Memory usage of imputation with mice in R
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03
) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:
imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)
iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb
I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.
Is there any documentation about how mice
in R
uses data?
My most important questions:
EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.
If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase
maxit
andm
because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?
More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?
r memory out-of-memory imputation r-mice
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03
) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:
imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)
iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb
I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.
Is there any documentation about how mice
in R
uses data?
My most important questions:
EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.
If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase
maxit
andm
because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?
More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?
r memory out-of-memory imputation r-mice
I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:28
Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:34
Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in.rdata( )
thenrm()
EVERYTHING from the environment and usegc()
. Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:40
No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03
) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:
imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)
iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb
I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.
Is there any documentation about how mice
in R
uses data?
My most important questions:
EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.
If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase
maxit
andm
because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?
More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?
r memory out-of-memory imputation r-mice
I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03
) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:
imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)
iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb
I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.
Is there any documentation about how mice
in R
uses data?
My most important questions:
EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.
If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase
maxit
andm
because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?
More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?
r memory out-of-memory imputation r-mice
r memory out-of-memory imputation r-mice
edited Nov 19 at 9:31
asked Nov 18 at 11:49
Tom
17811
17811
I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:28
Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:34
Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in.rdata( )
thenrm()
EVERYTHING from the environment and usegc()
. Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:40
No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:46
add a comment |
I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:28
Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:34
Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in.rdata( )
thenrm()
EVERYTHING from the environment and usegc()
. Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:40
No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:46
I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:28
I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:28
Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:34
Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:34
Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in
.rdata( )
then rm()
EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc()
. Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:40
Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in
.rdata( )
then rm()
EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc()
. Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:40
No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:46
No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:46
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53360523%2fmemory-usage-of-imputation-with-mice-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.
– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:28
Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:34
Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in
.rdata( )
thenrm()
EVERYTHING from the environment and usegc()
. Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible– sconfluentus
Nov 18 at 17:40
No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..
– Tom
Nov 18 at 17:46