The choice of portfolio in the proof of the Black-Scholes formula












3















Consider a stock whose price $S$ satisfies $$dS_t=mu S_tdt+sigma S_tdW_t$$ for constants $mu,sigma$ and where $W$ is a $mathbb{P}$-Brownian motion. Further assume that the stock pays out dividends continuously at a rate of $d$ proportional to the current stock price.



Let $p_t$ denote the price at time $t$ of a European-style derivative which has a payoff of $f(S_T)$ at time $T$. In order to determine a formula for $p_t$ we essentially carry out the following steps:




  1. Use Girsanov's theorem to determine the risk-neutral probability measure $mathbb{Q}$ such that $widetilde{W}_t=left(frac{mu+d-r}{sigma}right)t+W_t$ is a $mathbb{Q}$-Brownian motion.

  2. Define $P_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$. Show that both $hat{S}_t=e^{-(r-d)t}S_t$ and $hat{P_t}=e^{-rt}P_t$ are $mathbb{Q}$-martingales.

  3. Use the Martingale Representation Theorem to conclude the existence of a predictable process $A$ such that $hat{P}_t=hat{P}_0+int_0^tA_sdhat{S}_s$ under $mathbb{Q}$.

  4. Construct the portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ which consists of $hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t$ units of cash and $A_te^{dt}$ units of the stock at time $t$. The value of this portfolio is $P_t$.

  5. Since $P_T=p_T$ we conclude from the Law of One Price that $P_t=p_t$ for all $0leq tleq T$. In other words, $p_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$.


After going through the above steps I am wondering why the portfolio needs to be $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$. It seems like we could simply choose $(hat{P}_t,0)$ as our portfolio and this would still have a value of $P_t$ at time $t$.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    Consider a stock whose price $S$ satisfies $$dS_t=mu S_tdt+sigma S_tdW_t$$ for constants $mu,sigma$ and where $W$ is a $mathbb{P}$-Brownian motion. Further assume that the stock pays out dividends continuously at a rate of $d$ proportional to the current stock price.



    Let $p_t$ denote the price at time $t$ of a European-style derivative which has a payoff of $f(S_T)$ at time $T$. In order to determine a formula for $p_t$ we essentially carry out the following steps:




    1. Use Girsanov's theorem to determine the risk-neutral probability measure $mathbb{Q}$ such that $widetilde{W}_t=left(frac{mu+d-r}{sigma}right)t+W_t$ is a $mathbb{Q}$-Brownian motion.

    2. Define $P_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$. Show that both $hat{S}_t=e^{-(r-d)t}S_t$ and $hat{P_t}=e^{-rt}P_t$ are $mathbb{Q}$-martingales.

    3. Use the Martingale Representation Theorem to conclude the existence of a predictable process $A$ such that $hat{P}_t=hat{P}_0+int_0^tA_sdhat{S}_s$ under $mathbb{Q}$.

    4. Construct the portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ which consists of $hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t$ units of cash and $A_te^{dt}$ units of the stock at time $t$. The value of this portfolio is $P_t$.

    5. Since $P_T=p_T$ we conclude from the Law of One Price that $P_t=p_t$ for all $0leq tleq T$. In other words, $p_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$.


    After going through the above steps I am wondering why the portfolio needs to be $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$. It seems like we could simply choose $(hat{P}_t,0)$ as our portfolio and this would still have a value of $P_t$ at time $t$.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      3












      3








      3








      Consider a stock whose price $S$ satisfies $$dS_t=mu S_tdt+sigma S_tdW_t$$ for constants $mu,sigma$ and where $W$ is a $mathbb{P}$-Brownian motion. Further assume that the stock pays out dividends continuously at a rate of $d$ proportional to the current stock price.



      Let $p_t$ denote the price at time $t$ of a European-style derivative which has a payoff of $f(S_T)$ at time $T$. In order to determine a formula for $p_t$ we essentially carry out the following steps:




      1. Use Girsanov's theorem to determine the risk-neutral probability measure $mathbb{Q}$ such that $widetilde{W}_t=left(frac{mu+d-r}{sigma}right)t+W_t$ is a $mathbb{Q}$-Brownian motion.

      2. Define $P_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$. Show that both $hat{S}_t=e^{-(r-d)t}S_t$ and $hat{P_t}=e^{-rt}P_t$ are $mathbb{Q}$-martingales.

      3. Use the Martingale Representation Theorem to conclude the existence of a predictable process $A$ such that $hat{P}_t=hat{P}_0+int_0^tA_sdhat{S}_s$ under $mathbb{Q}$.

      4. Construct the portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ which consists of $hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t$ units of cash and $A_te^{dt}$ units of the stock at time $t$. The value of this portfolio is $P_t$.

      5. Since $P_T=p_T$ we conclude from the Law of One Price that $P_t=p_t$ for all $0leq tleq T$. In other words, $p_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$.


      After going through the above steps I am wondering why the portfolio needs to be $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$. It seems like we could simply choose $(hat{P}_t,0)$ as our portfolio and this would still have a value of $P_t$ at time $t$.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Consider a stock whose price $S$ satisfies $$dS_t=mu S_tdt+sigma S_tdW_t$$ for constants $mu,sigma$ and where $W$ is a $mathbb{P}$-Brownian motion. Further assume that the stock pays out dividends continuously at a rate of $d$ proportional to the current stock price.



      Let $p_t$ denote the price at time $t$ of a European-style derivative which has a payoff of $f(S_T)$ at time $T$. In order to determine a formula for $p_t$ we essentially carry out the following steps:




      1. Use Girsanov's theorem to determine the risk-neutral probability measure $mathbb{Q}$ such that $widetilde{W}_t=left(frac{mu+d-r}{sigma}right)t+W_t$ is a $mathbb{Q}$-Brownian motion.

      2. Define $P_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$. Show that both $hat{S}_t=e^{-(r-d)t}S_t$ and $hat{P_t}=e^{-rt}P_t$ are $mathbb{Q}$-martingales.

      3. Use the Martingale Representation Theorem to conclude the existence of a predictable process $A$ such that $hat{P}_t=hat{P}_0+int_0^tA_sdhat{S}_s$ under $mathbb{Q}$.

      4. Construct the portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ which consists of $hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t$ units of cash and $A_te^{dt}$ units of the stock at time $t$. The value of this portfolio is $P_t$.

      5. Since $P_T=p_T$ we conclude from the Law of One Price that $P_t=p_t$ for all $0leq tleq T$. In other words, $p_t=e^{-r(T-t)}mathbb{E}_{mathbb{Q}}[f(S_T)midmathcal{F}_t]$.


      After going through the above steps I am wondering why the portfolio needs to be $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$. It seems like we could simply choose $(hat{P}_t,0)$ as our portfolio and this would still have a value of $P_t$ at time $t$.







      black-scholes stochastic-processes risk-neutral-measure






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      user375366user375366

      1183




      1183




      New contributor




      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user375366 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          The portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ is chosen because it is a hedging portfolio. That is, unlike $(hat{P}_t,0)$ it will have the same value as the derivative an instant later. This is not generally the case for the portfolio $(hat{P}_t,0)$.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "204"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            user375366 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43408%2fthe-choice-of-portfolio-in-the-proof-of-the-black-scholes-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            The portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ is chosen because it is a hedging portfolio. That is, unlike $(hat{P}_t,0)$ it will have the same value as the derivative an instant later. This is not generally the case for the portfolio $(hat{P}_t,0)$.






            share|improve this answer




























              3














              The portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ is chosen because it is a hedging portfolio. That is, unlike $(hat{P}_t,0)$ it will have the same value as the derivative an instant later. This is not generally the case for the portfolio $(hat{P}_t,0)$.






              share|improve this answer


























                3












                3








                3







                The portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ is chosen because it is a hedging portfolio. That is, unlike $(hat{P}_t,0)$ it will have the same value as the derivative an instant later. This is not generally the case for the portfolio $(hat{P}_t,0)$.






                share|improve this answer













                The portfolio $(hat{P}_t-A_that{S}_t,A_te^{dt})$ is chosen because it is a hedging portfolio. That is, unlike $(hat{P}_t,0)$ it will have the same value as the derivative an instant later. This is not generally the case for the portfolio $(hat{P}_t,0)$.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Bob JansenBob Jansen

                3,33752145




                3,33752145






















                    user375366 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    user375366 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    user375366 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user375366 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43408%2fthe-choice-of-portfolio-in-the-proof-of-the-black-scholes-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                    Alcedinidae

                    Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?