Can I announce prefix 161.117.25.0/24 even though I don't have all of /24 IPs












4















I'm managing one BGP router, under the router I'm trying to announce the following IP prefix:161.117.25.0/24. But the problem is that some of the IP addresses were borrowed by other AS(Autonomous System), for example the IP address 161.117.25.100 and 161.117.25.200 were borrowed by other AS. So how should I announce the remaining IP addresses please.



Following questions please:



1, Can I announce `161.117.25.0/30`?

2, Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?








share




















  • 1





    ISPs will only advertise /24 or shorter IPv4 prefixes. You need to ask your ISP if you can announce a longer prefix to it, but it will not advertise it to the Internet. No, two ASes advertising the same prefix will break things, and likely get both blocked.

    – Ron Maupin
    8 hours ago











  • Is the prefix yours or not? It does not appear to be publicly assigned to you. It should go without saying that if the prefix is not yours, you can't announce it.

    – David Schwartz
    4 hours ago


















4















I'm managing one BGP router, under the router I'm trying to announce the following IP prefix:161.117.25.0/24. But the problem is that some of the IP addresses were borrowed by other AS(Autonomous System), for example the IP address 161.117.25.100 and 161.117.25.200 were borrowed by other AS. So how should I announce the remaining IP addresses please.



Following questions please:



1, Can I announce `161.117.25.0/30`?

2, Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?








share




















  • 1





    ISPs will only advertise /24 or shorter IPv4 prefixes. You need to ask your ISP if you can announce a longer prefix to it, but it will not advertise it to the Internet. No, two ASes advertising the same prefix will break things, and likely get both blocked.

    – Ron Maupin
    8 hours ago











  • Is the prefix yours or not? It does not appear to be publicly assigned to you. It should go without saying that if the prefix is not yours, you can't announce it.

    – David Schwartz
    4 hours ago
















4












4








4








I'm managing one BGP router, under the router I'm trying to announce the following IP prefix:161.117.25.0/24. But the problem is that some of the IP addresses were borrowed by other AS(Autonomous System), for example the IP address 161.117.25.100 and 161.117.25.200 were borrowed by other AS. So how should I announce the remaining IP addresses please.



Following questions please:



1, Can I announce `161.117.25.0/30`?

2, Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?








share
















I'm managing one BGP router, under the router I'm trying to announce the following IP prefix:161.117.25.0/24. But the problem is that some of the IP addresses were borrowed by other AS(Autonomous System), for example the IP address 161.117.25.100 and 161.117.25.200 were borrowed by other AS. So how should I announce the remaining IP addresses please.



Following questions please:



1, Can I announce `161.117.25.0/30`?

2, Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?






router bgp





share














share












share



share








edited 8 hours ago







Jack

















asked 10 hours ago









JackJack

1715




1715








  • 1





    ISPs will only advertise /24 or shorter IPv4 prefixes. You need to ask your ISP if you can announce a longer prefix to it, but it will not advertise it to the Internet. No, two ASes advertising the same prefix will break things, and likely get both blocked.

    – Ron Maupin
    8 hours ago











  • Is the prefix yours or not? It does not appear to be publicly assigned to you. It should go without saying that if the prefix is not yours, you can't announce it.

    – David Schwartz
    4 hours ago
















  • 1





    ISPs will only advertise /24 or shorter IPv4 prefixes. You need to ask your ISP if you can announce a longer prefix to it, but it will not advertise it to the Internet. No, two ASes advertising the same prefix will break things, and likely get both blocked.

    – Ron Maupin
    8 hours ago











  • Is the prefix yours or not? It does not appear to be publicly assigned to you. It should go without saying that if the prefix is not yours, you can't announce it.

    – David Schwartz
    4 hours ago










1




1





ISPs will only advertise /24 or shorter IPv4 prefixes. You need to ask your ISP if you can announce a longer prefix to it, but it will not advertise it to the Internet. No, two ASes advertising the same prefix will break things, and likely get both blocked.

– Ron Maupin
8 hours ago





ISPs will only advertise /24 or shorter IPv4 prefixes. You need to ask your ISP if you can announce a longer prefix to it, but it will not advertise it to the Internet. No, two ASes advertising the same prefix will break things, and likely get both blocked.

– Ron Maupin
8 hours ago













Is the prefix yours or not? It does not appear to be publicly assigned to you. It should go without saying that if the prefix is not yours, you can't announce it.

– David Schwartz
4 hours ago







Is the prefix yours or not? It does not appear to be publicly assigned to you. It should go without saying that if the prefix is not yours, you can't announce it.

– David Schwartz
4 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














That /24 is part of a larger block (161.117.0.0/16) which is assigned to Alibabacom Singapore and announced by AS45102 (which is Alibaba again). My guess is that you're a customer of them and have been assigned a number of IP addresses to use from that /24. However, that does not give you the right to advertise them under your own ASN in BGP. If you do so, it would be considered a BGP Hijack.



Hopefully, it wouldn't work very well due to filters in place at upstream networks, but if it would, IP addresses in that /24 used by others would become unreachable.



The conclusion here is: you don't announce the /24 unless you're authorized to do so.






share|improve this answer































    2















    Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?




    It is entirely possible for multiple ASNs to announce the same prefix -- the shortest AS-PATH from any given perspective "wins". However, it's a poor practice that will trigger warnings in any BGP monitoring systems. (see also: route hijacking) If AS1 and AS2 both announce the same prefix, those closest to AS1 will prefer AS1; those closest to AS2 will prefer AS2. As long as you are connected to both ASNs it will usually work, but you've create a very fragile arrangement.



    Beyond BGP (once routes are in the FIB), IP routing uses a longest-match algorithm. The /32 routes for 100 and 200 will match before the /24 (which will match before the /16, etc.) As others have already said, one cannot announce [BGP] anything more specific than /24 globally, so it would be up to you and/or your ISP(s) to make sure those two specific addresses are handled appropriately.






    share|improve this answer































      1














      Just to be concrete, you advertise the blocks you do have. Given a "/24 without .100 and .200", the minimal number of blocks is 14:



      A.B.C.0/26
      A.B.C.64/27
      A.B.C.96/30
      A.B.C.101/32
      A.B.C.102/31
      A.B.C.104/29
      A.B.C.112/28
      A.B.C.128/26
      A.B.C.192/29
      A.B.C.201/32
      A.B.C.202/31
      A.B.C.204/30
      A.B.C.208/28
      A.B.C.224/27


      enter image description here



      Whether your ISP or other organisation will accept such long prefixes is a matter to take up with them: most ISPs have a limit shorter than /24/



      Other, non-minimal, groupings are also possible in principle, up to the limiting case of 254 blocks each /32.






      share|improve this answer


























      • If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

        – Ricky Beam
        5 hours ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "496"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57231%2fcan-i-announce-prefix-161-117-25-0-24-even-though-i-dont-have-all-of-24-ips%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8














      That /24 is part of a larger block (161.117.0.0/16) which is assigned to Alibabacom Singapore and announced by AS45102 (which is Alibaba again). My guess is that you're a customer of them and have been assigned a number of IP addresses to use from that /24. However, that does not give you the right to advertise them under your own ASN in BGP. If you do so, it would be considered a BGP Hijack.



      Hopefully, it wouldn't work very well due to filters in place at upstream networks, but if it would, IP addresses in that /24 used by others would become unreachable.



      The conclusion here is: you don't announce the /24 unless you're authorized to do so.






      share|improve this answer




























        8














        That /24 is part of a larger block (161.117.0.0/16) which is assigned to Alibabacom Singapore and announced by AS45102 (which is Alibaba again). My guess is that you're a customer of them and have been assigned a number of IP addresses to use from that /24. However, that does not give you the right to advertise them under your own ASN in BGP. If you do so, it would be considered a BGP Hijack.



        Hopefully, it wouldn't work very well due to filters in place at upstream networks, but if it would, IP addresses in that /24 used by others would become unreachable.



        The conclusion here is: you don't announce the /24 unless you're authorized to do so.






        share|improve this answer


























          8












          8








          8







          That /24 is part of a larger block (161.117.0.0/16) which is assigned to Alibabacom Singapore and announced by AS45102 (which is Alibaba again). My guess is that you're a customer of them and have been assigned a number of IP addresses to use from that /24. However, that does not give you the right to advertise them under your own ASN in BGP. If you do so, it would be considered a BGP Hijack.



          Hopefully, it wouldn't work very well due to filters in place at upstream networks, but if it would, IP addresses in that /24 used by others would become unreachable.



          The conclusion here is: you don't announce the /24 unless you're authorized to do so.






          share|improve this answer













          That /24 is part of a larger block (161.117.0.0/16) which is assigned to Alibabacom Singapore and announced by AS45102 (which is Alibaba again). My guess is that you're a customer of them and have been assigned a number of IP addresses to use from that /24. However, that does not give you the right to advertise them under your own ASN in BGP. If you do so, it would be considered a BGP Hijack.



          Hopefully, it wouldn't work very well due to filters in place at upstream networks, but if it would, IP addresses in that /24 used by others would become unreachable.



          The conclusion here is: you don't announce the /24 unless you're authorized to do so.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 10 hours ago









          Teun VinkTeun Vink

          11.7k53053




          11.7k53053























              2















              Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?




              It is entirely possible for multiple ASNs to announce the same prefix -- the shortest AS-PATH from any given perspective "wins". However, it's a poor practice that will trigger warnings in any BGP monitoring systems. (see also: route hijacking) If AS1 and AS2 both announce the same prefix, those closest to AS1 will prefer AS1; those closest to AS2 will prefer AS2. As long as you are connected to both ASNs it will usually work, but you've create a very fragile arrangement.



              Beyond BGP (once routes are in the FIB), IP routing uses a longest-match algorithm. The /32 routes for 100 and 200 will match before the /24 (which will match before the /16, etc.) As others have already said, one cannot announce [BGP] anything more specific than /24 globally, so it would be up to you and/or your ISP(s) to make sure those two specific addresses are handled appropriately.






              share|improve this answer




























                2















                Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?




                It is entirely possible for multiple ASNs to announce the same prefix -- the shortest AS-PATH from any given perspective "wins". However, it's a poor practice that will trigger warnings in any BGP monitoring systems. (see also: route hijacking) If AS1 and AS2 both announce the same prefix, those closest to AS1 will prefer AS1; those closest to AS2 will prefer AS2. As long as you are connected to both ASNs it will usually work, but you've create a very fragile arrangement.



                Beyond BGP (once routes are in the FIB), IP routing uses a longest-match algorithm. The /32 routes for 100 and 200 will match before the /24 (which will match before the /16, etc.) As others have already said, one cannot announce [BGP] anything more specific than /24 globally, so it would be up to you and/or your ISP(s) to make sure those two specific addresses are handled appropriately.






                share|improve this answer


























                  2












                  2








                  2








                  Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?




                  It is entirely possible for multiple ASNs to announce the same prefix -- the shortest AS-PATH from any given perspective "wins". However, it's a poor practice that will trigger warnings in any BGP monitoring systems. (see also: route hijacking) If AS1 and AS2 both announce the same prefix, those closest to AS1 will prefer AS1; those closest to AS2 will prefer AS2. As long as you are connected to both ASNs it will usually work, but you've create a very fragile arrangement.



                  Beyond BGP (once routes are in the FIB), IP routing uses a longest-match algorithm. The /32 routes for 100 and 200 will match before the /24 (which will match before the /16, etc.) As others have already said, one cannot announce [BGP] anything more specific than /24 globally, so it would be up to you and/or your ISP(s) to make sure those two specific addresses are handled appropriately.






                  share|improve this answer














                  Is it possible that two Autonomous Systems announce or have the same ip prefix?




                  It is entirely possible for multiple ASNs to announce the same prefix -- the shortest AS-PATH from any given perspective "wins". However, it's a poor practice that will trigger warnings in any BGP monitoring systems. (see also: route hijacking) If AS1 and AS2 both announce the same prefix, those closest to AS1 will prefer AS1; those closest to AS2 will prefer AS2. As long as you are connected to both ASNs it will usually work, but you've create a very fragile arrangement.



                  Beyond BGP (once routes are in the FIB), IP routing uses a longest-match algorithm. The /32 routes for 100 and 200 will match before the /24 (which will match before the /16, etc.) As others have already said, one cannot announce [BGP] anything more specific than /24 globally, so it would be up to you and/or your ISP(s) to make sure those two specific addresses are handled appropriately.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Ricky BeamRicky Beam

                  21.8k22961




                  21.8k22961























                      1














                      Just to be concrete, you advertise the blocks you do have. Given a "/24 without .100 and .200", the minimal number of blocks is 14:



                      A.B.C.0/26
                      A.B.C.64/27
                      A.B.C.96/30
                      A.B.C.101/32
                      A.B.C.102/31
                      A.B.C.104/29
                      A.B.C.112/28
                      A.B.C.128/26
                      A.B.C.192/29
                      A.B.C.201/32
                      A.B.C.202/31
                      A.B.C.204/30
                      A.B.C.208/28
                      A.B.C.224/27


                      enter image description here



                      Whether your ISP or other organisation will accept such long prefixes is a matter to take up with them: most ISPs have a limit shorter than /24/



                      Other, non-minimal, groupings are also possible in principle, up to the limiting case of 254 blocks each /32.






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

                        – Ricky Beam
                        5 hours ago
















                      1














                      Just to be concrete, you advertise the blocks you do have. Given a "/24 without .100 and .200", the minimal number of blocks is 14:



                      A.B.C.0/26
                      A.B.C.64/27
                      A.B.C.96/30
                      A.B.C.101/32
                      A.B.C.102/31
                      A.B.C.104/29
                      A.B.C.112/28
                      A.B.C.128/26
                      A.B.C.192/29
                      A.B.C.201/32
                      A.B.C.202/31
                      A.B.C.204/30
                      A.B.C.208/28
                      A.B.C.224/27


                      enter image description here



                      Whether your ISP or other organisation will accept such long prefixes is a matter to take up with them: most ISPs have a limit shorter than /24/



                      Other, non-minimal, groupings are also possible in principle, up to the limiting case of 254 blocks each /32.






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

                        – Ricky Beam
                        5 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Just to be concrete, you advertise the blocks you do have. Given a "/24 without .100 and .200", the minimal number of blocks is 14:



                      A.B.C.0/26
                      A.B.C.64/27
                      A.B.C.96/30
                      A.B.C.101/32
                      A.B.C.102/31
                      A.B.C.104/29
                      A.B.C.112/28
                      A.B.C.128/26
                      A.B.C.192/29
                      A.B.C.201/32
                      A.B.C.202/31
                      A.B.C.204/30
                      A.B.C.208/28
                      A.B.C.224/27


                      enter image description here



                      Whether your ISP or other organisation will accept such long prefixes is a matter to take up with them: most ISPs have a limit shorter than /24/



                      Other, non-minimal, groupings are also possible in principle, up to the limiting case of 254 blocks each /32.






                      share|improve this answer















                      Just to be concrete, you advertise the blocks you do have. Given a "/24 without .100 and .200", the minimal number of blocks is 14:



                      A.B.C.0/26
                      A.B.C.64/27
                      A.B.C.96/30
                      A.B.C.101/32
                      A.B.C.102/31
                      A.B.C.104/29
                      A.B.C.112/28
                      A.B.C.128/26
                      A.B.C.192/29
                      A.B.C.201/32
                      A.B.C.202/31
                      A.B.C.204/30
                      A.B.C.208/28
                      A.B.C.224/27


                      enter image description here



                      Whether your ISP or other organisation will accept such long prefixes is a matter to take up with them: most ISPs have a limit shorter than /24/



                      Other, non-minimal, groupings are also possible in principle, up to the limiting case of 254 blocks each /32.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 7 hours ago

























                      answered 7 hours ago









                      jonathanjojonathanjo

                      11.7k1935




                      11.7k1935













                      • If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

                        – Ricky Beam
                        5 hours ago



















                      • If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

                        – Ricky Beam
                        5 hours ago

















                      If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

                      – Ricky Beam
                      5 hours ago





                      If 161.117.25.0/24 is assigned to a LAN, some trickery would be necessary to put 100 and 200 somewhere else. (I've done this very thing.) From a route table perspective, 161.117.25.0/24, 161.117.25.100/32, 161.117.25.200/32 do not create a conflict.

                      – Ricky Beam
                      5 hours ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57231%2fcan-i-announce-prefix-161-117-25-0-24-even-though-i-dont-have-all-of-24-ips%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                      Alcedinidae

                      Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?