What is the difference between 'as if it were nothing' or 'as it was nothing'












0














I have two sentences. In the first I used were. A friend of mine said that you can also use was as there is no difference. In my opinion the first sentence sounds more correct but I am not sure why.




The dog jumped over the couch as if it were nothing.



The dog jumped over the couch as if it was nothing.




Do you know what the different meaning is between these two sentences?
Thanks in advance










share|improve this question



























    0














    I have two sentences. In the first I used were. A friend of mine said that you can also use was as there is no difference. In my opinion the first sentence sounds more correct but I am not sure why.




    The dog jumped over the couch as if it were nothing.



    The dog jumped over the couch as if it was nothing.




    Do you know what the different meaning is between these two sentences?
    Thanks in advance










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      1





      I have two sentences. In the first I used were. A friend of mine said that you can also use was as there is no difference. In my opinion the first sentence sounds more correct but I am not sure why.




      The dog jumped over the couch as if it were nothing.



      The dog jumped over the couch as if it was nothing.




      Do you know what the different meaning is between these two sentences?
      Thanks in advance










      share|improve this question













      I have two sentences. In the first I used were. A friend of mine said that you can also use was as there is no difference. In my opinion the first sentence sounds more correct but I am not sure why.




      The dog jumped over the couch as if it were nothing.



      The dog jumped over the couch as if it was nothing.




      Do you know what the different meaning is between these two sentences?
      Thanks in advance







      tenses






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      xtarsy

      509411




      509411






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          This is an area where English has been changing over the last fifty or a hundred years; and it is also a matter of the level of formality.



          The sort of people who believe that there is only one "correct" English, and everything else is "incorrect", will tell you that it has to be "were" here, for a counter-factual conditional. Those people will look down on anybody who uses "was".



          Many people always use "were" here; some use "were" in writing, but are as likely to use "was" in speech; some people always use "was".



          If you don't want to be judged as "incorrect", use "were". If you are happy to speak English the way many (but certainly not all) use it, you can use "was".






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "97"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478593%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-as-if-it-were-nothing-or-as-it-was-nothing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            This is an area where English has been changing over the last fifty or a hundred years; and it is also a matter of the level of formality.



            The sort of people who believe that there is only one "correct" English, and everything else is "incorrect", will tell you that it has to be "were" here, for a counter-factual conditional. Those people will look down on anybody who uses "was".



            Many people always use "were" here; some use "were" in writing, but are as likely to use "was" in speech; some people always use "was".



            If you don't want to be judged as "incorrect", use "were". If you are happy to speak English the way many (but certainly not all) use it, you can use "was".






            share|improve this answer


























              0














              This is an area where English has been changing over the last fifty or a hundred years; and it is also a matter of the level of formality.



              The sort of people who believe that there is only one "correct" English, and everything else is "incorrect", will tell you that it has to be "were" here, for a counter-factual conditional. Those people will look down on anybody who uses "was".



              Many people always use "were" here; some use "were" in writing, but are as likely to use "was" in speech; some people always use "was".



              If you don't want to be judged as "incorrect", use "were". If you are happy to speak English the way many (but certainly not all) use it, you can use "was".






              share|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                This is an area where English has been changing over the last fifty or a hundred years; and it is also a matter of the level of formality.



                The sort of people who believe that there is only one "correct" English, and everything else is "incorrect", will tell you that it has to be "were" here, for a counter-factual conditional. Those people will look down on anybody who uses "was".



                Many people always use "were" here; some use "were" in writing, but are as likely to use "was" in speech; some people always use "was".



                If you don't want to be judged as "incorrect", use "were". If you are happy to speak English the way many (but certainly not all) use it, you can use "was".






                share|improve this answer












                This is an area where English has been changing over the last fifty or a hundred years; and it is also a matter of the level of formality.



                The sort of people who believe that there is only one "correct" English, and everything else is "incorrect", will tell you that it has to be "were" here, for a counter-factual conditional. Those people will look down on anybody who uses "was".



                Many people always use "were" here; some use "were" in writing, but are as likely to use "was" in speech; some people always use "was".



                If you don't want to be judged as "incorrect", use "were". If you are happy to speak English the way many (but certainly not all) use it, you can use "was".







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Colin Fine

                63.7k170160




                63.7k170160






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478593%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-as-if-it-were-nothing-or-as-it-was-nothing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                    Alcedinidae

                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]