often hear "writing a program" and "writing code" used interchangeably. The way I understand it, a program is a file which contains code written to perform a task or a series of tasks. Those who write computer programs (like myself) are typically referred to as programmers. However, the slogan of the popular website CodeProject is "For those who code," not "For those who program." Is there any difference in meaning between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living"?
meaning programming
As a programmer, I often hear "writing a program" and "writing code" used interchangeably. The way I understand it, a program is a file which contains code written to perform a task or a series of tasks. Those who write computer programs (like myself) are typically referred to as programmers. However, the slogan of the popular website CodeProject is "For those who code," not "For those who program." Is there any difference in meaning between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living"?
meaning programming
meaning programming
asked Apr 24 '14 at 15:13
Alex A.Alex A.
3202314
3202314
1
They're interchangeable for most purposes.
– milestyle
Apr 24 '14 at 15:16
@milestyle: For what purposes are they not interchangeable?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 16:34
Slightly off-topic, but I want to comment that the word program is broader than file. I think the word program encompasses any piece of software, not just the particular file or files it is written in. I would refer to Firefox or Outlook as a program, even though they are probably written over many many files. The files are irrelevant here as I cannot even access the source code / files for closed-source programs.
– sgauria
Apr 24 '14 at 18:15
In stead of being used interchangeably, you could be just hearing the use of synecdoche, where a part is used to represent the whole. Just as "Give me a hand" never means that your hand and your entire body are considered identical.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:00
1
I'm unsure why there seems so much downvoting of these reasonable answers.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:03
|
show 4 more comments
1
They're interchangeable for most purposes.
– milestyle
Apr 24 '14 at 15:16
@milestyle: For what purposes are they not interchangeable?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 16:34
Slightly off-topic, but I want to comment that the word program is broader than file. I think the word program encompasses any piece of software, not just the particular file or files it is written in. I would refer to Firefox or Outlook as a program, even though they are probably written over many many files. The files are irrelevant here as I cannot even access the source code / files for closed-source programs.
– sgauria
Apr 24 '14 at 18:15
In stead of being used interchangeably, you could be just hearing the use of synecdoche, where a part is used to represent the whole. Just as "Give me a hand" never means that your hand and your entire body are considered identical.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:00
1
I'm unsure why there seems so much downvoting of these reasonable answers.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:03
1
1
They're interchangeable for most purposes.
– milestyle
Apr 24 '14 at 15:16
They're interchangeable for most purposes.
– milestyle
Apr 24 '14 at 15:16
@milestyle: For what purposes are they not interchangeable?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 16:34
@milestyle: For what purposes are they not interchangeable?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 16:34
Slightly off-topic, but I want to comment that the word program is broader than file. I think the word program encompasses any piece of software, not just the particular file or files it is written in. I would refer to Firefox or Outlook as a program, even though they are probably written over many many files. The files are irrelevant here as I cannot even access the source code / files for closed-source programs.
– sgauria
Apr 24 '14 at 18:15
Slightly off-topic, but I want to comment that the word program is broader than file. I think the word program encompasses any piece of software, not just the particular file or files it is written in. I would refer to Firefox or Outlook as a program, even though they are probably written over many many files. The files are irrelevant here as I cannot even access the source code / files for closed-source programs.
– sgauria
Apr 24 '14 at 18:15
In stead of being used interchangeably, you could be just hearing the use of synecdoche, where a part is used to represent the whole. Just as "Give me a hand" never means that your hand and your entire body are considered identical.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:00
In stead of being used interchangeably, you could be just hearing the use of synecdoche, where a part is used to represent the whole. Just as "Give me a hand" never means that your hand and your entire body are considered identical.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:00
1
1
I'm unsure why there seems so much downvoting of these reasonable answers.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:03
I'm unsure why there seems so much downvoting of these reasonable answers.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:03
|
show 4 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Though some raise a distinction, there isn't a generally accepted difference between the two.
However, non-technical people may be more likely to understand what you mean if you call yourself a "programmer" rather than a "coder". The word "computer program" and "programmer" have very wide comprehension, whereas the term "code" - as a synonym for a computer program - has a narrower reach and is more easily confused with other meanings. Even worse: "hacker".
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
1
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
|
show 5 more comments
Programming encompasses coding, but coding does not encompass programming.
Programming is a blanket term for a set of activities, of which coding is one. See this explanation from WiseGeek:
"Generally, there are five basic stages of development that a computer programmer addresses in designing software. They are defining the need, designing a flowchart, coding the software, debugging and beta testing."
I would say rather that programming requires analysis, design, communication, coding, testing, and release management. A programmer not competent in at least a couple of these disciplines risks being a mere coder.
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
add a comment |
Here's how the New Hacker's Dictionary defines
program n.
A magic spell cast over a computer allowing it to turn one's input into error messages.
An exercise in experimental epistemology.
A form of art, ostensibly intended for the instruction of computers, which is nevertheless almost inevitably a failure if other programmers can't understand it.
and
code n.
The stuff that software writers write, either in source form or after translation by a compiler or assembler. Often used in opposition to "data", which is the stuff that code operates on. This is a mass noun, as in "How much code does it take to do a bubble sort?", or "The code is loaded at the high end of RAM." Anyone referring to software as "the software codes" is probably a newbie or a suit.
A program is something high-level, whereas code* refers to translation (e.g., English words → Morse code; C language → assembly or machine code); as the OED puts it, code is
Any system of symbols and rules for expressing information or instructions in a form usable by a computer or other machine for processing or transmitting information.
*from the Latin codex, meaning a tree trunk, book, or enumerated collection of things (e.g., legal canons)
A coder needn't be a programmer just like a telegraph operator needn't be a literary author. But programmers (those who make programs) do need to be coders (those who make code), just like literary authors need to encode their writings somehow (in the form of handwriting, typewriting, etc.).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f165952%2fprogramming-vs-coding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Though some raise a distinction, there isn't a generally accepted difference between the two.
However, non-technical people may be more likely to understand what you mean if you call yourself a "programmer" rather than a "coder". The word "computer program" and "programmer" have very wide comprehension, whereas the term "code" - as a synonym for a computer program - has a narrower reach and is more easily confused with other meanings. Even worse: "hacker".
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
1
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
|
show 5 more comments
Though some raise a distinction, there isn't a generally accepted difference between the two.
However, non-technical people may be more likely to understand what you mean if you call yourself a "programmer" rather than a "coder". The word "computer program" and "programmer" have very wide comprehension, whereas the term "code" - as a synonym for a computer program - has a narrower reach and is more easily confused with other meanings. Even worse: "hacker".
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
1
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
|
show 5 more comments
Though some raise a distinction, there isn't a generally accepted difference between the two.
However, non-technical people may be more likely to understand what you mean if you call yourself a "programmer" rather than a "coder". The word "computer program" and "programmer" have very wide comprehension, whereas the term "code" - as a synonym for a computer program - has a narrower reach and is more easily confused with other meanings. Even worse: "hacker".
Though some raise a distinction, there isn't a generally accepted difference between the two.
However, non-technical people may be more likely to understand what you mean if you call yourself a "programmer" rather than a "coder". The word "computer program" and "programmer" have very wide comprehension, whereas the term "code" - as a synonym for a computer program - has a narrower reach and is more easily confused with other meanings. Even worse: "hacker".
edited Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
answered Apr 24 '14 at 15:25
ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
8361617
8361617
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
1
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
1
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
Thanks for your answer! Could you please elaborate on narrower reach of "code" versus that of "program"?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:34
1
1
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
You can compare the words here. The gap has narrowed, but both seem to be in decline.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:37
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
So by "reach" you mean the size of the audience that understands or prefers one verb over the other?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 15:46
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Yes. Your great Aunt Edna will likely understand if you tell her you're a programmer, but may be confused if you call yourself a coder.
– ᴇʟᴇvᴀтᴇ
Apr 24 '14 at 15:55
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
Hacker, when referring to a programmer and not a person who breaks into computer networks, has a distinct meaning. Roughly, it means a programmer who takes unwise shortcuts.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:17
|
show 5 more comments
Programming encompasses coding, but coding does not encompass programming.
Programming is a blanket term for a set of activities, of which coding is one. See this explanation from WiseGeek:
"Generally, there are five basic stages of development that a computer programmer addresses in designing software. They are defining the need, designing a flowchart, coding the software, debugging and beta testing."
I would say rather that programming requires analysis, design, communication, coding, testing, and release management. A programmer not competent in at least a couple of these disciplines risks being a mere coder.
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
add a comment |
Programming encompasses coding, but coding does not encompass programming.
Programming is a blanket term for a set of activities, of which coding is one. See this explanation from WiseGeek:
"Generally, there are five basic stages of development that a computer programmer addresses in designing software. They are defining the need, designing a flowchart, coding the software, debugging and beta testing."
I would say rather that programming requires analysis, design, communication, coding, testing, and release management. A programmer not competent in at least a couple of these disciplines risks being a mere coder.
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
add a comment |
Programming encompasses coding, but coding does not encompass programming.
Programming is a blanket term for a set of activities, of which coding is one. See this explanation from WiseGeek:
"Generally, there are five basic stages of development that a computer programmer addresses in designing software. They are defining the need, designing a flowchart, coding the software, debugging and beta testing."
I would say rather that programming requires analysis, design, communication, coding, testing, and release management. A programmer not competent in at least a couple of these disciplines risks being a mere coder.
Programming encompasses coding, but coding does not encompass programming.
Programming is a blanket term for a set of activities, of which coding is one. See this explanation from WiseGeek:
"Generally, there are five basic stages of development that a computer programmer addresses in designing software. They are defining the need, designing a flowchart, coding the software, debugging and beta testing."
I would say rather that programming requires analysis, design, communication, coding, testing, and release management. A programmer not competent in at least a couple of these disciplines risks being a mere coder.
answered Apr 24 '14 at 15:45
William JamesWilliam James
551
551
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
add a comment |
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
I think you've missed the point that Gary's Student and I have made; but in fairness, since you're taking the motto of the CodeProject website to be definitive, I'll put it another way: CodeProject's use of the sloagn "For those who code" has everything to do with the name of their site, and very little to do with a formal definition of programming. That is, it's a nice bit of marketing copy. As Gary's Student has also pointed out, coding is one phase of a process employed by programmers, and this is the real difference between "I code for a living" and "I program for a living."
– William James
Apr 24 '14 at 16:25
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
The WiseGeek quote refers to the "five basic stages of development", not programming. You've made the leap to development*=*programming. As an experienced developer/coder/programmer, I strongly disagree with this statement, as do the handful of colleagues I just polled around the office. In the WiseGeek quote, you can replace coding the software with writing the software or programming the software and the meaning would be the same.
– Henry74
Jul 19 '14 at 0:39
add a comment |
Here's how the New Hacker's Dictionary defines
program n.
A magic spell cast over a computer allowing it to turn one's input into error messages.
An exercise in experimental epistemology.
A form of art, ostensibly intended for the instruction of computers, which is nevertheless almost inevitably a failure if other programmers can't understand it.
and
code n.
The stuff that software writers write, either in source form or after translation by a compiler or assembler. Often used in opposition to "data", which is the stuff that code operates on. This is a mass noun, as in "How much code does it take to do a bubble sort?", or "The code is loaded at the high end of RAM." Anyone referring to software as "the software codes" is probably a newbie or a suit.
A program is something high-level, whereas code* refers to translation (e.g., English words → Morse code; C language → assembly or machine code); as the OED puts it, code is
Any system of symbols and rules for expressing information or instructions in a form usable by a computer or other machine for processing or transmitting information.
*from the Latin codex, meaning a tree trunk, book, or enumerated collection of things (e.g., legal canons)
A coder needn't be a programmer just like a telegraph operator needn't be a literary author. But programmers (those who make programs) do need to be coders (those who make code), just like literary authors need to encode their writings somehow (in the form of handwriting, typewriting, etc.).
add a comment |
Here's how the New Hacker's Dictionary defines
program n.
A magic spell cast over a computer allowing it to turn one's input into error messages.
An exercise in experimental epistemology.
A form of art, ostensibly intended for the instruction of computers, which is nevertheless almost inevitably a failure if other programmers can't understand it.
and
code n.
The stuff that software writers write, either in source form or after translation by a compiler or assembler. Often used in opposition to "data", which is the stuff that code operates on. This is a mass noun, as in "How much code does it take to do a bubble sort?", or "The code is loaded at the high end of RAM." Anyone referring to software as "the software codes" is probably a newbie or a suit.
A program is something high-level, whereas code* refers to translation (e.g., English words → Morse code; C language → assembly or machine code); as the OED puts it, code is
Any system of symbols and rules for expressing information or instructions in a form usable by a computer or other machine for processing or transmitting information.
*from the Latin codex, meaning a tree trunk, book, or enumerated collection of things (e.g., legal canons)
A coder needn't be a programmer just like a telegraph operator needn't be a literary author. But programmers (those who make programs) do need to be coders (those who make code), just like literary authors need to encode their writings somehow (in the form of handwriting, typewriting, etc.).
add a comment |
Here's how the New Hacker's Dictionary defines
program n.
A magic spell cast over a computer allowing it to turn one's input into error messages.
An exercise in experimental epistemology.
A form of art, ostensibly intended for the instruction of computers, which is nevertheless almost inevitably a failure if other programmers can't understand it.
and
code n.
The stuff that software writers write, either in source form or after translation by a compiler or assembler. Often used in opposition to "data", which is the stuff that code operates on. This is a mass noun, as in "How much code does it take to do a bubble sort?", or "The code is loaded at the high end of RAM." Anyone referring to software as "the software codes" is probably a newbie or a suit.
A program is something high-level, whereas code* refers to translation (e.g., English words → Morse code; C language → assembly or machine code); as the OED puts it, code is
Any system of symbols and rules for expressing information or instructions in a form usable by a computer or other machine for processing or transmitting information.
*from the Latin codex, meaning a tree trunk, book, or enumerated collection of things (e.g., legal canons)
A coder needn't be a programmer just like a telegraph operator needn't be a literary author. But programmers (those who make programs) do need to be coders (those who make code), just like literary authors need to encode their writings somehow (in the form of handwriting, typewriting, etc.).
Here's how the New Hacker's Dictionary defines
program n.
A magic spell cast over a computer allowing it to turn one's input into error messages.
An exercise in experimental epistemology.
A form of art, ostensibly intended for the instruction of computers, which is nevertheless almost inevitably a failure if other programmers can't understand it.
and
code n.
The stuff that software writers write, either in source form or after translation by a compiler or assembler. Often used in opposition to "data", which is the stuff that code operates on. This is a mass noun, as in "How much code does it take to do a bubble sort?", or "The code is loaded at the high end of RAM." Anyone referring to software as "the software codes" is probably a newbie or a suit.
A program is something high-level, whereas code* refers to translation (e.g., English words → Morse code; C language → assembly or machine code); as the OED puts it, code is
Any system of symbols and rules for expressing information or instructions in a form usable by a computer or other machine for processing or transmitting information.
*from the Latin codex, meaning a tree trunk, book, or enumerated collection of things (e.g., legal canons)
A coder needn't be a programmer just like a telegraph operator needn't be a literary author. But programmers (those who make programs) do need to be coders (those who make code), just like literary authors need to encode their writings somehow (in the form of handwriting, typewriting, etc.).
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
GeremiaGeremia
179313
179313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f165952%2fprogramming-vs-coding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
They're interchangeable for most purposes.
– milestyle
Apr 24 '14 at 15:16
@milestyle: For what purposes are they not interchangeable?
– Alex A.
Apr 24 '14 at 16:34
Slightly off-topic, but I want to comment that the word program is broader than file. I think the word program encompasses any piece of software, not just the particular file or files it is written in. I would refer to Firefox or Outlook as a program, even though they are probably written over many many files. The files are irrelevant here as I cannot even access the source code / files for closed-source programs.
– sgauria
Apr 24 '14 at 18:15
In stead of being used interchangeably, you could be just hearing the use of synecdoche, where a part is used to represent the whole. Just as "Give me a hand" never means that your hand and your entire body are considered identical.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:00
1
I'm unsure why there seems so much downvoting of these reasonable answers.
– Oldcat
Apr 24 '14 at 19:03