About perfect particle clauses [on hold]












0















How do I form a correct perfect particle clauses sentence?



Do these sentences mean the same thing? Or does changing the verb change the meaning? Can I still use the present perfect I have presumed in the second clause?




  1. Having seen my best friend become an offender, I have always presumed that [something] caused his transition.


  2. Having seen my best friend becoming an offender, I have always presumed......







verbs participles







share|improve this question









New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Lawrence, Andrew Leach♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • I've made the question less proof-reading, but I'm not sure whether you really mean "perfect particle" or "participle" or something else.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago











  • What does the "perfect particle" (participle?) from your title and first sentence relate to the rest of the question?

    – Lawrence
    2 days ago











  • "Having seen" is a perfect participle, but the question does appear to be about "become/becoming". The title (and the reference to it in the first line) is still unclear, but perhaps the rest of the question is not. However, Luckyy, if it's not what you want to ask, please feel free to correct it. "Perfect particle" needs to change in any case.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    I start to realize that my question is actually about "see do" or "see doing". I don't know the terminology for this. I think I should go to the English Learner stack exchange

    – Luckyy
    2 days ago






  • 1





    It's possible that ELL would be a better site, but you're still going to have to articulate what you're trying to ask there too.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago
















0















How do I form a correct perfect particle clauses sentence?



Do these sentences mean the same thing? Or does changing the verb change the meaning? Can I still use the present perfect I have presumed in the second clause?




  1. Having seen my best friend become an offender, I have always presumed that [something] caused his transition.


  2. Having seen my best friend becoming an offender, I have always presumed......







verbs participles







share|improve this question









New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Lawrence, Andrew Leach♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • I've made the question less proof-reading, but I'm not sure whether you really mean "perfect particle" or "participle" or something else.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago











  • What does the "perfect particle" (participle?) from your title and first sentence relate to the rest of the question?

    – Lawrence
    2 days ago











  • "Having seen" is a perfect participle, but the question does appear to be about "become/becoming". The title (and the reference to it in the first line) is still unclear, but perhaps the rest of the question is not. However, Luckyy, if it's not what you want to ask, please feel free to correct it. "Perfect particle" needs to change in any case.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    I start to realize that my question is actually about "see do" or "see doing". I don't know the terminology for this. I think I should go to the English Learner stack exchange

    – Luckyy
    2 days ago






  • 1





    It's possible that ELL would be a better site, but you're still going to have to articulate what you're trying to ask there too.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago














0












0








0








How do I form a correct perfect particle clauses sentence?



Do these sentences mean the same thing? Or does changing the verb change the meaning? Can I still use the present perfect I have presumed in the second clause?




  1. Having seen my best friend become an offender, I have always presumed that [something] caused his transition.


  2. Having seen my best friend becoming an offender, I have always presumed......







verbs participles







share|improve this question









New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












How do I form a correct perfect particle clauses sentence?



Do these sentences mean the same thing? Or does changing the verb change the meaning? Can I still use the present perfect I have presumed in the second clause?




  1. Having seen my best friend become an offender, I have always presumed that [something] caused his transition.


  2. Having seen my best friend becoming an offender, I have always presumed......







verbs participles




verbs participles






share|improve this question









New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Andrew Leach♦

79.7k8151256




79.7k8151256






New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









LuckyyLuckyy

42




42




New contributor




Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Luckyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Lawrence, Andrew Leach♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Lawrence, Andrew Leach♦ 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • I've made the question less proof-reading, but I'm not sure whether you really mean "perfect particle" or "participle" or something else.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago











  • What does the "perfect particle" (participle?) from your title and first sentence relate to the rest of the question?

    – Lawrence
    2 days ago











  • "Having seen" is a perfect participle, but the question does appear to be about "become/becoming". The title (and the reference to it in the first line) is still unclear, but perhaps the rest of the question is not. However, Luckyy, if it's not what you want to ask, please feel free to correct it. "Perfect particle" needs to change in any case.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    I start to realize that my question is actually about "see do" or "see doing". I don't know the terminology for this. I think I should go to the English Learner stack exchange

    – Luckyy
    2 days ago






  • 1





    It's possible that ELL would be a better site, but you're still going to have to articulate what you're trying to ask there too.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago



















  • I've made the question less proof-reading, but I'm not sure whether you really mean "perfect particle" or "participle" or something else.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago











  • What does the "perfect particle" (participle?) from your title and first sentence relate to the rest of the question?

    – Lawrence
    2 days ago











  • "Having seen" is a perfect participle, but the question does appear to be about "become/becoming". The title (and the reference to it in the first line) is still unclear, but perhaps the rest of the question is not. However, Luckyy, if it's not what you want to ask, please feel free to correct it. "Perfect particle" needs to change in any case.

    – Andrew Leach♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    I start to realize that my question is actually about "see do" or "see doing". I don't know the terminology for this. I think I should go to the English Learner stack exchange

    – Luckyy
    2 days ago






  • 1





    It's possible that ELL would be a better site, but you're still going to have to articulate what you're trying to ask there too.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago

















I've made the question less proof-reading, but I'm not sure whether you really mean "perfect particle" or "participle" or something else.

– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago





I've made the question less proof-reading, but I'm not sure whether you really mean "perfect particle" or "participle" or something else.

– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago













What does the "perfect particle" (participle?) from your title and first sentence relate to the rest of the question?

– Lawrence
2 days ago





What does the "perfect particle" (participle?) from your title and first sentence relate to the rest of the question?

– Lawrence
2 days ago













"Having seen" is a perfect participle, but the question does appear to be about "become/becoming". The title (and the reference to it in the first line) is still unclear, but perhaps the rest of the question is not. However, Luckyy, if it's not what you want to ask, please feel free to correct it. "Perfect particle" needs to change in any case.

– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago





"Having seen" is a perfect participle, but the question does appear to be about "become/becoming". The title (and the reference to it in the first line) is still unclear, but perhaps the rest of the question is not. However, Luckyy, if it's not what you want to ask, please feel free to correct it. "Perfect particle" needs to change in any case.

– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago




1




1





I start to realize that my question is actually about "see do" or "see doing". I don't know the terminology for this. I think I should go to the English Learner stack exchange

– Luckyy
2 days ago





I start to realize that my question is actually about "see do" or "see doing". I don't know the terminology for this. I think I should go to the English Learner stack exchange

– Luckyy
2 days ago




1




1





It's possible that ELL would be a better site, but you're still going to have to articulate what you're trying to ask there too.

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago





It's possible that ELL would be a better site, but you're still going to have to articulate what you're trying to ask there too.

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness.
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

RAC Tourist Trophy

Image
Pour les articles homonymes, voir Tourist Trophy. Le RAC Tourist Trophy est une course automobile organisée par le Royal Automobile Club d'Angleterre. Créée en 1905, cette course a fait partie des épreuves comptant pour le championnat du monde des voitures de sport entre 1953 et 1955, en 1958 et 1959, et entre 1962 et 1965. Après une interruption de 17 ans (l'épreuve s'arrête après 1988), le RAC Tourist Trophy reprend en 2005 sous l'égide de la FIA GT. Palmarès | John Napier sur Arrol-Johnston, vainqueur du premier RAC Tourist Trophy, en 1905. L'honorable C.S. Rolls, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1906. Ernest Curtis, sur Rover 20 hp, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1907. William Watson, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1908. Kenelm Lee Guinness, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1914 sur Sunbeam. Départ du RAC Tourist Trophy 1928. Louis Gérard, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1938 sur Delage. Année Circuit Vainqueur
Read more