“Sit down” vs. “sit up”
When someone is lying down, you say sit up.
When someone is standing in an upright position, you say sit down.
What in the situation when you want to ask a very small kid to sit down to a chair, but the chair is too high for him so he has to climb up the chair to sit down on it?

(source: voiceboks.com)
Sit down sounds like not matching the context. Would you still use sit down?
What I want to find is if for the native English speaker the phrase sit down is stronger than the idea of the logical direction as in sit up (which seems more natural to me as the non-native speaker). So if you really had to choose and you had no other options, what would you select.
(I believe this is not a duplicate of lying down and then sit up/down?)
meaning phrasal-verbs
add a comment |
When someone is lying down, you say sit up.
When someone is standing in an upright position, you say sit down.
What in the situation when you want to ask a very small kid to sit down to a chair, but the chair is too high for him so he has to climb up the chair to sit down on it?

(source: voiceboks.com)
Sit down sounds like not matching the context. Would you still use sit down?
What I want to find is if for the native English speaker the phrase sit down is stronger than the idea of the logical direction as in sit up (which seems more natural to me as the non-native speaker). So if you really had to choose and you had no other options, what would you select.
(I believe this is not a duplicate of lying down and then sit up/down?)
meaning phrasal-verbs
1
"Get up in your chair!"
– Hot Licks
Apr 14 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
When someone is lying down, you say sit up.
When someone is standing in an upright position, you say sit down.
What in the situation when you want to ask a very small kid to sit down to a chair, but the chair is too high for him so he has to climb up the chair to sit down on it?

(source: voiceboks.com)
Sit down sounds like not matching the context. Would you still use sit down?
What I want to find is if for the native English speaker the phrase sit down is stronger than the idea of the logical direction as in sit up (which seems more natural to me as the non-native speaker). So if you really had to choose and you had no other options, what would you select.
(I believe this is not a duplicate of lying down and then sit up/down?)
meaning phrasal-verbs
When someone is lying down, you say sit up.
When someone is standing in an upright position, you say sit down.
What in the situation when you want to ask a very small kid to sit down to a chair, but the chair is too high for him so he has to climb up the chair to sit down on it?

(source: voiceboks.com)
Sit down sounds like not matching the context. Would you still use sit down?
What I want to find is if for the native English speaker the phrase sit down is stronger than the idea of the logical direction as in sit up (which seems more natural to me as the non-native speaker). So if you really had to choose and you had no other options, what would you select.
(I believe this is not a duplicate of lying down and then sit up/down?)
meaning phrasal-verbs
meaning phrasal-verbs
edited 4 hours ago
Glorfindel
8,186103741
8,186103741
asked May 19 '14 at 7:29
Honza ZidekHonza Zidek
2,39373659
2,39373659
1
"Get up in your chair!"
– Hot Licks
Apr 14 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
1
"Get up in your chair!"
– Hot Licks
Apr 14 '18 at 12:29
1
1
"Get up in your chair!"
– Hot Licks
Apr 14 '18 at 12:29
"Get up in your chair!"
– Hot Licks
Apr 14 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
You would still use sit down no matter how high up they have to climb to get onto the chair. You want them to sit in the chair not stand on it or swing from it or any other things children like to do on a chair other than sit on it.
Get up on that chair and sit down.
or
Sit down on that chair. (no need to let them know they have to climb up to do it)
You also want to be explicit to avoid the inevitable case where the child has climbed up onto the chair and is now spinning around while doing a handstand and when asked why they are not sitting down in the chair they will reply with You told me to get up on the chair, you didn't say I had to sit down on it.
Probably different for adults, where sit up there would be OK to mean sit on the large green chair. See Large Green Chair Minnesota
add a comment |
"Would you please get up on your chair?"
I wouldn't say anything different to a small child (or anyone else) than this. You're trying to force a square peg into a round hole, to use an old expression.
It's like asking whether you would tell the child to eat his breakfast or eat his lunch when you're serving dinner. The only answer here is that in the situation you've given, there is no such choice between “sit up” and “sit down”. People simply do not use either phrasing, at all. This site is about actual English usage, not how it would work in nonexistent, hypothetical situations.
add a comment |
'Sit up here sunshine, (whilst patting the chair with your hand)', or 'sit up on your chair'. But everyone would have their own way of saying this. There is no correct version, though some incorrect ones. I definitely wouldn't say 'sit down' to a toddler unless I wanted them to sit on the floor.
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
add a comment |
"Sit up" is a valid form of expression, referring to sitting "in a straight, tall position".
e.g. "i was slouching, and the teacher told me to sit up/sit up straight".
add a comment |
As a native speaker, I would always say "sit up" to a toddler, never "sit down" on a chair that is high for him.
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
3
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
add a comment |
If you don't want to use "up" or "down" because it refers to the physical direction of movement, you can try using "on" instead.
Sit on the chair; or
Get on the chair.
Whether the person is taller or shorter than the seat of the chair, what you end up doing is sitting on the chair. You won't sit under the chair. Using "on" can eliminate the referrals of direction implied in "up" or "down".
add a comment |
protected by MetaEd♦ Aug 15 '17 at 22:08
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You would still use sit down no matter how high up they have to climb to get onto the chair. You want them to sit in the chair not stand on it or swing from it or any other things children like to do on a chair other than sit on it.
Get up on that chair and sit down.
or
Sit down on that chair. (no need to let them know they have to climb up to do it)
You also want to be explicit to avoid the inevitable case where the child has climbed up onto the chair and is now spinning around while doing a handstand and when asked why they are not sitting down in the chair they will reply with You told me to get up on the chair, you didn't say I had to sit down on it.
Probably different for adults, where sit up there would be OK to mean sit on the large green chair. See Large Green Chair Minnesota
add a comment |
You would still use sit down no matter how high up they have to climb to get onto the chair. You want them to sit in the chair not stand on it or swing from it or any other things children like to do on a chair other than sit on it.
Get up on that chair and sit down.
or
Sit down on that chair. (no need to let them know they have to climb up to do it)
You also want to be explicit to avoid the inevitable case where the child has climbed up onto the chair and is now spinning around while doing a handstand and when asked why they are not sitting down in the chair they will reply with You told me to get up on the chair, you didn't say I had to sit down on it.
Probably different for adults, where sit up there would be OK to mean sit on the large green chair. See Large Green Chair Minnesota
add a comment |
You would still use sit down no matter how high up they have to climb to get onto the chair. You want them to sit in the chair not stand on it or swing from it or any other things children like to do on a chair other than sit on it.
Get up on that chair and sit down.
or
Sit down on that chair. (no need to let them know they have to climb up to do it)
You also want to be explicit to avoid the inevitable case where the child has climbed up onto the chair and is now spinning around while doing a handstand and when asked why they are not sitting down in the chair they will reply with You told me to get up on the chair, you didn't say I had to sit down on it.
Probably different for adults, where sit up there would be OK to mean sit on the large green chair. See Large Green Chair Minnesota
You would still use sit down no matter how high up they have to climb to get onto the chair. You want them to sit in the chair not stand on it or swing from it or any other things children like to do on a chair other than sit on it.
Get up on that chair and sit down.
or
Sit down on that chair. (no need to let them know they have to climb up to do it)
You also want to be explicit to avoid the inevitable case where the child has climbed up onto the chair and is now spinning around while doing a handstand and when asked why they are not sitting down in the chair they will reply with You told me to get up on the chair, you didn't say I had to sit down on it.
Probably different for adults, where sit up there would be OK to mean sit on the large green chair. See Large Green Chair Minnesota
answered May 19 '14 at 8:26
FrankFrank
4,60811329
4,60811329
add a comment |
add a comment |
"Would you please get up on your chair?"
I wouldn't say anything different to a small child (or anyone else) than this. You're trying to force a square peg into a round hole, to use an old expression.
It's like asking whether you would tell the child to eat his breakfast or eat his lunch when you're serving dinner. The only answer here is that in the situation you've given, there is no such choice between “sit up” and “sit down”. People simply do not use either phrasing, at all. This site is about actual English usage, not how it would work in nonexistent, hypothetical situations.
add a comment |
"Would you please get up on your chair?"
I wouldn't say anything different to a small child (or anyone else) than this. You're trying to force a square peg into a round hole, to use an old expression.
It's like asking whether you would tell the child to eat his breakfast or eat his lunch when you're serving dinner. The only answer here is that in the situation you've given, there is no such choice between “sit up” and “sit down”. People simply do not use either phrasing, at all. This site is about actual English usage, not how it would work in nonexistent, hypothetical situations.
add a comment |
"Would you please get up on your chair?"
I wouldn't say anything different to a small child (or anyone else) than this. You're trying to force a square peg into a round hole, to use an old expression.
It's like asking whether you would tell the child to eat his breakfast or eat his lunch when you're serving dinner. The only answer here is that in the situation you've given, there is no such choice between “sit up” and “sit down”. People simply do not use either phrasing, at all. This site is about actual English usage, not how it would work in nonexistent, hypothetical situations.
"Would you please get up on your chair?"
I wouldn't say anything different to a small child (or anyone else) than this. You're trying to force a square peg into a round hole, to use an old expression.
It's like asking whether you would tell the child to eat his breakfast or eat his lunch when you're serving dinner. The only answer here is that in the situation you've given, there is no such choice between “sit up” and “sit down”. People simply do not use either phrasing, at all. This site is about actual English usage, not how it would work in nonexistent, hypothetical situations.
edited Aug 15 '17 at 11:45
Kit Z. Fox♦
23.4k2094180
23.4k2094180
answered May 19 '14 at 7:31
Erik KowalErik Kowal
25.5k13885
25.5k13885
add a comment |
add a comment |
'Sit up here sunshine, (whilst patting the chair with your hand)', or 'sit up on your chair'. But everyone would have their own way of saying this. There is no correct version, though some incorrect ones. I definitely wouldn't say 'sit down' to a toddler unless I wanted them to sit on the floor.
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
add a comment |
'Sit up here sunshine, (whilst patting the chair with your hand)', or 'sit up on your chair'. But everyone would have their own way of saying this. There is no correct version, though some incorrect ones. I definitely wouldn't say 'sit down' to a toddler unless I wanted them to sit on the floor.
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
add a comment |
'Sit up here sunshine, (whilst patting the chair with your hand)', or 'sit up on your chair'. But everyone would have their own way of saying this. There is no correct version, though some incorrect ones. I definitely wouldn't say 'sit down' to a toddler unless I wanted them to sit on the floor.
'Sit up here sunshine, (whilst patting the chair with your hand)', or 'sit up on your chair'. But everyone would have their own way of saying this. There is no correct version, though some incorrect ones. I definitely wouldn't say 'sit down' to a toddler unless I wanted them to sit on the floor.
answered May 19 '14 at 9:11
WS2WS2
52k27115245
52k27115245
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
add a comment |
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
It seems that both you and Frank have understood the point of my question, however you give opposite answers...
– Honza Zidek
May 19 '14 at 9:25
add a comment |
"Sit up" is a valid form of expression, referring to sitting "in a straight, tall position".
e.g. "i was slouching, and the teacher told me to sit up/sit up straight".
add a comment |
"Sit up" is a valid form of expression, referring to sitting "in a straight, tall position".
e.g. "i was slouching, and the teacher told me to sit up/sit up straight".
add a comment |
"Sit up" is a valid form of expression, referring to sitting "in a straight, tall position".
e.g. "i was slouching, and the teacher told me to sit up/sit up straight".
"Sit up" is a valid form of expression, referring to sitting "in a straight, tall position".
e.g. "i was slouching, and the teacher told me to sit up/sit up straight".
answered Aug 15 '17 at 11:50
FaradinFaradin
1254
1254
add a comment |
add a comment |
As a native speaker, I would always say "sit up" to a toddler, never "sit down" on a chair that is high for him.
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
3
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
add a comment |
As a native speaker, I would always say "sit up" to a toddler, never "sit down" on a chair that is high for him.
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
3
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
add a comment |
As a native speaker, I would always say "sit up" to a toddler, never "sit down" on a chair that is high for him.
As a native speaker, I would always say "sit up" to a toddler, never "sit down" on a chair that is high for him.
answered May 31 '15 at 4:47
user123543user123543
1
1
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
3
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
add a comment |
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
3
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
Well, I as a non-native speaker feel it the same way. But obviously some other native speakers are of a different opinion...
– Honza Zidek
May 31 '15 at 7:51
3
3
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
As a native speaker, I would never use the idiom "sit up" to instruct anyone to go from a standing to a sitting position. As shown in WS2's answer, the two words may happen to be collocated, but they are not a single phrasal verb in that construction. but rather a verb plus a prepositional phrase.
– Hellion
Jun 1 '15 at 2:43
add a comment |
If you don't want to use "up" or "down" because it refers to the physical direction of movement, you can try using "on" instead.
Sit on the chair; or
Get on the chair.
Whether the person is taller or shorter than the seat of the chair, what you end up doing is sitting on the chair. You won't sit under the chair. Using "on" can eliminate the referrals of direction implied in "up" or "down".
add a comment |
If you don't want to use "up" or "down" because it refers to the physical direction of movement, you can try using "on" instead.
Sit on the chair; or
Get on the chair.
Whether the person is taller or shorter than the seat of the chair, what you end up doing is sitting on the chair. You won't sit under the chair. Using "on" can eliminate the referrals of direction implied in "up" or "down".
add a comment |
If you don't want to use "up" or "down" because it refers to the physical direction of movement, you can try using "on" instead.
Sit on the chair; or
Get on the chair.
Whether the person is taller or shorter than the seat of the chair, what you end up doing is sitting on the chair. You won't sit under the chair. Using "on" can eliminate the referrals of direction implied in "up" or "down".
If you don't want to use "up" or "down" because it refers to the physical direction of movement, you can try using "on" instead.
Sit on the chair; or
Get on the chair.
Whether the person is taller or shorter than the seat of the chair, what you end up doing is sitting on the chair. You won't sit under the chair. Using "on" can eliminate the referrals of direction implied in "up" or "down".
edited Aug 15 '17 at 23:58
answered Aug 15 '17 at 8:04
claymoreclaymore
134
134
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by MetaEd♦ Aug 15 '17 at 22:08
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
1
"Get up in your chair!"
– Hot Licks
Apr 14 '18 at 12:29