Type of filesystem to put on USB storage, that is compatible with most OSs [on hold]












6














I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:30










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:36










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:37










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:39






  • 1




    Voted to reopen to be able to close as duplicate of this
    – Fabby
    2 days ago
















6














I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:30










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:36










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:37










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:39






  • 1




    Voted to reopen to be able to close as duplicate of this
    – Fabby
    2 days ago














6












6








6







I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1







linux filesystems usb






share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Jeff Schaller

38.8k1053125




38.8k1053125






New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 29 '18 at 18:26









Stn

384




384




New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:30










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:36










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:37










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:39






  • 1




    Voted to reopen to be able to close as duplicate of this
    – Fabby
    2 days ago














  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:30










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:36










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:37










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    Dec 29 '18 at 18:39






  • 1




    Voted to reopen to be able to close as duplicate of this
    – Fabby
    2 days ago








1




1




vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Dec 29 '18 at 18:30




vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Dec 29 '18 at 18:30












I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
– Stn
Dec 29 '18 at 18:36




I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
– Stn
Dec 29 '18 at 18:36












A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
– tink
Dec 29 '18 at 18:37




A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
– tink
Dec 29 '18 at 18:37












I believe you duplicated vfat
– Jeff Schaller
Dec 29 '18 at 18:39




I believe you duplicated vfat
– Jeff Schaller
Dec 29 '18 at 18:39




1




1




Voted to reopen to be able to close as duplicate of this
– Fabby
2 days ago




Voted to reopen to be able to close as duplicate of this
– Fabby
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 4 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.
Note 4: Read-only






share|improve this answer























  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago










  • Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
    – Stn
    2 days ago



















1














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    2 days ago








  • 5




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    2 days ago










  • @Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
    – phuclv
    2 days ago










  • @ElementW: it depends on how you implement
    – Fabby
    2 days ago


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 4 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.
Note 4: Read-only






share|improve this answer























  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago










  • Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
    – Stn
    2 days ago
















11














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 4 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.
Note 4: Read-only






share|improve this answer























  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago










  • Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
    – Stn
    2 days ago














11












11








11






The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 4 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.
Note 4: Read-only






share|improve this answer














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 4 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.
Note 4: Read-only







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Fabby

3,63211228




3,63211228












  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago










  • Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
    – Stn
    2 days ago


















  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago










  • Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
    – Stn
    2 days ago
















May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
2 days ago




May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
2 days ago












Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
– Stn
2 days ago




Here, clarify that the question refers to what type of format is recommended for a Pen Drive, ntfs, fat, etc.
– Stn
2 days ago













1














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    2 days ago








  • 5




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    2 days ago










  • @Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
    – phuclv
    2 days ago










  • @ElementW: it depends on how you implement
    – Fabby
    2 days ago
















1














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    2 days ago








  • 5




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    2 days ago










  • @Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
    – phuclv
    2 days ago










  • @ElementW: it depends on how you implement
    – Fabby
    2 days ago














1












1








1






Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer












Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Jaleks

1,384424




1,384424








  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    2 days ago








  • 5




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    2 days ago










  • @Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
    – phuclv
    2 days ago










  • @ElementW: it depends on how you implement
    – Fabby
    2 days ago














  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    2 days ago








  • 5




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    2 days ago










  • @Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
    – phuclv
    2 days ago










  • @ElementW: it depends on how you implement
    – Fabby
    2 days ago








7




7




I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
– Fox
2 days ago




I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
– Fox
2 days ago




1




1




Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
– roaima
2 days ago






Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
– roaima
2 days ago






5




5




"NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
– ElementW
2 days ago




"NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
– ElementW
2 days ago












@Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
– phuclv
2 days ago




@Fox "nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations" all Linux distros I've ever used can read and write NTFS partitions by default for years
– phuclv
2 days ago












@ElementW: it depends on how you implement
– Fabby
2 days ago




@ElementW: it depends on how you implement
– Fabby
2 days ago



Popular posts from this blog

Paul Cézanne

UIScrollView CustomStickyHeader Resize height generates problems when scroll is too fast

Angular material date-picker (MatDatepicker) auto completes the date on focus out