Why didn't the Pioneer probes maintain communications with Earth as long as the Voyagers have?











up vote
10
down vote

favorite












The Pioneer Missions. March 26, 2007




PIONEER 10 SPACECRAFT SENDS LAST SIGNAL - After more than 30 years, it
appears the venerable Pioneer 10 spacecraft has sent its last signal
to Earth. Pioneer's last, very weak signal was received on 23 January
2003.




A little about Pioneer 11:




The Earth's motion has carried it out of the view of the spacecraft
antenna. The spacecraft cannot be maneuvered to point back at the
Earth.




Why didn't Pioneer 10 (as well as its twin probe Pioneer 11) keep up communications with Earth as the Voyagers do? As Pioneers and Voyagers were all launched in the 70's, presumably they all shared the similar technologies. Is it due to engineering failure or some other reason?





  • Pioneer 10 will continue to coast silently as a ghost ship through deep space into interstellar space, heading generally for the red star Aldebaran, which forms the eye of Taurus (The Bull). Aldebaran is about 68 light years away and it will take Pioneer over 2 million years to reach it.

  • The spacecraft is headed toward the constellation of Aquila (The Eagle), Northwest of the constellation of Sagittarius. Pioneer 11 will pass near one of the stars in the constellation in about 4 million years.




NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, so are they still on their way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement? How can scientists determine that? Is there any scientific purpose for the Pioneers to reach their respective so-called "destination"? Cause if they do, I can't figure out the purpose of having to wait for millions of years; humanity probably would no longer exist anymore. Or they simply wander around deep space for no specific purpose and act as a "time capsule" for the existence of humanity on Earth along with The Pioneer Plaque?










share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    Pioneer 10 was planned for 21 months of operation. It did work 31 years, that is 16 times longer. We should be very happy about such a reliable space probe.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago






  • 3




    Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for 5 years of operation: They work 41 years now, about 8 times longer. So Pioneer 10 did work 16 times longer than planned, much longer than the Voyagers. If the Voyagers work till 2025, it will be only about 10 times longer than planned.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago










  • @Uwe Shocking facts! Can't believe the Pioneer and Voyager probes would decently keep operating for much longer than expected. Since those probes were launched in 70's, it was over two decades before I was born!
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago















up vote
10
down vote

favorite












The Pioneer Missions. March 26, 2007




PIONEER 10 SPACECRAFT SENDS LAST SIGNAL - After more than 30 years, it
appears the venerable Pioneer 10 spacecraft has sent its last signal
to Earth. Pioneer's last, very weak signal was received on 23 January
2003.




A little about Pioneer 11:




The Earth's motion has carried it out of the view of the spacecraft
antenna. The spacecraft cannot be maneuvered to point back at the
Earth.




Why didn't Pioneer 10 (as well as its twin probe Pioneer 11) keep up communications with Earth as the Voyagers do? As Pioneers and Voyagers were all launched in the 70's, presumably they all shared the similar technologies. Is it due to engineering failure or some other reason?





  • Pioneer 10 will continue to coast silently as a ghost ship through deep space into interstellar space, heading generally for the red star Aldebaran, which forms the eye of Taurus (The Bull). Aldebaran is about 68 light years away and it will take Pioneer over 2 million years to reach it.

  • The spacecraft is headed toward the constellation of Aquila (The Eagle), Northwest of the constellation of Sagittarius. Pioneer 11 will pass near one of the stars in the constellation in about 4 million years.




NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, so are they still on their way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement? How can scientists determine that? Is there any scientific purpose for the Pioneers to reach their respective so-called "destination"? Cause if they do, I can't figure out the purpose of having to wait for millions of years; humanity probably would no longer exist anymore. Or they simply wander around deep space for no specific purpose and act as a "time capsule" for the existence of humanity on Earth along with The Pioneer Plaque?










share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    Pioneer 10 was planned for 21 months of operation. It did work 31 years, that is 16 times longer. We should be very happy about such a reliable space probe.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago






  • 3




    Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for 5 years of operation: They work 41 years now, about 8 times longer. So Pioneer 10 did work 16 times longer than planned, much longer than the Voyagers. If the Voyagers work till 2025, it will be only about 10 times longer than planned.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago










  • @Uwe Shocking facts! Can't believe the Pioneer and Voyager probes would decently keep operating for much longer than expected. Since those probes were launched in 70's, it was over two decades before I was born!
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago













up vote
10
down vote

favorite









up vote
10
down vote

favorite











The Pioneer Missions. March 26, 2007




PIONEER 10 SPACECRAFT SENDS LAST SIGNAL - After more than 30 years, it
appears the venerable Pioneer 10 spacecraft has sent its last signal
to Earth. Pioneer's last, very weak signal was received on 23 January
2003.




A little about Pioneer 11:




The Earth's motion has carried it out of the view of the spacecraft
antenna. The spacecraft cannot be maneuvered to point back at the
Earth.




Why didn't Pioneer 10 (as well as its twin probe Pioneer 11) keep up communications with Earth as the Voyagers do? As Pioneers and Voyagers were all launched in the 70's, presumably they all shared the similar technologies. Is it due to engineering failure or some other reason?





  • Pioneer 10 will continue to coast silently as a ghost ship through deep space into interstellar space, heading generally for the red star Aldebaran, which forms the eye of Taurus (The Bull). Aldebaran is about 68 light years away and it will take Pioneer over 2 million years to reach it.

  • The spacecraft is headed toward the constellation of Aquila (The Eagle), Northwest of the constellation of Sagittarius. Pioneer 11 will pass near one of the stars in the constellation in about 4 million years.




NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, so are they still on their way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement? How can scientists determine that? Is there any scientific purpose for the Pioneers to reach their respective so-called "destination"? Cause if they do, I can't figure out the purpose of having to wait for millions of years; humanity probably would no longer exist anymore. Or they simply wander around deep space for no specific purpose and act as a "time capsule" for the existence of humanity on Earth along with The Pioneer Plaque?










share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











The Pioneer Missions. March 26, 2007




PIONEER 10 SPACECRAFT SENDS LAST SIGNAL - After more than 30 years, it
appears the venerable Pioneer 10 spacecraft has sent its last signal
to Earth. Pioneer's last, very weak signal was received on 23 January
2003.




A little about Pioneer 11:




The Earth's motion has carried it out of the view of the spacecraft
antenna. The spacecraft cannot be maneuvered to point back at the
Earth.




Why didn't Pioneer 10 (as well as its twin probe Pioneer 11) keep up communications with Earth as the Voyagers do? As Pioneers and Voyagers were all launched in the 70's, presumably they all shared the similar technologies. Is it due to engineering failure or some other reason?





  • Pioneer 10 will continue to coast silently as a ghost ship through deep space into interstellar space, heading generally for the red star Aldebaran, which forms the eye of Taurus (The Bull). Aldebaran is about 68 light years away and it will take Pioneer over 2 million years to reach it.

  • The spacecraft is headed toward the constellation of Aquila (The Eagle), Northwest of the constellation of Sagittarius. Pioneer 11 will pass near one of the stars in the constellation in about 4 million years.




NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, so are they still on their way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement? How can scientists determine that? Is there any scientific purpose for the Pioneers to reach their respective so-called "destination"? Cause if they do, I can't figure out the purpose of having to wait for millions of years; humanity probably would no longer exist anymore. Or they simply wander around deep space for no specific purpose and act as a "time capsule" for the existence of humanity on Earth along with The Pioneer Plaque?







probe interstellar-travel voyager pioneer






share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Nathan Tuggy

3,58342436




3,58342436






New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









si_the_nibba

707




707




New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 7




    Pioneer 10 was planned for 21 months of operation. It did work 31 years, that is 16 times longer. We should be very happy about such a reliable space probe.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago






  • 3




    Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for 5 years of operation: They work 41 years now, about 8 times longer. So Pioneer 10 did work 16 times longer than planned, much longer than the Voyagers. If the Voyagers work till 2025, it will be only about 10 times longer than planned.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago










  • @Uwe Shocking facts! Can't believe the Pioneer and Voyager probes would decently keep operating for much longer than expected. Since those probes were launched in 70's, it was over two decades before I was born!
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago














  • 7




    Pioneer 10 was planned for 21 months of operation. It did work 31 years, that is 16 times longer. We should be very happy about such a reliable space probe.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago






  • 3




    Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for 5 years of operation: They work 41 years now, about 8 times longer. So Pioneer 10 did work 16 times longer than planned, much longer than the Voyagers. If the Voyagers work till 2025, it will be only about 10 times longer than planned.
    – Uwe
    2 days ago










  • @Uwe Shocking facts! Can't believe the Pioneer and Voyager probes would decently keep operating for much longer than expected. Since those probes were launched in 70's, it was over two decades before I was born!
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago








7




7




Pioneer 10 was planned for 21 months of operation. It did work 31 years, that is 16 times longer. We should be very happy about such a reliable space probe.
– Uwe
2 days ago




Pioneer 10 was planned for 21 months of operation. It did work 31 years, that is 16 times longer. We should be very happy about such a reliable space probe.
– Uwe
2 days ago




3




3




Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for 5 years of operation: They work 41 years now, about 8 times longer. So Pioneer 10 did work 16 times longer than planned, much longer than the Voyagers. If the Voyagers work till 2025, it will be only about 10 times longer than planned.
– Uwe
2 days ago




Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for 5 years of operation: They work 41 years now, about 8 times longer. So Pioneer 10 did work 16 times longer than planned, much longer than the Voyagers. If the Voyagers work till 2025, it will be only about 10 times longer than planned.
– Uwe
2 days ago












@Uwe Shocking facts! Can't believe the Pioneer and Voyager probes would decently keep operating for much longer than expected. Since those probes were launched in 70's, it was over two decades before I was born!
– si_the_nibba
4 hours ago




@Uwe Shocking facts! Can't believe the Pioneer and Voyager probes would decently keep operating for much longer than expected. Since those probes were launched in 70's, it was over two decades before I was born!
– si_the_nibba
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
20
down vote



accepted










Why the Pioneers didn't last as long:




  • The Pioneers were a low-budget mission just to test if flying to the outer planets was feasible

  • They used a smaller radio transmitter and antenna (2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter) so their signals are weaker

  • The Pioneers used a smaller Radioisotope thermoelectric generator as their power source. By 2003 (date of last contact) the RTG had decayed to the point where its power output was barely enough to power the transmitter. The Voyagers have a bigger RTG with more margin before that point is reached.



Despite NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, are they still on its way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement




Yes. These deep space probes follow a very predictable trajectory: they keep going in a straight line. There are no planets nearby that can change that trajectory.



It is possible one of the Pioneers has collided with a small Kuiper Belt Object we haven't detected yet, but that region of space is really empty so chances of a collision are tiny.




Is there any scientific research purpose for the Pioneers to reach its respective so-called "destination"?




No. Their instruments don't work anymore, the Pioneers are just inert objects now. The only purpose they still have is carrying a plaque that describes our location.






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
    – Joshua
    2 days ago






  • 1




    And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
    – amI
    2 days ago










  • The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
    – Uwe
    yesterday










  • The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
    – Hobbes
    yesterday










  • I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32221%2fwhy-didnt-the-pioneer-probes-maintain-communications-with-earth-as-long-as-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
20
down vote



accepted










Why the Pioneers didn't last as long:




  • The Pioneers were a low-budget mission just to test if flying to the outer planets was feasible

  • They used a smaller radio transmitter and antenna (2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter) so their signals are weaker

  • The Pioneers used a smaller Radioisotope thermoelectric generator as their power source. By 2003 (date of last contact) the RTG had decayed to the point where its power output was barely enough to power the transmitter. The Voyagers have a bigger RTG with more margin before that point is reached.



Despite NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, are they still on its way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement




Yes. These deep space probes follow a very predictable trajectory: they keep going in a straight line. There are no planets nearby that can change that trajectory.



It is possible one of the Pioneers has collided with a small Kuiper Belt Object we haven't detected yet, but that region of space is really empty so chances of a collision are tiny.




Is there any scientific research purpose for the Pioneers to reach its respective so-called "destination"?




No. Their instruments don't work anymore, the Pioneers are just inert objects now. The only purpose they still have is carrying a plaque that describes our location.






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
    – Joshua
    2 days ago






  • 1




    And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
    – amI
    2 days ago










  • The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
    – Uwe
    yesterday










  • The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
    – Hobbes
    yesterday










  • I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago















up vote
20
down vote



accepted










Why the Pioneers didn't last as long:




  • The Pioneers were a low-budget mission just to test if flying to the outer planets was feasible

  • They used a smaller radio transmitter and antenna (2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter) so their signals are weaker

  • The Pioneers used a smaller Radioisotope thermoelectric generator as their power source. By 2003 (date of last contact) the RTG had decayed to the point where its power output was barely enough to power the transmitter. The Voyagers have a bigger RTG with more margin before that point is reached.



Despite NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, are they still on its way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement




Yes. These deep space probes follow a very predictable trajectory: they keep going in a straight line. There are no planets nearby that can change that trajectory.



It is possible one of the Pioneers has collided with a small Kuiper Belt Object we haven't detected yet, but that region of space is really empty so chances of a collision are tiny.




Is there any scientific research purpose for the Pioneers to reach its respective so-called "destination"?




No. Their instruments don't work anymore, the Pioneers are just inert objects now. The only purpose they still have is carrying a plaque that describes our location.






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
    – Joshua
    2 days ago






  • 1




    And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
    – amI
    2 days ago










  • The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
    – Uwe
    yesterday










  • The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
    – Hobbes
    yesterday










  • I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago













up vote
20
down vote



accepted







up vote
20
down vote



accepted






Why the Pioneers didn't last as long:




  • The Pioneers were a low-budget mission just to test if flying to the outer planets was feasible

  • They used a smaller radio transmitter and antenna (2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter) so their signals are weaker

  • The Pioneers used a smaller Radioisotope thermoelectric generator as their power source. By 2003 (date of last contact) the RTG had decayed to the point where its power output was barely enough to power the transmitter. The Voyagers have a bigger RTG with more margin before that point is reached.



Despite NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, are they still on its way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement




Yes. These deep space probes follow a very predictable trajectory: they keep going in a straight line. There are no planets nearby that can change that trajectory.



It is possible one of the Pioneers has collided with a small Kuiper Belt Object we haven't detected yet, but that region of space is really empty so chances of a collision are tiny.




Is there any scientific research purpose for the Pioneers to reach its respective so-called "destination"?




No. Their instruments don't work anymore, the Pioneers are just inert objects now. The only purpose they still have is carrying a plaque that describes our location.






share|improve this answer












Why the Pioneers didn't last as long:




  • The Pioneers were a low-budget mission just to test if flying to the outer planets was feasible

  • They used a smaller radio transmitter and antenna (2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter) so their signals are weaker

  • The Pioneers used a smaller Radioisotope thermoelectric generator as their power source. By 2003 (date of last contact) the RTG had decayed to the point where its power output was barely enough to power the transmitter. The Voyagers have a bigger RTG with more margin before that point is reached.



Despite NASA already lost connection with the Pioneers, are they still on its way into deep space without NASA's acknowledgement




Yes. These deep space probes follow a very predictable trajectory: they keep going in a straight line. There are no planets nearby that can change that trajectory.



It is possible one of the Pioneers has collided with a small Kuiper Belt Object we haven't detected yet, but that region of space is really empty so chances of a collision are tiny.




Is there any scientific research purpose for the Pioneers to reach its respective so-called "destination"?




No. Their instruments don't work anymore, the Pioneers are just inert objects now. The only purpose they still have is carrying a plaque that describes our location.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Hobbes

82.4k2225370




82.4k2225370








  • 2




    And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
    – Joshua
    2 days ago






  • 1




    And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
    – amI
    2 days ago










  • The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
    – Uwe
    yesterday










  • The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
    – Hobbes
    yesterday










  • I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago














  • 2




    And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
    – Joshua
    2 days ago






  • 1




    And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
    – amI
    2 days ago










  • The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
    – Uwe
    yesterday










  • The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
    – Hobbes
    yesterday










  • I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
    – si_the_nibba
    4 hours ago








2




2




And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
– Joshua
2 days ago




And the only reason they tried one last time in 2007 to talk to Pioneer 10 is they wanted to firm-up its position for studying the Pioneer Anomaly.
– Joshua
2 days ago




1




1




And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
– amI
2 days ago




And there are actually 4 RTGs (mounted on 2 booms) which heat the leading side more, which explained the anomalous sun-ward acceleration.
– amI
2 days ago












The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
– Uwe
yesterday




The pioneers were designed for 21 months of operation but the Voyagers for 5 years, 2.8 times longer.
– Uwe
yesterday












The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
– Hobbes
yesterday




The official requirement was for 5 years. The engineers did everything they could to ensure the longest possible lifespan.
– Hobbes
yesterday












I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
– si_the_nibba
4 hours ago




I'm surprised that a slight difference of 2.7 vs 3.6 m diameter would ended up in such big consequences.
– si_the_nibba
4 hours ago










si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32221%2fwhy-didnt-the-pioneer-probes-maintain-communications-with-earth-as-long-as-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?