Are SMART Data Address Mark errors a concern on an SSD in particular?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have a Crucial 500 GB SSD (CT500MX500SSD4) which is reporting a non-zero number of data address mark errors. Other parameters appear fine (wear leveling is occurring, there are currently no I/O errors or failures at the OS or user-mode level, and the only other errors are old ultraDMA CRC errors that I have already ruled out as an old bad connection. The data address mark errors are new (they arose in the last two weeks, on a laptop with use of about 5-6 hours per day). All files can be successfully read (backups, including a recent full one, are succeeding).



I know that for spinning hard disks, this parameter is informational and does not indicate imminent drive failure (source), because this error may arise through benign one-time servomechanism seek/addressing failures or local degradation. However, SSDs locate blocks by addressing directly into flash chips without any opportunity for electromechanical error.



Does this mean that data address mark errors, on an SSD in particular, are a sign that indicates imminent or ongoing drive failure?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I have a Crucial 500 GB SSD (CT500MX500SSD4) which is reporting a non-zero number of data address mark errors. Other parameters appear fine (wear leveling is occurring, there are currently no I/O errors or failures at the OS or user-mode level, and the only other errors are old ultraDMA CRC errors that I have already ruled out as an old bad connection. The data address mark errors are new (they arose in the last two weeks, on a laptop with use of about 5-6 hours per day). All files can be successfully read (backups, including a recent full one, are succeeding).



    I know that for spinning hard disks, this parameter is informational and does not indicate imminent drive failure (source), because this error may arise through benign one-time servomechanism seek/addressing failures or local degradation. However, SSDs locate blocks by addressing directly into flash chips without any opportunity for electromechanical error.



    Does this mean that data address mark errors, on an SSD in particular, are a sign that indicates imminent or ongoing drive failure?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I have a Crucial 500 GB SSD (CT500MX500SSD4) which is reporting a non-zero number of data address mark errors. Other parameters appear fine (wear leveling is occurring, there are currently no I/O errors or failures at the OS or user-mode level, and the only other errors are old ultraDMA CRC errors that I have already ruled out as an old bad connection. The data address mark errors are new (they arose in the last two weeks, on a laptop with use of about 5-6 hours per day). All files can be successfully read (backups, including a recent full one, are succeeding).



      I know that for spinning hard disks, this parameter is informational and does not indicate imminent drive failure (source), because this error may arise through benign one-time servomechanism seek/addressing failures or local degradation. However, SSDs locate blocks by addressing directly into flash chips without any opportunity for electromechanical error.



      Does this mean that data address mark errors, on an SSD in particular, are a sign that indicates imminent or ongoing drive failure?










      share|improve this question













      I have a Crucial 500 GB SSD (CT500MX500SSD4) which is reporting a non-zero number of data address mark errors. Other parameters appear fine (wear leveling is occurring, there are currently no I/O errors or failures at the OS or user-mode level, and the only other errors are old ultraDMA CRC errors that I have already ruled out as an old bad connection. The data address mark errors are new (they arose in the last two weeks, on a laptop with use of about 5-6 hours per day). All files can be successfully read (backups, including a recent full one, are succeeding).



      I know that for spinning hard disks, this parameter is informational and does not indicate imminent drive failure (source), because this error may arise through benign one-time servomechanism seek/addressing failures or local degradation. However, SSDs locate blocks by addressing directly into flash chips without any opportunity for electromechanical error.



      Does this mean that data address mark errors, on an SSD in particular, are a sign that indicates imminent or ongoing drive failure?







      ssd smart hard-drive-failure






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 15:42









      hexafraction

      225317




      225317






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          In this HD Sentinel post
          it is answered:




          In general, the manufacturer for most SSD devices define a method to measure the overall "health" of the memory cells in the SSD.
          Usually there is a special attribute (for example, #202 Percentage Of The Rated Lifetime Used in your SSD) shows the calculated value, in this case 50%.




          Further, the article
          Predicting SSD Failures: Specific S.M.A.R.T. Values
          says:




          Percentage of the Rated Lifetime Used. This is the opposite of SSD Time Left. 1 means the drive is 100% healthy, while 100 means that 100% of the drive’s lifetime is used up, and the drive can be used as a small doorstop.




          This seems then like an indicator which might indicate when an SSD is nearing
          its end of life, according to the manufacturer.
          It doesn't mean that the drive will immediately fail when it reaches 100%,
          but that the drive shouldn't be relied upon to continue on working
          without problem.






          share|improve this answer





















          • This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
            – hexafraction
            Nov 19 at 17:04











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "3"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1376724%2fare-smart-data-address-mark-errors-a-concern-on-an-ssd-in-particular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          In this HD Sentinel post
          it is answered:




          In general, the manufacturer for most SSD devices define a method to measure the overall "health" of the memory cells in the SSD.
          Usually there is a special attribute (for example, #202 Percentage Of The Rated Lifetime Used in your SSD) shows the calculated value, in this case 50%.




          Further, the article
          Predicting SSD Failures: Specific S.M.A.R.T. Values
          says:




          Percentage of the Rated Lifetime Used. This is the opposite of SSD Time Left. 1 means the drive is 100% healthy, while 100 means that 100% of the drive’s lifetime is used up, and the drive can be used as a small doorstop.




          This seems then like an indicator which might indicate when an SSD is nearing
          its end of life, according to the manufacturer.
          It doesn't mean that the drive will immediately fail when it reaches 100%,
          but that the drive shouldn't be relied upon to continue on working
          without problem.






          share|improve this answer





















          • This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
            – hexafraction
            Nov 19 at 17:04















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          In this HD Sentinel post
          it is answered:




          In general, the manufacturer for most SSD devices define a method to measure the overall "health" of the memory cells in the SSD.
          Usually there is a special attribute (for example, #202 Percentage Of The Rated Lifetime Used in your SSD) shows the calculated value, in this case 50%.




          Further, the article
          Predicting SSD Failures: Specific S.M.A.R.T. Values
          says:




          Percentage of the Rated Lifetime Used. This is the opposite of SSD Time Left. 1 means the drive is 100% healthy, while 100 means that 100% of the drive’s lifetime is used up, and the drive can be used as a small doorstop.




          This seems then like an indicator which might indicate when an SSD is nearing
          its end of life, according to the manufacturer.
          It doesn't mean that the drive will immediately fail when it reaches 100%,
          but that the drive shouldn't be relied upon to continue on working
          without problem.






          share|improve this answer





















          • This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
            – hexafraction
            Nov 19 at 17:04













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          In this HD Sentinel post
          it is answered:




          In general, the manufacturer for most SSD devices define a method to measure the overall "health" of the memory cells in the SSD.
          Usually there is a special attribute (for example, #202 Percentage Of The Rated Lifetime Used in your SSD) shows the calculated value, in this case 50%.




          Further, the article
          Predicting SSD Failures: Specific S.M.A.R.T. Values
          says:




          Percentage of the Rated Lifetime Used. This is the opposite of SSD Time Left. 1 means the drive is 100% healthy, while 100 means that 100% of the drive’s lifetime is used up, and the drive can be used as a small doorstop.




          This seems then like an indicator which might indicate when an SSD is nearing
          its end of life, according to the manufacturer.
          It doesn't mean that the drive will immediately fail when it reaches 100%,
          but that the drive shouldn't be relied upon to continue on working
          without problem.






          share|improve this answer












          In this HD Sentinel post
          it is answered:




          In general, the manufacturer for most SSD devices define a method to measure the overall "health" of the memory cells in the SSD.
          Usually there is a special attribute (for example, #202 Percentage Of The Rated Lifetime Used in your SSD) shows the calculated value, in this case 50%.




          Further, the article
          Predicting SSD Failures: Specific S.M.A.R.T. Values
          says:




          Percentage of the Rated Lifetime Used. This is the opposite of SSD Time Left. 1 means the drive is 100% healthy, while 100 means that 100% of the drive’s lifetime is used up, and the drive can be used as a small doorstop.




          This seems then like an indicator which might indicate when an SSD is nearing
          its end of life, according to the manufacturer.
          It doesn't mean that the drive will immediately fail when it reaches 100%,
          but that the drive shouldn't be relied upon to continue on working
          without problem.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 19 at 16:12









          harrymc

          248k10257544




          248k10257544












          • This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
            – hexafraction
            Nov 19 at 17:04


















          • This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
            – hexafraction
            Nov 19 at 17:04
















          This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
          – hexafraction
          Nov 19 at 17:04




          This covers my concerns perfectly--I didn't realize that the SMART attribute had a somewhat unrelated meaning as you mentioned here.
          – hexafraction
          Nov 19 at 17:04


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1376724%2fare-smart-data-address-mark-errors-a-concern-on-an-ssd-in-particular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Paul Cézanne

          UIScrollView CustomStickyHeader Resize height generates problems when scroll is too fast

          Angular material date-picker (MatDatepicker) auto completes the date on focus out