Why ESTABLISHED connection state between localhost processes are shown twice?












0















Like nginx and php-fpm. netstat -anpt|grep 9000

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 926/php-fpm: pool w
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59895 ESTABLISHED 12996/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60094 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60068 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11423/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60424 ESTABLISHED 13015/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60189 ESTABLISHED 926/php-fpm: pool w
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59885 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11430/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59902 ESTABLISHED 13023/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59895 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11431/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60068 ESTABLISHED 13247/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:21065 ESTABLISHED 13469/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60972 ESTABLISHED 13965/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59906 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11421/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59891 ESTABLISHED 13936/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59948 ESTABLISHED 12988/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59889 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:21069 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11427/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60143 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11424/nginx: worker
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60011 ESTABLISHED 13818/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60349 ESTABLISHED 1950/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59930 ESTABLISHED 14521/php-fpm: pool
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59889 ESTABLISHED 12968/php-fpm: pool
...

I just paste part of the output. What I want to ask is that why one established connection(between localhost processes) state is shown twice here?






connection state netstat







share|improve this question





























    0















    Like nginx and php-fpm. netstat -anpt|grep 9000

    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 926/php-fpm: pool w
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59895 ESTABLISHED 12996/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60094 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60068 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11423/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60424 ESTABLISHED 13015/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60189 ESTABLISHED 926/php-fpm: pool w
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59885 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11430/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59902 ESTABLISHED 13023/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59895 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11431/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60068 ESTABLISHED 13247/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:21065 ESTABLISHED 13469/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60972 ESTABLISHED 13965/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59906 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11421/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59891 ESTABLISHED 13936/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59948 ESTABLISHED 12988/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59889 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:21069 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11427/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60143 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11424/nginx: worker
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60011 ESTABLISHED 13818/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60349 ESTABLISHED 1950/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59930 ESTABLISHED 14521/php-fpm: pool
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59889 ESTABLISHED 12968/php-fpm: pool
    ...

    I just paste part of the output. What I want to ask is that why one established connection(between localhost processes) state is shown twice here?






    connection state netstat







    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      Like nginx and php-fpm. netstat -anpt|grep 9000

      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 926/php-fpm: pool w
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59895 ESTABLISHED 12996/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60094 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60068 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11423/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60424 ESTABLISHED 13015/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60189 ESTABLISHED 926/php-fpm: pool w
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59885 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11430/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59902 ESTABLISHED 13023/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59895 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11431/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60068 ESTABLISHED 13247/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:21065 ESTABLISHED 13469/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60972 ESTABLISHED 13965/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59906 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11421/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59891 ESTABLISHED 13936/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59948 ESTABLISHED 12988/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59889 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:21069 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11427/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60143 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11424/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60011 ESTABLISHED 13818/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60349 ESTABLISHED 1950/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59930 ESTABLISHED 14521/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59889 ESTABLISHED 12968/php-fpm: pool
      ...

      I just paste part of the output. What I want to ask is that why one established connection(between localhost processes) state is shown twice here?






      connection state netstat







      share|improve this question
















      Like nginx and php-fpm. netstat -anpt|grep 9000

      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 926/php-fpm: pool w
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59895 ESTABLISHED 12996/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60094 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60068 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11423/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60424 ESTABLISHED 13015/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60189 ESTABLISHED 926/php-fpm: pool w
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59885 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11430/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59902 ESTABLISHED 13023/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59895 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11431/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60068 ESTABLISHED 13247/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:21065 ESTABLISHED 13469/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60972 ESTABLISHED 13965/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59906 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11421/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59891 ESTABLISHED 13936/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59948 ESTABLISHED 12988/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:59889 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11429/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:21069 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11427/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:60143 127.0.0.1:9000 ESTABLISHED 11424/nginx: worker
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60011 ESTABLISHED 13818/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:60349 ESTABLISHED 1950/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59930 ESTABLISHED 14521/php-fpm: pool
      tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 127.0.0.1:59889 ESTABLISHED 12968/php-fpm: pool
      ...

      I just paste part of the output. What I want to ask is that why one established connection(between localhost processes) state is shown twice here?






      connection state netstat




      connection state netstat






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 23 '18 at 4:30







      Max

















      asked Nov 23 '18 at 4:04









      MaxMax

      53248




      53248
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53440525%2fwhy-established-connection-state-between-localhost-processes-are-shown-twice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53440525%2fwhy-established-connection-state-between-localhost-processes-are-shown-twice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness. ...
          Read more

          Alcedinidae

          Image
          Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout ...
          Read more

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 17 1 Today, I found myself discussing what students should have "under their belts" during a lecture, and I wondered to myself if there was some inappropriate undertone here that I might be unaware of. Question : What is the origin of the phrase "under your belt"? A google search revealed some webpages (e.g. [1]) that assert its origin is related to consumption of food -- once a meal has been eaten, it's under your belt (which is a relief). However, with such websites, I have no way to determine fact from "random guy on the internet making stuff up". etymology idioms ...
          Read more