What do you call nested circles that are not concentric?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












The circles in the image don't have the same center, so they are not concentric. Is there a word to describe circles that overlap (completely or not) so that enclosed circles are smaller than the outer circles?



non-concentric circles










share|improve this question




















  • 4




    As you yourself called them: nested circles? That’s what I would call them. Nested, non-concentric circles if I wanted to be absolutely specific.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:27






  • 1




    @JanusBahsJacquet since the question says "overlap (completely or not)" I inferred that they were interested in their eccentricity alone, rather than whether they were nested or imbricated.
    – Jon Hanna
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:49










  • The illustration given is of a set of circles with one tangent point in common, such that all circles but the largest are contained in another member of the set. This is a very special case of "nested circles that are not tangent"; to fulfil this description, the circles need not touch at all, and if they have tangent intersections, they needn't be at the same point.
    – John Lawler
    Jun 8 '14 at 21:36

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












The circles in the image don't have the same center, so they are not concentric. Is there a word to describe circles that overlap (completely or not) so that enclosed circles are smaller than the outer circles?



non-concentric circles










share|improve this question




















  • 4




    As you yourself called them: nested circles? That’s what I would call them. Nested, non-concentric circles if I wanted to be absolutely specific.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:27






  • 1




    @JanusBahsJacquet since the question says "overlap (completely or not)" I inferred that they were interested in their eccentricity alone, rather than whether they were nested or imbricated.
    – Jon Hanna
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:49










  • The illustration given is of a set of circles with one tangent point in common, such that all circles but the largest are contained in another member of the set. This is a very special case of "nested circles that are not tangent"; to fulfil this description, the circles need not touch at all, and if they have tangent intersections, they needn't be at the same point.
    – John Lawler
    Jun 8 '14 at 21:36













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





The circles in the image don't have the same center, so they are not concentric. Is there a word to describe circles that overlap (completely or not) so that enclosed circles are smaller than the outer circles?



non-concentric circles










share|improve this question















The circles in the image don't have the same center, so they are not concentric. Is there a word to describe circles that overlap (completely or not) so that enclosed circles are smaller than the outer circles?



non-concentric circles







single-word-requests mathematics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 8 '14 at 23:48









J.R.

54.8k582183




54.8k582183










asked Jun 8 '14 at 20:21









nachocab

2601515




2601515








  • 4




    As you yourself called them: nested circles? That’s what I would call them. Nested, non-concentric circles if I wanted to be absolutely specific.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:27






  • 1




    @JanusBahsJacquet since the question says "overlap (completely or not)" I inferred that they were interested in their eccentricity alone, rather than whether they were nested or imbricated.
    – Jon Hanna
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:49










  • The illustration given is of a set of circles with one tangent point in common, such that all circles but the largest are contained in another member of the set. This is a very special case of "nested circles that are not tangent"; to fulfil this description, the circles need not touch at all, and if they have tangent intersections, they needn't be at the same point.
    – John Lawler
    Jun 8 '14 at 21:36














  • 4




    As you yourself called them: nested circles? That’s what I would call them. Nested, non-concentric circles if I wanted to be absolutely specific.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:27






  • 1




    @JanusBahsJacquet since the question says "overlap (completely or not)" I inferred that they were interested in their eccentricity alone, rather than whether they were nested or imbricated.
    – Jon Hanna
    Jun 8 '14 at 20:49










  • The illustration given is of a set of circles with one tangent point in common, such that all circles but the largest are contained in another member of the set. This is a very special case of "nested circles that are not tangent"; to fulfil this description, the circles need not touch at all, and if they have tangent intersections, they needn't be at the same point.
    – John Lawler
    Jun 8 '14 at 21:36








4




4




As you yourself called them: nested circles? That’s what I would call them. Nested, non-concentric circles if I wanted to be absolutely specific.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Jun 8 '14 at 20:27




As you yourself called them: nested circles? That’s what I would call them. Nested, non-concentric circles if I wanted to be absolutely specific.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Jun 8 '14 at 20:27




1




1




@JanusBahsJacquet since the question says "overlap (completely or not)" I inferred that they were interested in their eccentricity alone, rather than whether they were nested or imbricated.
– Jon Hanna
Jun 8 '14 at 20:49




@JanusBahsJacquet since the question says "overlap (completely or not)" I inferred that they were interested in their eccentricity alone, rather than whether they were nested or imbricated.
– Jon Hanna
Jun 8 '14 at 20:49












The illustration given is of a set of circles with one tangent point in common, such that all circles but the largest are contained in another member of the set. This is a very special case of "nested circles that are not tangent"; to fulfil this description, the circles need not touch at all, and if they have tangent intersections, they needn't be at the same point.
– John Lawler
Jun 8 '14 at 21:36




The illustration given is of a set of circles with one tangent point in common, such that all circles but the largest are contained in another member of the set. This is a very special case of "nested circles that are not tangent"; to fulfil this description, the circles need not touch at all, and if they have tangent intersections, they needn't be at the same point.
– John Lawler
Jun 8 '14 at 21:36










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










In your particular picture, those circles are tangent circles (i.e., they are all tangent to each other). More specifically, they are internally tangent circles. According to Wikipedia, because they all intersect at a single point, these are also known as "kissing circles" (informally, I presume).



Of course, there is more than one way to draw circles that are "nested but not concentric":



enter image description here



I would call the circles in A nested circles; and the circles in B and C internally tangent circles. Because the circles in B happen to be tangent at a single point, they could also be called kissing circles. I would call the circles in D nested circles, but, because not all of them are tangent, I would not call them tangent circles.



If you want more formal terminology, perhaps math.se would be the place to ask.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
    – sumelic
    Feb 15 '16 at 16:40




















up vote
6
down vote













I'm going a bit more into maths and geometry but the circle family in the image is called a parabolic pencil. These kind of circle sets are called pencil of circles. It is also a part of Apollonian circles.




A parabolic pencil (as a limiting case) is defined where two generating circles are tangent to each other at a single point . It consists of a family of real circles, all tangent to each other at a single common point. The degenerate circle with radius zero at that point also belongs to the pencil.




Also, they might be coaxal (or coaxial) circles.




Except for the two special cases of a pencil of concentric circles and a pencil of coincident lines, any two circles within a pencil have the same radical axis, and all circles in the pencil have collinear centers. Any three or more circles from the same family are called coaxal circles or coaxial circles.






Further information:




A pencil of circles is another name for specific families of circles who all share certain characteristics within the family.



The third kind of pencil is the parabolic pencil. This is the family of circles which all have one common point, and thus are all tangent to each other, either internally or externally. Also, the orthogonal set of circles to a parabolic pencil is another parabolic pencil.




enter image description here



Source: http://www.math.washington.edu/~king/coursedir/m445w04/as/ga2/gp2/groupassign2.html





enter image description here




Coaxal circles are circles whose centers are collinear and that share a common radical line. The collection of all coaxal circles is called a pencil of coaxal circles (Coxeter and Greitzer 1967, p. 35). It is possible to combine the two types of coaxal systems illustrated above such that the sets are orthogonal.






A representation of Apollonian circles:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Eccentric: Not placed centrally or not having its axis or other part placed centrally.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
      – 200_success
      Jun 9 '14 at 0:51


















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I just found out that in topology, this is known as a Hawaiian earring






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      If you are mostly interested in a mathematical jargon term that generalizes to other instances, I think the best term would be descending. Whenever you see 'descending' in mathematics, it usually means something is getting smaller or is being nested in something else. Some common turns of phrase include descending sequence or descending sequence of sets. With your picture, I'd be able to say descending set of circles to some colleagues and be perfectly understood (this also applies to all of the pictures in J.R.'s answer).






      share|improve this answer






























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        In topology (a branch of mathematics where we study such shapes), we call it the Hawaiian earring.



        Source: Mathematics student, have taken courses on topology.






        share|improve this answer























        • This was already given as an answer.
          – Mitch
          2 days ago










        • The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
          – Tom
          2 days ago


















        up vote
        -1
        down vote













        Without the requirement that the circles be of decreasing size as shown, circles which overlap are simply intersecting.






        share|improve this answer





















        • "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
          – 200_success
          Jun 9 '14 at 0:46











        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "97"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176769%2fwhat-do-you-call-nested-circles-that-are-not-concentric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted










        In your particular picture, those circles are tangent circles (i.e., they are all tangent to each other). More specifically, they are internally tangent circles. According to Wikipedia, because they all intersect at a single point, these are also known as "kissing circles" (informally, I presume).



        Of course, there is more than one way to draw circles that are "nested but not concentric":



        enter image description here



        I would call the circles in A nested circles; and the circles in B and C internally tangent circles. Because the circles in B happen to be tangent at a single point, they could also be called kissing circles. I would call the circles in D nested circles, but, because not all of them are tangent, I would not call them tangent circles.



        If you want more formal terminology, perhaps math.se would be the place to ask.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 1




          I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
          – sumelic
          Feb 15 '16 at 16:40

















        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted










        In your particular picture, those circles are tangent circles (i.e., they are all tangent to each other). More specifically, they are internally tangent circles. According to Wikipedia, because they all intersect at a single point, these are also known as "kissing circles" (informally, I presume).



        Of course, there is more than one way to draw circles that are "nested but not concentric":



        enter image description here



        I would call the circles in A nested circles; and the circles in B and C internally tangent circles. Because the circles in B happen to be tangent at a single point, they could also be called kissing circles. I would call the circles in D nested circles, but, because not all of them are tangent, I would not call them tangent circles.



        If you want more formal terminology, perhaps math.se would be the place to ask.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 1




          I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
          – sumelic
          Feb 15 '16 at 16:40















        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted






        In your particular picture, those circles are tangent circles (i.e., they are all tangent to each other). More specifically, they are internally tangent circles. According to Wikipedia, because they all intersect at a single point, these are also known as "kissing circles" (informally, I presume).



        Of course, there is more than one way to draw circles that are "nested but not concentric":



        enter image description here



        I would call the circles in A nested circles; and the circles in B and C internally tangent circles. Because the circles in B happen to be tangent at a single point, they could also be called kissing circles. I would call the circles in D nested circles, but, because not all of them are tangent, I would not call them tangent circles.



        If you want more formal terminology, perhaps math.se would be the place to ask.






        share|improve this answer














        In your particular picture, those circles are tangent circles (i.e., they are all tangent to each other). More specifically, they are internally tangent circles. According to Wikipedia, because they all intersect at a single point, these are also known as "kissing circles" (informally, I presume).



        Of course, there is more than one way to draw circles that are "nested but not concentric":



        enter image description here



        I would call the circles in A nested circles; and the circles in B and C internally tangent circles. Because the circles in B happen to be tangent at a single point, they could also be called kissing circles. I would call the circles in D nested circles, but, because not all of them are tangent, I would not call them tangent circles.



        If you want more formal terminology, perhaps math.se would be the place to ask.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:22









        Community

        1




        1










        answered Jun 8 '14 at 23:41









        J.R.

        54.8k582183




        54.8k582183








        • 1




          I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
          – sumelic
          Feb 15 '16 at 16:40
















        • 1




          I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
          – sumelic
          Feb 15 '16 at 16:40










        1




        1




        I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
        – sumelic
        Feb 15 '16 at 16:40






        I guess the formal version of that would be "osculating circles" ("osculate" comes from the Latin word for "kiss").
        – sumelic
        Feb 15 '16 at 16:40














        up vote
        6
        down vote













        I'm going a bit more into maths and geometry but the circle family in the image is called a parabolic pencil. These kind of circle sets are called pencil of circles. It is also a part of Apollonian circles.




        A parabolic pencil (as a limiting case) is defined where two generating circles are tangent to each other at a single point . It consists of a family of real circles, all tangent to each other at a single common point. The degenerate circle with radius zero at that point also belongs to the pencil.




        Also, they might be coaxal (or coaxial) circles.




        Except for the two special cases of a pencil of concentric circles and a pencil of coincident lines, any two circles within a pencil have the same radical axis, and all circles in the pencil have collinear centers. Any three or more circles from the same family are called coaxal circles or coaxial circles.






        Further information:




        A pencil of circles is another name for specific families of circles who all share certain characteristics within the family.



        The third kind of pencil is the parabolic pencil. This is the family of circles which all have one common point, and thus are all tangent to each other, either internally or externally. Also, the orthogonal set of circles to a parabolic pencil is another parabolic pencil.




        enter image description here



        Source: http://www.math.washington.edu/~king/coursedir/m445w04/as/ga2/gp2/groupassign2.html





        enter image description here




        Coaxal circles are circles whose centers are collinear and that share a common radical line. The collection of all coaxal circles is called a pencil of coaxal circles (Coxeter and Greitzer 1967, p. 35). It is possible to combine the two types of coaxal systems illustrated above such that the sets are orthogonal.






        A representation of Apollonian circles:



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer



























          up vote
          6
          down vote













          I'm going a bit more into maths and geometry but the circle family in the image is called a parabolic pencil. These kind of circle sets are called pencil of circles. It is also a part of Apollonian circles.




          A parabolic pencil (as a limiting case) is defined where two generating circles are tangent to each other at a single point . It consists of a family of real circles, all tangent to each other at a single common point. The degenerate circle with radius zero at that point also belongs to the pencil.




          Also, they might be coaxal (or coaxial) circles.




          Except for the two special cases of a pencil of concentric circles and a pencil of coincident lines, any two circles within a pencil have the same radical axis, and all circles in the pencil have collinear centers. Any three or more circles from the same family are called coaxal circles or coaxial circles.






          Further information:




          A pencil of circles is another name for specific families of circles who all share certain characteristics within the family.



          The third kind of pencil is the parabolic pencil. This is the family of circles which all have one common point, and thus are all tangent to each other, either internally or externally. Also, the orthogonal set of circles to a parabolic pencil is another parabolic pencil.




          enter image description here



          Source: http://www.math.washington.edu/~king/coursedir/m445w04/as/ga2/gp2/groupassign2.html





          enter image description here




          Coaxal circles are circles whose centers are collinear and that share a common radical line. The collection of all coaxal circles is called a pencil of coaxal circles (Coxeter and Greitzer 1967, p. 35). It is possible to combine the two types of coaxal systems illustrated above such that the sets are orthogonal.






          A representation of Apollonian circles:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            I'm going a bit more into maths and geometry but the circle family in the image is called a parabolic pencil. These kind of circle sets are called pencil of circles. It is also a part of Apollonian circles.




            A parabolic pencil (as a limiting case) is defined where two generating circles are tangent to each other at a single point . It consists of a family of real circles, all tangent to each other at a single common point. The degenerate circle with radius zero at that point also belongs to the pencil.




            Also, they might be coaxal (or coaxial) circles.




            Except for the two special cases of a pencil of concentric circles and a pencil of coincident lines, any two circles within a pencil have the same radical axis, and all circles in the pencil have collinear centers. Any three or more circles from the same family are called coaxal circles or coaxial circles.






            Further information:




            A pencil of circles is another name for specific families of circles who all share certain characteristics within the family.



            The third kind of pencil is the parabolic pencil. This is the family of circles which all have one common point, and thus are all tangent to each other, either internally or externally. Also, the orthogonal set of circles to a parabolic pencil is another parabolic pencil.




            enter image description here



            Source: http://www.math.washington.edu/~king/coursedir/m445w04/as/ga2/gp2/groupassign2.html





            enter image description here




            Coaxal circles are circles whose centers are collinear and that share a common radical line. The collection of all coaxal circles is called a pencil of coaxal circles (Coxeter and Greitzer 1967, p. 35). It is possible to combine the two types of coaxal systems illustrated above such that the sets are orthogonal.






            A representation of Apollonian circles:



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer














            I'm going a bit more into maths and geometry but the circle family in the image is called a parabolic pencil. These kind of circle sets are called pencil of circles. It is also a part of Apollonian circles.




            A parabolic pencil (as a limiting case) is defined where two generating circles are tangent to each other at a single point . It consists of a family of real circles, all tangent to each other at a single common point. The degenerate circle with radius zero at that point also belongs to the pencil.




            Also, they might be coaxal (or coaxial) circles.




            Except for the two special cases of a pencil of concentric circles and a pencil of coincident lines, any two circles within a pencil have the same radical axis, and all circles in the pencil have collinear centers. Any three or more circles from the same family are called coaxal circles or coaxial circles.






            Further information:




            A pencil of circles is another name for specific families of circles who all share certain characteristics within the family.



            The third kind of pencil is the parabolic pencil. This is the family of circles which all have one common point, and thus are all tangent to each other, either internally or externally. Also, the orthogonal set of circles to a parabolic pencil is another parabolic pencil.




            enter image description here



            Source: http://www.math.washington.edu/~king/coursedir/m445w04/as/ga2/gp2/groupassign2.html





            enter image description here




            Coaxal circles are circles whose centers are collinear and that share a common radical line. The collection of all coaxal circles is called a pencil of coaxal circles (Coxeter and Greitzer 1967, p. 35). It is possible to combine the two types of coaxal systems illustrated above such that the sets are orthogonal.






            A representation of Apollonian circles:



            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 9 '14 at 2:01

























            answered Jun 8 '14 at 21:41









            ermanen

            45.3k24123234




            45.3k24123234






















                up vote
                4
                down vote













                Eccentric: Not placed centrally or not having its axis or other part placed centrally.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
                  – 200_success
                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:51















                up vote
                4
                down vote













                Eccentric: Not placed centrally or not having its axis or other part placed centrally.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
                  – 200_success
                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:51













                up vote
                4
                down vote










                up vote
                4
                down vote









                Eccentric: Not placed centrally or not having its axis or other part placed centrally.






                share|improve this answer












                Eccentric: Not placed centrally or not having its axis or other part placed centrally.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jun 8 '14 at 20:46









                Jon Hanna

                47.4k192175




                47.4k192175












                • Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
                  – 200_success
                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:51


















                • Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
                  – 200_success
                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:51
















                Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
                – 200_success
                Jun 9 '14 at 0:51




                Technically correct according to the first definition, but confusing due to the second definition
                – 200_success
                Jun 9 '14 at 0:51










                up vote
                3
                down vote













                I just found out that in topology, this is known as a Hawaiian earring






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  I just found out that in topology, this is known as a Hawaiian earring






                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote









                    I just found out that in topology, this is known as a Hawaiian earring






                    share|improve this answer












                    I just found out that in topology, this is known as a Hawaiian earring







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Feb 15 '16 at 16:38









                    nachocab

                    2601515




                    2601515






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        If you are mostly interested in a mathematical jargon term that generalizes to other instances, I think the best term would be descending. Whenever you see 'descending' in mathematics, it usually means something is getting smaller or is being nested in something else. Some common turns of phrase include descending sequence or descending sequence of sets. With your picture, I'd be able to say descending set of circles to some colleagues and be perfectly understood (this also applies to all of the pictures in J.R.'s answer).






                        share|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          If you are mostly interested in a mathematical jargon term that generalizes to other instances, I think the best term would be descending. Whenever you see 'descending' in mathematics, it usually means something is getting smaller or is being nested in something else. Some common turns of phrase include descending sequence or descending sequence of sets. With your picture, I'd be able to say descending set of circles to some colleagues and be perfectly understood (this also applies to all of the pictures in J.R.'s answer).






                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            If you are mostly interested in a mathematical jargon term that generalizes to other instances, I think the best term would be descending. Whenever you see 'descending' in mathematics, it usually means something is getting smaller or is being nested in something else. Some common turns of phrase include descending sequence or descending sequence of sets. With your picture, I'd be able to say descending set of circles to some colleagues and be perfectly understood (this also applies to all of the pictures in J.R.'s answer).






                            share|improve this answer














                            If you are mostly interested in a mathematical jargon term that generalizes to other instances, I think the best term would be descending. Whenever you see 'descending' in mathematics, it usually means something is getting smaller or is being nested in something else. Some common turns of phrase include descending sequence or descending sequence of sets. With your picture, I'd be able to say descending set of circles to some colleagues and be perfectly understood (this also applies to all of the pictures in J.R.'s answer).







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Jun 9 '14 at 20:58

























                            answered Jun 9 '14 at 20:50









                            Robert Wolfe

                            1599




                            1599






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                In topology (a branch of mathematics where we study such shapes), we call it the Hawaiian earring.



                                Source: Mathematics student, have taken courses on topology.






                                share|improve this answer























                                • This was already given as an answer.
                                  – Mitch
                                  2 days ago










                                • The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
                                  – Tom
                                  2 days ago















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                In topology (a branch of mathematics where we study such shapes), we call it the Hawaiian earring.



                                Source: Mathematics student, have taken courses on topology.






                                share|improve this answer























                                • This was already given as an answer.
                                  – Mitch
                                  2 days ago










                                • The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
                                  – Tom
                                  2 days ago













                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote









                                In topology (a branch of mathematics where we study such shapes), we call it the Hawaiian earring.



                                Source: Mathematics student, have taken courses on topology.






                                share|improve this answer














                                In topology (a branch of mathematics where we study such shapes), we call it the Hawaiian earring.



                                Source: Mathematics student, have taken courses on topology.







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 2 days ago

























                                answered 2 days ago









                                Tom

                                1293




                                1293












                                • This was already given as an answer.
                                  – Mitch
                                  2 days ago










                                • The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
                                  – Tom
                                  2 days ago


















                                • This was already given as an answer.
                                  – Mitch
                                  2 days ago










                                • The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
                                  – Tom
                                  2 days ago
















                                This was already given as an answer.
                                – Mitch
                                2 days ago




                                This was already given as an answer.
                                – Mitch
                                2 days ago












                                The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
                                – Tom
                                2 days ago




                                The answer says 'I just found out...'. My answer confirms from someone who works in the area and also has knowledge of names for other similar geometric shapes. 'I just found out' could mean anything, from whom, from where, who told you that, do you know what topology is etc?
                                – Tom
                                2 days ago










                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote













                                Without the requirement that the circles be of decreasing size as shown, circles which overlap are simply intersecting.






                                share|improve this answer





















                                • "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
                                  – 200_success
                                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:46















                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote













                                Without the requirement that the circles be of decreasing size as shown, circles which overlap are simply intersecting.






                                share|improve this answer





















                                • "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
                                  – 200_success
                                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:46













                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote









                                Without the requirement that the circles be of decreasing size as shown, circles which overlap are simply intersecting.






                                share|improve this answer












                                Without the requirement that the circles be of decreasing size as shown, circles which overlap are simply intersecting.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered Jun 8 '14 at 23:23









                                WhatRoughBeast

                                7,8171124




                                7,8171124












                                • "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
                                  – 200_success
                                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:46


















                                • "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
                                  – 200_success
                                  Jun 9 '14 at 0:46
















                                "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
                                – 200_success
                                Jun 9 '14 at 0:46




                                "Intersecting circles" doesn't capture the nesting requirement. They could very well intersect at more than one point.
                                – 200_success
                                Jun 9 '14 at 0:46


















                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded



















































                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176769%2fwhat-do-you-call-nested-circles-that-are-not-concentric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Alcedinidae

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]