will vs going to as a fact about future
Is there any difference between these two sentences?
The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.
The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.
They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.
future will-future
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
Is there any difference between these two sentences?
The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.
The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.
They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.
future will-future
New contributor
"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43
They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50
1
How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago
The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago
Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
Is there any difference between these two sentences?
The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.
The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.
They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.
future will-future
New contributor
Is there any difference between these two sentences?
The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.
The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.
They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.
future will-future
future will-future
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Jan 5 at 13:32
nklymoknklymok
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43
They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50
1
How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago
The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago
Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43
They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50
1
How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago
The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago
Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43
"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43
They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50
They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50
1
1
How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago
How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago
The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago
The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago
Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479997%2fwill-vs-going-to-as-a-fact-about-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479997%2fwill-vs-going-to-as-a-fact-about-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43
They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50
1
How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago
The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago
Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago