will vs going to as a fact about future












-1














Is there any difference between these two sentences?





  1. The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.


  2. The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.





They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.










share|improve this question







New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • "going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
    – KJO
    Jan 5 at 14:43












  • They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
    – Robusto
    Jan 5 at 14:50






  • 1




    How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
    – The Photon
    2 days ago










  • The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
    – nklymok
    2 days ago










  • Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago


















-1














Is there any difference between these two sentences?





  1. The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.


  2. The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.





They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.










share|improve this question







New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • "going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
    – KJO
    Jan 5 at 14:43












  • They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
    – Robusto
    Jan 5 at 14:50






  • 1




    How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
    – The Photon
    2 days ago










  • The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
    – nklymok
    2 days ago










  • Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago
















-1












-1








-1







Is there any difference between these two sentences?





  1. The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.


  2. The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.





They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.










share|improve this question







New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Is there any difference between these two sentences?





  1. The new airport will be the biggest in Europe.


  2. The new airport is going to be the biggest in Europe.





They're both refer to a fact about the future and not to a prediction. I could say the first is a prediction without any evidence when the second has some evidence we can see. But here, they're both refer to a fact about the future.







future will-future






share|improve this question







New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Jan 5 at 13:32









nklymoknklymok

11




11




New contributor




nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






nklymok is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • "going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
    – KJO
    Jan 5 at 14:43












  • They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
    – Robusto
    Jan 5 at 14:50






  • 1




    How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
    – The Photon
    2 days ago










  • The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
    – nklymok
    2 days ago










  • Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago




















  • "going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
    – KJO
    Jan 5 at 14:43












  • They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
    – Robusto
    Jan 5 at 14:50






  • 1




    How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
    – The Photon
    2 days ago










  • The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
    – nklymok
    2 days ago










  • Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago


















"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43






"going to" will, placed in the search box give 2166 hits and now its going to have +1 or more hits
– KJO
Jan 5 at 14:43














They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50




They both mean the same thing. Both express future condition. The only difference is how they do that. Using "going to be" is sometimes called "imperfect future" and has parallels in other languages (cf. Spanish va a ser, etc.).
– Robusto
Jan 5 at 14:50




1




1




How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago




How can you know with absolute certainty that a statement about the future is a fact? The construction site could have a fire before the airport opens. The builders could run out of money before it is finished. They could simply dither on forever without finishing like BER. So both your examples are predictions, not facts.
– The Photon
2 days ago












The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago




The Photon, I can know it because that's a textbook example, predictions with both 'be going to' and 'will' are mentioned there, but these 2 sentences are examples for future facts. So what I'm asking is exactly if there is any difference. Robusto, thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if you answer this question with this comment so I can mark it as the answer.
– nklymok
2 days ago












Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago






Just as a note, any future-looking statement is based on prediction rather than fact. (Although present-day facts can support the probability of something happening.) Nothing about the future can be stated to an absolute certainty, nor is there such a thing as a future fact (relative to the present).
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479997%2fwill-vs-going-to-as-a-fact-about-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












nklymok is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479997%2fwill-vs-going-to-as-a-fact-about-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?